On 22 June 2010 20:36, Erik Norgaard wrote:
> On 21/06/10 20.06, pete wright wrote:
>
>> On Jun 21, 2010, at 10:28 AM, Jean-Paul Natola wrote:
>>>
I'm particuclary trying to implement some type of rate control as we
are getting hammered by spam.
>>>
>> I'd humbly suggest pf + spam
On 21/06/10 20.06, pete wright wrote:
On Jun 21, 2010, at 10:28 AM, Jean-Paul Natola wrote:
I'm particuclary trying to implement some type of rate control as we are
getting hammered by spam.
I'd humbly suggest pf + spamd if you are concerned specifically about
stopping spam, both are support
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> Hi--
>
> On Jun 21, 2010, at 10:28 AM, Jean-Paul Natola wrote:
>> I'm looking for FREEBSD's equivalent of iptables
>>
>> I'm particuclary trying to implement some type of rate control as we are
>> getting hammered by spam.
>
> The three maj
Hi--
On Jun 21, 2010, at 10:28 AM, Jean-Paul Natola wrote:
> I'm looking for FREEBSD's equivalent of iptables
>
> I'm particuclary trying to implement some type of rate control as we are
> getting hammered by spam.
The three major choices available with FreeBSD are documented here:
http://w
I'm looking for FREEBSD's equivalent of iptables
I'm particuclary trying to implement some type of rate control as we are
getting hammered by spam.
Any and all help would be graetly appreciated
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http:/
