Re: sharity-light

2007-04-09 Thread Eric
Miguel Alcántara wrote: hello everybody, I was trying to get working sharity-light, but until now it's impossible. I have added in /etc/hosts the IP and the name of the XP(fat32 or ntfs), created a folder in order to mount. foo# cd / foo#mkdir share foo#shlight //nightwalker/share /share -

sharity-light

2007-04-09 Thread Miguel Alcántara
hello everybody, I was trying to get working sharity-light, but until now it's impossible. I have added in /etc/hosts the IP and the name of the XP(fat32 or ntfs), created a folder in order to mount. foo# cd / foo#mkdir share foo#shlight //nightwalker/share /share -U foo -P bar foo#Using

RE: Odd Sharity-Light mount issue

2006-04-04 Thread Zimmerman, Eric
It kicks back the error `nfs mount /usr/ntmount: [2] No such file or directory' /usr/ntmount does exist with absolute certainty. I'm using version sharity-light-1.2_1 which I believe is the latest. Any ideas? _______ Sharity light didn't wo

Odd Sharity-Light mount issue

2006-04-04 Thread Huy Ton That
Hello, I found one other person who had the same below issue with sharity-light however I did not find a resolution after some googling. I'm running FreeBSD 6.0 Release and have just installed sharity-light from the ports. When I execute: ./shlight //192.168.0.2/directory /usr/ntmou

Re: Alternative to Sharity Light in the base system?

2005-03-17 Thread Gerry Freymann
On 17 Mar 2005 09:53:03 -0500 Lowell Gilbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Does anybody know off hand what is now in the base system I can use? > >mount_smbfs(8) Beauties! Exactly what I was after. Got it mounted and working fine. -gerry ___ freebsd-q

Re: Alternative to Sharity Light in the base system?

2005-03-17 Thread Andrew L. Gould
On Thursday 17 March 2005 08:51 am, Gerry Freymann wrote: > I've been using Sharity Light to access open shares on my Windoze > machine from FreeBSD. > > But somewhere along the line I know this is now built-in to FreeBSD > but I can't remember or find what program to use

Alternative to Sharity Light in the base system?

2005-03-17 Thread Gerry Freymann
I've been using Sharity Light to access open shares on my Windoze machine from FreeBSD. But somewhere along the line I know this is now built-in to FreeBSD but I can't remember or find what program to use to do this and I would prefer not to rely on a port to make this happen. Does an

Re: Any idea why Sharity-Light is at least 3X faster than smbfs

2004-10-11 Thread Doug Lee
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 02:21:53PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Doug Lee wrote: > > > > >I'm running FreeBSD 4.10-STABLE on a P166 and trying to copy very > .. > > > > > >dc0: port 0xfc00-0xfcff mem > 0xffbefc00-0xffbe irq 10 at > device 20.0 on pci0 > > >miibus0: on dc0 > > >ukphy0:

Re: Any idea why Sharity-Light is at least 3X faster than smbfs

2004-10-06 Thread knowtree
> Doug Lee wrote: > > >I'm running FreeBSD 4.10-STABLE on a P166 and trying to copy very .. > > > >dc0: port 0xfc00-0xfcff mem 0xffbefc00-0xffbe irq 10 at device 20.0 on pci0 > >miibus0: on dc0 > >ukphy0: on miibus0 > >ukphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto On my LAN

Re: Any idea why Sharity-Light is at least 3X faster than smbfs here?

2004-10-06 Thread jason
s LAN and which produces the following info at boot time: dc0: port 0xfc00-0xfcff mem 0xffbefc00-0xffbe irq 10 at device 20.0 on pci0 miibus0: on dc0 ukphy0: on miibus0 ukphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto Anomaly: Contrary to Sharity-Light docs, which say smbfs is

Any idea why Sharity-Light is at least 3X faster than smbfs here?

2004-10-05 Thread Doug Lee
ch produces the following info at boot time: dc0: port 0xfc00-0xfcff mem 0xffbefc00-0xffbe irq 10 at device 20.0 on pci0 miibus0: on dc0 ukphy0: on miibus0 ukphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto Anomaly: Contrary to Sharity-Light docs, which say smbfs is faster, A Win9

Re: sharity-light/winxp issues

2003-12-16 Thread Dorin H
--- Redmond Militante <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hi all > i almost have sharity-light working well enough to > be able to map a windows share to my freebsd5.1 box. > > the two machines are: > 1. Freebsd 5.1-RELEASE, DHCP but i'm using > dyndns.org to map the a

sharity-light/winxp issues

2003-12-16 Thread Redmond Militante
hi all i almost have sharity-light working well enough to be able to map a windows share to my freebsd5.1 box. the two machines are: 1. Freebsd 5.1-RELEASE, DHCP but i'm using dyndns.org to map the address of 'machine1.gotdns.org' to this machine, ipfilter enabled 2. Windows X

Sharity Light -v- SMBFS

2003-11-19 Thread Micheal Patterson
If I use smbfs to access the shares so I can run awstats on the iis log files, I can't read the current log file if iis is running. However, if I run sharity light on the same share, I can then read the current file. At first glance, there appears to be a lock in place that smbfs honors wher

Can I get SMBFS to cooperate with NT apps as well as Sharity Light?

2003-10-20 Thread Doug Lee
I am trying to open a series of database files from FreeBSD that are hosted by a Windows NT share. I only need read-only access at this point. For some reason though, if a file is opened by a Windows program, FreeBSD can't get read access to it if I use smbfs, but other Windows machines can and s