On Thu, 23 May 2013 20:09:35 +0200
Matthias Apitz articulated:
> M$ has Linux Skype 4.2 for some Linux distributions, for example for
> F16; would it be possible to run one of these distributions on top of
> linux_base-c6? Is there any work in progress I could support?
> I have enoug
David Demelier gmail.com> writes:
> ...
> Do you have linux emulation enabled? Such as linux_enable="YES" in your
> /etc/rc.conf
>
> Cheers,
> David
Yes, indeed, that was the cause. Thanks.
jb
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http:
On 01/01/2013 13:52, jb wrote:
===>>> Port directory: /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-f10
===>>> This port is marked IGNORE
===>>> linuxulator is not (kld)loaded
It is said there :
===>>> Port directory: /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-f10
Hi,
# portmaster /usr/ports/www/nspluginwrapper
...
===>>> www/nspluginwrapper >> accessibility/linux-f10-atk >>
emulators/linux_base-f10 (2/2)
===>>> Port directory: /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-f10
===>>> This port is marked IGNORE
On Mon, 7 Sep 2009 07:29:32 -0400 Jerry wrote:
> I presently have linux_base-fc-4_14 installed on a FreeBSD-7.2 machine.
> Would there be any benefit installing linux_base-f10-10_1 instead? I
If it works for you, don't touch it. ;-)
As for benefits:
. use supported linux distribu
I presently have linux_base-fc-4_14 installed on a FreeBSD-7.2 machine.
Would there be any benefit installing linux_base-f10-10_1 instead? I
believe I have to remove the linux_base-fc-4_14 installation first. Are
there any pitfalls, etc? I assume I would have to rebuild any ports
that depended on
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 15:54:05 +0400 Jeff Laine wrote:
> I've unpacked my apps under /compat/linux tree but my binary requires
> shared X libraries:
> >nsdexec: error while loading shared libraries: libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0: cannot
> > open shared object file: No such file or directory
This library
On Fri,28-08-2009 [14:57:04], Boris Samorodov wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 13:06:28 +0400 Jeff Laine wrote:
>
> > I've just installed the emulators/linux_base-f10 port in order to run some
> > rpm-based applications.
> > Various online manuals told me that one shou
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 13:06:28 +0400 Jeff Laine wrote:
> I've just installed the emulators/linux_base-f10 port in order to run some
> rpm-based applications.
> Various online manuals told me that one should not use the native freebsd rpm
> binary (archivers/rpm), but instead use
Hello,
I've just installed the emulators/linux_base-f10 port in order to run some
rpm-based applications.
Various online manuals told me that one should not use the native freebsd rpm
binary (archivers/rpm), but instead use the /compat/linux/bin/rpm. But there's
no such rpm bi
On Saturday 25 July 2009 23:25:41 per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
> Boris Samorodov wrote:
> > PJ writes:
> > > I already had f8 installed as well as fc-4
> >
> > That's wrong. Two linux_base ports should not be installed
> > at a system ...
>
> Might
Boris Samorodov wrote:
> PJ writes:
> > I already had f8 installed as well as fc-4
> That's wrong. Two linux_base ports should not be installed
> at a system ...
Might it be advisable for each new linux_base port to declare
itself incompatible with all earlier ones, to
Hello,all!
The problem is as follows.
A couple of days ago I did transition from linux_base-fc4 (default
linux support module) to linux_base-fc6. The purpose was to install
skype, which rquires at least linux_base-fc6 support. Along with this
I completely reinstalled ("pkg_delete"
On Tue, 05 May 2009 22:07:48 -0500 Adam Vande More wrote:
> If you intend on using f8, you'll want entries like this in /etc/make.conf
> USE_LINUX_BASE_PORT=f8
> USE_LINUX_NONBASE_PORTS=f8
> OVERRIDE_LINUX_BASE_PORT=f8
> OVERRIDE_LINUX_NONBASE_PORTS=f8
Actually, only the last two hav to be defin
>
Wow, thanks for very fast reply. I understood that I was still missing some
variables in my make.conf
as you stated above.
Btw I just reconfirmed for sure only:
This means, if I installed linux_base-fc8 correctly, when I install
net/skype, this port 'must'
retrieve rpm files etc from
vuthecuong wrote:
Hi all
I just did a clean install of freebsd 7.2 final release (I not enable linux
compatibility during install).
In first boot, I enabled linux compatibilitty with linux_base-fc8 as below:
Add linux_enable=”YES” to /etc/rc.conf.
Add
Hi all
I just did a clean install of freebsd 7.2 final release (I not enable linux
compatibility during install).
In first boot, I enabled linux compatibilitty with linux_base-fc8 as below:
Add linux_enable=”YES” to /etc/rc.conf.
Add compat.linux.osrelease
this error:
===> linux-f8-xorg-libs-7.3 the port should be used with
linux_base-f8, please read /usr/ports/UPDATING.
There was an error at /usr/ports/UPDATING, I committed a fix two
hours ago. You should define at /etc/make.conf variables:
OVERRIDE_LINUX_BASE_PORT
receive this error:
>
> ===> linux-f8-xorg-libs-7.3 the port should be used with linux_base-f8,
> please read /usr/ports/UPDATING.
^^^
> *** Error code 1
>
> Stop in /usr/ports/x11/linux-f8-xorg-libs.
>
>
> Package /usr/ports/emulators
eive this error:
> ===> linux-f8-xorg-libs-7.3 the port should be used with
> linux_base-f8, please read /usr/ports/UPDATING.
There was an error at /usr/ports/UPDATING, I committed a fix two
hours ago. You should define at /etc/make.conf variables:
OVERRIDE_LINUX_BASE_PORT=f8
OVERRID
ith linux_base-f8,
please read /usr/ports/UPDATING.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/ports/x11/linux-f8-xorg-libs.
Package /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-f8 is already installed, up to
date and Linux kernel module is also running and showing up when doing
kldstat adjacent with linprocfs and linsy
On Thu, 18 Dec 2008 22:43:22 +1000 Da Rock wrote:
> If this is the case, what is the difference between the ports?
Well, just what they are: ports for Fedora Core 6, Fedora 7 and
Fedora 8.
> Do the libraries change?
Sure, some libraries changes did occure. At least minor versions
were. A more d
On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 19:03:45 -0800 Chris wrote:
> I just updated ports and have the following shown
> linux_base-f7
> linux_base-f8
I'd use this one if you cat't use linux_base-fc4. AFAIC this port has a
fixed libc which works better with linuxulator. Please read
/usr/port
or newer or Fam – 2.7.0 or newer
> > Glibc – 2.5-3 or newer, or Libc6 – 2.5-3 or newer
> > Libgcc – 4.2.1 or newer
> > Libstdc++ - 4.2.1 or newer
> >
> > Which of the linux_base* ports would be best to
> > attempt to run these two daemons.
> >
> > I ju
8
Mandriva
OpenSuSE 10.2 / 10.3
Ubuntu 6.06 / 7.04 / 7.10 / 8.0
Here are the components needed.
Gamin - 0.1.7.7 or newer or Fam – 2.7.0 or newer
Glibc – 2.5-3 or newer, or Libc6 – 2.5-3 or newer
Libgcc – 4.2.1 or newer
Libstdc++ - 4.2.1 or newer
Which of the linux_base* ports would be best to
attempt to
ra 6 / 7 / 8
> Mandriva
> OpenSuSE 10.2 / 10.3
> Ubuntu 6.06 / 7.04 / 7.10 / 8.0
>
> Here are the components needed.
>
> Gamin - 0.1.7.7 or newer or Fam – 2.7.0 or newer
> Glibc – 2.5-3 or newer, or Libc6 – 2.5-3 or newer
> Libgcc – 4.2.1 or newer
> Libstdc++ - 4.2.1 or newe
- 0.1.7.7 or newer or Fam – 2.7.0 or newer
Glibc – 2.5-3 or newer, or Libc6 – 2.5-3 or newer
Libgcc – 4.2.1 or newer
Libstdc++ - 4.2.1 or newer
Which of the linux_base* ports would be best to
attempt to run these two daemons.
I just updated ports and have the following shown
linux_base-f7
lin
On Tue, 21 Oct 2008 18:19:31 -0400 matt donovan wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 1:28 PM, Boris Samorodov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, 21 Oct 2008 14:49:01 -0200 luizbcampos wrote:
> >
> > > After I had tried to download linux_base-fc4 I got file
> &g
On Tuesday 21 October 2008, luizbcampos wrote:
> After I had tried to download linux_base-fc4 I got file
> unavailable not found no access...I need to put my printer to work!
> What`s the matter?
Please read http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/128160
Yo
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 1:28 PM, Boris Samorodov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Oct 2008 14:49:01 -0200 luizbcampos wrote:
>
> > After I had tried to download linux_base-fc4 I got file
> > unavailable not found no access...I need to put my printer to work
On Tue, 21 Oct 2008 14:49:01 -0200 luizbcampos wrote:
> After I had tried to download linux_base-fc4 I got file
> unavailable not found no access...I need to put my printer to work!
You may try to use packages:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/packages-usin
After I had tried to download linux_base-fc4 I got file
unavailable not found no access...I need to put my printer to work!
What`s the matter?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
is "just install any linux application you need from
>> ports/packages and the ports infrastructure will DTRT". ;-)
>
> matlab isn't in the ports collection.
Yes. There is a PR about new port Matlab7 though.
>> > linux_base-f7/
>> > linux_base-f8/
&g
gt; ports/packages and the ports infrastructure will DTRT". ;-)
matlab isn't in the ports collection.
> > linux_base-f7/
> > linux_base-f8/
> > linux_base-fc4/
> > linux_base-fc6/
> > linux_base-gentoo-stage1/
> > linux_base-gentoo-stage2/
> > linux_base-g
Steve Kargl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Which linux base port is recommended for FreeBSD-current on amd64?
Well, the answer is "just install any linux application you need from
ports/packages and the ports infrastructure will DTRT". ;-)
> linux_base-f7/
> linux_
Which linux base port is recommended for FreeBSD-current on amd64?
linux_base-f7/
linux_base-f8/
linux_base-fc4/
linux_base-fc6/
linux_base-gentoo-stage1/
linux_base-gentoo-stage2/
linux_base-gentoo-stage3/
I currently have fc4 installed, but have run into some pthread
problems.
--
Steve
P.Moulin wrote:
Hi there.
I recently added linux_base-fc4 on a host, to run linux
setiathome enhanced versions (aka crunchers).
The problem is that on multicore engines (core 2 duo, pentium D, etc...)
where before there was 2 freebsd-crunchers on 2 differents core,
now, with linux-crunchers
Hi there.
I recently added linux_base-fc4 on a host, to run linux
setiathome enhanced versions (aka crunchers).
The problem is that on multicore engines (core 2 duo, pentium D, etc...)
where before there was 2 freebsd-crunchers on 2 differents core,
now, with linux-crunchers, the 2 crunchers
On Mon, 1 Oct 2007 13:33:44 -0300 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi, everybody! My box runs FreeBSD-6.1-R amd64 and I need to print an
> important doc; its driver when uncompressed features i386.rpm files and
Did you mean a printer's driver?
> linux_base-fc4 is not at /usr/p
Hi, everybody! My box runs FreeBSD-6.1-R amd64 and I need to print an
important doc; its driver when uncompressed features i386.rpm files and
linux_base-fc4 is not at /usr/ports/emulators..
What should I do? Shall I have to update all the OS in order to setup
"linux_base-fc4 or sh
Hi, since updating linux_base from RH to linux_base-fc-4_9, I'm getting the
following error when I run matlab:
Warning: Unable to load Java Runtime Environment:
/usr/local/matlab/sys/java/jre/glnx86/jre/lib/i386/native_threads/libjava.so:
symbol __libc_wait, version GLIBC_2.0 not defin
On Fri, 9 Feb 2007 15:58:39 +0100, Divacky Roman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> just out of curiousity - what do you mean by "better then the recommended
> fc4" ? what problems disappear with you switch to gentoo base?
Well, the short answer is that with the Gentoo base, some of the proprietary
ap
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 05:22:31PM -0600, Kirk Strauser wrote:
> I'm using linux_base-gentoo-stage3-2006.0_2 for my 6.2-RELEASE system's Linux
> emulation. It works perfectly for my Linux apps - better than the recommend
> linux_base-fc4 port, in fact - but has a strange p
I'm using linux_base-gentoo-stage3-2006.0_2 for my 6.2-RELEASE system's Linux
emulation. It works perfectly for my Linux apps - better than the recommend
linux_base-fc4 port, in fact - but has a strange problem. Whenever I install
new software using Gentoo's "emerge&
Moving the thread to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 14:43:59 -0400 stan wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 30, 2006 at 05:51:38PM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote:
> > On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 08:56:53 -0400 stan wrote:
> > > The handbook says that I need to install the emulators/linux_base po
On Sat, Sep 30, 2006 at 05:51:38PM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 08:56:53 -0400 stan wrote:
> > The handbook says that I need to install the emulators/linux_base port in
> > order to install
> > Oracle. But when I try to install this port, it says
On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 08:56:53 -0400 stan wrote:
> The handbook says that I need to install the emulators/linux_base port in
> order to install
> Oracle. But when I try to install this port, it says that it is depricated.
> What ports do I need to install in order to install Oracle on
The handbook says that I need to install the emulators/linux_base port in order
to install
Oracle. But when I try to install this port, it says that it is depricated.
What ports do I need to install in order to install Oracle on FreeBSD 6.x
on an AMD64 architecture machine?
--
Unix is very
On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 19:24:46 +0300 Adrian Vraciu wrote:
> ===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found
> ===> Extracting for linux_base-fc-4_9
> ===> linux_base-fc-4_9 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/rpm2cpio - found
> error reading header from package
> /usr/bi
===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found
===> Extracting for linux_base-fc-4_9
===> linux_base-fc-4_9 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/rpm2cpio - found
error reading header from package
/usr/bin/cpio: premature end of archive
*** Error code 1
how can i fix that?
--
Bes
Hi there.
I recently upgraded my server to FreeBSD 6.1 but cannot for the life of
me get the linux_base emulator installed. All attempts to fetch the
required files fail for some reason.
-START-
# cd /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-fc4
# make install clean
===> Vulnerability ch
On Thu, 13 Jul 2006 21:18:57 +0300 Petre Bandac wrote:
> after a cvsup, portupgrading acroread gives me the following:
> ######
> linux_base-fc-4_6 conflicts with installed package(s):
> linux_base-8-8.0_15
> They install files into the same place.
> Please remo
On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 09:18:57PM +0300, Petre Bandac wrote:
> hallo
>
> after a cvsup, portupgrading acroread gives me the following:
>
> ##
> linux_base-fc-4_6 conflicts with installed package(s):
> linux_base-8-8.0_15
>
> They install files into the
hallo
after a cvsup, portupgrading acroread gives me the following:
##
linux_base-fc-4_6 conflicts with installed package(s):
linux_base-8-8.0_15
They install files into the same place.
Please remove them first with pkg_delete(1).
##
and
kgb# pkg_info linux_base-8-8.0_15
On 6/21/06, Ion-Mihai IOnut Tetcu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 13:32:04 +0200
Martin Wilke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 14:47:59 +0400
> Boris Samorodov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Do you have some non-default settings that results in seaching /usr
> >
On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 13:32:04 +0200
Martin Wilke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 14:47:59 +0400
> Boris Samorodov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Do you have some non-default settings that results in seaching /usr
> > before /compat/linux (ex. LD_LIBRARY_PATH) or so?
> >
> > And
On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 14:47:59 +0400
Boris Samorodov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do you have some non-default settings that results in seaching /usr
> before /compat/linux (ex. LD_LIBRARY_PATH) or so?
>
> And, please, show your:
> $ ldd `which skype_bin`
hi Boris,
thx you solved :)
Martin
___
On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 12:13:50 +0200 Martin Wilke wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 12:53:56 +0300
> Ion-Mihai "IOnut" Tetcu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 11:51:27 +0200
> > Martin Wilke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > someone has the same problems with skype after the update
On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 11:51:27 +0200 Martin Wilke wrote:
> someone has the same problems with skype after the update ?
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~% skype
> skype_bin: error while loading shared
> libraries: /usr/lib/libpthread.so.0: ELF file OS ABI invalid
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~%
Do you have some non-de
On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 12:13:50 +0200
Martin Wilke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 12:53:56 +0300
> Ion-Mihai "IOnut" Tetcu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 11:51:27 +0200
> > Martin Wilke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi forks,
> > >
> > >
> > > someo
On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 12:53:56 +0300
Ion-Mihai "IOnut" Tetcu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 11:51:27 +0200
> Martin Wilke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi forks,
> >
> >
> > someone has the same problems with skype after the update ?
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~% skype
> > s
Hi forks,
someone has the same problems with skype after the update ?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~% skype
skype_bin: error while loading shared
libraries: /usr/lib/libpthread.so.0: ELF file OS ABI invalid
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~%
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 11:51:27 +0200
Martin Wilke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi forks,
>
>
> someone has the same problems with skype after the update ?
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~% skype
> skype_bin: error while loading shared
> libraries: /usr/lib/libpthread.so.0: ELF file OS ABI invalid
> [EMAI
Hi forks,
someone has the same problems with skype after the update ?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~% skype
skype_bin: error while loading shared
libraries: /usr/lib/libpthread.so.0: ELF file OS ABI invalid
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~%
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 17:11:33 +0400
Boris Samorodov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 14:54:09 +0200 Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> > Quoting Boris Samorodov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Tue, 20 Jun 2006 15:07:48
> > +0400):
> > > On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 13:33:48 +0300 Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 14:54:09 +0200 Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> Quoting Boris Samorodov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Tue, 20 Jun 2006 15:07:48
> +0400):
> > On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 13:33:48 +0300 Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 13:33:06 +0300
> >> Ion-Mihai "IOnut" Tetcu <[EMAIL PROTE
Quoting Boris Samorodov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Tue, 20 Jun 2006 15:07:48
+0400):
On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 13:33:48 +0300 Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 13:33:06 +0300
Ion-Mihai "IOnut" Tetcu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 14:09:31 +0400
> Boris Samorodov <[EMAIL
Hi Guys,
sorry for top-posting, but I don't really know where to add this:
I still have problems with acroread7, even after the update to
linux_base-fc-4_2 and linux-xorg-libs-6.8.2_4:
/usr/X11R6/Adobe/Acrobat7.0/ENU/Reader/intellinux/bin/acroread: error
while loading shared libraries: /us
On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 13:33:48 +0300 Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 13:33:06 +0300
> Ion-Mihai "IOnut" Tetcu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 14:09:31 +0400
> > Boris Samorodov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 12:23:19 +0300 Ion-Mihai "IOnut"
On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 13:33:06 +0300
Ion-Mihai "IOnut" Tetcu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 14:09:31 +0400
> Boris Samorodov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 12:23:19 +0300 Ion-Mihai "IOnut" Tetcu wrote:
> >
> > > /me whispers 'cvs diff -uN' and misc/tinderbox
On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 13:33:06 +0300 Ion-Mihai "IOnut" Tetcu wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 14:09:31 +0400
> Boris Samorodov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 12:23:19 +0300 Ion-Mihai "IOnut" Tetcu wrote:
> >
> > > /me whispers 'cvs diff -uN' and misc/tinderbox :)
> >
> > > Or send
On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 14:09:31 +0400
Boris Samorodov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 12:23:19 +0300 Ion-Mihai "IOnut" Tetcu wrote:
>
> > /me whispers 'cvs diff -uN' and misc/tinderbox :)
>
> > Or send it over andI'll run a test on one of my tindyes.
>
> Here it is.
Looks OK:
htt
On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 13:14:43 +0300 Adi Pircalabu wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 14:09:31 +0400 Boris Samorodov wrote:
> > diff -u -r1.4 pkg-plist
> > --- pkg-plist 2 Jun 2006 20:50:32 - 1.4
> > +++ pkg-plist 19 Jun 2006 10:39:14 -
> > @@ -598,6 +598,10 @@
> > usr/lib/libst
On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 14:09:31 +0400 Boris Samorodov wrote:
> diff -u -r1.4 pkg-plist
> --- pkg-plist 2 Jun 2006 20:50:32 - 1.4
> +++ pkg-plist 19 Jun 2006 10:39:14 -
> @@ -598,6 +598,10 @@
> usr/lib/libstdc++.so.5.0.7
> usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6
> usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6.0.7
> +usr/lib
www.ipt.ru
Telephone & Internet Service Provider
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /home/ncvs/ports/emulators/linux_base-fc4/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -r1.7 Makefile
--- Makefile 10 Jun 2006 13:35:52 - 1.7
+++
rcalabu wrote:
> > > On Sun, 18 Jun 2006 19:43:16 -0600 Jeff Molofee wrote:
> > >
> > > > After upgrading to linux_base-fc4, I've noticed a lot of
> > > > applications and games that will no longer run. One of the games is
> > > > HoH. I re
On Mon, 19 Jun 2006 19:15:42 +0300 Adi Pircalabu wrote:
> (Really cc-ed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and Boris Samodorov a.k.a
> [EMAIL PROTECTED])
> On Mon, 19 Jun 2006 18:41:10 +0300 Adi Pircalabu wrote:
> > On Sun, 18 Jun 2006 19:43:16 -0600 Jeff Molofee wrote:
> >
> > >
(Really cc-ed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and Boris Samodorov a.k.a
[EMAIL PROTECTED])
On Mon, 19 Jun 2006 18:41:10 +0300 Adi Pircalabu wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Jun 2006 19:43:16 -0600 Jeff Molofee wrote:
>
> > After upgrading to linux_base-fc4, I've noticed a lot of
> > applications
(Cc-ed to freebsd-ports@, sorry if anyone's affected by cross-posting)
On Sun, 18 Jun 2006 19:43:16 -0600 Jeff Molofee wrote:
> After upgrading to linux_base-fc4, I've noticed a lot of applications
> and games that will no longer run. One of the games is HoH. I receive
>
Jeff Molofee wrote:
> After upgrading to linux_base-fc4, I've noticed a lot of applications and
> games that will no longer run. One of the games is HoH. I receive the
> following error when trying to run it... does anyone know how to fix this?
>
> ./HoH: error while load
After upgrading to linux_base-fc4, I've noticed a lot of applications
and games that will no longer run. One of the games is HoH. I receive
the following error when trying to run it... does anyone know how to fix
this?
./HoH: error while loading shared libraries: libstdc++-libc6.2-2
On 1/30/06, Joel Hatton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to try a linux binary application (Arkeia backup server) under
> FreeBSD R6, so naturally this means linux compatibility, but I'm a little
> confused - until today I presumed that only one '
Hi,
I'd like to try a linux binary application (Arkeia backup server) under
FreeBSD R6, so naturally this means linux compatibility, but I'm a little
confused - until today I presumed that only one 'linux_base' port existed.
A brief inspection of the Makefile for linux_base s
"Anthony M. Agelastos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello everyone,
>
> Several hours ago, I tried to upgrade linux_base-8 on my 6.0-STABLE
> box and it ran into many fetch problems, which can be seen below.
> Prior to this upgrading, I upgraded xorg without
Hello everyone,
Several hours ago, I tried to upgrade linux_base-8 on my 6.0-STABLE
box and it ran into many fetch problems, which can be seen below.
Prior to this upgrading, I upgraded xorg without problems and after
the failed troubleshooting, I had the machine install Firefox and it
Leslie Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've installed the linux_base but later found out that I needed the
> linux_base-8. I did a make deinstall for the linux_base and then I
> tried to install the linux_base-8.
>
> cd /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base
Hi
I've installed the linux_base but later found out that I needed the
linux_base-8. I did a make deinstall for the linux_base and then I tried
to install the linux_base-8.
cd /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-8
make install clean
===> Installing for linux_base-8-8.0_10
===>
On Sunday 31 July 2005 17:25, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> installing linux_base and get error:
> /===> linux_base-rh-7.3 depends on executable: rpm - found
> Linux mode is not enabled.
> Loading linux kernel module now...
> kldload: can't load linux: Exec format error
&g
installing linux_base and get error:
/===> linux_base-rh-7.3 depends on executable: rpm - found
Linux mode is not enabled.
Loading linux kernel module now...
kldload: can't load linux: Exec format error
The linux kernel module could not be loaded.
Please enable linux mode manually a
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 11:27:14 +0300, roma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> At me the same problem as at you, whether was possible to you to solve it?
>
[Paste from other thread]
>
> I came across a post you made regarding the following erros on the CS source
> with freebsd 4.9
>
> Illegal in
Hi,
At me the same problem as at you, whether was possible to you to solve it?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
>
> I came across a post you made regarding the following erros on the CS source
> with freebsd 4.9
>
> Illegal instruction (core dumped)
>
> cat: hlds.12893.pid: No such file or directory
>
> Deprecated bfd_read called at
> /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/gdb/../../../../contrib/gdb/gdb/dwarf2re
On 02/25/05 10:53:03, Viren Patel wrote:
===> linux_base-rh-7.3 depends on executable: rpm - found
LC_ALL=C rpm --initdb --root
/usr/ports/emulators/linux_base/work/linux_base-rh-7.3
--dbpath /var/lib/rpm
kern.fallback_elf_brand: -1
sysctl: kern.fallback_elf_brand: Operation not permitted
Hello. I am trying to install linux_base inside a jail and
it fails with the following:
#make
===> Extracting for linux_base-rh-7.3
=> Checksum OK for
rpm/rh-7.3/glibc-common-2.2.5-44.legacy.3.i386.rpm.
=> Checksum OK for
rpm/rh-7.3/glibc-2.2.5-44.legacy.3.i386.rpm.
=> Checksum OK fo
Derrick Ryalls,
I came across a post you made regarding the following erros on the CS source
with freebsd 4.9
Illegal instruction (core dumped)
cat: hlds.12893.pid: No such file or directory
Deprecated bfd_read called at
/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/gdb/../../../../contrib/gdb/gdb/dwarf2
I keep running into problems of the sort
host# /compat/linux/lib/ld-linux.so.2
/compat/linux/lib/ld-2.3.4.so: Exec format error. Binary file not
executable.
host#
Apparently under linux that will work (here is from a gentoo box I have
access to)
bash-2.05b# /lib/ld-linux.so.2
Usage: ld.so [OPTI
Not to long ago I upgraded to linux_base-rh-9 so I'd have the latest
libraries. Not any time a package that depends on linux_base is
upgraded or installed, all my dependecies are pointed to linux_base-8-*
and I have to run pkgdb -F to fix them. Is there some variable I can
set to avoid
> > and jdk14 via NFS mounts from a bigger server.
> >
> > I'm down to trying to get the specific version of linux_base that
> > it wants(and I already have the linux kld loaded and linprocfs
> > mounted). I have rpc.statd and rpc.lockd running on both systems.
>
to trying to get the specific version of linux_base that
> it wants(and I already have the linux kld loaded and linprocfs
> mounted). I have rpc.statd and rpc.lockd running on both systems.
What version of FreeBSD are you running? AFAIK, rpc.lockd in 4.x
only handles s
I don't have enough storage on my laptop for the entire ports tree
(surprise, surprise), so I'm trying to "make install" acroread
and jdk14 via NFS mounts from a bigger server.
I'm down to trying to get the specific version of linux_base that
it wants(and I already have
1 - 100 of 162 matches
Mail list logo
