On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 22:09:42 +0200
Mel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 31 August 2007 18:27:26 Norberto Meijome wrote:
> > On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 17:40:06 +0200
> >
> > Mel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > netsed's output is (part ) :
> > > > ---
> > > > Script started on Fri Aug 31 07:52:12
On Friday 31 August 2007 18:27:26 Norberto Meijome wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 17:40:06 +0200
>
> Mel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > netsed's output is (part ) :
> > > ---
> > > Script started on Fri Aug 31 07:52:12 2007
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/home/luser]# netsed tcp 10101 0 0 s/FOO/BAR
>
On Friday 31 August 2007 18:27:26 Norberto Meijome wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 17:40:06 +0200
>
> Mel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > netsed's output is (part ) :
> > > ---
> > > Script started on Fri Aug 31 07:52:12 2007
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/home/luser]# netsed tcp 10101 0 0 s/FOO/BAR
>
On Friday 31 August 2007 19:12:42 Mel wrote:
> On Friday 31 August 2007 18:27:26 Norberto Meijome wrote:
> > On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 17:40:06 +0200
> >
> > Mel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > netsed's output is (part ) :
> > > > ---
> > > > Script started on Fri Aug 31 07:52:12 2007
> > > > [EMAIL P
On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 17:40:06 +0200
Mel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > netsed's output is (part ) :
> > ---
> > Script started on Fri Aug 31 07:52:12 2007
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/home/luser]# netsed tcp 10101 0 0 s/FOO/BAR
> > netsed 0.01b by Michal Zalewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > [*] Parsing
On Friday 31 August 2007 15:10:15 Norberto Meijome wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 13:33:53 +0200
>
> Daniel Hartmeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 31, 2007 at 08:27:29PM +1000, Norberto Meijome wrote:
> > > rdr on $int_if proto tcp from 172.16.82.81 to any -> 127.0.0.1 port
> > > 10101
On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 13:33:53 +0200
Daniel Hartmeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> b) Instead of replacing the destination address in pf with rdr, try
> leaving it as it is, but use route-to (lo0) to get the packet routed to
> the loopback interface. This would require netsed to listen on
> INADDR_A
On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 13:33:53 +0200
Daniel Hartmeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2007 at 08:27:29PM +1000, Norberto Meijome wrote:
>
> > rdr on $int_if proto tcp from 172.16.82.81 to any -> 127.0.0.1 port 10101
> > netsed tcp 10101 0 0 s/FOO/BAR
>
> > The traffic from XP gets red
On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 13:13:12 +0200
Mel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think you're looking for tagging, for example:
> rdr on $int_if proto tcp from 172.16.82.81 to any tag NETSED -> 127.0.0.1
> port
> 10101
>
> Then you need to figure out how they come back and pass them through, for
> exampl
On Fri, Aug 31, 2007 at 08:27:29PM +1000, Norberto Meijome wrote:
> rdr on $int_if proto tcp from 172.16.82.81 to any -> 127.0.0.1 port 10101
> netsed tcp 10101 0 0 s/FOO/BAR
> The traffic from XP gets redirected just fine to netsed, which replaces the
> bytes just fine. BUT the changed packets
On Friday 31 August 2007 12:27:29 Norberto Meijome wrote:
> 1) pf.conf has :
>
> ext_if="em0"
> int_if="em1"
> nat on $ext_if from $internal_net to any -> ($ext_if)
> rdr on $int_if proto tcp from 172.16.82.81 to any -> 127.0.0.1 port 10101
> -
> 2) I run netsed in transparent proxy mode
Hello everyone, I need your help / insight here :)
My setup, 2 VMs, XP (WinXP) and BSD (FreeBSD 6.2)
[XP ,172.16.82.81 ] --- [172.16.82.81,em1 BSD A.B.C.D,em0] --- The Interweb
[Other_servers_galore]
A.B.C.D is a public IP.
[Other_servers_galore] represents all and any servers XP wants
12 matches
Mail list logo
