On 10/07/2011 14:02, Jerry wrote:
On Sun, 10 Jul 2011 00:35:28 -0400
b. f. articulated:
This is the tag that you would use on src collections to update your
base system sources (usually in /usr/src) to 8-STABLE. You would use
RELENG_8_2 for the 8.2-STABLE security branch, RELENG_8_2_RELEASE fo
> On Sun, 10 Jul 2011 00:35:28 -0400
>
> b. f. articulated:
> > This is the tag that you would use on src collections to update your
> > base system sources (usually in /usr/src) to 8-STABLE. You would use
> > RELENG_8_2 for the 8.2-STABLE security branch, RELENG_8_2_RELEASE for
> > 8.2-RELEASE,
On Sun, 10 Jul 2011 00:35:28 -0400
b. f. articulated:
> This is the tag that you would use on src collections to update your
> base system sources (usually in /usr/src) to 8-STABLE. You would use
> RELENG_8_2 for the 8.2-STABLE security branch, RELENG_8_2_RELEASE for
> 8.2-RELEASE, and so on.
Re
On 7/10/11, b. f. wrote:
> On 7/9/11, Thomas D. Dean wrote:
>> On Sat, 2011-07-09 at 19:54 -0400, b. f. wrote:
> You could cheat, and neither upgrade your base system nor make the
> changes I mentioned in my last message, but instead fool portupgrade
> into thinking that you have a newer base sy
On 7/9/11, Thomas D. Dean wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-07-09 at 19:54 -0400, b. f. wrote:
>
>> occasionally trip over problems that will require intervention. (Note
>> that in the section of the csup file that you reproduced in an earlier
>> message, 'release-cvs' should be 'release=cvs'.)
>
> The '-' w
On Sat, 2011-07-09 at 19:54 -0400, b. f. wrote:
> occasionally trip over problems that will require intervention. (Note
> that in the section of the csup file that you reproduced in an earlier
> message, 'release-cvs' should be 'release=cvs'.)
The '-' was a typo on my part. The machine I used f
Thomas D. Dean wrote:
...
> For the most recent try, I have
>
> ...
> # OS_PATCHLEVEL: "" "-p8"
> # OS_PLATFORM:"i386" "amd64"
> # OS_PKGBRANCH: "7-current" "6.1-release"
> OS_RELEASE="8-STABLE"
> OS_BRANCH="STABLE"
> OS_PKGBRANCH="8-stable"
The c
On Sat, 2011-07-09 at 21:45 +0200, Polytropon wrote:
>
> If I understood everything correctly, CVS (csup) and portsnap
> do both follow "the one tree" which gets frequently updated,
> and by the tag specified above you'll always get the current
> version of the tree. Getting older versions (e. g.
On Sat, 09 Jul 2011 12:32:12 -0700, Thomas D. Dean wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-07-09 at 12:05 -0700, Thomas D. Dean wrote:
>
> Sorry to answer my own post.
>
> The packages that are out-of-date on the system I was updating are in
> relationship to 8.2-release.
>
> A couple days ago, I cvsup'd the port
On Sat, 2011-07-09 at 12:05 -0700, Thomas D. Dean wrote:
Sorry to answer my own post.
The packages that are out-of-date on the system I was updating are in
relationship to 8.2-release.
A couple days ago, I cvsup'd the port tree with
*default release-cvs tag=.
ports-all
Today,
portsnap fetch ext
On Sat, 2011-07-09 at 20:47 +0200, Polytropon wrote:
> On Sat, 09 Jul 2011 11:33:00 -0700, Thomas D. Dean wrote:
> > > /usr/bin/fetch -v
> > 'ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-8-STABLE/All/m4-1.4.16,1.tbz'
> > looking up ftp.FreeBSD.org
> > connecting to ftp.FreeBSD.org:21
> > f
On Sat, 09 Jul 2011 11:33:00 -0700, Thomas D. Dean wrote:
> > /usr/bin/fetch -v
> 'ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-8-STABLE/All/m4-1.4.16,1.tbz'
> looking up ftp.FreeBSD.org
> connecting to ftp.FreeBSD.org:21
> fetch:
> ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-8-S
On Sat, 2011-07-09 at 14:15 -0400, Chris Brennan wrote:
> On 7/9/2011 1:14 PM, Thomas D. Dean wrote:
> > As root, I attempted to use
> > portupgrade -PPRv m4
> > which attempted to access
> > ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-8.2-release/All/m4-1.4.16,1.tbz
> > but failed - F
On 7/9/2011 1:14 PM, Thomas D. Dean wrote:
> As root, I attempted to use
> portupgrade -PPRv m4
> which attempted to access
> ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-8.2-release/All/m4-1.4.16,1.tbz
> but failed - File unavailable (e.g. file not found, no access)
>
> I changed etc/
As root, I attempted to use
portupgrade -PPRv m4
which attempted to access
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-8.2-release/All/m4-1.4.16,1.tbz
but failed - File unavailable (e.g. file not found, no access)
I changed etc/pkgtools.conf
OS_PKGBRANCH="8-STABLE"
and
portupgra
Brian McCann wrote:
Hi all...easy question for someone. I'm starting to use one machine
to make my ports and system on and NFS mount and install from that one
central machine. I'm trying to use "make package" and "make
package-recursive" for ports...but is there a way to have it NOT try
to instal
Hi all...easy question for someone. I'm starting to use one machine
to make my ports and system on and NFS mount and install from that one
central machine. I'm trying to use "make package" and "make
package-recursive" for ports...but is there a way to have it NOT try
to install the port, just mak
Background - All was well until the boss upgraded the glibc on the
RedHat server which made all kinds of things unhappy. Taking the
opportunity to convert yet another server here to FreeBSD, I built a new
DNS on FreeBSD 4.9.
I have noticed a couple of odd things.
Typing in /usr/sbin/named -v,
Hi,
Background - All was well until the boss upgraded the glibc on the
RedHat server which made all kinds of things unhappy. Taking the
opportunity to convert yet another server here to FreeBSD, I built a new
DNS on FreeBSD 4.9.
I have noticed a couple of odd things.
Typing in /usr/
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 10:55:59AM -0400, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
> "Brian Henning" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > when performing a 'make package' does that grab all the dependencies for that
> > package so when you go to install the package it doesn't ask for dependencies?
>
> No. It should b
"Brian Henning" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> when performing a 'make package' does that grab all the dependencies for that
> package so when you go to install the package it doesn't ask for dependencies?
No. It should be pretty easy to ask it to build packages for the
dependencies too, though.
Greetings:
when performing a 'make package' does that grab all the dependencies for that
package so when you go to install the package it doesn't ask for dependencies?
thanks,
brian
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/list
22 matches
Mail list logo
