utput below are typed up by hand but I think
they are accurate.
Fixit# ls -l /dev/ad0s2
crw-r- 1 root operator0, 94 Jan 31 13:39 /dev/ad0s2
Fixit# mount_ntfs -o ro /dev/ad0s2 /mnt
mount_ntfs: /dev/ad0s2: No such file or director
So I thought I would try using ntfs-3g which I would p
mands and output below are typed up by hand but I think
> they are accurate.
>
> Fixit# ls -l /dev/ad0s2
> crw-r- 1 root operator0, 94 Jan 31 13:39 /dev/ad0s2
> Fixit# mount_ntfs -o ro /dev/ad0s2 /mnt
> mount_ntfs: /dev/ad0s2: No such file or director
>
>
> So I t
urate.
Fixit# ls -l /dev/ad0s2
crw-r- 1 root operator0, 94 Jan 31 13:39 /dev/ad0s2
Fixit# mount_ntfs -o ro /dev/ad0s2 /mnt
mount_ntfs: /dev/ad0s2: No such file or director
So I thought I would try using ntfs-3g which I would prefer anyway as it
is probably safer.
Fixit# pkg_a
/dev/ad0s2
crw-r- 1 root operator0, 94 Jan 31 13:39 /dev/ad0s2
Fixit# mount_ntfs -o ro /dev/ad0s2 /mnt
mount_ntfs: /dev/ad0s2: No such file or director
So I thought I would try using ntfs-3g which I would prefer anyway as it
is probably safer.
Fixit# pkg_add -r fusefs-ntfs
Fetchin
> > Maybe somebody else have this same behavior as I have with ntfs?
> >
> > I install FreeBSD 6.2 on my second machine and then I have
> this same
> > problem with ntfs. This was a clean install, so I suppose that
> problem with
> > ntfs is, or ... I dont known what is wrong.
>
> I don't known
> Maybe somebody else have this same behavior as I have with ntfs?
>
> I install FreeBSD 6.2 on my second machine and then I have this same
> problem with ntfs. This was a clean install, so I suppose that problem with
> ntfs is, or ... I dont known what is wrong.
I don't known it is important, but
On Friday 14 of September 2007 22:02:06 Mel wrote:
> The ls didn't list a setuid (you would see -r-sr-x-r-x), I would expect it
> to for this behavior to occur. I have no idea how this is possible and
> would see it as security risk if you're not the only user of the machine.
Yes, of course.
Ok.
On Thursday 13 September 2007 15:43:05 Zbigniew Komarnicki wrote:
> On Thursday 13 of September 2007 12:13:46 Mel wrote:
> > Well, that kills that. Only thing I could think of is setuid mount_ntfs.
> > It's really weird, cause I can't get ntfs to mount under normal use
> Thank hou very much Mel.
I'm very sorry for the misspell.
Thank you very much Mel.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On Thursday 13 of September 2007 12:13:46 Mel wrote:
> Well, that kills that. Only thing I could think of is setuid mount_ntfs.
> It's really weird, cause I can't get ntfs to mount under normal userid even
> with correct permissions. What you can do shouldn't be possible
On Thursday 13 September 2007 11:27:43 Zbigniew Komarnicki wrote:
> On Wednesday 12 of September 2007 21:49:15 Mel wrote:
> > What is the output of:
> > ls -al `which mount_ntfs`
> >
> > under your user id?
>
> It is:
> $ ls -al `which mount_ntfs`
> -r-xr-
On Wednesday 12 of September 2007 21:49:15 Mel wrote:
> What is the output of:
> ls -al `which mount_ntfs`
>
> under your user id?
It is:
$ ls -al `which mount_ntfs`
-r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 10316 Sep 8 22:36 /sbin/mount_ntfs*
___
freeb
d0s1
> crw-r- 1 root operator0, 101 Sep 10 14:06 /dev/ad0s1
>
> Next in my home directory create folder win
> $ mkdir win
> $ mount_ntfs /dev/ad0s1 win
> $ ls win
> here is the output
>
> $AttrDef* MSDOS.SYS*
> $BadClus*
r win
$ mkdir win
$ mount_ntfs /dev/ad0s1 win
$ ls win
here is the output
$AttrDef* MSDOS.SYS*
$BadClus* NTDETECT.COM*
$Bitmap* Program Files/
$Boot* RECYCLER/
[...]
but I am not in group 'operator', and I'm now
I try mount my windows partition as following
mount_ntfs -C ISO-8859-2 -u anuser -g ganuser -m 540 /dev/ad0s1 /c
but with this is one problem - files are set execution flag e.g
-r-xr- 0 anuser ganuser 672 Jan 8 2006 file.txt
folders are ok and I have acces to folders.
dr-xr- 0
I'm having a few problems with mounting and then reading a w2k ntfs partition.
Basically, everything works well when I go to mount, no errors. I can
navigate the tree, and copy files off onto the usr partition.
Problem occurs if I try to use an application ( Kmplayer, mplayer, konquerer,
sam
tfscat -fv /dev/ad3s2 important.bkf > /usr/recovered.bkf
3. restore as per Windows SOP.
So, "ntfscat" is able to handle large file operations (>2GB) in FreeBSD,
operations that seem to fail with mount_ntfs and standard 'Nix tools
(cat, cp, cpio, tar, dd, etc).
Important: I'
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 12:30:32PM -0600, Kevin Kinsey wrote:
Good day,
I'm quite *stuck* attempting to read a 14GB file from
an NTFS volume. Obviously, an NTFS-based machine
would be great, but they aren't playing nice, and I'm
afraid my Winfoo isn't up to snuff (and
On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 12:30:32PM -0600, Kevin Kinsey wrote:
> Good day,
>
> I'm quite *stuck* attempting to read a 14GB file from
> an NTFS volume. Obviously, an NTFS-based machine
> would be great, but they aren't playing nice, and I'm
> afraid my Winfoo isn't up to snuff (and I was up most
>
Good day,
I'm quite *stuck* attempting to read a 14GB file from
an NTFS volume. Obviously, an NTFS-based machine
would be great, but they aren't playing nice, and I'm
afraid my Winfoo isn't up to snuff (and I was up most
of the night with it, so my RTFM is suffering, too)
FreeBSD mounts and
NTFS
> > > hard ad0 has 3 partition:
> > > ad0s1 -Primary NTFS;
> > > ad0s2 -Extended NTFS;
> > > ad0s3 - Primary FreeBSD;
> > > When I try from to mount ntfs partition via commands: mount_ntfs
> > > /dev/ad0s1 / mnt or mount -t ntfs /dev/ad0s1 /m
Jerry McAllister wrote:
The last part of the name you
are adding are "slices" which are what FBSD uses to divide up a partition.
They are not relevant to NTFS.
Just a little side terminology snit here. The 'e' refers to a _partition_
which FreeBSD uses to divide up _slices_ 's1' rather than the
>
> >>>> When I try from to mount ntfs partition via commands: mount_ntfs
> >>>> /dev/ad0s1 / mnt or mount -t ntfs /dev/ad0s1 /mnt I get a messege:
> >>>> < mount_ntfs: vfsload(ntfs): File exists >
> >>>> What does thi
When I try from to mount ntfs partition via commands: mount_ntfs
/dev/ad0s1 / mnt or mount -t ntfs /dev/ad0s1 /mnt I get a messege:
< mount_ntfs: vfsload(ntfs): File exists >
What does this mean, and what i'll do next? How I can to get access to
NTFS partition my hard drive?
It's
FreeBSD;
When I try from to mount ntfs partition via commands: mount_ntfs
/dev/ad0s1 / mnt or mount -t ntfs /dev/ad0s1 /mnt I get a messege:
< mount_ntfs: vfsload(ntfs): File exists >
What does this mean, and what i'll do next? How I can to get access to
NTFS partition my hard drive?
0s2 -Extended NTFS;
> > ad0s3 - Primary FreeBSD;
> > When I try from to mount ntfs partition via commands: mount_ntfs
> > /dev/ad0s1 / mnt or mount -t ntfs /dev/ad0s1 /mnt I get a messege:
> > < mount_ntfs: vfsload(ntfs): File exists >
> > What does this mean, a
s partition via commands: mount_ntfs /dev/ad0s1
> / mnt or mount -t ntfs /dev/ad0s1 /mnt I get a messege:
> < mount_ntfs: vfsload(ntfs): File exists >
> What does this mean, and what i'll do next? How I can to get access to NTFS
> partition my hard drive?
Try this:
# mkdir
try:
mount_ntfs /dev/ad0s1 /mnt
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Vladimir Yourtaev
Sent: Friday, January 30, 2004 12:09 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Problem with mount_ntfs
Hello all
My system FreeBSD-4.9 REALEASE
kernel compiled
Hello all
My system FreeBSD-4.9 REALEASE
kernel compiled with options NTFS
hard ad0 has 3 partition:
ad0s1 -Primary NTFS;
ad0s2 -Extended NTFS;
ad0s3 - Primary FreeBSD;
When I try from to mount ntfs partition via commands: mount_ntfs /dev/ad0s1 /
mnt or mount -t ntfs /dev/ad0s1 /mnt I get a
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 02:26:02PM +0100, Wiroth Didier wrote:
From: "Wiroth Didier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: mount_ntfs fails
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 14:26:02 +0100
On Fri, 21 Feb 2003 13:15:03 +
Daniel Bye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri,
slices s1 is ntfs and s2 is freebsd
> 4.7-release
> >
> > I can mount_ntfs without problems ad2s1 from freebsd!
> >
> > BUT I can't mount_ntfs ad0s! When I try to mount it
> with the following
> > command:
> > mount_ntfs /dev/ad0s1 /mnt
> >
>
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 01:54:57PM +0100, Didier Wiroth wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I have two harddisks:
> 1) ad0 with 1 slice containing Windows XP pro
> 2) ad2 with two slices s1 is ntfs and s2 is freebsd 4.7-release
>
> I can mount_ntfs without problems ad2s1 from freebsd!
>
Hey,
I have two harddisks:
1) ad0 with 1 slice containing Windows XP pro
2) ad2 with two slices s1 is ntfs and s2 is freebsd 4.7-release
I can mount_ntfs without problems ad2s1 from freebsd!
BUT I can't mount_ntfs ad0s! When I try to mount it with the following
command:
mount_ntfs /dev/
33 matches
Mail list logo
