Re: libxul compilation problem

2010-10-18 Thread Robert Bonomi
> Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 08:28:15 +0200 > From: Fernando_Apesteguia > Subject: Re: libxul compilation problem > > > I still refuse to think 1GB is low ;) though I could be wrong. One gig of RAM is not the problem. 1.25 gig total of VM _is_. I have some stuff I run on an *

Re: libxul compilation problem

2010-10-17 Thread Fernando Apesteguía
2010/10/17 Rob Farmer : > 2010/10/17 Fernando Apesteguía : >> The machine has one single core cpu. Finally I was able to compile the >> thing, compiling >> the offending file by hand (nsHtml5ElementName.cpp) without the -O2 >> optimization flag. >> With this flag, cc1plus eats up all the memory of

Re: libxul compilation problem

2010-10-17 Thread Fernando Apesteguía
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 7:55 PM, Robert Bonomi wrote: >> From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org  Sun Oct 17 11:46:48 2010 >> Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 18:47:09 +0200 >> From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fernando_Apestegu=EDa?= >> To: Rob Farmer >> Cc: User Questions >

Re: libxul compilation problem

2010-10-17 Thread Rob Farmer
2010/10/17 Fernando Apesteguía : > The machine has one single core cpu. Finally I was able to compile the > thing, compiling > the offending file by hand (nsHtml5ElementName.cpp) without the -O2 > optimization flag. > With this flag, cc1plus eats up all the memory of my system in a few > seconds. W

Re: libxul compilation problem

2010-10-17 Thread Robert Bonomi
> From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Sun Oct 17 11:46:48 2010 > Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 18:47:09 +0200 > From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fernando_Apestegu=EDa?= > To: Rob Farmer > Cc: User Questions > Subject: Re: libxul compilation problem > > 2010/10/16 Rob Farmer :

Re: libxul compilation problem

2010-10-17 Thread Fernando Apesteguía
2010/10/16 Rob Farmer : > 2010/10/16 Fernando Apesteguía : >> I didn't run X or whatsoever. That's why I think I should have enough memory. >> In fact after getting that error, I rebooted so I could update the >> ports from a "fresh" >> running system (nothing cached or so). But even in that case,

Re: libxul compilation problem

2010-10-16 Thread Rob Farmer
2010/10/16 Fernando Apesteguía : > I didn't run X or whatsoever. That's why I think I should have enough memory. > In fact after getting that error, I rebooted so I could update the > ports from a "fresh" > running system (nothing cached or so). But even in that case, I'm getting the > same error.

Re: libxul compilation problem

2010-10-16 Thread Fernando Apesteguía
2010/10/15 Rob Farmer : > 2010/10/15 Fernando Apesteguía : >> The process being killed is cc1plus while compiling libxul. I'm >> running a stock 8.1-RELEASE GENERIC kernel on amd64 platform. >> The machine has 1Gb of physical memory and 256MB for swap (I have had >> this setup for quite a long time

Re: libxul compilation problem

2010-10-15 Thread Rob Farmer
2010/10/15 Fernando Apesteguía : > The process being killed is cc1plus while compiling libxul. I'm > running a stock 8.1-RELEASE GENERIC kernel on amd64 platform. > The machine has 1Gb of physical memory and 256MB for swap (I have had > this setup for quite a long time and have always kept > my sys

libxul compilation problem

2010-10-15 Thread Fernando Apesteguía
Hi, I have a ports version fetched on Oct 13th. I wanted to update all the ports I have installed. In order to do that I run: swap_pager_getswapspace(16): failed swap_pager_getswapspace(12): failed swap_pager_getswapspace(16): failed swap_pager_getswapspace(12): failed swap_pager_getswapspace(16)