Re: pkgdb -F issues

2004-04-05 Thread Matthew Seaman
On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 11:28:58AM -0700, Gary Kline wrote: > On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 12:18:06PM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote: > > [*] Lest this leads to much wailing and gnashing of teeth, I should > > stress here that you'll also have to recompile any ports that link > > against the OpenSSL shlib

Re: pkgdb -F issues

2004-04-05 Thread Gary Kline
On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 12:18:06PM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 08:24:40PM +0930, Brian Astill wrote: [[ ... ]] > > > > Looked diligently for detailed guidance on pkgdb (Complete FBSD 3rd & > > 4th Eds, Handbook, man page, FBSD Diary) but found nothing very >

Re: pkgdb -F issues

2004-04-05 Thread Matthew Seaman
On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 08:24:40PM +0930, Brian Astill wrote: > Before a fairly major system upgrade I have done "portsdb -Uu" and > "pkgdb -F". Next step, upgrade portupgrade, which entails doing smart > things to also painlessly upgrade to ruby 1.8. BUT .. > > I must have misunderstood what

pkgdb -F issues

2004-04-05 Thread Brian Astill
Before a fairly major system upgrade I have done "portsdb -Uu" and "pkgdb -F". Next step, upgrade portupgrade, which entails doing smart things to also painlessly upgrade to ruby 1.8. BUT .. I must have misunderstood what pkgdb requires when it asks about stale dependencies because at the pen