Polytropon wrote:
On Thu, 27 May 2010 10:26:49 +0200, Coert wrote:
I checked the man page, and the -PP option is indeed what I am looking for.
The -PP option forces packages. Keep in mind that it *may* happen
that there isn't a package for a specific port, or a package uses
the default option
On Thu, 27 May 2010 10:26:49 +0200, Coert wrote:
> I checked the man page, and the -PP option is indeed what I am looking for.
The -PP option forces packages. Keep in mind that it *may* happen
that there isn't a package for a specific port, or a package uses
the default options of a port (see "ma
Polytropon wrote:
On Thu, 27 May 2010 08:23:58 +0200, Coert wrote:
First I completed the freebsd-update
Then I ran portupgrade -av
Then I ran portsnap.
It's a bit confusing to me. Why do you first update your installed
ports, then the ports database? I would thing it would make more
sense in
On Thu, 27 May 2010 08:23:58 +0200, Coert wrote:
> First I completed the freebsd-update
> Then I ran portupgrade -av
> Then I ran portsnap.
It's a bit confusing to me. Why do you first update your installed
ports, then the ports database? I would thing it would make more
sense in reverse order, i
Hello all,
Thanks for the awesome OS!
I am a Linux user and I just started using FreeBSD. It is awesome, and
the Handbook as well!
I am following Chapter 24 of the Handbook to update my system.
First I completed the freebsd-update
Then I ran portupgrade -av
Then I ran portsnap.
When I decide
On Thursday 09 July 2009 01:44:14 Jonathan Chen wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 10:20:41PM +0100, RW wrote:
> > On Thu, 9 Jul 2009 08:00:28 +1200
> >
> > Jonathan Chen wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 02:50:17PM +0200, dan wrote:
> > > > THat's the point !
> > > >
> > > > isnt that -R implied
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 10:20:41PM +0100, RW wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Jul 2009 08:00:28 +1200
> Jonathan Chen wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 02:50:17PM +0200, dan wrote:
> > > THat's the point !
> > >
> > > isnt that -R implied by -N ?
> > >
> > > From the portupgrade man page
> > >
> > >
>
On Thu, 9 Jul 2009 08:00:28 +1200
Jonathan Chen wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 02:50:17PM +0200, dan wrote:
> > THat's the point !
> >
> > isnt that -R implied by -N ?
> >
> > From the portupgrade man page
> >
> >
> > [...]
> > -N
> > --new
> > Install a new port/package when a specif
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 02:50:17PM +0200, dan wrote:
> THat's the point !
>
> isnt that -R implied by -N ?
>
> From the portupgrade man page
>
>
> [...]
> -N
> --new
> Install a new port/package when a specified package is not installed.
> Prior
> to the installation a new port/p
2009 14:05
> Please respond to
> mesli...@yahoo.fr
>
>
> To
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> cc
>
> Subject
> portupgrade question
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
> yesterday, having to install kdeadmin, I issued the following command
>
>
-questions@freebsd.org
cc
Subject
portupgrade question
Hello,
yesterday, having to install kdeadmin, I issued the following command
portupgrade -vnyNb -l file kdeadmin-3.5.10
Noting that "n" is negated by "y" (my mistake), the result
Hello,
yesterday, having to install kdeadmin, I issued the following command
portupgrade -vnyNb -l file kdeadmin-3.5.10
Noting that "n" is negated by "y" (my mistake), the result of this command was
+ print/cups-base
+ print/xdvik
+ print/cm-super
+ prin
On Tue, 7 April 2009 16:17:40 Jeffrey Goldberg wrote:
> On Apr 6, 2009, at 8:59 PM, Glen Barber wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 9:55 PM, new_guy wrote:
> >> Is there a way to use portupgrade without all the stopping for
> >> config questions?
> >
> > You could add:
> >
> > BATCH=yes
> >
> > to
On Apr 6, 2009, at 8:59 PM, Glen Barber wrote:
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 9:55 PM, new_guy wrote:
Is there a way to use portupgrade without all the stopping for config
questions?
You could add:
BATCH=yes
to /etc/make.conf.
Or use the --batch command line option to portupgrade.
Or use t
On Mon, 6 Apr 2009, new_guy wrote:
Silly question... when I use portupgrade on gnome installs, it interrupts
itself a lot to prompt for config options. I normally take all the defaults.
Is there a way to use portupgrade without all the stopping for config
questions? I'd like to leave my laptop a
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 9:55 PM, new_guy wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Silly question... when I use portupgrade on gnome installs, it interrupts
> itself a lot to prompt for config options. I normally take all the defaults.
> Is there a way to use portupgrade without all the stopping for config
> questions? I
e.com/portupgrade-question-tp22920813p22920813.html
Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any ma
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 03:24:10PM -0500, Neal Hogan wrote:
>
> What do we do about packages that "fail" to update?
>
> This is my first time running portupgrade, and am unsure what to think about
> the ones where there is a "configure error" or "uknown build error" or
> "install error"
>
> FYI -
What do we do about packages that "fail" to update?
This is my first time running portupgrade, and am unsure what to think about
the ones where there is a "configure error" or "uknown build error" or
"install error"
FYI -- I followed the following steps:
1) upgraded from 7.0-RELEASE to 7.1-RELEAS
On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 18:13:19 -0800 (PST)
gahn wrote:
> Hi all:
>
> I was doing "portupgrade -fa -y" remotely via ssh (desktop xp), it
> worked fine and was still running almost two days (7.1). But suddenly
> i lost power on my xp station, lost ssh connection to the freebsd7.1
> box.
>
> What sh
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 9:43 PM, Robert Huff wrote:
>
> Glen Barber writes:
>
>> > Never used screen. Does that mean it is too late and I have to
>> > start over again?
>>
>> Note that I said: "You *should* just be able to restart the
>> portupgrade, and (ideally) it should start where it lef
Glen Barber writes:
> > Never used screen. Does that mean it is too late and I have to
> > start over again?
>
> Note that I said: "You *should* just be able to restart the
> portupgrade, and (ideally) it should start where it left off."
Not according to my understanding of portu
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 9:29 PM, gahn wrote:
> Thanks Glen:
>
> So use "portupgrade -fa -y" again or a bit different knobs?
>
>
Please stop top-posting.
Continue with the command you had already used.
--
Glen Barber
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Thanks Glen:
So use "portupgrade -fa -y" again or a bit different knobs?
--- On Tue, 2/24/09, Glen Barber wrote:
> From: Glen Barber
> Subject: Re: portupgrade question
> To: ipfr...@yahoo.com
> Cc: "freebsd general questions"
> Date: Tuesday, February
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 9:25 PM, gahn wrote:
> Thanks Glen:
>
> Never used screen. Does that mean it is too late and I have to start over
> again?
>
Note that I said: "You *should* just be able to restart
the portupgrade, and (ideally) it should start where it left off."
Otherwise, yes, it is
Thanks Glen:
Never used screen. Does that mean it is too late and I have to start over again?
--- On Tue, 2/24/09, Glen Barber wrote:
> From: Glen Barber
> Subject: Re: portupgrade question
> To: ipfr...@yahoo.com
> Cc: "freebsd general questions"
> Date: Tuesday
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 9:13 PM, gahn wrote:
> Hi all:
>
> I was doing "portupgrade -fa -y" remotely via ssh (desktop xp), it worked
> fine and was still running almost two days (7.1). But suddenly i lost power
> on my xp station, lost ssh connection to the freebsd7.1 box.
>
> What shall i do so
Hi all:
I was doing "portupgrade -fa -y" remotely via ssh (desktop xp), it worked fine
and was still running almost two days (7.1). But suddenly i lost power on my xp
station, lost ssh connection to the freebsd7.1 box.
What shall i do so that i don't have to start over again?
Thanks in advance
> Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 12:35:03 +1000
> From: Fraser Tweedale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> AN wrote:
> > I installed openoffice 2.4.0 from ports with:
> > make -DWITHOUT_MOZILLA install clean
> >
> > Now, when I do a portupgrade it tries to install mozilla:
> >
> > To bu
* AN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [05-13-2008]:
> How do I portupgrade openoffice and get it to use the -DWITHOUT_MOZILLA
> option from the command line? What is the correct way to do this?
Look for references to MAKE_ARGS in $PREFIX/etc/pkgtools.conf.
--
Sahil Tandon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
___
On Tue, 13 May 2008 17:54:15 -0500, AN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I installed openoffice 2.4.0 from ports with:
make -DWITHOUT_MOZILLA install clean
Now, when I do a portupgrade it tries to install mozilla:
To build OOo, you should have a lot
of free diskspace (~ 11GB) and memory (~ 2GB).
If y
AN wrote:
I installed openoffice 2.4.0 from ports with:
make -DWITHOUT_MOZILLA install clean
Now, when I do a portupgrade it tries to install mozilla:
To build OOo, you should have a lot
of free diskspace (~ 11GB) and memory (~ 2GB).
If you want SDK and/or solver, please type make sdk and/or ma
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 11:05:02PM +, AN wrote:
> I installed openoffice 2.4.0 from ports with:
> make -DWITHOUT_MOZILLA install clean
>
> Now, when I do a portupgrade it tries to install mozilla:
>
> To build OOo, you should have a lot
> of free diskspace (~ 11GB) and memory (~ 2GB).
> If yo
I installed openoffice 2.4.0 from ports with:
make -DWITHOUT_MOZILLA install clean
Now, when I do a portupgrade it tries to install mozilla:
To build OOo, you should have a lot
of free diskspace (~ 11GB) and memory (~ 2GB).
If you want SDK and/or solver, please type make sdk and/or make solver
=
I installed openoffice 2.4.0 from ports with:
make -DWITHOUT_MOZILLA install clean
Now, when I do a portupgrade it tries to install mozilla:
To build OOo, you should have a lot
of free diskspace (~ 11GB) and memory (~ 2GB).
If you want SDK and/or solver, please type make sdk and/or make solver
=
On Wed, 15 Aug 2007 13:18:11 +0100
Christopher Key <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> I've gone for a portconf based solution for now, although, when I get
> the chance, I'll try to test how portupgrade behaves wrt
> dependencies.
Please don't forget to try switching to portupgrade-devel in that
On Wed, 15 Aug 2007 07:56:52 -0400
Robert Huff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Nikola Lecic wrote:
>
> >> So the /etc/make.conf option is better.
> >
> > It is definitively the most universal and IMHO it should appear
> > in the Handbook.
>
> I try to avoid setting things in make.conf th
Nikola Lecic wrote:
On Wed, 15 Aug 2007 08:36:53 +0400 (GST)
Rakhesh Sasidharan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Nikola Lecic wrote:
Yes, options are not saved that way and Vim's default is with X11.
Please make sure that the following lines exist in
your /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf:
MAK
Nikola Lecic wrote:
>> So the /etc/make.conf option is better.
>
> It is definitively the most universal and IMHO it should appear
> in the Handbook.
I try to avoid setting things in make.conf that do not need to
be set there. Why? Because - as far as I know - they will apply to
_eve
On Wed, 15 Aug 2007 08:36:53 +0400 (GST)
Rakhesh Sasidharan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nikola Lecic wrote:
>
> > Yes, options are not saved that way and Vim's default is with X11.
> > Please make sure that the following lines exist in
> > your /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf:
> >
> > MAKE_ARGS =
Nikola Lecic wrote:
Yes, options are not saved that way and Vim's default is with X11.
Please make sure that the following lines exist in
your /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf:
MAKE_ARGS = {
'editors/vim' => 'NO_GUI=yes',
[... options for other ports ...]
}
Next time portupgrade
On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 12:40:30AM +0200, Nikola Lecic wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Aug 2007 21:12:40 +0100
> Christopher Key <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I've just CVSupped my ports collection and run 'portupgrade -ra'.
>
> Hello Christopher,
>
> 'portupgrade -a' is just enough, '-r'
On Tue, 14 Aug 2007 21:12:40 +0100
Christopher Key <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've just CVSupped my ports collection and run 'portupgrade -ra'.
Hello Christopher,
'portupgrade -a' is just enough, '-r' means nothing here.
> One of the ports that was updated was vim, which had origi
Hello,
I've just CVSupped my ports collection and run 'portupgrade -ra'. One
of the ports that was updated was vim, which had originally been
installed without X11:
# cd /usr/ports/editors/vim
# NO_GUI=1 make install clean
Now, this option appears to have been lost as I've ended up with a f
On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 17:12 +0100, RW wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 10:57:05 -0700
> "Michael S. Eubanks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Don't use the ``p'' option. Use something like ``-afrRPv''.
> >
>
> -Rr doesn't actually do anything in combination with -a
Make sense. I've been using th
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 10:57:05 -0700
"Michael S. Eubanks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Don't use the ``p'' option. Use something like ``-afrRPv''.
>
-Rr doesn't actually do anything in combination with -a
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
On Thu, 2007-07-19 at 12:29 -0500, Jonathan Horne wrote:
> ive been using 'portupgrade -apP' on my systems lately (since i keep a
> central
> repository of packages i build for my systems; a good bulk of them are used
> across most/all of them).
>
> in situations where new packages are built
ive been using 'portupgrade -apP' on my systems lately (since i keep a central
repository of packages i build for my systems; a good bulk of them are used
across most/all of them).
in situations where new packages are built from ports (ie, when the package
in /usr/ports/packages/All is no lon
On Saturday October 21, 2006 at 08:29:05 (PM) Tsu-Fan Cheng wrote:
> Hi people,
>I just did the "portupgrade -rf pkg-config\*" to upgrade the apps, but i
> think some of the upgrades went wrong so there are a whole bunch ports
> skipped. I noticed glib20 has some compilation error, and probab
Hi people,
I just did the "portupgrade -rf pkg-config\*" to upgrade the apps, but i
think some of the upgrades went wrong so there are a whole bunch ports
skipped. I noticed glib20 has some compilation error, and probably is the
cause to all the rest. To fix this, should I apply the same command
On 7/20/06, Nagy László <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
After running
portupgrade -aP
I get this:
** Listing the failed packages (*:skipped / !:failed)
! textproc/linux-expat (linux-expat-1.95.7_1) (install error)
* x11-fonts/linux-fontconfig (linux-fontconfig-2.2.3_4)
* x
After running
portupgrade -aP
I get this:
** Listing the failed packages (*:skipped / !:failed)
! textproc/linux-expat (linux-expat-1.95.7_1) (install error)
* x11-fonts/linux-fontconfig (linux-fontconfig-2.2.3_4)
* x11/linux-XFree86-libs (linux-XFree86-libs-4.3.99.902_7)
D]>
Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List
Sent: Wed, 7 Jun 2006 21:29:10 -0400
Subject: Re: portupgrade question (solved)
> I did define the to environment variables. For some reason, wget
> works just fine on the same machine.
>
> Thanks a lot.
>
> On 6/7/06, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 09:29:10PM -0400, Michael S wrote:
> I did define the to environment variables. For some reason, wget works
> just fine on the same machine.
Different defaults.
> Thanks a lot.
np.
Kris
pgpbQ76wJJ4Xj.pgp
Description: PGP signature
I did define the to environment variables. For some reason, wget works
just fine on the same machine.
Thanks a lot.
On 6/7/06, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 04:35:12PM -0400, Michael S wrote:
> wget works like magic. I used the defaults. fetch I guess is the
>
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 04:35:12PM -0400, Michael S wrote:
> wget works like magic. I used the defaults. fetch I guess is the
> FreeBSD default for "fetching" files from the web. It was having
> problems fetching files from FTP sites.
> No idea what the problem is.
Try setting FTP_PASSIVE_MODE. T
On Wed, 7 Jun 2006, Michael S wrote:
> Good day everyone!
>
> I have a portupgrade related question. I am behind a proxy and fetch
> doesn't appear to cope with it very well. I installed wget and it
> works great. I updated the pkgtools.conf to reflect that, however
> portupgrade insists on using
wget works like magic. I used the defaults. fetch I guess is the
FreeBSD default for "fetching" files from the web. It was having
problems fetching files from FTP sites.
No idea what the problem is.
On 6/7/06, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 09:38:36AM -0400, Mic
I had them set, but in lower case - $http_proxy and $ftp_proxy. wget
doesn't have a problem with that.
More precisely (applogies for not specifying in the first place) the
problem was retrieving files from FTP hosts. HTTP sites were fine.
On 6/7/06, Toni Schmidbauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
At
At Wed, 7 Jun 2006 09:38:36 -0400,
Michael S wrote:
> I have a portupgrade related question. I am behind a proxy and fetch
> doesn't appear to cope with it very well. I installed wget and it
> works great. I updated the pkgtools.conf to reflect that, however
> portupgrade insists on using fetch for
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 09:38:36AM -0400, Michael S wrote:
> Good day everyone!
>
> I have a portupgrade related question. I am behind a proxy and fetch
> doesn't appear to cope with it very well.
What did you try? fetch works fine with proxies for the rest of us :)
Kris
pgpQqWxSTgnVY.pgp
Des
Thanks, I will definitely try it out.
On 6/7/06, Andrey Slusar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Wed, 7 Jun 2006 09:38:36 -0400, Michael S wrote:
> I have a portupgrade related question. I am behind a proxy and fetch
> doesn't appear to cope with it very well. I installed wget and it
> works great. I
Wed, 7 Jun 2006 09:38:36 -0400, Michael S wrote:
> I have a portupgrade related question. I am behind a proxy and fetch
> doesn't appear to cope with it very well. I installed wget and it
> works great. I updated the pkgtools.conf to reflect that, however
> portupgrade insists on using fetch for s
Good day everyone!
I have a portupgrade related question. I am behind a proxy and fetch
doesn't appear to cope with it very well. I installed wget and it
works great. I updated the pkgtools.conf to reflect that, however
portupgrade insists on using fetch for some reason. At first I thought
that p
On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 09:42:44AM +0930, Ian Moore wrote:
> So to sum up, it's a problem with the way the ports system detects wether the
> mysql-client port is installed that caused the problem (I thought it just
> used the ports database), and/or it's a problem with the mysql-client port
> no
On Monday 24 April 2006 23:56, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> Ian Moore wrote:
> > Hi, I've got a question about portupgrade and something that's happened
> > with it a couple of times now. The last 2 times libgda has been upgraded,
> > I've run portupgrade -a to upgrade a bunch of ports, including libgda
On Monday 24 April 2006 21:29, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> RW wrote:
> >On Monday 24 April 2006 12:50, Richard Collyer wrote:
> >>On Mon, April 24, 2006 12:16 pm, Ian Moore wrote:
> >>>On Monday 24 April 2006 20:43, Ian Moore wrote:
> Hi, I've got a question about portupgrade and something that's h
Ian Moore wrote:
On Monday 24 April 2006 22:38, Kevin Kinsey wrote:
Ian Moore wrote:
Yes, that would fix the problem, but I'm just curious about what causes
the problem in the first place, given that portupgrade rarely seems to
have these kind of problems.
Cheers,
ls -l /var/d
RW wrote:
On Monday 24 April 2006 12:50, Richard Collyer wrote:
On Mon, April 24, 2006 12:16 pm, Ian Moore wrote:
On Monday 24 April 2006 20:43, Ian Moore wrote:
Hi, I've got a question about portupgrade and something that's happened
with it a couple of times now. The last 2 ti
On Monday 24 April 2006 12:50, Richard Collyer wrote:
> On Mon, April 24, 2006 12:16 pm, Ian Moore wrote:
> > On Monday 24 April 2006 20:43, Ian Moore wrote:
> >> Hi, I've got a question about portupgrade and something that's happened
> >> with it a couple of times now. The last 2 times libgda has
Ian Moore wrote:
> Hi, I've got a question about portupgrade and something that's happened with
> it a couple of times now. The last 2 times libgda has been upgraded, I've run
> portupgrade -a to upgrade a bunch of ports, including libgda.
>
> The libgda upgrade has caused a re-install of mysql
On Monday 24 April 2006 22:38, Kevin Kinsey wrote:
> Ian Moore wrote:
> >Yes, that would fix the problem, but I'm just curious about what causes
> > the problem in the first place, given that portupgrade rarely seems to
> > have these kind of problems.
> >
> >Cheers,
>
> ls -l /var/db/pkg/mysql-cli
Ian Moore wrote:
Yes, that would fix the problem, but I'm just curious about what causes the
problem in the first place, given that portupgrade rarely seems to have these
kind of problems.
Cheers,
ls -l /var/db/pkg/mysql-client*??
Kevin Kinsey
--
A method of solution is perfect if
I have:
FORCE_PKG_REGISTER=YES
in /etc/make.conf
for portupgrade or if I need to re-install a port manually.
-Derek
At 06:16 AM 4/24/2006, Ian Moore wrote:
On Monday 24 April 2006 20:43, Ian Moore wrote:
> Hi, I've got a question about portupgrade and something that's happened
> w
On Monday 24 April 2006 21:20, Richard Collyer wrote:
> On Mon, April 24, 2006 12:16 pm, Ian Moore wrote:
> >> Hi, I've got a question about portupgrade and something that's happened
> >> with it a couple of times now. The last 2 times libgda has been
> >> upgraded,
> >> I've run portupgrade -a to
On Mon, April 24, 2006 12:16 pm, Ian Moore wrote:
> On Monday 24 April 2006 20:43, Ian Moore wrote:
>> Hi, I've got a question about portupgrade and something that's happened
>> with it a couple of times now. The last 2 times libgda has been
>> upgraded,
>> I've run portupgrade -a to upgrade a bun
On Monday 24 April 2006 20:43, Ian Moore wrote:
> Hi, I've got a question about portupgrade and something that's happened
> with it a couple of times now. The last 2 times libgda has been upgraded,
> I've run portupgrade -a to upgrade a bunch of ports, including libgda.
>
Sorry, I forgot to add the
Hi, I've got a question about portupgrade and something that's happened with
it a couple of times now. The last 2 times libgda has been upgraded, I've run
portupgrade -a to upgrade a bunch of ports, including libgda.
The libgda upgrade has caused a re-install of mysql-client-4, but when
portup
On Tuesday 22 June 2004 23:57, Dan Nelson wrote:
> In the last episode (Jun 22), Ben Paley said:
> > I've got three versions of libtool on my system:
> >
> > bash-2.05b$ pkg_info | grep libtool
> > libtool-1.3.5_2 Generic shared library support script (version 1.3)
> > libtool-1.4.3_2 Gener
In the last episode (Jun 22), Ben Paley said:
> I've got three versions of libtool on my system:
>
> bash-2.05b$ pkg_info | grep libtool
> libtool-1.3.5_2 Generic shared library support script (version 1.3)
> libtool-1.4.3_2 Generic shared library support script
> libtool-1.5 Gener
Hello,
I've got three versions of libtool on my system:
bash-2.05b$ pkg_info | grep libtool
libtool-1.3.5_2 Generic shared library support script (version 1.3)
libtool-1.4.3_2 Generic shared library support script
libtool-1.5 Generic shared library support script
bash-2.05b$
Does
On Monday 29 March 2004 12:03 pm, Bart Silverstrim wrote:
> I recently ran a portupgrade on one of our servers. The following
> error and exchange came up:
>
> server# pkgdb -F
> ---> Checking the package registry database
> Stale dependency: portupgrade-20040325_1 -> openssl-0.9.7d
> (security/o
I recently ran a portupgrade on one of our servers. The following
error and exchange came up:
server# pkgdb -F
---> Checking the package registry database
Stale dependency: portupgrade-20040325_1 -> openssl-0.9.7d
(security/openssl):
New dependency? (? to help): ?
[Enter] to skip, [Ctrl]+[D]
Hello,
I have installed portupgrade tool on my system. I need some clarification before i use
it. At present, my system has mysql3.23,Apache1.3 and no php.
Earlier, My system had php4.2.2 but when i used "pkg_update php4.2.2" ; php4-4.2.2 got
uninstalled and new version php4-4.3.3 was not i
On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 01:19:36AM -0500, Shaun T. Erickson wrote:
> Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P. wrote:
>
> >Shaun T. Erickson wrote:
> >
> >>I understand that 'portupgrade -arR' will upgrade everything. Some are
> >>packages and some are ports. Will portupgrade upgrade packages with
> >>packa
On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 12:55:55AM -0500, Shaun T. Erickson wrote:
> I understand that 'portupgrade -arR' will upgrade everything. Some are
> packages and some are ports. Will portupgrade upgrade packages with
> packages, and ports with ports, or do packages get replaced with ports,
> so that al
Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P. wrote:
Shaun T. Erickson wrote:
I understand that 'portupgrade -arR' will upgrade everything. Some are
packages and some are ports. Will portupgrade upgrade packages with
packages, and ports with ports, or do packages get replaced with
ports, so that all are ports
I understand that 'portupgrade -arR' will upgrade everything. Some are
packages and some are ports. Will portupgrade upgrade packages with
packages, and ports with ports, or do packages get replaced with ports,
so that all are ports after it's run?
-ste
___
Shaun T. Erickson wrote:
I understand that 'portupgrade -arR' will upgrade everything. Some are
packages and some are ports. Will portupgrade upgrade packages with
packages, and ports with ports, or do packages get replaced with
ports, so that all are ports after it's run?
-ste
__
When I run portupgrade -aP after running cvsup, I get this error:
I think I have fixed it before by reinstalling lessTif and
OpenMotif and possibly imake-4 but then I have gotten bitten by
the broken widgets in some version of openmotif.
Obviously, I'm going about this the wrong way: what is th
At 11:42 PM 10.24.2002 -0400, you wrote:
>On 24 Oct 2002, Kirk R. Wythers wrote:
>
>> It looks to me like there is no reason for both aalib-1.4.r5 and
>> aalib-1.4.r5_1. Seems that portupgrade does not cause this problem and
>> is the prefered upgrade method
>>
>> There are numerous examples of thi
in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
wrote Jason Hunt thusly...
>
> Personally I have always just installed the newer version of a
> port on-top of the older one. Then I go through the package
> "database" and fix the dependencies ... After fixing the
> dependencies I just remove the directory for the
in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
wrote Kirk R. Wythers thusly...
>
> aalib-1.4.r5< needs updating (port has 1.4.r5_1)
> aalib-1.4.r5_1 = up-to-date with port
...
>
> There are numerous examples of this issue. My question is: what is
> the recommended
On 24 Oct 2002, Kirk R. Wythers wrote:
> It looks to me like there is no reason for both aalib-1.4.r5 and
> aalib-1.4.r5_1. Seems that portupgrade does not cause this problem and
> is the prefered upgrade method
>
> There are numerous examples of this issue. My question is: what is the
> recommend
94 matches
Mail list logo
