On Sat, 21 Mar 2009 00:39:31 -0500
Adam Vande More wrote:
> RW wrote:
> >
> > IMO this doesn't make any sense. If portupgrade is failing on a port
> > where manual "make install" works, then portupgrade simply has a
> > bug. Any port upgrading tool belongs in a port, because it's more
> > importa
RW wrote:
IMO this doesn't make any sense. If portupgrade is failing on a port
where manual "make install" works, then portupgrade simply has a bug.
Any port upgrading tool belongs in a port, because it's more important
that it responds to changes in the ports system than changes in the
base sys
On Fri, 20 Mar 2009 17:04:00 -0500
Neal Hogan wrote:
> But, I wonder what the most efficient way is to update ports. I
> appreciate Adam's point about the fact that portupgrade (and
> portmanager and portmaster) are ports themselves and are going to not
> be as reliable as what is in base.
IMO t
Neal Hogan wrote:
In light of Adam's comment and thinking about the comment he's
responding to, I realize that I may have been rather obnoxious. I
appreciate Adam setting that aside to give me and the list some of his
time. I'm rather new to fBSD (obvious) and I've got my parent's
machine on i
Well Frank, if/when you read my most recent comment, you'll notice that I've
probably confused ports and packages again. As has been the case for the
past week or so, thanks for taking the time.
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 5:17 PM, Frank Shute wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 10:14:32AM -0500, Neal
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 10:14:32AM -0500, Neal Hogan wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 4:15 PM, Frank Shute wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 03:21:05PM -0500, Neal Hogan wrote:
> > >
> > > The last couple of days I've been running portupgrade -av and am to the
> > > point where I'd like to m
In light of Adam's comment and thinking about the comment he's responding
to, I realize that I may have been rather obnoxious. I appreciate Adam
setting that aside to give me and the list some of his time. I'm rather new
to fBSD (obvious) and I've got my parent's machine on it, which is hundreds
of
Neal Hogan wrote:
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 4:15 PM, Frank Shute wrote:
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 03:21:05PM -0500, Neal Hogan wrote:
The last couple of days I've been running portupgrade -av and am to the
point where I'd like to move onto something else, but there is one
package
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 4:15 PM, Frank Shute wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 03:21:05PM -0500, Neal Hogan wrote:
> >
> > The last couple of days I've been running portupgrade -av and am to the
> > point where I'd like to move onto something else, but there is one
> package
> > that won't upgrade
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 03:21:05PM -0500, Neal Hogan wrote:
>
> The last couple of days I've been running portupgrade -av and am to the
> point where I'd like to move onto something else, but there is one package
> that won't upgrade . . . xorg-server. As you can see below, it claims that
> there i
Neal Hogan wrote:
Stop in /usr/ports/x11-servers/xorg-server/work/xorg-server-1.5.3/glx.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/ports/x11-servers/xorg-server/work/xorg-server-1.5.3.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/ports/x11-servers/xorg-server.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/ports/x11-servers/xorg-server
The last couple of days I've been running portupgrade -av and am to the
point where I'd like to move onto something else, but there is one package
that won't upgrade . . . xorg-server. As you can see below, it claims that
there is a missing header and there are a fair amount of reported errors.
I'm
12 matches
Mail list logo
