On 09/01/13 20:34, ill...@gmail.com wrote:
> On 1 September 2013 22:32, ill...@gmail.com wrote:
>> On 1 September 2013 20:36, Gary Aitken wrote:
>>> portsnap and update just done,
>>> UPDATING shows nothing,
>>> /etc/make.conf contains
>>> WITH_PKGNG=yes
>>
>> I don't know, but I have it set to
On 1 September 2013 22:32, ill...@gmail.com wrote:
> On 1 September 2013 20:36, Gary Aitken wrote:
>> portsnap and update just done,
>> UPDATING shows nothing,
>> /etc/make.conf contains
>> WITH_PKGNG=yes
>
> I don't know, but I have it set to use gcc46 & it builds fine.
>
> Do you perhaps have
On 1 September 2013 20:36, Gary Aitken wrote:
> portsnap and update just done,
> UPDATING shows nothing,
> /etc/make.conf contains
> WITH_PKGNG=yes
I don't know, but I have it set to use gcc46 & it builds fine.
Do you perhaps have
WITH_CLANG_IS_CC=
set?
--
--
portsnap and update just done,
UPDATING shows nothing,
/etc/make.conf contains
WITH_PKGNG=yes
#cd /usr/ports
#portmaster sysutils/lsof
...
===>>> All dependencies are up to date
===> Cleaning for lsof-4.88.d,8
===> lsof-4.88.d,8 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - foun
I personally just synced my servers Kernel and Userland to current via cvsup
on a live system and still get same issue as discussed here for unknown
reasons.
FreeBSD Alpha.The-IRC.Com 8.0-STABLE FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE
===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found
===> Extracting fo
On Tue 25 May 2010 at 11:17:36 PDT Arthur Barlow wrote:
I did this and sure enough "vm_memattr_t" is defined as a parameter
in a typedef as follows: typedef int d_mmap2_t (struc cdev *dev,
vm_offset_t offset, vm_paddr_t *paddr, int nprot, vm_memattr_t
*memattr);
So the question is, why didn
Message: 29
Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 22:14:52 -0700
From: Charlie Kester
Subject: Re: Problem compiling lsof
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <20100525051452.gi...@comcast.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
On Mon 24 May 2010 at 21:55:01 PDT Charlie
Can you also make sure that the installed world and kernel matches the source
tree?
Thanks,
Larry Rosenman
lsof maintainer
"Charlie Kester" wrote:
>On Mon 24 May 2010 at 18:54:11 PDT Lowell Gilbert wrote:
>>Arthur Barlow writes:
>>
>>> Sorry about the false
On Mon 24 May 2010 at 21:55:01 PDT Charlie Kester wrote:
The Configure script grep's for vm_memattr_t in
${LSOF_INCLUDE}/sys/conf.h and sets HAS_VM_MEMATTR_T if the grep
succeeds. The build failure tells us that your /usr/src/sys/conf.h uses
vm_memattr_t, so it seems the Configure is testing so
On Mon 24 May 2010 at 20:24:49 PDT Arthur Barlow wrote:
[r...@uranus /usr/ports/sysutils/lsof]# HASPSEUDOFS -DHASNULLFS
-DHASIPv6 -DHAS_STRFTIME -DLSOF_VSTR=\"8.0-STABLE\"")
cc -pipe -march=athlon -fno-strict-aliasing -march=athlon
-DHASEFFNLINK=i_effnlink -DHASF_VNO
useful feedback, then you ought to provide a little more in the
> way of details-- what error?
>
> --
> -Chuck
>
Chuck,
Fair point. Here's the error messages:
Stop in /usr/ports/sysutils/lsof.
[r...@uranus /usr/ports/sysutils/lsof]# HASPSEUDOFS -DHASNULLFS -DHASIPv6
-DHAS_STRFTIME
rlow wrote:
> >> > Sorry about the false start. Fat fingers. I'm trying to compile the
> lsof
> >> > program in FreeBSD 8.0 on an i686 machine. There is a error
> referencing
> >> > "dlsof.h" and it looks like there is an ugly "h
Hi Arthur,
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 8:57 PM, Arthur Barlow wrote:
> On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 5:43 PM, Chuck Swiger wrote:
>
>> Hi--
>>
>> On May 24, 2010, at 5:41 PM, Arthur Barlow wrote:
>> > Sorry about the false start. Fat fingers. I'm trying to compile t
On Mon 24 May 2010 at 18:54:11 PDT Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Arthur Barlow writes:
Sorry about the false start. Fat fingers. I'm trying to compile the lsof
program in FreeBSD 8.0 on an i686 machine. There is a error referencing
"dlsof.h" and it looks like there is an ugly "
Arthur Barlow writes:
> Sorry about the false start. Fat fingers. I'm trying to compile the lsof
> program in FreeBSD 8.0 on an i686 machine. There is a error referencing
> "dlsof.h" and it looks like there is an ugly "hack" in the header file. Any
> sugge
On May 24, 2010, at 5:57 PM, Arthur Barlow wrote:
> That doesn't work, which was my point to begin with. The compile process
> throws an error.
You're abbreviating too much. :-)
If you want useful feedback, then you ought to provide a little more in the way
of details-- what error?
--
-Chuc
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 5:43 PM, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> Hi--
>
> On May 24, 2010, at 5:41 PM, Arthur Barlow wrote:
> > Sorry about the false start. Fat fingers. I'm trying to compile the lsof
> > program in FreeBSD 8.0 on an i686 machine. There is a error referencing
Hi--
On May 24, 2010, at 5:41 PM, Arthur Barlow wrote:
> Sorry about the false start. Fat fingers. I'm trying to compile the lsof
> program in FreeBSD 8.0 on an i686 machine. There is a error referencing
> "dlsof.h" and it looks like there is an ugly "h
Sorry about the false start. Fat fingers. I'm trying to compile the lsof
program in FreeBSD 8.0 on an i686 machine. There is a error referencing
"dlsof.h" and it looks like there is an ugly "hack" in the header file. Any
suggestions, besi
I've tried to compile lsof in FreeBSD
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Dan Nelson wrote:
It looks like fstat doesn't work on unix sockets at all; I tried on
/tmp/mysql.sock and some X11 sockets.
I filed a PR: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=143962
Yuri
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://l
Yuri wrote:
>But when I run "fstat /tmp/dbus-iQmkLjgxD6"
>it doesn't return anything, like this file isn't
>open at all.
I'm not sure that this will answer your question but bear with me.
Usually I use lsof to list any listening TCP or UDP ports, with follo
In the last episode (Feb 15), Yuri said:
> I am looking at one file which is actually a unix socket:
> /tmp/dbus-iQmkLjgxD6.
> "lsof | grep dbus-iQmkLjgxD6" shows that it's open by a particular
> process many times:
> ibus-daem 48407 yuri4uunix 0xc9660
I am looking at one file which is actually a unix socket:
/tmp/dbus-iQmkLjgxD6.
"lsof | grep dbus-iQmkLjgxD6" shows that it's open by a particular
process many times:
ibus-daem 48407 yuri4uunix 0xc966019c0t0
/tmp/dbus-iQmkLjgxD6
ibus-daem 48407
Larry Smith wrote:
I'm a newbie trying to upgrade 'lsof'. 'Portupgrade -a' goes well except for
lsof and a couple of files that depend on it (gnome-system-monitor,
gnome-applets, etc.)
I have cvs'ed my ports tree, did portsdb, pkgdb and portsclean over the las
On Wednesday 23 April 2008 18:25:51 Sam Fourman Jr. wrote:
> I also have the same trouble, FreeBSD 7.0 using portupgrade -ar
>
> Sam Fourman Jr.
I had the same problem and had to remove lsof and one other package so that I
could upgrade other packa
I also have the same trouble, FreeBSD 7.0 using portupgrade -ar
Sam Fourman Jr.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Hi,
I'm a newbie trying to upgrade 'lsof'. 'Portupgrade -a' goes well except for
lsof and a couple of files that depend on it (gnome-system-monitor,
gnome-applets, etc.)
I am running FreeBSD 7-RELEASE on an AMD Sempron with 1Gb of RAM. I have
cvs'ed my port
On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 11:25:44PM -0600, Dan Nelson wrote:
> In the last episode (Jan 08), Jeffrey Lehman said:
> > I'm running 7.0-RC1 amd64 and having an issue with lsof.
> >
> > # lsof
> > lsof: can't determine user device random seed.
> >
> >
In the last episode (Jan 08), Jeffrey Lehman said:
> I'm running 7.0-RC1 amd64 and having an issue with lsof.
>
> # lsof
> lsof: can't determine user device random seed.
>
> Anyone seen this problem and have a fix?
Do you also have a zfs root? That's wha
I'm running 7.0-RC1 amd64 and having an issue with lsof.
# lsof
lsof: can't determine user device random seed.
Anyone seen this problem and have a fix?
--
Jeffrey Lehman
http://digitalguy.net
GPG Key fingerprint = 3087 CED0 57F7 3BD3 14E7 969B EE14 BADA D619 8CF5
pgps3qb
On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 23:58:44 +0300, TuxGirl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If you install bash, be aware that you have that you have to add it
(with it's full path, /usr/local/bin/bash) to /etc/shells befor trying
to change your shell (with 'pw usermod yourname -s bash').
amon-re# pw usermod erins
At 13:58 Thu 15 Dec 2005, TuxGirl wrote:
> > If you install bash, be aware that you have that you have to add it
> > (with it's full path, /usr/local/bin/bash) to /etc/shells befor trying
> > to change your shell (with 'pw usermod yourname -s bash').
>
> amon-re# pw usermod erins -s zsh
> pw: no d
> If you install bash, be aware that you have that you have to add it
> (with it's full path, /usr/local/bin/bash) to /etc/shells befor trying
> to change your shell (with 'pw usermod yourname -s bash').
amon-re# pw usermod erins -s zsh
pw: no default shell available or defined
I've added it to /
> You can confirm that the package was installed by running the pkg_info
> command, which returns a list of all installed packages and ports.
> You can also look in /var/db/pkg, which is where the package database
> is kept. Assuming you've got it installed (which you should, pkg_add
> returns err
On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 10:39:10PM -0700, TuxGirl wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I installed FreeBSD for the first time tonight (I've been running
> Linux for a while), and I seem to be misunderstanding pkg_add. I'm
> following the instructions in the FreeBSD manual, and I ra
TuxGirl wrote:
then:
# lsof
lsof: Command not found.
Type:
rehash
then try your lsof command again. You've just run into a "feature" of
tcsh(1) -- it doesn't pick up changes to the executable files on $PATH
automatically.
Cheers,
Matthew
--
Dr
Hello,
I installed FreeBSD for the first time tonight (I've been running
Linux for a while), and I seem to be misunderstanding pkg_add. I'm
following the instructions in the FreeBSD manual, and I ran:
# pkg_add -r lsof
It claimed to succeed:
Fetching
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/Fre
> I'm trying to (re)install lsof (under -CURRENT, details below),
> and am running into:
>
> (cd lib; make DEBUG="-O"
CFGF="-pipe -march=pentium4 -DHASEFFNLINK=i_effnlink -D
>
HASF_VNODE -DHASCPUMASK_T -DHASSBSTATE -DHAS_KVM_VNODE -DHAS_UFS1_2 -DHAS_NO
_SI_
&g
I'm trying to (re)install lsof (under -CURRENT, details below),
and am running into:
(cd lib; make DEBUG="-O" CFGF="-pipe -march=pentium4 -DHASEFFNLINK=i_effnlink -D
HASF_VNODE -DHASCPUMASK_T -DHASSBSTATE -DHAS_KVM_VNODE -DHAS_UFS1_2 -DHAS_NO_SI_
UDEV -DFREEBSDV
On Sun, 21 Aug 2005 07:32:59 +
Pat Maddox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I ran rkhunter and got this warning:
> lsof: WARNING: compiled for FreeBSD release 5.4-RELEASE; this is
> 5.4-RELEASE-p6.
>
> I'm guessing what it means is that when I upgraded the base system
It never fails that when I work on something for an hour, and can't
figure it out so I post to the list..I figure it out two minutes
later.
I thought lsof was part of the base system, turns out it's a port.
(brain dead)
On 8/21/05, Pat Maddox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I r
I ran rkhunter and got this warning:
lsof: WARNING: compiled for FreeBSD release 5.4-RELEASE; this is 5.4-RELEASE-p6.
I'm guessing what it means is that when I upgraded the base system
that lsof wasn't rebuilt along with it? Is that going to cause a
problem at all? How do I rebuild it
I am attempting to use netstat to gain the current amount of
bandwidth used by a user. I have devised a way to use lsof to find the IP
addresses assigned per each user process and add the bandwidth up in
netstat, but if more than 1 user is using that IP address they will all be
noted for
On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 04:01:13PM +0100, Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
> I installed the BIND daemon as chroot to /chroot/mamed,
> does the following lsof output show that named is not chroot'ed?
>
> FreeBSD 4.6.2, BIND 9.2.1
>
> syslogd80root4u unix 0xca5d0e0
I installed the BIND daemon as chroot to /chroot/mamed,
does the following lsof output show that named is not chroot'ed?
FreeBSD 4.6.2, BIND 9.2.1
syslogd80root4u unix 0xca5d0e000t0
/chroot/named/dev/log
named 470 named cwd VDIR 13,131072512
On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 11:47:01PM -0700, Firsto Lasto wrote:
> I am running 4.6.2, and I am trying to install `lsof` from the ports tree.
> The port attempts to download:
>
> lsof_4.64G.freebsd.tar.gz
You should have a look for
[/usr/ports/sysutils/lsof] edwin@k7>ma
update your ports tree and try again. you should be fetching
lsof-4.6.4.tar.gz.
-Adam
>> (10.07.2002 @ 2347 PST): Firsto Lasto said, in 1.0K: <<
>
> Hi,
>
> I am running 4.6.2, and I am trying to install `lsof` from the ports tree.
> Th
Hi,
I am running 4.6.2, and I am trying to install `lsof` from the ports tree.
The port attempts to download:
lsof_4.64G.freebsd.tar.gz
If you go to the lsof ftp site and the mirrors, this file does not exist.
Further, if you go to ftp.freebsd.org and go to ports/distfiles, it also
does
Len Conrad wrote:
>
>> I don't know what I did differently but when I tried it just now, I see
>>
>> >> Attempting to fetch from
>> ftp://vic.cc.purdue.edu/pub/tools/unix/lsof/NEW/.
>> Receiving lsof_4.65B.freebsd.tar.gz (509943 bytes): 100%
>&g
>I don't know what I did differently but when I tried it just now, I see
>
> >> Attempting to fetch from ftp://vic.cc.purdue.edu/pub/tools/unix/lsof/NEW/.
>Receiving lsof_4.65B.freebsd.tar.gz (509943 bytes): 100%
>509943 bytes transferred in 17.6 seconds (28.29 kBps)
Ivailo Tanusheff wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It seems lsof port is broken, e.g. can't download the file needed for
> update:
>
>
>>>lsof_4.65B.freebsd.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist in
>>>
> /usr/ports/distfiles/.
>
>>>Attempting to fetch fro
Hi,
It seems lsof port is broken, e.g. can't download the file needed for
update:
>> lsof_4.65B.freebsd.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist in
/usr/ports/distfiles/.
>> Attempting to fetch from
ftp://vic.cc.purdue.edu/pub/tools/unix/lsof/.
fetch: lsof_4.65B.freebsd.tar.gz: Not l
53 matches
Mail list logo
