On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 1:30 AM, Matthias Petermann wrote:
> Hi Ethan,
>
> Zitat von "Ethan W. House" :
>
>
> What could be causing my brightness control to not work on my Intel
>> graphics card. The acpi values change but no effect takes place.
>&
Hi Ethan,
Zitat von "Ethan W. House" :
What could be causing my brightness control to not work on my Intel
graphics card. The acpi values change but no effect takes place.
ehouse@derpy ~ $ sudo sysctl hw.acpi.video.lcd0.brightness=50
hw.acpi.video.lcd0.brightness: 100 -> 50
What could be causing my brightness control to not work on my Intel
graphics card. The acpi values change but no effect takes place.
ehouse@derpy ~ $ sudo sysctl hw.acpi.video.lcd0.brightness=50
hw.acpi.video.lcd0.brightness: 100 -> 50
ehouse@derpy ~ $ sudo sysctl hw.acpi.video.lcd0.activ
I have a graphics card that behaves differently under CentOS 6.4 and
FreeBSD 9.1. Specifically, it is an older card (Spapphire with a ATI
chip set) where I have a multi-monitor set up but under CentOS the
monitors come up as expected but under FreeBSD there is some kind of
weird video-line overlap
On Tuesday 23 October 2012 01:34:33 Polytropon wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Oct 2012 15:56:56 -0500, ajtiM wrote:
> > Hi!
> There are several options for X you can tweak, and the
> native "ati" driver is excellent for the older ATI models.
> Make sure you have DRM/DRI working, and check for GL
> support (g
On 23/10/2012 11:15 AM, Rares Aioanei wrote:
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 05:09:22PM -0400, Gardner Bell wrote:
On 22/10/2012 4:56 PM, ajtiM wrote:
Hi!
I have an old computer but it works good still :). I use KDE and GIMP and I
like to use Krita more but a problem is graphics card and it is slow
On Mon, 22 Oct 2012 15:56:56 -0500, ajtiM wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I have an old computer but it works good still :). I use KDE and GIMP and I
> like to use Krita more but a problem is graphics card and it is slow (Gimp is
> okay).
> I have ASUS P4P800 mother board and ATI Radeon 9000
On Monday 22 October 2012 16:09:22 Gardner Bell wrote:
> On 22/10/2012 4:56 PM, ajtiM wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > I have an old computer but it works good still :). I use KDE and GIMP and
> > I like to use Krita more but a problem is graphics card and it is slow
> >
On 22/10/2012 4:56 PM, ajtiM wrote:
Hi!
I have an old computer but it works good still :). I use KDE and GIMP and I
like to use Krita more but a problem is graphics card and it is slow (Gimp is
okay).
I have ASUS P4P800 mother board and ATI Radeon 9000 AGP graphics card. I look
for some Nvidia
Hi!
I have an old computer but it works good still :). I use KDE and GIMP and I
like to use Krita more but a problem is graphics card and it is slow (Gimp is
okay).
I have ASUS P4P800 mother board and ATI Radeon 9000 AGP graphics card. I look
for some Nvidia AGP cards (opengl 2.0) but the
Hello,
Do someone know when FreeBSD will have
support for the new graphics chip (Vision, Sandy bridge)???
I am tired of watching my laptop at vesa 1024x768 resolution...
Thanks...
SErgio
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.fre
devices to snoop VGA palette register
accesses and forward them to the ISA bus.
* Off - (the default) forces VGA and graphics devices to respond
positively to palette register accesses.
Is there a "Init Graphics Card First" that can be set to AGP/PCI? That woul
accesses and forward them to the ISA bus.
* Off - (the default) forces VGA and graphics devices to respond
positively to palette register accesses.
Is there a "Init Graphics Card First" that can be set to AGP/PCI? That
would let the preferred card be seen first. Stil
the graphics card I had added to
my Dell PE300 built in the last century. I was told the ability to
have two cards in one box was lost due to int10 provided by
libpciaccess.
Is this still the case? The BIOS on the PE300 does not allow the
on-board card to 'disappear'. I can not find any i
doug wrote:
On Mon, 8 Nov 2010, doug wrote:
On Mon, 8 Nov 2010, Jerry wrote:
On Mon, 8 Nov 2010 17:08:23 -0500 (EST)
d...@safeport.com articulated:
When I slid froward from FreeBSD 7.2 and Xorg (whatever) to 8.0 and
xorg-7.4_4 I lost the ability to use the graphics card I had added to
my
On Mon, 8 Nov 2010, doug wrote:
On Mon, 8 Nov 2010, Jerry wrote:
On Mon, 8 Nov 2010 17:08:23 -0500 (EST)
d...@safeport.com articulated:
When I slid froward from FreeBSD 7.2 and Xorg (whatever) to 8.0 and
xorg-7.4_4 I lost the ability to use the graphics card I had added to
my Dell PE300
On Mon, 8 Nov 2010, Jerry wrote:
On Mon, 8 Nov 2010 17:08:23 -0500 (EST)
d...@safeport.com articulated:
When I slid froward from FreeBSD 7.2 and Xorg (whatever) to 8.0 and
xorg-7.4_4 I lost the ability to use the graphics card I had added to
my Dell PE300 built in the last century. I was
On Mon, 8 Nov 2010 17:08:23 -0500 (EST)
d...@safeport.com articulated:
> When I slid froward from FreeBSD 7.2 and Xorg (whatever) to 8.0 and
> xorg-7.4_4 I lost the ability to use the graphics card I had added to
> my Dell PE300 built in the last century. I was told the ability to
&
When I slid froward from FreeBSD 7.2 and Xorg (whatever) to 8.0 and xorg-7.4_4
I lost the ability to use the graphics card I had added to my Dell PE300 built
in the last century. I was told the ability to have two cards in one box was
lost due to int10 provided by libpciaccess.
Is this still
Hello,
After ports/kernel update (just 8.0 update) Google Earth stopped working.
Error message shows up over the splash: "Unknown Graphics Card"
"GoogleEarth was unable to identify your graphics card ..."
When I press Ok X server crashes. But OS is still up.
Nvidia 9400GT
Hi all,
My motherboard has onboard nvidia GeForce 8300 graphics rated up to
1920x1080 (1080p). It has VGA, DVI and HDMI outputs. Are there any
issues using a 1920x1080 monitor with HDMI like LG electronics W2361V?
Eg would this mode need special drivers? Or should it all just work?
http://u
On Wed,14-10-2009 [23:48:26], Polytropon wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 10:55:05 -0600 (MDT), Warren Block
> wrote:
> > All of my cards are ATI and I don't know of the "mtrr" problem you're
> > talking about. This X1650 works fine on i386 with both 7-STABLE and
> > 8-STABLE.
>
> I had an old-fa
On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 11:59:49 -0400
Jerry wrote:
> nVidia (AMD64) is not supported in 7.x versions of FreeBSD as far as I
> know. There was some talk of it being supported in 8.x, but I have
> not heard from anyone actually doing so.
The existing driver is 32 bit and will never run on amd64. Wha
On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 10:55:05 -0600 (MDT), Warren Block
wrote:
> All of my cards are ATI and I don't know of the "mtrr" problem you're
> talking about. This X1650 works fine on i386 with both 7-STABLE and
> 8-STABLE.
I had an old-fashioned ATI Radeon 9200 RV250 AGP with both a VGA
and a VGA-on
On Wed, 14 Oct 2009, cpghost wrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 10:55:05AM -0600, Warren Block wrote:
On Wed, 14 Oct 2009, jgro...@es.net wrote:
nVidia support on i386 FreeBSD is not much better. One can use an nVidia
card with 7.1 but under 7.2 one hits the dreaded mtrr error. A Google
search fin
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 10:55:05AM -0600, Warren Block wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Oct 2009, jgro...@es.net wrote:
> > nVidia support on i386 FreeBSD is not much better. One can use an nVidia
> > card with 7.1 but under 7.2 one hits the dreaded mtrr error. A Google
> > search finds many posts on how to fix
On Wed, 14 Oct 2009, jgro...@es.net wrote:
All of my cards are ATI and I don't know of the "mtrr" problem you're
talking about. This X1650 works fine on i386 with both 7-STABLE and
8-STABLE.
I am seeing mtrr error using a Diamond Radeon HD4670 on FreeBSD 7.2
Really need a lot more specifics
>
> jgro...@es.net writes:
>
>> I could be wrong but nVidia does not seem to be very interested
>> in working with the FreeBSD project to address these problems.
>
> nVidia has offered what many/most hardware vendors* do not: to
> write and maintain a driver for their product.
> Howev
jgro...@es.net writes:
> I could be wrong but nVidia does not seem to be very interested
> in working with the FreeBSD project to address these problems.
nVidia has offered what many/most hardware vendors* do not: to
write and maintain a driver for their product.
However, in or
> On Wed, 14 Oct 2009, jgro...@es.net wrote:
>> nVidia support on i386 FreeBSD is not much better. One can use an nVidia
>> card with 7.1 but under 7.2 one hits the dreaded mtrr error. A Google
>> search finds many posts on how to fix this but none of them seem to
>> work.
>> I could be wrong but n
On Wed, 14 Oct 2009, jgro...@es.net wrote:
nVidia support on i386 FreeBSD is not much better. One can use an nVidia
card with 7.1 but under 7.2 one hits the dreaded mtrr error. A Google
search finds many posts on how to fix this but none of them seem to work.
I could be wrong but nVidia does not
> On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 08:31:00 -0700
> free...@t41t.com free...@t41t.com (free...@t41t.com) replied:
>
>>I'm in need of a new graphics card for a new computer, that I hope will
>>run FreeBSD (with a strong preference for AMD64) and compiz-fusion on a
>>dual-monit
On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 08:31:00 -0700
free...@t41t.com free...@t41t.com (free...@t41t.com) replied:
>I'm in need of a new graphics card for a new computer, that I hope will
>run FreeBSD (with a strong preference for AMD64) and compiz-fusion on a
>dual-monitor, which I believ
I'm in need of a new graphics card for a new computer, that I hope will
run FreeBSD (with a strong preference for AMD64) and compiz-fusion on a
dual-monitor, which I believe means the 3D acceleration has to be in good
working order. I don't really care whether the graphics driver is
On Thursday 07 May 2009 04:35:30 Scott Parrish wrote:
> Hi all,
> Recently my PCI graphics card failed on my Dell Dimension 4100. I replaced
> it with a known good card I had lying around: an Nvidia GeForce 3 TI200
> with an AGP interface. My FreeBSD installation will not bo
Hi all,
Recently my PCI graphics card failed on my Dell Dimension 4100. I replaced it
with a known good card I had lying around: an Nvidia GeForce 3 TI200 with an
AGP interface. My FreeBSD installation will not boot with this graphics card.
The boot loader hangs at the twirling baton as
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I am running 8-current amd64 on a e6850 with 4 GB of RAM and currently
have a nvidia 5200 GT. Well I have a $100 gift card for amazon and
decided to use it to get a new video card. I also run vista and
occasionally a live cd for linux but I spend 90
On Thursday 15 March 2007 20:50, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> Composite still isn't the greatest under the 6.9 branch of Xorg
> (and it wasn't that great under Xorg 7.0 either). It might have improved
> since then though in 7.1/7.2.
I am running 7,2 and still cannot get the nvidia drivers to work with
Norbert Papke wrote:
On Thursday 15 March 2007 10:37, Jim Stapleton wrote:
Also a couple of OpenGL applications are running slower
than one would expect given my card (especially in the screen savers
area, where the same apps would run /too fast/ with my old Ti4200.
These in conjunction lead me
Jim Stapleton wrote:
I have a 7300GT in my computer, and I have run into a couple of errors
trying to set up WoW in Wine (couldn't find copies of the error
elsewhere). Also a couple of OpenGL applications are running slower
than one would expect given my card (especially in the screen savers
area
On Thursday 15 March 2007 10:37, Jim Stapleton wrote:
> Also a couple of OpenGL applications are running slower
> than one would expect given my card (especially in the screen savers
> area, where the same apps would run /too fast/ with my old Ti4200.
> These in conjunction lead me to suspect my g
I have a 7300GT in my computer, and I have run into a couple of errors
trying to set up WoW in Wine (couldn't find copies of the error
elsewhere). Also a couple of OpenGL applications are running slower
than one would expect given my card (especially in the screen savers
area, where the same apps
On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 09:56:42PM -0600, Kirk Strauser wrote:
> My aging GeForce MX 400 is dying and I want to replace it with something a
> bit
> more modern. My desktop is running FreeBSD 6.2 on a Asus A7V (Via chipset)
> motherboard with a 1.4GHz Athlon. This is more of a hardward question
On Monday 22 January 2007 04:56, Kirk Strauser wrote:
> My aging GeForce MX 400 is dying and I want to replace it with something a
> bit more modern. My desktop is running FreeBSD 6.2 on a Asus A7V (Via
> chipset) motherboard with a 1.4GHz Athlon. This is more of a hardward
> question than softwa
My aging GeForce MX 400 is dying and I want to replace it with something a bit
more modern. My desktop is running FreeBSD 6.2 on a Asus A7V (Via chipset)
motherboard with a 1.4GHz Athlon. This is more of a hardward question than
software, although pointers to any FreeBSD-specific driver gotcha
Charles Swiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Are you saying that it just means you can address more memory?
>
> No, the CPU registers and the address bus can be wider (not just the
> memory bus) with Intel EM64T or AMD64 architectures, and can get more
> work done per clock for some tasks, b
On May 4, 2006, at 1:25 PM, Kep Woof wrote:
Sure. For the most part, if you don't have more than 4GB of RAM,
there is little point to running in 64-bit mode. A more fine-grained
analysis:
I think I get it now.. having seen loads of adverts and hype
(particularly from apple) bigging up 64bit,
hi,
On 5/4/06, Alex Zbyslaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I can't comment on the difference because I didn't bother with amd64 for
the very reasons you mention. But, for me, A8V plus single core AMD
4000 + 6800GT is plain bloody fast. It'll certainly run your screen saver :-)
Runs cool too.
tha
Kep Woof wrote:
i need to have direct rendering and dual head dvi. in 2006, decent 3d
performance doesn't seem unreasonable, even if it is just to run a
swanky screen saver. i've got an xfx geforce 6800GT sitting around
here that i'd like to use, but it seems this is currently impossible
on am
On May 4, 2006, at 12:28 PM, Kep Woof wrote:
it seems like a huge waste to run the i386 version on an
amd64 machine, but can anyone comment on the performance difference?
Sure. For the most part, if you don't have more than 4GB of RAM,
there is little point to running in 64-bit mode. A more
hi,
i'm about to build a new system and obviously it would be nice if
everything worked nicely. my plan is to one of the asus A8V
motherboards, but i've just spent a while reading nvidia forums and it
seems there aren't any amd64 drivers for freebsd, or even any plans to
release them.
i need to
> more so I was thinking if I could use a graphics card to mitigate the
> problem a bit..
> Thanks...
No, sorry.
Kris
pgp6KurhsHagE.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
after reading
http://hedera.linuxnews.pl/_news/2002/09/03/_long/1445.html I was
wondering if this would be possible with FreeBSD?
I have a Soekris 4801 box which has way too less memory and no room for
more so I was thinking if I could use a graphics card to mitigate the
problem a bit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Montag, 18. August 2003 22:42 Ken Copling wrote:
> hello i bought freebsd desktop edition and it didnt reconize my graphics
> card so now i need to know what would be a powerful graphics card to
> install on my system that it will reconi
> > I have the following problem with FreeBSD 4.7-STABLE (running XFree86
> > 4.2.0).
> >
> > Recently, my AGP graphics card (Matrox G200) stopped working (a hardware
> > defect), so I used a rather old PCI Mach64 card instead. I also have
> > a Soundblast
On Tue, 10 Jun 2003 10:17:29 +0200, Thomas Schuerger
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I have the following problem with FreeBSD 4.7-STABLE (running XFree86
4.2.0).
Recently, my AGP graphics card (Matrox G200) stopped working (a hardware
defect), so I used a rather old PCI Mach64 card inst
Hi,
I have the following problem with FreeBSD 4.7-STABLE (running XFree86
4.2.0).
Recently, my AGP graphics card (Matrox G200) stopped working (a hardware
defect), so I used a rather old PCI Mach64 card instead. I also have
a Soundblaster AWE 64 (ISA, using pcm) in my box.
Now, whenever the PCI
Hello, I have a FreeBSD 4.7 on my Gateway Solo 9150 with ATI Rage LT 3D PRO
8MB video card. I am not sure wether it is onboard or not. It is identified
as ATI 4c42 graphics accelerator. It is not in the list of video cards and I
cannot configure Xfree86 to accept my settings. Any Ideas on how I
John Bleichert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Wow! That's great news! I may have to eat my hat... I'll definately be
> considering one of these for my next video card (probably next month).
Consider the 8500 model carefully, as it might not be supported well yet.
http://people.freebsd.org/~anho
On Tue, 17 Sep 2002, David Haworth wrote:
> Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2002 21:27:25 +0100
> From: David Haworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: IF you like your NVIDIA Graphics card
>
> > If you tell me that your Radeon works in OpenGL 3D in XFree8
> If you tell me that your Radeon works in OpenGL 3D in XFree86 (at better
> than 5 FPS) I'll go buy one right now ;-)
dave@blink:~> uname -a
FreeBSD x.y.z 4.6-STABLE FreeBSD 4.6-STABLE #8: Wed Aug 7 23:17:27 BST 2002
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/X i386
drm0: port 0xd800-0xd8f
On Tue, 17 Sep 2002 13:37:17 -0400 (EDT)
John Bleichert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, but without any useful 3-D (OpenGL) support, correct? My nVidia
> card works fine with the XFree86 'nv' driver as well, but only with 3D
>
> acceleration where the nVidia drivers have been provided.
noneth
On 17 Sep 2002, Gary W. Swearingen wrote:
> Date: 17 Sep 2002 07:48:29 -0700
> From: Gary W. Swearingen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: IF you like your NVIDIA Graphics card
>
> ...
> > Saw this on /.
> ...
> > Hugh writes &q
...
> Saw this on /.
...
> Hugh writes "The FreeBSD NVIDIA Driver Initiative has
> announced[1] that nVidia itself will be releasing a FreeBSD
> driver for its line of cards. This is excellent news for
> people who prefer to Quake on the best OS available."
>From what I re
64 matches
Mail list logo
