Peter Leftwich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm surprised that xargs has no flag for interactive mode (-i) so that the
> command line will be echoed to the terminal asking [y/n/!] where y means yes
> proceed and n means no stop now and ! would mean answer y to all remaining
> promptings.
Norm
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, Edwin Groothuis wrote:
> If you're comparing it with Linux, it's -p or --interactive. -i is
> for replacing.
> Edwin
> Edwin Groothuis |Personal website: http://www.MavEtJu.org
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]|Weblog: http://www.mavetju.org/weblog/weblog.php
> bash
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> On 2002-09-24 18:48, Peter Leftwich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm surprised that xargs has no flag for interactive mode (-i) so that the
> > command line will be echoed to the terminal asking [y/n/!] where y means yes
> > proceed and n means no
On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 06:48:15PM -0400, Peter Leftwich wrote:
> I'm surprised that xargs has no flag for interactive mode (-i) so that the
> command line will be echoed to the terminal asking [y/n/!] where y means yes
> proceed and n means no stop now and ! would mean answer y to all remaining
>
On 2002-09-24 18:48, Peter Leftwich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm surprised that xargs has no flag for interactive mode (-i) so that the
> command line will be echoed to the terminal asking [y/n/!] where y means yes
> proceed and n means no stop now and ! would mean answer y to all remaining
>
I'm surprised that xargs has no flag for interactive mode (-i) so that the
command line will be echoed to the terminal asking [y/n/!] where y means yes
proceed and n means no stop now and ! would mean answer y to all remaining
promptings.
If the command passed to xargs *includes* something like "
