Heh,
there were too many factors as possible culprits in the system.
Glen Barber's command started to run, until I cancelled it when my
laptop battery died... :D
I'm not 100% sure what the problem was, but here's what I did...
. The PC has a msk ethernet device, which I wasn't 100% sold I'd use
Tim,
Looks like perhaps your ports tree is bad, I suggest you install the full ports
tree and try and build from source
k
- "Tim Judd" wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-03-22 at 14:00 +0800, Fbsd1 wrote:
> > Tim Judd wrote:
> > > I'm getting ZERO feedback when I install the xorg metaport,
> updated
On Sun, 2009-03-22 at 14:00 +0800, Fbsd1 wrote:
> Tim Judd wrote:
> > I'm getting ZERO feedback when I install the xorg metaport, updated
> > ports tree today.
> >
> > # cd /usr/ports/x11/xorg
> > # make install
> > #
> >
> >
> >
> > So what am i missing?
> >
> > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en
On Sunday 22 March 2009 07:04:14 Glen Barber wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 10:20 PM, Tim Judd wrote:
> > I'm getting ZERO feedback when I install the xorg metaport, updated
> > ports tree today.
> >
> > # cd /usr/ports/x11/xorg
> > # make install
> > #
> >
> >
> >
> > So what am i missing?
>
>
Tim Judd writes:
> I'm getting ZERO feedback when I install the xorg metaport, updated
> ports tree today.
>
> # cd /usr/ports/x11/xorg
> # make install
> #
Seems that you miss a "make clean" stage.
> So what am i missing?
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/handbook/x-install.html
> tells
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 10:20 PM, Tim Judd wrote:
> I'm getting ZERO feedback when I install the xorg metaport, updated
> ports tree today.
>
> # cd /usr/ports/x11/xorg
> # make install
> #
>
>
>
> So what am i missing?
>
If xorg is already installed, you won't see any output. This is
"expected"
Tim Judd wrote:
I'm getting ZERO feedback when I install the xorg metaport, updated
ports tree today.
# cd /usr/ports/x11/xorg
# make install
#
So what am i missing?
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/handbook/x-install.html
tells me to install this port.
I even deleted /var/db/pkg/* an
I'm getting ZERO feedback when I install the xorg metaport, updated
ports tree today.
# cd /usr/ports/x11/xorg
# make install
#
So what am i missing?
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/handbook/x-install.html
tells me to install this port.
I even deleted /var/db/pkg/* and /var/db/ports/* t
> I didn't think this would do much, but gave it a try anyway
> And it doesn't help. :/
I think i meant '-i' -- but I'd have to look at the patch`s interaction.
I can't recreate the problem in the 1.6.x we're running in our internal
release engineering.
1.7.x, and its associated backport,
On 02/25/2009 11:49, Brian A. Seklecki wrote:
>> lowering the umask of the person running sudo.
>>
>> This had the effect of truly screwing up many installed ports for me
>
> Maybe try "sudo -H -u root [command]" NetBSD Pkgsrc is nice in this
> respect because it has sudo(8) integration in the
> lowering the umask of the person running sudo.
>
> This had the effect of truly screwing up many installed ports for me
Maybe try "sudo -H -u root [command]" NetBSD Pkgsrc is nice in this
respect because it has sudo(8) integration in the MKs. ~BAS
signature.asc
Description: This is a digi
On 02/19/2009 15:56, Aleksandr Miroslav wrote:
> For the longest time, I have installed ports via the "sudo make install" or
> "sudo portupgrade" or "sudo portinstall" method and never had a problem.
This seems to have jumped up and bitten me on the arse as well. I
believe the "problem" lies here
For the longest time, I have installed ports via the "sudo make install" or
"sudo portupgrade" or "sudo portinstall" method and never had a problem.
Recently, as of a few weeks ago, I started noticing that ports that were
installed or upgraded were getting the wrong permissions. Not only were
dir
Matt Fioravante wrote:
> Well I was just comtemplating the idea of setting up a freebsd load at
> my workplace. They already run linux and solaris and because of bad
> decisions in the past, they mount their afs shares on /usr/local. So I
> would have to install ports in /usr or some other prefix.
Matt Fioravante writes:
> Well I was just comtemplating the idea of setting up a freebsd
> load at my workplace. They already run linux and solaris and
> because of bad decisions in the past, they mount their afs shares
> on /usr/local. So I would have to install ports in /usr or some
> othe
Eighner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 14 Nov 2007, Matt Fioravante wrote:
>
> > Would there be any negative ramifications to installing ports in /usr
> > instead of /usr/local? Like could they potentially clobber system
> > binaries and other files or is t
On Wed, 14 Nov 2007, Matt Fioravante wrote:
Would there be any negative ramifications to installing ports in /usr
instead of /usr/local? Like could they potentially clobber system
binaries and other files or is this pretty safe to do?
I know of a few name conflicts that can occur in certain
> Would there be any negative ramifications to installing ports in /usr
> instead of /usr/local? Like could they potentially clobber system
> binaries and other files or is this pretty safe to do?
More importantly, why do you want/need to do this? I personally like
the separation of
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 01:05:39PM -0500, Matt Fioravante wrote:
> Would there be any negative ramifications to installing ports in /usr
> instead of /usr/local? Like could they potentially clobber system
> binaries and other files or is this pretty safe to do?
You break the '
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 01:05:39PM -0500, Matt Fioravante wrote:
> Would there be any negative ramifications to installing ports in /usr
> instead of /usr/local? Like could they potentially clobber system
> binaries and other files or is this pretty safe to do?
It's not safe, for th
Would there be any negative ramifications to installing ports in /usr
instead of /usr/local? Like could they potentially clobber system
binaries and other files or is this pretty safe to do?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http
;
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2006 9:45 AM
Subject: Re: installing ports
> Hi Jeff,
>
> Thanks for the suggestion and yes the bandwidth manager is an etinc
> (ETR1800) box.
>
> Let me see how the portsnap goes.
>
> - Original Message -
> From: &quo
Hi Jeff,
Thanks for the suggestion and yes the bandwidth manager is an etinc
(ETR1800) box.
Let me see how the portsnap goes.
- Original Message -
From: "Jeff Palmer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, October 03, 2006 9:08 PM
Subject
You may want to try using portsnap.
pkg_add -r portsnap
then
portsnap fetch extract
BTW: This sounds like one of the etnic (sp?) bandwidth manager boxes.
Would that happen to be the case?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://li
In response to "Mbuthia Wangui" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I have a bandwidth manager running on FreeBSD 4.9 LOCAL. I want to
> install net-snmp so that traffic generated on the bwmger can be pointed
> to cacti (like mrtg). My problem is that I have gone through enough
> manuals to get assistance on w
On Oct 3, 2006, at 5:51 AM, Mbuthia Wangui wrote:
I have a bandwidth manager running on FreeBSD 4.9 LOCAL. I want to
install net-snmp so that traffic generated on the bwmger can be
pointed to cacti (like mrtg). My problem is that I have gone
through enough manuals to get assistance on which
I have a bandwidth manager running on FreeBSD 4.9 LOCAL. I want to install
net-snmp so that traffic generated on the bwmger can be pointed to cacti (like
mrtg). My problem is that I have gone through enough manuals to get assistance
on which commands I should run to install the ports hierarchy.
Brett Wiggins wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> I am having some problems installing ports when I have
>
> IPFILTER running. I have put FTP_PASSIVE_MODE=YES in /etc/make.conf
>
> but the command 'make all install clean' yields;
>
> ===> Vulnerabili
Brett Wiggins wrote:
Hi everyone,
I am having some problems installing ports when I have
IPFILTER running. I have put FTP_PASSIVE_MODE=YES in /etc/make.conf
Try putting it in /etc/login.conf
/etc #grep PASSIVE *
login.conf: :setenv=MAIL=/var/mail/$,BLOCKSIZE=K
Hi everyone,
I am having some problems installing ports when I have
IPFILTER running. I have put FTP_PASSIVE_MODE=YES in /etc/make.conf
but the command 'make all install clean' yields;
===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found
=> jce-aba-1.1.tar.gz
, 2006 11:40 PM
To: Jonathan Horne; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: method for installing ports
--- Jonathan Horne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ive read many many guides found all over the net in the past few
> days, and
> they can never seem to agree on the way a port i
--- Jonathan Horne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ive read many many guides found all over the net in the past few
> days, and
> they can never seem to agree on the way a port is installed. I see
> these
> methods:
>
> Make install
Installs a port and any needed build dependencies.
> Make insta
Jonathan Horne wrote:
Ive read many many guides found all over the net in the past few days, and
they can never seem to agree on the way a port is installed. I see these
methods:
Make install
Make install clean
Make install distclean
What is the difference between the 3, and are there legitima
Ive read many many guides found all over the net in the past few days, and
they can never seem to agree on the way a port is installed. I see these
methods:
Make install
Make install clean
Make install distclean
What is the difference between the 3, and are there legitimate times when
one is pre
as root I continually receive permission denied when attempting to veiw ports
collection.When I try to install again it says cannot find.I try using commands
in the handbook very few of which
are found by system.My version is 5.3 with total port collection(supposedly
installed,the install
sreen
(Wed, 11 May 2005 02:17:24 -0700) Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > # cd /var/db/ports
>
> # make rmconfig
>
> see the ports manpage.
Thanks a lot, to all of you.
Carsten.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.
On Wednesday 11 May 2005 04:56 am, Carsten Fuchs wrote:
> Hi,
> I have a (simple) question about installing from the ports
> coll. The 1st time I issued `make install`in
> /usr/ports/www/firefox it showed a configuration menu where I
> could select things like xfs. I disabled this xfs option. Now
>
On 2005-05-11 02:17, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 12:14:20PM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
>> By removing /var/db/ports/firefox. Running the following as root before
>> you attempt to reinstall firefox should be all it takes:
>>
>> # cd /var/db/ports
>>
On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 12:14:20PM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> By removing /var/db/ports/firefox. Running the following as root before
> you attempt to reinstall firefox should be all it takes:
>
> # cd /var/db/ports
> # rm -fr firefox
Or simpler:
# make rmconfig
see the por
On 2005-05-11 10:56, Carsten Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a (simple) question about installing from the ports coll. The
> 1st time I issued `make install`in /usr/ports/www/firefox it showed a
> configuration menu where I could select things like xfs. I disabled
> this xfs option. Now i
Hi,
I have a (simple) question about installing from the ports coll. The
1st time I issued `make install`in /usr/ports/www/firefox it showed a
configuration menu where I could select things like xfs. I disabled
this xfs option. Now if I want to install Firefox again it won't show
me this configurat
On Sun, Mar 27, 2005 at 04:01:08PM -0700, Pat Maddox wrote:
> I've got the pf firewall installed, and every time I run cvsup,
> portupgrade or try to install ports, I have to disable it. What
> outgoing and incoming ports do I need to allow in order to run these
> without disabling the firewall?
I've got the pf firewall installed, and every time I run cvsup,
portupgrade or try to install ports, I have to disable it. What
outgoing and incoming ports do I need to allow in order to run these
without disabling the firewall?
___
freebsd-questions@fre
On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 01:19:18PM +0100, Ruben de Groot wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 05:15:19PM -0600, John typed:
> > I don't have enough storage on my laptop for the entire ports tree
> > (surprise, surprise), so I'm trying to "make install" acroread
> > and jdk14 via NFS mounts from a bigge
On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 05:15:19PM -0600, John typed:
> I don't have enough storage on my laptop for the entire ports tree
> (surprise, surprise), so I'm trying to "make install" acroread
> and jdk14 via NFS mounts from a bigger server.
>
> I'm down to trying to get the specific version of linux_b
I don't have enough storage on my laptop for the entire ports tree
(surprise, surprise), so I'm trying to "make install" acroread
and jdk14 via NFS mounts from a bigger server.
I'm down to trying to get the specific version of linux_base that
it wants(and I already have the linux kld loaded and li
Hello,
What form does the FTP_PROXY shell variable need to take to work with fetch,
so that I can install ports through an FTP proxy server?
Andi L. Bigelow
Dyncorp EOS - Network Engineering Group
bigelowa{at}sec{dot}gov
(202) 942-4368
"Every man dies, but not every man really lives." -- Braveh
On Fri, Sep 10, 2004 at 03:09:04PM +0100 or thereabouts, Matthew Seaman wrote:
>
> # make -DWITH_MYSQL
>
> and you should certainly see mysql mentioned during the configuration
> and compilation steps.
For myself I am using make WITH_MYSQL=yes (all install clean).
It is working. I do also pu
> On Fri, Sep 10, 2004 at 10:02:37AM -0400, Steve Bertrand wrote:
>
>> I am attempting to install /usr/ports/security/snort, but I want
>> MySQL
>> support.
>>
>> I've uncommented OPTIONS and the line that states MYSQL=on in the
>> Makefile, however, when I run:
>>
>> # script
>> # make
>
> Don't d
On Fri, Sep 10, 2004 at 10:02:37AM -0400, Steve Bertrand wrote:
> I am attempting to install /usr/ports/security/snort, but I want MySQL
> support.
>
> I've uncommented OPTIONS and the line that states MYSQL=on in the
> Makefile, however, when I run:
>
> # script
> # make
Don't do that: the OPT
I believe that you should just be able to install the port with the
option '--with-mysql' to bring in support for mysql
i.e.:
#make --with-mysql
should do it for you.
-tom
On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 10:02:37 -0400 (EDT), Steve Bertrand
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am attempting to ins
> Hi all,
>
> I am attempting to install /usr/ports/security/snort, but I want MySQL
> support.
>
> I've uncommented OPTIONS and the line that states MYSQL=on in the
> Makefile, however, when I run:
>
> # script
> # make
>
> the resulting script shows no indication that MySQL was included. How
> ca
Hi all,
I am attempting to install /usr/ports/security/snort, but I want MySQL
support.
I've uncommented OPTIONS and the line that states MYSQL=on in the
Makefile, however, when I run:
# script
# make
the resulting script shows no indication that MySQL was included. How
can I verify that suppor
Florian Hengstberger wrote:
Hi!
I'm using FreeBSD 5.2.1 and I'm in trouble with installing software
using the ports collection. After typing "make install" everything
seems to be okay, but in most cases I get a message like this after
a few minutes:
fetch time out
It seemed to me that the mirror
Florian Hengstberger wrote:
fetch time out
It seemed to me that the mirror servers are not uptodate or that
some filenames have changed in the meantime, because fetching data
from ftp-servers worked a few times.
But in nearly all cases I had to copy the files manually in
/usr/ports/distfiles as "m
Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > I'm using FreeBSD 5.2.1 and I'm in trouble with installing software
> > > using the ports collection. After typing "make install" everything
> > > seems to be okay, but in most cases I get a message like this after
> > > a few minu
>
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > I'm using FreeBSD 5.2.1 and I'm in trouble with installing software
> > using the ports collection. After typing "make install" everything
> > seems to be okay, but in most cases I get a message like this after
> > a few minutes:
> >
> > fetch time out
> >
> > It seemed t
On Tue, 24 Aug 2004 20:11:49 +0200
"Florian Hengstberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'm using FreeBSD 5.2.1 and I'm in trouble with installing software
> using the ports collection. After typing "make install" everything
> seems to be okay, but in most cases I get a message like this
Are your local ports-tree up-to-date?
> Hi!
>
> I'm using FreeBSD 5.2.1 and I'm in trouble with installing software
> using the ports collection. After typing "make install" everything
> seems to be okay, but in most cases I get a message like this after
> a few minutes:
>
> fetch time out
>
Hi!
I'm using FreeBSD 5.2.1 and I'm in trouble with installing software
using the ports collection. After typing "make install" everything
seems to be okay, but in most cases I get a message like this after
a few minutes:
fetch time out
It seemed to me that the mirror servers are not uptodate o
Brad Tarver wrote:
Bruce Hunter wrote on 05/12/04 09:09 PM:
I am pinging b/c I am testing. I am trying to install a port. When a
port installs, it downloads the required files. Whenever I try, I get
an error b/c it can't download any of the files needed for the port.
This happens with all port
Bruce Hunter wrote on 05/12/04 09:09 PM:
I am pinging b/c I am testing. I am trying to install a port. When a
port installs, it downloads the required files. Whenever I try, I get an
error b/c it can't download any of the files needed for the port. This
happens with all ports. On top of that I
Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P. wrote:
Bruce Hunter wrote:
Brad Tarver wrote:
Bruce Hunter wrote on 05/12/04 09:02 PM:
Brad Tarver wrote:
Check /etc/resolv.conf and /etc/rc.conf for your defaultrouter entry.
my defaultrouter entry is set to my router ip, any other ideas?
hmmm.
what are y
Bruce Hunter wrote:
Brad Tarver wrote:
Bruce Hunter wrote on 05/12/04 09:02 PM:
Brad Tarver wrote:
Check /etc/resolv.conf and /etc/rc.conf for your defaultrouter entry.
my defaultrouter entry is set to my router ip, any other ideas?
hmmm.
what are you trying to ping? an ip address or a host
Brad Tarver wrote:
Bruce Hunter wrote on 05/12/04 09:02 PM:
Brad Tarver wrote:
Bruce Hunter wrote on 05/12/04 08:41 PM:
I have setup a headless system. I connect to the system from
another machine using a ssh client. I have set the headless machine
to allow me to login at root. I am able to l
Brad Tarver wrote:
Bruce Hunter wrote on 05/12/04 08:41 PM:
I have setup a headless system. I connect to the system from another
machine using a ssh client. I have set the headless machine to allow
me to login at root. I am able to login and edit files , except I can
not ping outside my networ
Bruce Hunter wrote on 05/12/04 08:41 PM:
I have setup a headless system. I connect to the system from another
machine using a ssh client. I have set the headless machine to allow me
to login at root. I am able to login and edit files , except I can not
ping outside my network or install ports,
I have setup a headless system. I connect to the system from another
machine using a ssh client. I have set the headless machine to allow me
to login at root. I am able to login and edit files , except I can not
ping outside my network or install ports, b/c it won't allow it to
access the inter
> - -Original Message-
> From: Dino Vliet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 3:39 PM
> To: Jonathan M. Slivko
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: hurry and help with installing ports
> through http proxy
>
> No I'm not!
>
> Do
To: Jonathan M. Slivko
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: hurry and help with installing ports through http proxy
No I'm not!
Do you know how to what to edit (eg where to put the
line prxyserver:port) in order to let the ports being
fetched through that proxyserver and port?
- --- "
]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Dino Vliet
> Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 3:31 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: hurry and help with installing ports
> through http proxy
>
> Hi there,
>
> I just finished installing freebsd 4.9.
> In sysinst
Hi there,
I just finished installing freebsd 4.9.
In sysinstall I had to give my proxy adress and it
went smooth.
But now when I try to do a make install clean
at a port I get this error message telling me it can't
connect to the sources (ftp servers)
I think I have to tell to the ports program
Matthew Seaman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 11:06:40PM +, carmoda wrote:
>
> > I seem to get failures just about every time i try to install anything:
> >
> > in particular errors with dependant packages:
> >
> > "An older version of whatever/whatever is already ins
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 11:06:40PM +, carmoda wrote:
> I seem to get failures just about every time i try to install anything:
>
> in particular errors with dependant packages:
>
> "An older version of whatever/whatever is already installed..."
>
> now, on attempts to update any of these de
Hi,
# cd /usr/ports/xxx/directory of port that wont compile
# make deinstall
# make install or # make install clean or # make package
works for me without any problems
Seeya
David Lodeiro
> Hi,
>
> I seem to get failures just about every time i try to install anything:
>
> in particular
Hi,
I seem to get failures just about every time i try to install anything:
in particular errors with dependant packages:
"An older version of whatever/whatever is already installed..."
now, on attempts to update any of these dependancy packages i break my
system... so. do i just accept i cann
Lee Harr wrote:
I've always used FreeBSD on machines connected to the internet... so I
have never experienced installing applications offline.
My question is: Is it possible to install applications (using the port
collection ) on a machine that's not connected to the internet?
Possible? Of course.
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Lee Harr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed:
> >I've always used FreeBSD on machines connected to the internet... so I
> >have never experienced installing applications offline.
> >My question is: Is it possible to install applications (using the port
> >collection ) on a machine tha
I've always used FreeBSD on machines connected to the internet... so I
have never experienced installing applications offline.
My question is: Is it possible to install applications (using the port
collection ) on a machine that's not connected to the internet?
If yes, what are the requirements?
I've got 4 CD of FreeBSD4.7
How can I know if program I want to install is in ports
or in pakages of my CDs?
I've copied all INDEX form /cdrom/pakages of each CD
and can know whether it in in pakages,
but when it is not I look in /ust/ports
The problem is:
when installing from ports
I don't want
On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 11:31:07PM -0700, Roberto Armenteros wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> When I downlaoded the ports initially with cvsup I
> could install any port by typing "make install". After
> I updated the ports a couple of times, I get the error
> "make: dont know who to make install. Stop in
Hi all,
When I downlaoded the ports initially with cvsup I
could install any port by typing "make install". After
I updated the ports a couple of times, I get the error
"make: dont know who to make install. Stop in
/usr/ports..."
Why am I getting this error now and not before? I
tried with lots
Hello...
I am trying to install the ports into /usr/pkg instead of /usr/local, I am setting
LOCALBASE and PREFIX to /usr/pkg in the /etc/make.conf it installes where I want it
but when I install a port that depends on a already installed port it does not see
that it is installed and trys to in
83 matches
Mail list logo
