Re: portversion error

2004-10-12 Thread Vince Hoffman
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004, Petre Bandac wrote: xxl# portversion | grep "<" [Failed `Inappropriate file type or format'] [Updating the portsdb in /usr/ports ... - 11731 port entries found .1000.2000.3000.4000.5000.. ...6000.7000.8000/usr/lo

portversion error

2004-10-12 Thread Petre Bandac
xxl# portversion | grep "<" [Failed `Inappropriate file type or format'] [Updating the portsdb in /usr/ports ... - 11731 port entries found .1000.2000.3000.4000.5000.. ...6000.7000.8000/usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/ portsdb.rb:587

Re: portversion error after cvsup

2004-02-13 Thread Petre Bandac
true indeed almost all are the same version, with an _1 at the end thank you for enlightening me :-) petre On Friday 13 February 2004 21:27 Anno Domini, Lowell Gilbert wrote using one of his keyboards: > Petre Bandac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > after I cvsup-ed and portsdb -Uu && pkgdb -Fv

Re: portversion error after cvsup

2004-02-13 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Petre Bandac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > after I cvsup-ed and portsdb -Uu && pkgdb -Fvu, portversion | grep "<" shows > me almost all the ports I have installed (on a closer look, almost all the > ports shown erroneously were portupgraded once) Is there any reason you *think* that those ports

portversion error after cvsup

2004-02-12 Thread Petre Bandac
after I cvsup-ed and portsdb -Uu && pkgdb -Fvu, portversion | grep "<" shows me almost all the ports I have installed (on a closer look, almost all the ports shown erroneously were portupgraded once) has anyone had this type of problem and how can it be solved ? thanks, petre -- Login: petre