On 8/28/12 11:53 AM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
> On 8/28/2012 1:47 PM, David Newman wrote:
>> 1. On a 8.0-RELEASE system, I'm having a problem with the automake14
>> port, where the portaudit port reports this vulnerability:
>>
>> http://portaudit.freebsd.org/10f38033-
On 8/28/2012 1:47 PM, David Newman wrote:
> 1. On a 8.0-RELEASE system, I'm having a problem with the automake14
> port, where the portaudit port reports this vulnerability:
>
> http://portaudit.freebsd.org/10f38033-e006-11e1-9304-.html
>
> Refreshing th
1. On a 8.0-RELEASE system, I'm having a problem with the automake14
port, where the portaudit port reports this vulnerability:
http://portaudit.freebsd.org/10f38033-e006-11e1-9304-.html
Refreshing the ports collection with 'portsnap fetch extract' and then
runn
On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 11:14:13 -0300
"Fábio Jr." wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I'm facing problems after updating the portaudit to 0.6.0. This is
> happening on 2 server I own, both with FreeBSD 6.2. Check this out:
You obviously have missed that FreeBSD 6.x is no longer
su
El día 19 de marzo de 2012 08:14, "Fábio Jr." escribió:
> Hi folks,
>
> I'm facing problems after updating the portaudit to 0.6.0. This is happening
> on 2 server I own, both with FreeBSD 6.2. Check this out:
>
> /# portaudit -Fda/
> /auditfile.tbz
Hi folks,
I'm facing problems after updating the portaudit to 0.6.0. This is
happening on 2 server I own, both with FreeBSD 6.2. Check this out:
/# portaudit -Fda/
/auditfile.tbz 100% of 75 kB 381
kBps/
/unknown option '-sha256'/
I originally installed WordPress as a port because it was convenient to way to
make sure I had all the PHP dependencies. However, I've since updated WordPress
internally a number of times, and am now getting portaudit advisories against
the original port that was installed.
I'd pre
Hi,
I've noticed that servers runing exim version 4.74 are being
flagged by portaudit as having this vulnerability:
http://www.FreeBSD.org/ports/portaudit/36594c54-7be7-11e0-9838-0022156e8794.html
But systems with the port exim-mysql are not. This has to be an
oversight doesn
On Fri, 25 Dec 2009 23:45:39 -0800
Nerius Landys replied:
>> For the past week or so, portaudit has been warning me that the
>> installed version of php on my system (php5-5.2.11_1) has known
>> vulnerabilties. Fair enough. However, I've not seen a fix in the
>> port
> For the past week or so, portaudit has been warning me that the
> installed version of php on my system (php5-5.2.11_1) has known
> vulnerabilties. Fair enough. However, I've not seen a fix in the ports
> tree since then. Is my only option to deinstall php until this gets
&g
For the past week or so, portaudit has been warning me that the
installed version of php on my system (php5-5.2.11_1) has known
vulnerabilties. Fair enough. However, I've not seen a fix in the ports
tree since then. Is my only option to deinstall php until this gets
Hi again,
Today portaudit works fine with
${portaudit_sites="http://portaudit.FreeBSD.org/"}
Now I need to change this option in portaudit on all servers.
Regards
Arek
--
Arek Czereszewski
arek (at) wup-katowice (dot) pl
"UNIX allows me to work smar
On Wednesday, 1 July 2009 02:02:47 Arek Czereszewski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On all my servers I have portaudit version 0.5.13
> If I try update audit database (by hand or from periodic script)
> I have:
>
> # portaudit -Fd
> auditfile.tbz 1
On Wednesday 01 July 2009 08:02:47 Arek Czereszewski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On all my servers I have portaudit version 0.5.13
> If I try update audit database (by hand or from periodic script)
> I have:
>
> # portaudit -Fd
> auditfile.tbz 1
Hi,
On all my servers I have portaudit version 0.5.13
If I try update audit database (by hand or from periodic script)
I have:
# portaudit -Fd
auditfile.tbz 100% of 53 kB 39 kBps
portaudit: Database too old.
Old database restored.
portaudit: Download failed
I believe I am incorrect. I checked further and it looks like
$daily_status_security_portaudit_enable defaults to YES in the
portaudit script so it should run fine. Everything seems to be
working. I don't know why I thought it wasn't running before. Sorry
for the trouble. Thanks.
On S
I am using FreeBSD 7-RELEASE. I installed portaudit. The FreeBSD
handbook stated that during the install process, the configuration
files for periodic will be updated, permitting portaudit output in the
daily security runs.
portaudit was not run in my daily security runs. There is no mention
of
portaudit command
failed. I have now opened up port 80 and get the thing working.
Your message got me thinking in this direction as you confiremed that the
file is from http://www.FreeBSD.org/ports.
Once again thanks and apologies for the late reply.
On Mon, 8 Dec 2008, Sahil Tandon wrote
Richard KHOO Guan Chen wrote:
> I have recently installed 6.4 release and tried to do a portausidt -F.
> No go reply was that auditfile.tbz unavailable.
By default, portaudit fetches the database from www.FreeBSD.org/ports.
What is the output of the following commands on your machine?
I have recently installed 6.4 release and tried to do a portausidt -F.
No go reply was that auditfile.tbz unavailable.
Would be grateful for help
Thanks
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-que
Hello all,
anyone having issues with portaudit download of the auditfile.tbz? mine
seems to just stall.
I'm using portaudit .0.5.2 with -Fda switches.
Thanks
Ezat
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/ma
e problem was that I have to use a proxy: from
the shell portaudit picked up HTTP_PROXY and FTP_PROXY from the
environment, while it didn't when launched from cron.
Obiously setting up portaudit.conf was the solution.
bye & Thanks
av.
_
Andrea Venturoli wrote:
> Cristian KLEIN ha scritto:
>
>> I used to have problem with cron scripts, because cron uses another
>> PATH then
>> what the script gets if it's run from the shell. Could you try the
>> following
>> (assuming sh):
>>
>> export SHELL=/bin/sh
>> export PATH=/etc:/bin:/sbin:
Cristian KLEIN ha scritto:
I used to have problem with cron scripts, because cron uses another PATH then
what the script gets if it's run from the shell. Could you try the following
(assuming sh):
export SHELL=/bin/sh
export PATH=/etc:/bin:/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/sbin
export HOME=/var/log
periodic
l.
That shouldn't be relevant, the update should be done as a side-effect
of the daily security run, and the path to portaudit is hard-coded into
the periodic script.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Andrea Venturoli wrote:
> Hello.
> I'm running a dozen boxes (most being 6.2) with portaudit installed and
> I usually get a port vulnerability report in the daily security run.
>
> On one box, however, portaudit's db won't update automatically. The
>
RW ha scritto:
Have you checked its clock?
Yep.
# date
Fri Nov 23 18:13:17 CET 2007
Seems fine to me.
Also, it's running ntp, although I'd excpect something better from it.
bye & Thanks
av.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 10:28:31 +0100
Andrea Venturoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello.
> I'm running a dozen boxes (most being 6.2) with portaudit installed
> and I usually get a port vulnerability report in the daily security
> run.
>
> On one box, however
Hello.
I'm running a dozen boxes (most being 6.2) with portaudit installed and
I usually get a port vulnerability report in the daily security run.
On one box, however, portaudit's db won't update automatically. The
security reports will mention no vulnerability, even when I
Hi All
i am trying to run portaudit -F to fetch new database on FreeBSD
6.1-RELEASE but i cannot fetch the new database and it gives me
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/var/db/portaudit] # portaudit -F
auditfile.tbz 100% of 39 kB 2516 kBps
portaudit: Database too old.
Old
For some reason, portaudit is now showing 0 problems with my ports when
yesterday it was showing about 9.
Did something happen that is going to cause me a lot of headaches?
-Matt
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org
I have a 4.11-RELEASE system.
Prior to doing some minor portupdates, I had this portaudit report:
Checking for packages with security vulnerabilities:
Affected package: php4-4.4.1_3
Type of problem: php -- open_basedir Race Condition Vulnerability.
Reference:
<http://www.FreeBSD.org/po
"jan gestre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > the box's running for almost 2 months now setup as webmail server, the
> > only thing i removed was the linux compatible applications since i have no
> > plans of installing linux. i ran pkgdb -F and pkgdb -fu to no avail, after
> > doing cvsup this morning, ra
On 8/1/06, Gerard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"jan gestre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> it took almost 3 hours, i don't have X installed. i'm sending you the
> portmanager.log in private coz it might clutter the thread.
You have a warning message listed here:
Tue Aug 1 04:38:03 2006
options changed
Chris Whitehouse wrote:
> It seems to be when a port presents the blue Options screen. If you
> change anything (maybe even when you don't, not sure) portmanager gives
> that message. Unless there are other problems it seems to get back round
> to updating the port later in the run.
Interestin
Gerard wrote:
"jan gestre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
it took almost 3 hours, i don't have X installed. i'm sending you the
portmanager.log in private coz it might clutter the thread.
You have a warning message listed here:
Tue Aug 1 04:38:03 2006
options changed so returningphp4-mbstring
"jan gestre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> it took almost 3 hours, i don't have X installed. i'm sending you the
> portmanager.log in private coz it might clutter the thread.
You have a warning message listed here:
Tue Aug 1 04:38:03 2006
options changed so returningphp4-mbstring-4.4.2_2
/
"jan gestre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > after almost an eternity i finally was able to upgrade all packages via
> > portmanager, run cvsup then portsdb and with the same end result, i still
> > get those missing..not install... packages :(
It seems to me that you rebuilt your system with portmanag
On 8/1/06, jan gestre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/1/06, Gerard Seibert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, 1 Aug 2006, jan gestre wrote:
>
> > hi guys,
> >
> > i was trying to portupgrade ruby coz portaudit is complaining of
> &g
On 8/1/06, Gerard Seibert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 1 Aug 2006, jan gestre wrote:
> hi guys,
>
> i was trying to portupgrade ruby coz portaudit is complaining of
> vulnerabilities, i did run cvsup and portsdb -Uu before portupgrade, at
> first i couldn't up
On Tue, 1 Aug 2006, jan gestre wrote:
hi guys,
i was trying to portupgrade ruby coz portaudit is complaining of
vulnerabilities, i did run cvsup and portsdb -Uu before portupgrade, at
first i couldn't upgrade ruby coz portupgrade is complaining maybe coz
portaudit but someone in the
On 8/1/06, jan gestre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/1/06, Svein Halvor Halvorsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> jan gestre wrote:
> i was trying to portupgrade ruby coz portaudit is complaining of
> vulnerabilities, i did run cvsup and portsdb -Uu before portupgrade,
On 8/1/06, Svein Halvor Halvorsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
jan gestre wrote:
> i was trying to portupgrade ruby coz portaudit is complaining of
> vulnerabilities, i did run cvsup and portsdb -Uu before portupgrade, at
> first i couldn't upgrade ruby coz portupgrade is c
jan gestre wrote:
> i was trying to portupgrade ruby coz portaudit is complaining of
> vulnerabilities, i did run cvsup and portsdb -Uu before portupgrade, at
> first i couldn't upgrade ruby coz portupgrade is complaining maybe coz
> portaudit but someone in the li
hi guys,
i was trying to portupgrade ruby coz portaudit is complaining of
vulnerabilities, i did run cvsup and portsdb -Uu before portupgrade, at
first i couldn't upgrade ruby coz portupgrade is complaining maybe coz
portaudit but someone in the list suggested this:
# portupgrade -
or that advice.
>
> So I have done the cvsup, buildworld, buildkernel,
> .., process and completed without errors. (Thanks to
> all who have posted helpful messages on this subject.)
>
> Running "portaudit -Fa" advised me that the same 9
> packages were still a probl
ernel,
..., process and completed without errors. (Thanks to
all who have posted helpful messages on this subject.)
Running "portaudit -Fa" advised me that the same 9
packages were still a problem.
Running "portupgrade -n firefox" advised me:
** No need to upgrade 'firefox-1.
David Robillard wrote:
> We use the port security/portaudit on all of our FreeBSD servers.
> Currently, every machine has to out on the internet to download the
> portaudit vulnerability database from the FreeBSD server.
If your internal machines need to talk to the web, and you wish t
David Robillard wrote:
Hello,
We use the port security/portaudit on all of our FreeBSD servers.
Currently, every machine has to out on the internet to download the
portaudit vulnerability database from the FreeBSD server.
Since all of the machines are downloading the exact same file, we
would
Hello,
We use the port security/portaudit on all of our FreeBSD servers.
Currently, every machine has to out on the internet to download the
portaudit vulnerability database from the FreeBSD server.
Since all of the machines are downloading the exact same file, we
would like to setup a local
run output all of them disappeared, but nobody upgraded or removed the
affected packages. I reinstalled portaudit, refreshd its database, but
now it reports 0 affected pakages. The pkg_info command lists that three
packages, so they are still installed. Does anybody suspect what's wrong?
le packages (php4,
> > > ruby, openssl) in tomorrows security run output, but in today's security
> > > run output all of them disappeared, but nobody upgraded or removed the
> > > affected packages. I reinstalled portaudit, refreshd its database, but
> > > now
On Sunday, 2005-11-06 at 23:09:42 +0100, Simon L. Nielsen wrote:
> It does seem to work for me now. Could people having this problem
> please check the size of /var/db/portaudit/auditfile.tbz and try to
> run portaudit -Fa to refetch the database and check again?
> For referenc
's security
> > run output all of them disappeared, but nobody upgraded or removed the
> > affected packages. I reinstalled portaudit, refreshd its database, but
> > now it reports 0 affected pakages. The pkg_info command lists that three
> > packages, so they are st
raded or removed the
> affected packages. I reinstalled portaudit, refreshd its database, but
> now it reports 0 affected pakages. The pkg_info command lists that three
> packages, so they are still installed. Does anybody suspect what's wrong
Kövesdán Gábor wrote:
Hello,
One of my machines I got a report about 3 vulnerable packages (php4,
ruby, openssl) in tomorrows security run output, but in today's security
run output all of them disappeared, but nobody upgraded or removed the
affected packages. I reinstalled port
e affected packages. I reinstalled portaudit, refreshd its
database, but now it reports 0 affected pakages. The pkg_info command
lists that three packages, so they are still installed. Does anybody
suspect what's wrong?
Cheers,
Gabor Kovesdan
Hello,
One of my machines I got a report about 3 vulnerable packages (php4,
ruby, openssl) in tomorrows security run output, but in today's security
run output all of them disappeared, but nobody upgraded or removed the
affected packages. I reinstalled portaudit, refreshd its database
"Michael C. Shultz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sunday 30 October 2005 22:45, you wrote:
G'day.
[...]
>> I can't work out how to tell portaudit to stop bothering me about
>> [a single] particular vulnerability, though.
>>
>> Can I
On Sunday 30 October 2005 22:45, you wrote:
> G'day. I am relatively new to FreeBSD, but failed to find an answer to
> this question in the handbook, manual pages, or other references about
> portaudit:
>
> At the moment, portaudit is reporting one vulnerability on my system,
G'day. I am relatively new to FreeBSD, but failed to find an answer to
this question in the handbook, manual pages, or other references about
portaudit:
At the moment, portaudit is reporting one vulnerability on my system,
with the 'p5-Crypt-OpenPGP' package.
There isn&#
trying to understand and use the FreeBSD tools )
IMHO, the messages from portaudit are misleadingly worded. Portaudit is
correct that some of the software you installed has *some kind* of
security vulnerability. But everything else it says is potentially
misleading.
1) There may be no
pretty sure I'm still overlooking and/or leaving something out.
I just discovered the portaudit command and ran it against my system.
It comes up with 15 items that need to be upgraded or deinstalled.
For this question I'll use Mozilla.
The version it reports is Mozilla-1.7.7,
- Original Message -
From: "Wright Jim Contractor 14MDSS/SGSI" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2005 1:07 PM
Subject: portaudit question.
> To keep the story short:
>
>
>
> I'm using version FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE #6: Thu Aug
On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 15:07:40 -0500, Wright Jim Contractor 14MDSS/SGSI <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>
Subject: portaudit question.
Wrote these words of wisdom:
> To keep the story short:
>
>
>
> I'm using version FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE #6: Thu Aug 25 09:12:43 CDT 2005;
> pa
or leaving something out.
I just discovered the portaudit command and ran it against my system.
It comes up with 15 items that need to be upgraded or deinstalled.
For this question I'll use Mozilla.
The version it reports is Mozilla-1.7.7,2.
When I go to http://www.freebsd.o
Is Xpdf still listed in the portsaudit database as being vulnerable
for you?
portaudit -f /usr/ports/INDEX-5
If so, I guess there is nothing I can do except wait... I was just
wondering if this has not been corrected because of the freeze?
On Aug 25, 2005, at 11:12 AM, Roland Smith wrote
, even though the
> >>latest portrevision was supposed to resolve these problems? Has the
> >>portaudit database not been updated because of the code freeze?
> >>
> >
> >Some other ports (like cups-base) incorporate part of the xpdf
> >code. so they will
Yes, everything is up-to-date... Still can't portinstall cups-base
because of the problem with xpdf, and this problem still appears when I
portaudit -f /usr/ports/INDEX-5
On Aug 25, 2005, at 4:40 AM, Herbert J. Skuhra wrote:
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 03:23:11AM -0500, Joe Auty
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 03:23:11AM -0500, Joe Auty wrote:
> Hello,
>
> How come xpdf is still showing up as a vulnerability, even though the
> latest portrevision was supposed to resolve these problems? Has the
> portaudit database not been updated because of the code free
Hello,
How come xpdf is still showing up as a vulnerability, even though the
latest portrevision was supposed to resolve these problems? Has the
portaudit database not been updated because of the code freeze?
---
Joe Auty
NetMusician: helping musicians exploit new
Good news about the wget-devel I wasnt aware it was been updated
again, when this problem first occured both versions of wget were
affected.
It appears in nighly security logs so can get annoying after a while.
Chris
On 5/21/05, Thomas Hurst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Tony Shadwick ([EMAIL P
about portaudit and wget from just the other day, and you will
realize that fixes are not necessarily being commited once a security flaw
has been found.
> Also -- is there a similar utility to portaudit and freebsd-update,
> that can be used on the base operating system (not through ports)
to do the trick. Note portaudit_fixed is a
regular expression, so if you want to list multiple entries, seperate
them with |
--
Thomas 'Freaky' Hurst
http://hur.st/
--- portaudit.old Mon Sep 6 20:18:55 2004
+++ portaudit Sat May 21 20:18:21 2005
@@ -136,8 +136,8 @@
On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 01:29:11PM +, Robert S wrote:
> 8I've just started playing around with FreeBSD. One of my main
> priorities of an OS is ease of upgrading. If I run portaudit, I get a
> list of insecure packages (here is an excerpt from the output):
>
> Affec
I'd like to see it done, but I know just enough sh scripting to be
dangerous. ;)
If it were perl I'd be all over it. Any takers? :)
On Sat, 21 May 2005, Thomas Hurst wrote:
* Chris ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
This annoys me as well, I expect portaudit to alert me when an
On Saturday 21 May 2005 06:29 am, Robert S wrote:
> 8I've just started playing around with FreeBSD. One of my main
> priorities of an OS is ease of upgrading. If I run portaudit, I get
> a list of insecure packages (here is an excerpt from the output):
>
> Affected pack
8I've just started playing around with FreeBSD. One of my main
priorities of an OS is ease of upgrading. If I run portaudit, I get a
list of insecure packages (here is an excerpt from the output):
Affected package: firefox-1.0.3,1
Type of problem: mozilla -- code execution via javas
* Chris ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> This annoys me as well, I expect portaudit to alert me when an update
> is available to fix an exploit, but wget has no update so what is the
> point of the warning, there also seems to be no way to shut it up.
portaudit_fixed is only for OS
On Fri, 20 May 2005 13:43:29 +0100
Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This annoys me as well, I expect portaudit to alert me when an update
> is available to fix an exploit, but wget has no update so what is the
> point of the warning, there also seems to be no way to shut it
This annoys me as well, I expect portaudit to alert me when an update
is available to fix an exploit, but wget has no update so what is the
point of the warning, there also seems to be no way to shut it up.
Chris
On 5/17/05, Tony Shadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is driving me
This is driving me nuts. I just downloaded the latest portaudit database
and ran it on my system:
mx02# portaudit -ad
Database created: Tue May 17 13:40:02 CDT 2005
Affected package: wget-1.8.2_7
Type of problem: wget -- multiple vulnerabilities.
Reference:
<http://www.FreeBSD.org/po
Thomas S. Crum - AAA Web Solution, Inc. wrote:
Is there something that I am not updating that portaudit would like to see
done or is this just a generic warning. Either way, please provide
examples of what I might due to have it stop complaining. I can find no
examples googling the portaudit "
Thomas S. Crum wrote:
> Is there something that I am not updating that portaudit
> would like to see
> done or is this just a generic warning. Either way, please provide
> examples of what I might due to have it stop complaining. I
> can find no
> examples googling the port
On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 09:19:15 -0500, Thomas S. Crum - AAA Web Solution,
Inc. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there something that I am not updating that portaudit would like to see
> done or is this just a generic warning. Either way, please provide
> examples of what I might due
Is there something that I am not updating that portaudit would like to see
done or is this just a generic warning. Either way, please provide
examples of what I might due to have it stop complaining. I can find no
examples googling the portaudit "note" below.
# Here's what I did.
to override the freeze?
> >
> > What "JPEG vuln in firefox"?
>
> Sorry, that was from memory - I was thinking of the libpng hole
> (which of course isn't firefox specific).
>
> But I'm still seeing this:
>
> s known vulnerabilities:
> >>
as from memory - I was thinking of the libpng hole
(which of course isn't firefox specific).
But I'm still seeing this:
s known vulnerabilities:
>> mozilla -- scripting vulnerabilities.
Reference:
<http://www.FreeBSD.org/ports/portaudit/b2e6d1d6-1339-11d9-bc4a-000c41e2cdad
Some output:
bane# portaudit -F -a
auditfile.tbz 100% of9 kB 24 kBps
New database installed.
Affected package: FreeBSD-491000
Type of problem: multiple vulnerabilities in the cvs server code.
Reference: <http://www.FreeBSD.org/ports/portaudit/d2102505-f
Matthew Seaman wrote:
On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 10:01:23AM -0500, Chris wrote:
While running portaudit, I get the complaint;
Affected package: FreeBSD-502010
Type of problem: multiple vulnerabilities in the cvs server code.
Reference:
<http://www.FreeBSD.org/ports/portaudit/d2102505-f03d-11d8-8
On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 10:01:23AM -0500, Chris wrote:
> While running portaudit, I get the complaint;
>
> Affected package: FreeBSD-502010
> Type of problem: multiple vulnerabilities in the cvs server code.
> Reference:
> <http://www.FreeBSD.org/ports/portaudit/d2
While running portaudit, I get the complaint;
Affected package: FreeBSD-502010
Type of problem: multiple vulnerabilities in the cvs server code.
Reference:
<http://www.FreeBSD.org/ports/portaudit/d2102505-f03d-11d8-81b0-000347a4fa7d.html>
Note: To disable this check add the u
hich
you probably don't as openssl is in the base system) think first of
installing it under /usr/local.
In this case, probably all you need to do is:
# pkg_delete security/openssl
then install portaudit, and then (if you're sure you need it)
re-install security/openssl. Be warned: y
Hi,
I'm trying to install portaudit from ports, but get this error:
Dependency error: this port wants the OpenSSL library from the FreeBSD
base system. You can't build against it, while a newer
version is installed by a port.
Please deinstall the port or undefine WITH_OP
like these over half gigs for each cron
> report and this is generating traffic
See my other mail. Give what I asked for. I cannot guess what is
happening.
Give the output of:
# portaudit -Vd && env FETCH_CMD='fetch -vvvp' portaudit -F -d
>
> tha
-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Apr 2004 14:04:04 -0600 (MDT)
> RJ45 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > Hello,
> > I installed portaudit.
> > Since I installed it I noticed there are always ESTABLISHED connections to
> > some ftp serve
D]> wrote:
>
> >
> > Hello,
> > I installed portaudit.
> > Since I installed it I noticed there are always ESTABLISHED connections to
> > some ftp servers:
> >
> > tcp4 0 20 venus.51739freebsd.utcluj.r
On Tue, 13 Apr 2004 14:04:04 -0600 (MDT)
RJ45 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello,
> I installed portaudit.
> Since I installed it I noticed there are always ESTABLISHED connections to
> some ftp servers:
>
> tcp4 0 20 venus.51739freebsd.utcluj
Hello,
I installed portaudit.
Since I installed it I noticed there are always ESTABLISHED connections to
some ftp servers:
tcp4 0 20 venus.51739freebsd.utcluj.r.ftp
ESTABLISHED
tcp4 0 20 venus.49718gort.ludd.ltu.se.ftp
ESTABLISHED
tcp4 0 6
99 matches
Mail list logo
