from Ewald Jenisch :
> I'm trying to get my system up2date using portupgrade as usual.
> However during the upgrade process I ran into a problem during upgrade
> of yelp:
> ===> yelp-2.30.2_4 depends on package: libxul<2 - not found
> ===> Found libxul-10.0.1
from Ewald Jenisch :
> I'm trying to get my system up2date using portupgrade as usual.
> However during the upgrade process I ran into a problem during upgrade
> of yelp:
> ===> yelp-2.30.2_4 depends on package: libxul<2 - not found
> ===> Found libxul-10.0.1
Hi,
I'm trying to get my system up2date using portupgrade as usual.
However during the upgrade process I ran into a problem during upgrade
of yelp:
===> yelp-2.30.2_4 depends on package: libxul<2 - not found
===> Found libxul-10.0.10, but you need to upgrade to libxul<2.
On Sun, 19 Aug 2012, ajtiM wrote:
On Saturday 18 August 2012 21:16:09 Antonio Olivares wrote:
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 6:25 PM, ajtiM wrote:
Hi!
There are vulnerabilities in libxul-1.9.2 very long time and looks like
nothing is better. Are there a new libxul version somewhere to download
On Saturday 18 August 2012 21:16:09 Antonio Olivares wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 6:25 PM, ajtiM wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > There are vulnerabilities in libxul-1.9.2 very long time and looks like
> > nothing is better. Are there a new libxul version somewh
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 6:25 PM, ajtiM wrote:
> Hi!
>
> There are vulnerabilities in libxul-1.9.2 very long time and looks like
> nothing is better. Are there a new libxul version somewhere to download,
> please?
>
>
>
> portaudit -Fda
> auditfile.tbz
Hi!
There are vulnerabilities in libxul-1.9.2 very long time and looks like
nothing is better. Are there a new libxul version somewhere to download,
please?
portaudit -Fda
auditfile.tbz 100% of 79 kB 316 kBps
New database installed.
Database created: Sat
Thu, 12 Jul 2012 kirjutas Jan Beich :
I've seen other people confused by this harmless warning.
OMG. All this time the build was actually successful and all I should
have done was 'make install', which I did just now and of course it
worked. I just assumed that if the last line in build o
Hello!
It seems I can't build www/libxul from a freshly updated ports tree on
my 9.0-STABLE amd64 system. No matter how I try, the build ends with
sed: /usr/ports/www/libxul/work/mozilla-1.9.2/build/unix/*.pc: No such
file or directory.
I have commented out entire /etc/make.conf e
During a ports upgrade, I had an upgrade from libxul also.
this took quite a long time to build and used lots of CPU power and made
response time slow ...
just for curiosity, I checked
# pkg_info | grep libxul
libxul-1.9.2.27 Mozilla runtime package that can be used to bootstrap
XUL+X
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 09:28:40PM +0200, Beat G?tzi wrote:
> On Oct 22, 2011, at 2:54 AM, Joe Altman wrote:
> > Greetings...
> >
> > I was running portupgrade on libxul and noticed it depends on Firefox
> > 3.x. I cancelled the upgrade, because I thought FF3.x was
On Oct 22, 2011, at 2:54 AM, Joe Altman wrote:
> Greetings...
>
> I was running portupgrade on libxul and noticed it depends on Firefox
> 3.x. I cancelled the upgrade, because I thought FF3.x was insecure and
> therefore deprecated while FF7 was recommended and secure.
>
>
On Sat, 22 Oct 2011 12:45:11 +0200
Polytropon articulated:
> I'm not sure if it still applies, but in earlier Firefox
> version transitions (and the consideration of dependencies)
> some programs depending on libxul would install an outdated
> Firefox version. The solution ha
On Sat, 22 Oct 2011 09:32:47 +0200, Eduardo Morras wrote:
> As far as i know, the libxul port is inside ff3. Installing libxul
> doesn't install ff3, only libxul. Perhaps it's an old libxul and the
> newr one is inside ff7, so libxul port should point there, don't know t
At 02:54 22/10/2011, Joe Altman wrote:
Greetings...
I was running portupgrade on libxul and noticed it depends on Firefox
3.x. I cancelled the upgrade, because I thought FF3.x was insecure and
therefore deprecated while FF7 was recommended and secure.
My questions:
1) is the dependency libxul
Greetings...
I was running portupgrade on libxul and noticed it depends on Firefox
3.x. I cancelled the upgrade, because I thought FF3.x was insecure and
therefore deprecated while FF7 was recommended and secure.
My questions:
1) is the dependency libxul has for FF3 a security problem?
2) is
Hello.
A week ago the portaudit alert came for mozilla products. I updated
www/firefox36 and mail/thunderbird3 ports but still no www/libxul in the
ports.
I suppose I need the 1.9.2.23 version:
http://portaudit.freebsd.org/1fade8a3-e9e8-11e0-9580-4061862b8c22.html
But I can't even f
> Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 08:28:15 +0200
> From: Fernando_Apesteguia
> Subject: Re: libxul compilation problem
>
>
> I still refuse to think 1GB is low ;) though I could be wrong.
One gig of RAM is not the problem. 1.25 gig total of VM _is_.
I have some stuff I run on an *
2010/10/17 Rob Farmer :
> 2010/10/17 Fernando Apesteguía :
>> The machine has one single core cpu. Finally I was able to compile the
>> thing, compiling
>> the offending file by hand (nsHtml5ElementName.cpp) without the -O2
>> optimization flag.
>> With this flag, cc1plus eats up all the memory of
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 7:55 PM, Robert Bonomi wrote:
>> From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Sun Oct 17 11:46:48 2010
>> Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 18:47:09 +0200
>> From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fernando_Apestegu=EDa?=
>> To: Rob Farmer
>> Cc: User Questions
>
2010/10/17 Fernando Apesteguía :
> The machine has one single core cpu. Finally I was able to compile the
> thing, compiling
> the offending file by hand (nsHtml5ElementName.cpp) without the -O2
> optimization flag.
> With this flag, cc1plus eats up all the memory of my system in a few
> seconds. W
> From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Sun Oct 17 11:46:48 2010
> Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 18:47:09 +0200
> From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fernando_Apestegu=EDa?=
> To: Rob Farmer
> Cc: User Questions
> Subject: Re: libxul compilation problem
>
> 2010/10/16 Rob Farmer :
2010/10/16 Rob Farmer :
> 2010/10/16 Fernando Apesteguía :
>> I didn't run X or whatsoever. That's why I think I should have enough memory.
>> In fact after getting that error, I rebooted so I could update the
>> ports from a "fresh"
>> running system (nothing cached or so). But even in that case,
2010/10/16 Fernando Apesteguía :
> I didn't run X or whatsoever. That's why I think I should have enough memory.
> In fact after getting that error, I rebooted so I could update the
> ports from a "fresh"
> running system (nothing cached or so). But even in that case, I'm getting the
> same error.
2010/10/15 Rob Farmer :
> 2010/10/15 Fernando Apesteguía :
>> The process being killed is cc1plus while compiling libxul. I'm
>> running a stock 8.1-RELEASE GENERIC kernel on amd64 platform.
>> The machine has 1Gb of physical memory and 256MB for swap (I have had
>
2010/10/15 Fernando Apesteguía :
> The process being killed is cc1plus while compiling libxul. I'm
> running a stock 8.1-RELEASE GENERIC kernel on amd64 platform.
> The machine has 1Gb of physical memory and 256MB for swap (I have had
> this setup for quite a long time and have
): failed
swap_pager_getswapspace(12): failed
...
...
swap_pager_getswapspace(3): failed
swap_pager_getswapspace(3): failed
The process being killed is cc1plus while compiling libxul. I'm
running a stock 8.1-RELEASE GENERIC kernel on amd64 platform.
The machine has 1Gb of physical memory and
keneasson wrote:
Can anyone help me get my system back up and running?
make.conf looks like this:
WITH_MYSQL_VER=51
APACHE_VERSION=22
OVERRIDE_LINUX_BASE_PORT=f8
WWWDIR = /web/phpmyadmin
WITH_CUPS="yes"
CUPS_OVERWRITE_BASE=true
#NO_LPR=true
USE_GECKO=libxul
^
Th
Hello,
I'm running Freebsd 8.0-Stable #9 Dec 17/09 on amd64. I'm running gnome, and at
the time i started my update i was at Gnome 2.26
I went through UPDATING and tried to switch from firefox 2 which is marked
ignore to libxul by changing WITH_GECKO=libxul removed firefox3 and
Hello,
I'm running Freebsd 8.0-Stable #9 Dec 17/09 on amd64. I'm running gnome, and at
the time i started my update i was at Gnome 2.26
I went through UPDATING and tried to switch from firefox 2 which is marked
ignore to libxul by changing WITH_GECKO=libxul removed firefox3 and
t gave an error message (xulrunner isn't an option). So, I tried
>
> "www/mplayer-plugin" => "WITH_GECKO=libxul",
>
> then:
>
> > ===> libxul-1.9.0.7_3 conflicts with installed package(s):
> > xulrunner-1.8.0.4_15
> >
> >
pkgtools.conf . Now I'm trying to portupgrade
mplayer-plugin, it also tried to build firefox 2. I tried
Do a 'make config' in graphic/librsvg2 and disable the mozilla plugin
option. It's not needed for firefox3 -- at least firefox is still happily
rendering SVG content for me --
r "xulrunner" references in pkgtools.conf with
"libxul". Then, you can:
portupgrade -f -r -o www/libxul xulrunner
--
Jonathan Chen
--
rying to portupgrade
mplayer-plugin, it also tried to build firefox 2. I tried
"www/mplayer-plugin" => "WITH_GECKO=xulrunner",
but that gave an error message (xulrunner isn't an option). So, I tried
"www/mplayer-plugin" => "WITH_GECKO=li
34 matches
Mail list logo
