Re: make.conf syntax question (MODULES_OERRRIDE)

2005-02-05 Thread Lowell Gilbert
"Colin J. Raven" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > What I was (erroneously) trying to do was trim down the kernel to its > absolute minimum size and maximum performance, my thought was if I don't > need it, don't load it. Which makes sense. "Don't load it" is not the same as "don't build it," thou

Re: make.conf syntax question (MODULES_OERRRIDE)

2005-02-04 Thread Colin J. Raven
On Feb 4 at 12:55, Lowell Gilbert launched this into the bitstream: > "Colin J. Raven" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> I'm considering *not* loading unecessary modules in a new kernel, so I >> need to ask what seems like some dumb questions. >> >> In the kernel config file (MYKERNEL in this case)

Re: make.conf syntax question (MODULES_OERRRIDE)

2005-02-04 Thread Lowell Gilbert
"Colin J. Raven" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm considering *not* loading unecessary modules in a new kernel, so I > need to ask what seems like some dumb questions. > > In the kernel config file (MYKERNEL in this case) does commenting out > stuff there stop some modules from loading? So for

make.conf syntax question (MODULES_OERRRIDE)

2005-02-04 Thread Colin J. Raven
I'm considering *not* loading unecessary modules in a new kernel, so I need to ask what seems like some dumb questions. In the kernel config file (MYKERNEL in this case) does commenting out stuff there stop some modules from loading? So for example if I comment out SCSI support are the relevant