On Sun, 2008-04-20 at 08:16 +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> Fraser Tweedale wrote:
> > Gary Kline wrote:
> >> I'd feel real warm+funny nuking the ads that churn my uprocessor.
> >
> > You can use the Firefox FlashBlock extension which blocks all flash
> > objects, and allows you to run only th
On Sun 2008-04-20 08:16:51 UTC+0100, Matthew Seaman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> xpi-noscript is even better IMHO. Blocks flash, javascript and all
> forms of embedded media. Will remember the sites where you *do* want
> that stuff, or it will let you turn it on temporarily. It's in ports:
> ww
Fraser Tweedale wrote:
Gary Kline wrote:
I'd feel real warm+funny nuking the ads that churn my uprocessor.
You can use the Firefox FlashBlock extension which blocks all flash
objects, and allows you to run only the ones you want.
xpi-noscript is even better IMHO. Blocks flash, javascri
Gary Kline wrote:
I'd feel real warm+funny nuking the ads that churn my uprocessor.
You can use the Firefox FlashBlock extension which blocks all flash
objects, and allows you to run only the ones you want.
frase
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi people,
For several years I've been grumblish about us open-src folks not
having flash (and whatever toys come with the package. A lot of
web site require (or insist that the require the latest flash.
Long-story-short -- and I nay be wrong about this --
