Re: mapping [process|socket|...] to Filesystem

2006-01-05 Thread Richard Kästner
On Thursday 05 January 2006 12:12, Oliver Fromme wrote: > > Lou Kamenov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 04/01/06, Oliver Fromme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [..] > > > > > It would be much easier to use HTTP instead of (ab)using > > > file system operations. Just install an Apache web ser

Re: mapping [process|socket|...] to Filesystem

2006-01-03 Thread Richard Kästner
On Tuesday 03 January 2006 20:20, Gary Corcoran wrote: > > Richard Kästner wrote: > > On Monday 02 January 2006 22:29, Björn König wrote: > >>Richard Kästner schrieb: > >>>Hello, > >>> > >>>hope to find some help, hints and experience here: > >>> > >>>an external device expects commands and command

Re: mapping [process|socket|...] to Filesystem

2006-01-03 Thread Gary Corcoran
Richard Kästner wrote: On Monday 02 January 2006 22:29, Björn König wrote: Richard Kästner schrieb: Hello, hope to find some help, hints and experience here: an external device expects commands and command data, it produces result-codes and result data. Communication is done via HTTP (and w

Re: mapping [process|socket|...] to Filesystem

2006-01-03 Thread Richard Kästner
On Monday 02 January 2006 22:29, Björn König wrote: > > Richard Kästner schrieb: > > Hello, > > > > hope to find some help, hints and experience here: > > > > an external device expects commands and command data, > > it produces result-codes and result data. > > Communication is done via HTTP (and