Danny Howard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Brad Bendy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: ng_one2many v.s. AFT (NIC Fault Tolerance/Fail Over/Redundancy
Revisited) (fwd)
On Thu, 12 Jan 2006, Brian J. Creasy wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Brian A. Seklecki wrote:
|
|
an J. Creasy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Chad Ziccardi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Danny Howard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Brad Bendy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: ng_one2many v.s. AFT (NIC Fault Tolerance/Fail Over/Redundancy
Revisited) (fwd)
On Wed, 15 Feb 2006, Jonathan Donald
On Saturday 15 October 2005 16:25, Brian A. Seklecki wrote:
Has anyone had any success with FBSD 6.0? I totally forgot about this email...
Thanks!
Brad
> Re:
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2005-October/100623.ht
>ml
>
> First: This is all very preliminary from some testin
On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 08:52:24AM -0400, Jonathan Donaldson wrote:
> >Essentially, a single layer 3 IP address needs to be visible in a
> >"switch fault tolerant" or "adapter fault tolerant" configuration.
> >A userland-level daemon could be scripted, and it has been done
> >before:
[...]
Brian,
Thanks for this excellent stream of thoughts, it is a lot like what I
am trying to accomplish...Please see my comments and questions in-line:
On Oct 15, 2005, at 7:25 PM, Brian A. Seklecki wrote:
Re: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2005-
October/100623.html
Fi
Re:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2005-October/100623.html
First: This is all very preliminary from some testing over the weekend.
Dell's reponse was that Intel's AFT/ALB was entirely software based.
That left me with few options:
1) Try userland layer 3 failover (ugly)
