On Sunday November 05, 2006 at 12:16:52 (PM) Tsu-Fan Cheng wrote:
> Hi people,
> as recently i have problem with firefox, i thought i will try to upgrade
> my port by my way...
>as i first run "portmanager -s > log" to see what ports are outdated, and
> if that port seem critical, I will
Hi people,
as recently i have problem with firefox, i thought i will try to upgrade
my port by my way...
as i first run "portmanager -s > log" to see what ports are outdated, and
if that port seem critical, I will do
"portupgrade -R/-r " to fix it. it's probably not the best, but I decided
t
jan gestre wrote:
> sorry for this newbie question, i've been upgrading my box using portupgrade
> but recently i'm experiencing some wierd logs that can't be explained nor
> solved but luckily my box does not appear to be broken, i have a question
> though regarding portmanager, someone on this l
hi guys,
sorry for this newbie question, i've been upgrading my box using portupgrade
but recently i'm experiencing some wierd logs that can't be explained nor
solved but luckily my box does not appear to be broken, i have a question
though regarding portmanager, someone on this list recommended
On Mon, 28 Mar 2005, Jay O'Brien wrote:
Francisco Reyes wrote:
/usr/ports/sysutils/pkg_tree
Interesting. Thanks! I wonder how that compares to portmanager.
I have never used port manager, but pkg_tree only lets you see a tree of
the ports. It doesn't help you manage them. I don't know if port mana
Alex de Kruijff wrote:
>
> You told your system to install portmanager and the ports that
> it needs, but also all the ports that are based on it. Please
> check 'man portupgrade' about the options.
>
Good point, That is a man page I hadn't thought to review.
Thank you!
Jay
___
Francisco Reyes wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Mar 2005, Jay O'Brien wrote:
>
>
>>Thanks for the heads up on 'make search', even if I can't find a complete
>>description of the command. I find that it is referenced in the manual,
>>however.
>
>
> Also check out the port
> /usr/ports/sysutils/pkg_tree
>
On Sun, Mar 27, 2005 at 06:20:00PM -0800, Jay O'Brien wrote:
> Updating a computer, pkg_info reported I only had two packages,
> cvsup-without-gui-16.1h and perl-5.8.5, both of which were out
> of date as reported by pkg_version.
>
> I tried to install portmanager, but it was not able to get th
On Sun, 27 Mar 2005, Jay O'Brien wrote:
Alec Berryman wrote:
Thanks for the heads up on 'make search', even if I can't find a complete
description of the command. I find that it is referenced in the manual,
however.
Also check out the port
/usr/ports/sysutils/pkg_tree
It's very usefull to see depen
Randy, Mike:
Thanks for the explanation. I hadn't considered a dependency
that goes away after the dependent port is built. Now it
makes perfect sense.
Jay
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/free
RW wrote:
> make seach is documented in man ports
It sure is! THANK YOU!
Jay
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On Monday 28 March 2005 05:50 am, Randy Pratt wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Mar 2005 23:49:11 -0800
>
> Jay O'Brien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Michael C. Shultz wrote:
> > > It would be nice if the ports make options were better
> > > documented, but
> > >
> > > you can read through /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.p
On Sunday 27 March 2005 11:49 pm, Jay O'Brien wrote:
> Michael C. Shultz wrote:
> > It would be nice if the ports make options were better documented,
> > but
> >
> > you can read through /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk and find information
> > on the various options.
> >
> > here is an example:
> >
>
On Sun, 27 Mar 2005 23:49:11 -0800
Jay O'Brien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michael C. Shultz wrote:
>
> > It would be nice if the ports make options were better documented, but
> > you can read through /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk and find information
> > on the various options.
> >
> > here is
On Monday 28 March 2005 06:41, Jay O'Brien wrote:
> stheg olloydson wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > They are recursive dependencies. Check each ports requirements.
> > cvsup-without-gui depends on ezm3. ezm3 depends on gmake,
> > gettext and libiconv. libiconv depends on libtool...and the foot
> > bone's
Michael C. Shultz wrote:
> It would be nice if the ports make options were better documented, but
> you can read through /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk and find information
> on the various options.
>
> here is an example:
>
> # all-depends-list
> # - Show all directories w
it was said:
>But how does it work (/usr/ports/Makefile doesn't have a
>SEARCH statement) and is it documented somewhere, like in a MAN
>page?
>
>The handbook, ΒΆ4.3, mentions 'make search' but doesn't explain
>how it works.
>
Hello,
It uses /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk. I doubt the options in
On Sun, 27 Mar 2005 21:51:28 -0800, Michael C. Shultz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday 27 March 2005 09:41 pm, Jay O'Brien wrote:
> > stheg olloydson wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > They are recursive dependencies. Check each ports requirements.
> > > cvsup-without-gui depends on ezm3. ezm3 d
On Sunday 27 March 2005 09:41 pm, Jay O'Brien wrote:
> stheg olloydson wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > They are recursive dependencies. Check each ports requirements.
> > cvsup-without-gui depends on ezm3. ezm3 depends on gmake,
> > gettext and libiconv. libiconv depends on libtool...and the foot
> > bon
stheg olloydson wrote:
> Hello,
>
> They are recursive dependencies. Check each ports requirements.
> cvsup-without-gui depends on ezm3. ezm3 depends on gmake,
> gettext and libiconv. libiconv depends on libtool...and the foot
> bone's connected to the toe bone :).
>
> hth,
>
> stheg
>
stheg
it was said:
>>If you updated your soirces/ports "cvsup" then portupgrade did
>>what you asked it to do. It Updated all outdated
packages/ports
>>and there dependencies.
>
>I'm convinced that you are right. However, why don't I show the
>other dependencies?
Hello,
They are recursive dependenci
On Sun, 27 Mar 2005 20:27:17 -0800, Jay O'Brien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Abu Khaled wrote:
>
> > ezm3, gettext, gmake, libiconv, libtool are the build dependencies for
> > cvsup-without-gui.
> >
> > # cd /usr/ports
> > # make search name="cvsup-without-gui"
> >
>
> Abu, I don't get that resul
Abu Khaled wrote:
> ezm3, gettext, gmake, libiconv, libtool are the build dependencies for
> cvsup-without-gui.
>
> # cd /usr/ports
> # make search name="cvsup-without-gui"
>
Abu, I don't get that result. I only show ezm3-1.2.
# cd /usr/ports
# make search name="cvsup-without-gui"
Port: c
On Sun, 27 Mar 2005 19:08:56 -0800, Jay O'Brien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alec Berryman wrote:
>
> > Jay O'Brien on 2005-03-27 18:20:00 -0800:
> >
> >
> >>Now, pkg_info says I have 10 packages installed; added were ezm3,
> >>gettext, gmake, libiconv, libtool, portupgrade,ruby and ruby18. If
> >
Alec Berryman wrote:
> Jay O'Brien on 2005-03-27 18:20:00 -0800:
>
>
>>Now, pkg_info says I have 10 packages installed; added were ezm3,
>>gettext, gmake, libiconv, libtool, portupgrade,ruby and ruby18. If
>>these all required to make portupgrade or perl work, where is that
>>reference?
>
>
Jay O'Brien on 2005-03-27 18:20:00 -0800:
> Now, pkg_info says I have 10 packages installed; added were ezm3,
> gettext, gmake, libiconv, libtool, portupgrade,ruby and ruby18. If
> these all required to make portupgrade or perl work, where is that
> reference?
They are required to build and ru
Updating a computer, pkg_info reported I only had two packages,
cvsup-without-gui-16.1h and perl-5.8.5, both of which were out
of date as reported by pkg_version.
I tried to install portmanager, but it was not able to get the
needed files from http://portmanager.sunsite.dk.
So, I installed po
27 matches
Mail list logo
