On 05/08/2013 9:10 am, firm...@gmail.com wrote:
What is the best option out there for a mini-pc to run FreeBSD as a
home
router/firewall? (needs to have 2 nic's)
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/lis
load but if do not plan such high speeds it work like
charm..Kind of expensive though...
Peter
On 08/05/2013 17:10, firm...@gmail.com wrote:
> What is the best option out there for a mini-pc to run FreeBSD as a home
> router/firewall? (needs to have 2
On 05/08/13 15:48, Arthur Chance wrote:
On 05/08/13 15:10, firm...@gmail.com wrote:
What is the best option out there for a mini-pc to run FreeBSD as a home
router/firewall? (needs to have 2 nic's)
I use an alix2d3 running embedded pfSense as a 3 NIC (WAN, LAN, DMZ)
router. If you only
On 05/08/13 15:10, firm...@gmail.com wrote:
What is the best option out there for a mini-pc to run FreeBSD as a home
router/firewall? (needs to have 2 nic's)
I use an alix2d3 running embedded pfSense as a 3 NIC (WAN, LAN, DMZ)
router. If you only need 2 NICs go for the alix2d2. You can
Op 8 mei 2013 om 16:24 heeft "C. P. Ghost" het volgende
geschreven:
> On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 4:10 PM, firm...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> What is the best option out there for a mini-pc to run FreeBSD as a home
>> router/firewall? (needs to have 2 nic's)
>
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 4:10 PM, firm...@gmail.com wrote:
> What is the best option out there for a mini-pc to run FreeBSD as a home
> router/firewall? (needs to have 2 nic's)
>
I had some pretty good experiences with older Soekris models (net-4801)
acting as fanless routers and
What is the best option out there for a mini-pc to run FreeBSD as a home
router/firewall? (needs to have 2 nic's)
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any ma
Hi--
On Apr 24, 2013, at 1:53 PM, Michael Powell wrote:
> This is along the lines of what I was thinking. I am my own CA and can
> generate certs that no one else has the private keys to.
So can someone who does not run their own CA...?
> The problem with buying certs from a provider is the go
On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 16:16:32 -0400
Michael Powell wrote:
> Alejandro Imass wrote:
>
> [snip]
> >>> Most consider the answer to use WPA2, which I do use too. Many
> >>> think it is 'virtually' unbreakable, but this really is not true;
> >>> it just takes longer. I've done WPA2 keys in as little as
nterprise WPA
> is stronger because it is a user account based system which authenticates
> using 802.1x via a Radius server. You can even assign certificates to user
OK. So we are talking about weak PSKs, of course with enough computing
power virtually anything is crackable by brute force.
Michael Powell wrote:
> [snip]
>>> Are you saying that any WPA2 key can be cracked or or you simply
>>> referring to weak keys?
>>
>> I would also like to specifically if it's for weak keys or are all
>> WPA2 personal keys crackable by brute force. Also is WPA2 Enterprise
>> as weak also. Could a
Arthur Chance wrote:
[snip]
>> What I was pondering is some form of L2TP tunnel, or some other form of
>> IPSEC tunnel to form some kind of VPN like communication between the
>> client and the wifi. Just never have begun to find the time to get
>> anywhere with the idea. But basically it would res
Alejandro Imass wrote:
[snip]
>>> Most consider the answer to use WPA2, which I do use too. Many think
>>> it is 'virtually' unbreakable, but this really is not true; it just
>>> takes longer. I've done WPA2 keys in as little as 2-3 hours before.
>>
>> Are you saying that any WPA2 key can be crack
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 8:04 PM, RW wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Apr 2013 14:25:30 -0400
> Michael Powell wrote:
>
>
>> Most consider the answer to use WPA2, which I do use too. Many think
>> it is 'virtually' unbreakable, but this really is not true; it just
>> takes longer. I've done WPA2 keys in as litt
etting a trifle long, so suffice to say if you
really need the best security on a home ISP router the best you can do is
turn off the radio and use Ethernet and UTP. This returns to the original
focus of your question in that the firewall would be the point of
contention and not the cracking of WEP
On Mon, 22 Apr 2013 14:25:30 -0400
Michael Powell wrote:
> Most consider the answer to use WPA2, which I do use too. Many think
> it is 'virtually' unbreakable, but this really is not true; it just
> takes longer. I've done WPA2 keys in as little as 2-3 hours before.
Are you saying that any WPA
s utilizes a Radius server. At work we are mostly a $MS WinderZ shop,
>> but with Enterprise grade access points (we have Aruba's), EAP, and
>> Radius we
> [...]
>>
>> This email is already getting a trifle long, so suffice to say if you
>> really need the best
cess points (we have Aruba's), EAP, and Radius we
[...]
>
> This email is already getting a trifle long, so suffice to say if you really
> need the best security on a home ISP router the best you can do is turn off
> the radio and use Ethernet and UTP. This returns to the origin
ld be designed that would inherently be somewhat more secure
than what I see in the basic ISP home router. I have Verizon's FIOS here
with an Actiontec MI424WR-Rev 3 router and I think I could do better. The
alternate provider here is Comcast which mostly seems to be using Motorola
Surfboar
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Michael Powell wrote:
> Alejandro Imass wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 9:52 AM, Michael Powell
>> wrote:
>>> Alejandro Imass wrote:
>>>
Hi,
[...]
> Really these WEP/WPA2 protocols are not providing the level of protection
> that is truly necessary
Alejandro Imass wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 9:52 AM, Michael Powell
> wrote:
>> Alejandro Imass wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm looking to replace the piece of crap 2wire WiFi router that gets
>>> crakced every other day for somethi
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 9:52 AM, Michael Powell wrote:
> Alejandro Imass wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm looking to replace the piece of crap 2wire WiFi router that gets
>> crakced every other day for something with pfSense or m0n0wall
>
> Not sure what you m
Alejandro Imass wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm looking to replace the piece of crap 2wire WiFi router that gets
> crakced every other day for something with pfSense or m0n0wall
Not sure what you mean by 'cracked' here. If you are meaning that someone is
using air
> Hi,
>
> I'm looking to replace the piece of crap 2wire WiFi router that gets
> crakced every other day for something with pfSense or m0n0wall
>
> I would like something that is plug and play and easy to use in the
> $300 rage tops that has the WiFi router integra
Hi Alejandro. I can't speak about Hacom, but I've had excellent
results with Soekris hardware. It'll run all sorts of FreeBSD-based
systems. They have kit suitable for both wired and wireless networks.
--
James.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing
Hi,
I'm looking to replace the piece of crap 2wire WiFi router that gets
crakced every other day for something with pfSense or m0n0wall
I would like something that is plug and play and easy to use in the
$300 rage tops that has the WiFi router integrated. It seems only
Hacom offers this
Hi!
I have a printer connected through router which works. But the last two days I
found three printed papers:
two are empty and on the one is:
GET http://www.rackspace.com/ HTTP/1.1
Host: www.rackspace.com
User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible, MSIE 6.0: Windows NT 5.1)
Axxept: */*
Accept
On 08/06/2012 06:59, Matthew Seaman wrote:
Probably. The good news is that once you've got it running the IPv6
support in FreeBSD is rock solid and works like a charm.
It turns out that PF was being too helpful and trying to NAT for both
IPv4 and IPv6 - adding 'inet' to the "nat on $ext_if..
On 07/06/2012 23:56, Robert Bonomi wrote:
Please provide the output from these two commands:
ifconfig -a
netstat -nr
on both the router and on an 'inside' machine. (identifying which is which:)
There is also a question of 'where' the /48 comes from -- and how
traffi
Make sure you are only advertising a /64 addr prefixlen in rtadvd.conf,
and not the entire /48.
On 6/7/2012 4:36 PM, Bruce Cran wrote:
I'm trying to set up a IPv6 router (running -current) on my home
network. My ISP gives me a /128 via PPP and I have a /48 allocation,
which I use to giv
On 07/06/2012 23:36, Bruce Cran wrote:
> I'm trying to set up a IPv6 router (running -current) on my home
> network. My ISP gives me a /128 via PPP and I have a /48 allocation,
> which I use to give em0 and tun0 public addresses in different subnets
> (tun0 is assigned the addre
> From: Bruce Cran
>
> I'm trying to set up a IPv6 router (running -current) on my home
> network. My ISP gives me a /128 via PPP and I have a /48 allocation,
> which I use to give em0 and tun0 public addresses in different subnets
> (tun0 is assigned the address via pp
I'm trying to set up a IPv6 router (running -current) on my home
network. My ISP gives me a /128 via PPP and I have a /48 allocation,
which I use to give em0 and tun0 public addresses in different subnets
(tun0 is assigned the address via ppp.linkup).
I've added all the IPv6 settings
I have a twire modem/router that has 5 static IPs assigned to it. It
configures the firewall settings by discovering the hosts (by means
unknown to me) and allowing you to go into the firmware menu and
setting each host individually. Once the hosts are recognized it
sends arp requests every few
On Wed, 20 Jul 2011, Polytropon wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 11:55:02 -0600 (MDT), Warren Block wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jul 2011, Franci Nabalanci wrote:
I am so sorry it was my mistake: the printer is HP Business inkjet 3000.
That printer supports PCL and maybe even PostScript. Make sure it has
D
On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 11:55:02 -0600 (MDT), Warren Block wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Jul 2011, Franci Nabalanci wrote:
>
> > I am so sorry it was my mistake: the printer is HP Business inkjet 3000.
>
> That printer supports PCL and maybe even PostScript. Make sure it has
> DNS. Entries in /etc/hosts sho
On Wed, 20 Jul 2011, Franci Nabalanci wrote:
I am so sorry it was my mistake: the printer is HP Business inkjet 3000.
That printer supports PCL and maybe even PostScript. Make sure it has
DNS. Entries in /etc/hosts should be adequate. Set it with a fixed IP
address or through DHCP.
The
I am so sorry it was my mistake: the printer is HP Business inkjet 3000.
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 8:13 PM, Warren Block wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Jul 2011, ajtiM wrote:
>
> My system: FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE-p1 #0m I use KDE 4.6.5
>> CUPS and HPLIP are installed.
>> I have an old b
On Tue, 19 Jul 2011, ajtiM wrote:
My system: FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE-p1 #0m I use KDE 4.6.5
CUPS and HPLIP are installed.
I have an old broadband router D-604 (dlink), cable Internet and my computer
with FreeBSD and the other one with Windows are connected to the router.
I got HP bussiness inkjet
Hi!
My system: FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE-p1 #0m I use KDE 4.6.5
CUPS and HPLIP are installed.
I have an old broadband router D-604 (dlink), cable Internet and my computer
with FreeBSD and the other one with Windows are connected to the router.
I got HP bussiness inkjet 5000 which was connected to the
e you are
> others may be better. Many will also sell them pre-loaded with m0n0wall or
> pfsense, both of which are FreeBSD-based router/firewall distros with web
> interfaces to do most things you would want. (Although I know pfsense at
> least doesn't support IPv6 configuration t
.
> Root is mounted in read-only mode so eventual power loss will not be a
> problem.
> Taking Alix(or any x86 compatible board) and having i386 buildhost
> environment
> you may install packages from ports to your prepared image.
>
> For router you may use ARM or MIPS board
On 06/30/11 23:34, Chris Brennan wrote:
Greetings!
While trying to learn IPv6 as best as I can and messing with my Linksys
WRT54Gv3 router running DD-WRT, I realized that it cannot properly do
IPv6 yet. This leaves me rather limited. More then once some people on
IRC who were helping me with
--As of June 30, 2011 6:34:52 PM -0400, Chris Brennan is alleged to have
said:
While trying to learn IPv6 as best as I can and messing with my Linksys
WRT54Gv3 router running DD-WRT, I realized that it cannot properly do
IPv6 yet. This leaves me rather limited. More then once some people on
Hi Chris,
On Friday 01 of July 2011 00:34:52 Chris Brennan wrote:
> Greetings!
>
> While trying to learn IPv6 as best as I can and messing with my Linksys
> WRT54Gv3 router running DD-WRT, I realized that it cannot properly do
> IPv6 yet. This leaves me rather limited. More then o
Greetings!
While trying to learn IPv6 as best as I can and messing with my Linksys
WRT54Gv3 router running DD-WRT, I realized that it cannot properly do
IPv6 yet. This leaves me rather limited. More then once some people on
IRC who were helping me with this suggested I build my own router
On Fri, 27 May 2011, Jaime Kikpole wrote:
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 7:46 PM, Chris Hill wrote:
I'm looking to build a NAT / DHCP box for a lab network for my company. My
question is, how do I estimate the amount of RAM the machine will need?
FWIW, I can tell you some experiences that I've had.
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 7:46 PM, Chris Hill wrote:
> I'm looking to build a NAT / DHCP box for a lab network for my company. My
> question is, how do I estimate the amount of RAM the machine will need?
FWIW, I can tell you some experiences that I've had.
Example #1:
At one time, I had as many as
--As of May 26, 2011 7:46:10 PM -0400, Chris Hill is alleged to have said:
I'm looking to build a NAT / DHCP box for a lab network for my company.
My question is, how do I estimate the amount of RAM the machine will need?
This box will be running isc-dhcpd, doing NAT either via natd or pf, and
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org
[mailto:owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Chris Hill
Sent: 27 May 2011 02:16
To: Gary Gatten; Chuck Swiger
Cc: 'questi...@freebsd.org'
Subject: Re: RAM needed for DHCP + router?
On Thu, 26 May
Message -
From: Chris Hill [mailto:ch...@monochrome.org]
Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2011 06:46 PM
To: FreeBSD Questions List
Subject: RAM needed for DHCP + router?
Hello list,
I'm looking to build a NAT / DHCP box for a lab network for my company. My
question is, how do I estimate the amou
? Tweaked/minimal
kernel, etc.
- Original Message -
From: Chris Hill [mailto:ch...@monochrome.org]
Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2011 06:46 PM
To: FreeBSD Questions List
Subject: RAM needed for DHCP + router?
Hello list,
I'm looking to build a NAT / DHCP box for a lab network for my co
On May 26, 2011, at 4:46 PM, Chris Hill wrote:
> I'm looking to build a NAT / DHCP box for a lab network for my company. My
> question is, how do I estimate the amount of RAM the machine will need?
How many DHCP leases and NAT clients?
ISC's DHCPd typically runs a few tens of MB unless you have
Hello list,
I'm looking to build a NAT / DHCP box for a lab network for my company. My
question is, how do I estimate the amount of RAM the machine will need?
This box will be running isc-dhcpd, doing NAT either via natd or pf, and
not much else. I expect the amount of traffic (throughput) to
On Fri, 6 May 2011 04:10:58 -0700 (PDT)
Bill Tillman articulated:
> Please excuse me. I typed my reply below all the existing text but
> somehow it ended up being formatted into the middle of this one. Can
> someone give me the tip for insuring I don't top post and that my
> reply ends up at the
From: Leonardo M. Ramé
To: questi...@freebsd.org
Sent: Thu, May 5, 2011 3:44:36 PM
Subject: Home firewall with DLink router & FreeBSD
The short answer is a definite yes, but you will need two NIC's in the FreeBSD
server. I have a FreeBSD server w
Bill Tillman
To: Leonardo M. Ramé ; questi...@freebsd.org
Sent: Fri, May 6, 2011 6:53:56 AM
Subject: Re: Home firewall with DLink router & FreeBSD
From: Leonardo M. Ramé
To: questi...@freebsd.org
Sent: Thu, May 5, 2011 3:44:36 PM
Subject: Home firewall w
--- On Thu, 5/5/11, Jon Radel wrote:
> From: Jon Radel
> Subject: Re: Home firewall with DLink router and FreeBSD
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Date: Thursday, May 5, 2011, 9:50 PM
>
> On 5/5/11 8:37 PM, Leonardo M. Ramé wrote:
> >
> > Hi, at home I
--As of May 5, 2011 5:37:52 PM -0700, Leonardo M. Ramé is alleged to have
said:
Hi, at home I have a DLink Dir 300 router to provide internet access for
my home network. The network is composed by two Windows PCs, one Linux
laptop and one FreeBSD server we use mainly for storage and as
web
On 5/5/11 8:37 PM, Leonardo M. Ramé wrote:
Hi, at home I have a DLink Dir 300 router to provide internet access for my
home network. The network is composed by two Windows PCs, one Linux laptop and
one FreeBSD server we use mainly for storage and as web/database server.
I must add, the
Hi, at home I have a DLink Dir 300 router to provide internet access for my
home network. The network is composed by two Windows PCs, one Linux laptop and
one FreeBSD server we use mainly for storage and as web/database server.
I must add, the server only have one network card.
I would like to
Hi, at home I have a DLink Dir 300 router to provide internet access for my
home network. The network is composed by two Windows PCs, one Linux laptop and
one FreeBSD server we use mainly for storage and as web/database server.
I must add, the server only have one network card.
I would like to
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
--As of April 8, 2011 3:50:52 PM -0600, Chad Perrin is alleged to have said:
You seem to fail to realize that it's possible to CC someone who isn't on
the list, but not CC someone who *is* on the list. That would be why
people who aren't members of the list say thinks like "please CC me",
while
Hi,
On Saturday 09 April 2011 05:46:43 Carmel wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Apr 2011 15:50:52 -0600
> Chad Perrin articulated:
>
> The solution to this problem is so obvious that I am amazed that no one
this is a solution which creates just new problems.
> has proposed it. Simply require the poster to be
Can we just drop this matter? It's bad enough that iPhone mail makes this whole
ordeal a pain in the butt to read, but in the grand scheme of things, it _just
doesn't matter_. I'm subscribed to the list, I expect lots of email from the
list that I probably won't read anyway, but at least it's he
On Fri, 8 Apr 2011 15:50:52 -0600
Chad Perrin articulated:
> On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 11:15:11PM +0200, Erik Trulsson wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 01:11:52PM -0600, Chad Perrin wrote:
> > > On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 06:42:16PM +0100, Arthur Chance wrote:
> > > >
> > > > section 8.6 starts:
>
On Fri, 8 Apr 2011 23:15:11 +0200
Erik Trulsson wrote:
> You seem to miss one crucial fact: Not all the people who write to
> this list are subscribed to it. They will not see any replies
> directed only to the list. It is for their benefit that that rule
> exists.
I don't know about anyone e
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 11:15:11PM +0200, Erik Trulsson wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 01:11:52PM -0600, Chad Perrin wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 06:42:16PM +0100, Arthur Chance wrote:
> > >
> > > section 8.6 starts:
> > >
> > > start quote
> > > Unless there is a good reason to
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 01:11:52PM -0600, Chad Perrin wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 06:42:16PM +0100, Arthur Chance wrote:
> >
> > section 8.6 starts:
> >
> > start quote
> > Unless there is a good reason to do otherwise, reply to the sender and
> > to FreeBSD-questions.
> > end
On 8 April 2011 16:10, Carmel wrote:
> By the way, did you notice I directed a polite, one sentence directive
> towards Odhiambo. Suddenly, every buttinsky crawls out of the woodwork,
> sans any factual input on my original post and hijacks this thread
Maybe you would be better served by not usin
On 8 April 2011 20:28, Chad Perrin wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 08:30:25PM +0100, Chris Rees wrote:
>> On 8 Apr 2011 20:25, "Chad Perrin" wrote:
>> >
>> > I, for one, am glad this does not happen more often. I really do
>> > *not* need a bunch of duplicates cluttering up my inbox. I have ye
On Fri, 8 Apr 2011 13:11:52 -0600
Chad Perrin articulated:
> On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 06:42:16PM +0100, Arthur Chance wrote:
> >
> > section 8.6 starts:
> >
> > start quote
> > Unless there is a good reason to do otherwise, reply to the sender
> > and to FreeBSD-questions.
> > end
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 12:34:24PM -0700, Chip Camden wrote:
>
> +1 (I replied, cluttering up inboxes all over freebsdland)
You didn't CC me directly, though, for which I'm grateful.
--
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]
pgpnTlZSkroSX.pgp
Description: PGP s
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 08:30:25PM +0100, Chris Rees wrote:
> On 8 Apr 2011 20:25, "Chad Perrin" wrote:
> >
> > I, for one, am glad this does not happen more often. I really do
> > *not* need a bunch of duplicates cluttering up my inbox. I have yet
> > to see anyone complain of not receiving a C
Quoth Chad Perrin on Friday, 08 April 2011:
> On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 06:42:16PM +0100, Arthur Chance wrote:
> >
> > section 8.6 starts:
> >
> > start quote
> > Unless there is a good reason to do otherwise, reply to the sender and
> > to FreeBSD-questions.
> > end quote
>
>
On 8 Apr 2011 20:25, "Chad Perrin" wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 06:42:16PM +0100, Arthur Chance wrote:
> >
> > section 8.6 starts:
> >
> > start quote
> > Unless there is a good reason to do otherwise, reply to the sender and
> > to FreeBSD-questions.
> > end quote
>
> I,
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 06:42:16PM +0100, Arthur Chance wrote:
>
> section 8.6 starts:
>
> start quote
> Unless there is a good reason to do otherwise, reply to the sender and
> to FreeBSD-questions.
> end quote
I, for one, am glad this does not happen more often. I really d
On Apr 8, 2011, at 11:37 AM, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> Yes, although a new E2100L is much than $20 more than the refurb'ed 160NL.
Hmm, substitute: "isn't much than $20 more"...
-C
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mai
ty issue.
> If the stock firmware fills your needs, then there's no reason you
> would *have* to flash with a third-party firmware. Although, flashing
> that particular model was, in my experience, about as obtrusive as it
> would have been flashing the router with an updated firmware
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 5:43 PM, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> On Apr 7, 2011, at 3:19 PM, Bryan H. wrote:
>> If you're just looking for a new router, I would highly recommend the
>> Linksys WRT160NL. I got mine refurbished from Cisco's store[1], and
>> flashed it with
On 04/08/11 16:21, Carmel wrote:
On Fri, 08 Apr 2011 12:51:41 +0100
Arthur Chance articulated:
On 04/07/11 15:32, Carmel wrote:
Odhiambo, please don't CC me. I don't need multiple copies of the
same post.
CCing the original poster is standard etiquette on FreeBSD mailing
lists. Most lists a
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 10:41 AM, Jon Radel wrote:
>
> That's the nice thing about standards, there are so many of them to choose
> from.
>
>
>
>> 2) I placed a very clear notice at the bottom of my post(s). Many
>> people would consider that a clue as to my desire to receive multiple
>> copies of
Ok
Ce message a été envoyé depuis un terminal BlackBerry de Bouygues Telecom
-Original Message-
From: Carmel
Sender: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2011 06:55:57
To: FreeBSD
Reply-To: FreeBSD
Subject: Re: Linksys-E4200 Wireless N-router
On Fri, 8 Apr 2011 07:56
ow statement. Either point
> > > me to the specific documentation explaining the differences in
> > > detail or explain them to me yourself.
> > >
> > >
> > I did not know I needed a spoon to feed someone, but anyway, the main
> > details are at http://
On 4/8/11 11:21 AM, Carmel wrote:
On Fri, 08 Apr 2011 12:51:41 +0100
Arthur Chance articulated:
On 04/07/11 15:32, Carmel wrote:
Odhiambo, please don't CC me. I don't need multiple copies of the
same post.
CCing the original poster is standard etiquette on FreeBSD mailing
lists. Most lists
llow statement. Either point
> > > me to the specific documentation explaining the differences in
> > > detail or explain them to me yourself.
> >
> > I did not know I needed a spoon to feed someone, but anyway, the main
> > details are at http://dd-wrt.com/site/co
On Fri, 08 Apr 2011 12:51:41 +0100
Arthur Chance articulated:
> On 04/07/11 15:32, Carmel wrote:
> > Odhiambo, please don't CC me. I don't need multiple copies of the
> > same post.
>
> CCing the original poster is standard etiquette on FreeBSD mailing
> lists. Most lists are open to anybody to
gt; detail or explain them to me yourself.
> >
> >
> I did not know I needed a spoon to feed someone, but anyway, the main
> details are at http://dd-wrt.com/site/content/about
> The finer details are only visible once you look at what you can do
> with factory firmware, then fla
On 04/07/11 15:32, Carmel wrote:
Odhiambo, please don't CC me. I don't need multiple copies of the same
post.
CCing the original poster is standard etiquette on FreeBSD mailing
lists. Most lists are open to anybody to mail to without being signed
up, so when replying there's no way of knowing
at http://dd-wrt.com/site/content/about
The finer details are only visible once you look at what you can do with
factory firmware, then flash your router with dd-wrt and compare. FYI, you
can always revert to factory firmware if dd-wrt does not please you.
--
Best regard
On Fri, 8 Apr 2011 07:56:00 +0300
Odhiambo Washington articulated:
> It may void the warranty yes, but dd-wrt has more features than stock
> firmware.
That is like saying "A" is better than "B" without divulging any
specific information. It is just a hollow statement. Either point me to
the spec
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 6:03 PM, Carmel wrote:
> What do you gain by flashing it? I did not see anything specific
> mentioned. This would also undoubtedly void any guarantee on the unit
> I presume.
>
Technically yes. However, I have had a failed dd-wrt replaced under
warranty. Other people I k
; On Thu, 7 Apr 2011 17:00:43 +0300
> > >> Odhiambo Washington articulated:
> > >>
> > >> > On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 15:54, Carmel
> > >> > wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > > I was wondering if anyone here has had any experi
>>
> >> > On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 15:54, Carmel
> >> > wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > I was wondering if anyone here has had any experience with a
> >> > > "Linksys-E4200 Wireless N-
On Apr 7, 2011, at 3:19 PM, Bryan H. wrote:
> If you're just looking for a new router, I would highly recommend the
> Linksys WRT160NL. I got mine refurbished from Cisco's store[1], and
> flashed it with dd-wrt[2] (which was incredibly easy, just search for
> the rout
; > > I was wondering if anyone here has had any experience with a
>> > > "Linksys-E4200 Wireless N-router"
>> > > <
>> > >
>> http://homestore.cisco.com/en-us/Routers/Linksys-E4200-MaximumPerformance-Wirelessn-router_stcVVpro
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 17:32, Carmel wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Apr 2011 17:00:43 +0300
> Odhiambo Washington articulated:
>
> > On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 15:54, Carmel wrote:
> >
> > > I was wondering if anyone here has had any experience with a
> >
On Thu, 7 Apr 2011 17:00:43 +0300
Odhiambo Washington articulated:
> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 15:54, Carmel wrote:
>
> > I was wondering if anyone here has had any experience with a
> > "Linksys-E4200 Wireless N-router"
> > <
> > http://home
On Thu, 7 Apr 2011, Carmel wrote:
I was wondering if anyone here has had any experience with a
"Linksys-E4200 Wireless N-router"
I know that FreeBSD probably does not support its wireless functions as
it employs 802.11n wireless technology; however, other than that
does anyone have
1 - 100 of 821 matches
Mail list logo
