Jonathan Horne wrote in msgid:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Monday 28 August 2006 10:05, Jonathan Horne wrote:
>> On Monday 28 August 2006 08:40, newsmaster wrote:
>> > Jonathan Horne wrote in msgid:
>> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >
>> > > On Monday 28 August 2006 07:44, newsmaster wrote:
>> > >> Jonatha
Jonathan Horne wrote in msgid:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> when you click the narrower and shorters (etc) buttons, shouldnt the
> display
> be obeying these buttons? if so, im at a loss, as when i click them back
> and forth, nothing happens.
>
> ill try again,
>
You should press "apply" after any c
On Monday 28 August 2006 10:05, Jonathan Horne wrote:
> On Monday 28 August 2006 08:40, newsmaster wrote:
> > Jonathan Horne wrote in msgid:
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > > On Monday 28 August 2006 07:44, newsmaster wrote:
> > >> Jonathan Horne wrote in msgid:
> > >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >>
>
On Monday 28 August 2006 08:40, newsmaster wrote:
> Jonathan Horne wrote in msgid:
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > On Monday 28 August 2006 07:44, newsmaster wrote:
> >> Jonathan Horne wrote in msgid:
> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>
> >> > well, i finally got it to render at 1680x1050, but the size of my
Jonathan Horne wrote in msgid:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Monday 28 August 2006 07:44, newsmaster wrote:
>> Jonathan Horne wrote in msgid:
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>> > well, i finally got it to render at 1680x1050, but the size of my
>> > desktop is fixed at about 1.5" outside the physical size of
On Monday 28 August 2006 07:44, newsmaster wrote:
> Jonathan Horne wrote in msgid:
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > well, i finally got it to render at 1680x1050, but the size of my desktop
> > is fixed at about 1.5" outside the physical size of the lcd (and about
> > 3/8" top
> > and bottom). ive dont
Jonathan Horne wrote in msgid:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> well, i finally got it to render at 1680x1050, but the size of my desktop
> is fixed at about 1.5" outside the physical size of the lcd (and about
> 3/8" top
> and bottom). ive dont quite a bit of googling, and i am now trying to
> figure o
On Sunday 27 August 2006 16:37, John Nielsen wrote:
> Quoting Jonathan Horne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > i just brought home new samsung 22" widescreen LCD. so far, i cannot
> > get xorg
> > to take anything other than standard CRT type resolutions, such as
> > 1280x1024.
>
>
>
> > the first part, s
Quoting Jonathan Horne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
i just brought home new samsung 22" widescreen LCD. so far, i cannot
get xorg
to take anything other than standard CRT type resolutions, such as 1280x1024.
the first part, seems to be the normal video modes that i would expect to see
from an i810 g
i just brought home new samsung 22" widescreen LCD. so far, i cannot get xorg
to take anything other than standard CRT type resolutions, such as 1280x1024.
i took at look at my Xorg.0.log, and saw this:
(II) I810(0): [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(II) I810(0): [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(II) I810(0): [EMAIL PROTEC
10 matches
Mail list logo