On 08/03/2012 11:24, ellip...@elliptic.plus.com wrote:
> I apologise in advance if this is a stupid question. I am having
> problrems installing ports the ones that fail always do so with same
> problem:
>
> Attempting to fetch ftp://ftp.cs.cuhk.edu.hk/pub/Login Failure On
> ttyv1
>
> I
I apologise in advance if this is a stupid question. I am having
problrems installing ports the ones that fail always do so with same
problem:
Attempting to fetch ftp://ftp.cs.cuhk.edu.hk/pub/Login Failure On
ttyv1
I have looked to see if i can change the ftp site, i cannot ping
ftp.cs
On 1/30/12 8:31 PM, Lubomir Matousek wrote:
>
>
>
>>
>>
>> On 1/30/12 2:24 PM, Lubomir Matousek wrote:
>>> I changed apache default user from www to wbserv.
>>>
>>> I changed also file ownership from www to wbserv.
>>>
>>>
>>> Is there any way for portupgrade, that the ownership of installed p
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 14:24:08 +0100
Lubomir Matousek wrote:
I changed apache default user from www to wbserv.
I changed also file ownership from www to wbserv.
Is there any way for portupgrade, that the ownership of installed
port files remains the same? It means wbserv?
On 30.1.2012 15:08
On 1/30/12 2:24 PM, Lubomir Matousek wrote:
I changed apache default user from www to wbserv.
I changed also file ownership from www to wbserv.
Is there any way for portupgrade, that the ownership of installed port
files remains the same? It means wbserv?
On 30.1.2012 14:52, Damien
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 14:24:08 +0100
Lubomir Matousek wrote:
> I changed apache default user from www to wbserv.
>
> I changed also file ownership from www to wbserv.
>
>
> Is there any way for portupgrade, that the ownership of installed
> port files remains the same? It means wbserv?
>
If you
On 1/30/12 2:24 PM, Lubomir Matousek wrote:
> I changed apache default user from www to wbserv.
>
> I changed also file ownership from www to wbserv.
>
>
> Is there any way for portupgrade, that the ownership of installed port
> files remains the same? It means wbserv?
>
You'll want to be mor
I changed apache default user from www to wbserv.
I changed also file ownership from www to wbserv.
Is there any way for portupgrade, that the ownership of installed port
files remains the same? It means wbserv?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mai
Lowell Gilbert wrote:
pj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
When trying to install CUPS and also when installing Gnome-light, I
get the same error messsage, really, the exact same:
"===> cups-1.2.10_1 depends on executable: espgs - not found
===>Verifying install for espgs in /usr/ports/print/c
pj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> When trying to install CUPS and also when installing Gnome-light, I
> get the same error messsage, really, the exact same:
>
> "===> cups-1.2.10_1 depends on executable: espgs - not found
> ===>Verifying install for espgs in /usr/ports/print/cups-pstoraster
>
When trying to install CUPS and also when installing Gnome-light, I get
the same error messsage, really, the exact same:
"===> cups-1.2.10_1 depends on executable: espgs - not found
===>Verifying install for espgs in /usr/ports/print/cups-pstoraster
===> Installing for cups-pstoraster-8.1
On 2/22/07, Simon Gao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I had following errors when trying to install a package through port on
one FreeBSD 4.7 machine:
# make install
"/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk", line 2292: warning: String comparison
operator should be either == or !=
"/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk",
Hi,
I had following errors when trying to install a package through port on
one FreeBSD 4.7 machine:
# make install
"/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk", line 2292: warning: String comparison
operator should be either == or !=
"/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk", line 2292: warning: String comparison
operato
In the last episode (Jan 18), Alain G. Fabry said:
> I'm trying to install the JDK15 port (need a JVM for gallery remote),
> but it seems to crash on the mozilla dependancy. Here is the output
> where it crashes:
Try the diablo-jdk15 port instead; it's a precompiled package.
--
Dan Nelso
I'm trying to install the JDK15 port (need a JVM for gallery remote), but it
seems to crash
on the mozilla dependancy. Here is the output where it crashes:
c++ -o nsType1.o -c -DOSTYPE=\"FreeBSD6\" -DOSARCH=\"FreeBSD\"
-DHAVE_DEPENDENT_LIBS -I../.. -I./.. -I../../../dist/include/xpcom
-I../..
Peter wrote:
--- Duane Whitty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Matt Singerman wrote:
Hi all,
I am installing an upgrade to the Cyrus email server. Our existing
email boxes are in a database format that is no longer used by
Cyrus;
however, there is a configuration option which
--- Duane Whitty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matt Singerman wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I am installing an upgrade to the Cyrus email server. Our existing
> > email boxes are in a database format that is no longer used by
> Cyrus;
> > however, there is a configuration option which will instruct
I am using make. I will look into the options for using portupgrade
tomorrow, thanks.
On 3/26/06, Duane Whitty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matt Singerman wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I am installing an upgrade to the Cyrus email server. Our existing
> > email boxes are in a database format that i
Matt Singerman wrote:
Hi all,
I am installing an upgrade to the Cyrus email server. Our existing
email boxes are in a database format that is no longer used by Cyrus;
however, there is a configuration option which will instruct the new
version to use the old database format. They are
--with-m
Hi Chris,
> You would have to browse through the Makefile and look for configuration
> options. Typically, if there is a FOOBAR option, you would 'make
> -DFOOBAR install' in the port directory.
I will try this. Thanks.
> Or, you could just edit the Makefile to add the arg you want. Let's look
On Sun, 26 Mar 2006, Matt Singerman wrote:
Thank you for letting me know about this option. Unfortunately, the
specific configure options I am looking for are not listed there. Is
there another way to go in and modify the configuration?
You would have to browse through the Makefile and look
Hi Chris,
Thank you for letting me know about this option. Unfortunately, the
specific configure options I am looking for are not listed there. Is
there another way to go in and modify the configuration?
On 3/26/06, Chris Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Mar 2006, Matt Singerman wro
On Sun, 26 Mar 2006, Matt Singerman wrote:
I am installing an upgrade to the Cyrus email server. Our existing
email boxes are in a database format that is no longer used by Cyrus;
however, there is a configuration option which will instruct the new
version to use the old database format. The
Hi all,
I am installing an upgrade to the Cyrus email server. Our existing
email boxes are in a database format that is no longer used by Cyrus;
however, there is a configuration option which will instruct the new
version to use the old database format. They are
--with-mboxlist-db=berkeley and
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of je killen
Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2006 7:35 PM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: port installation
I am trying to install apache 1.3.34. I cd to the apache13 dir and
attempt make install and
I am trying to install apache 1.3.34. I cd to the apache13 dir and
attempt make install and am told that apache 1.3.33 doesn't exist. I
downloaded apache 1.3.34 and put it in the /usr/ports/distfiles dir but
since make is looking for v 1.3.33 it doesn't see version 1.3.34. So
What now? How woui
On Monday 15 November 2004 05:15, Curtis Vaughan wrote:
> I was installing a port (make && make install) during which it asked me
> about some configuration information. Because I made a wrong choice at
> one point, the install failed. Now, I want to run make install again in
> order to chose the r
On Mon, Nov 15, 2004 at 05:15:35PM -0800, Curtis Vaughan wrote:
> I was installing a port (make && make install) during which it asked me
> about some configuration information. Because I made a wrong choice at
> one point, the install failed. Now, I want to run make install again in
> order to
On Tuesday 16 November 2004 01:15, Curtis Vaughan wrote:
> I was installing a port (make && make install) during which it
> asked me about some configuration information. Because I made a
> wrong choice at one point, the install failed. Now, I want to run
> make install again in order to chose the
I was installing a port (make && make install) during which it asked me
about some configuration information. Because I made a wrong choice at
one point, the install failed. Now, I want to run make install again in
order to chose the right options. Unfortunately, I can't just issue
that command
I had been having some problems installing ports: they manifested as
configure misreading the system type and setting up libtool so it
wouldn't build shared libs.
After some correspondence with a FreeBSD team member and a port
maintainer, I decided to start afresh with a kernel and world
reins
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 06:24:45PM -0600, Jason Zimberoff wrote:
Hmmm... Either your clock is a few days out, or it took 3 days for
this message to make it to the list...
> I am trying to install xmms. When I run sysinstall, I first have to
> change the location to something else because 5.0-REL
Hello all.
I'm new to all of this, so please bear with me...
Here is my uname:
FreeBSD freeBSD.comcast.com 5.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 5.0-RELEASE #0: Thu Jan
16 22:16:53 GMT 2003
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386
I also seem to be using gnome2 as an xwindows manager.
I am trying
On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 09:04:47PM -0400, Todd Stephens wrote:
> On Saturday 27 September 2003 07:43 pm, Alex de Kruijff wrote:
> >
> > If you've just installed a fresh FreeBSD system then there isn't
> > much difference. I offten use the make method in this case. But I
> > switch to portinstall a
On Saturday 27 September 2003 07:43 pm, Alex de Kruijff wrote:
>
> If you've just installed a fresh FreeBSD system then there isn't
> much difference. I offten use the make method in this case. But I
> switch to portinstall and portupgrade if I a) have updated /usr/ports
> and b) have installed an
On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 04:59:50PM -0400, Todd Stephens wrote:
> Is there any benefit to using the standard 'make' method of installing
> ports over the 'portinstall' command (or portupgrade -N), or
> vice-versa?
If you've just installed a fresh FreeBSD system then there isn't much
difference. I
Is there any benefit to using the standard 'make' method of installing
ports over the 'portinstall' command (or portupgrade -N), or
vice-versa?
--
Todd Stephens
"Good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly,
while bad people will find a way around the laws." - Plato
On Sun, Feb 09, 2003 at 06:48:01PM +0100, c a r s t e n wrote:
> disclaimer: i am a freebsd newbie. although i have installed and used
> linux in the past, and work daily on unix at work, i have little
> sysadmin experience.
>
> although in the manual it mentions that ports such as kermit cannot
disclaimer: i am a freebsd newbie. although i have installed and used
linux in the past, and work daily on unix at work, i have little
sysadmin experience.
although in the manual it mentions that ports such as kermit cannot be
included on the cd, it seems that ports which i think should be on t
39 matches
Mail list logo
