Re: shared irqs and performance

2004-09-14 Thread Sandy Rutherford
> On Wed, 15 Sep 2004 10:21:52 +0530, > Subhro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > The card won't be facing any stability problems. And there is no > reason why you should force the card to another IRQ because modern > motherboards DOES allow IRQ sharing and there is no performance hits > for

Re: shared irqs and performance

2004-09-14 Thread Subhro
The card won't be facing any stability problems. And there is no reason why you should force the card to another IRQ because modern motherboards DOES allow IRQ sharing and there is no performance hits for it. Regards S. On Tue, 14 Sep 2004 18:56:18 -0600, Gary Aitken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >

shared irqs and performance

2004-09-14 Thread Gary Aitken
On my 4.10 system, I added in a third ethernet device. However, I see from dmesg that the irq assigned is shared with my scsi controller: de1: port 0xf880-0xf8ff mem 0xfdfffc00-0xfdfffc7f irq 9 at device 16.0 on pci0 bt0: port 0xfcec-0xfcef irq 9 at device 17.0 on pci0 Since the driver was al