On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 06:40:51 -0400, Maxim Khitrov wrote:
> I've been using 'dangerously dedicated' partitioning for years without
> any issues. What problems have been reported by others?
I think those "problems" originate from some operating systems
not able to work with disks that do not come w
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 12:30 AM, Carl Johnson wrote:
> Maxim Khitrov writes:
>
>> On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 4:38 PM, Maxim Khitrov wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Executing the following commands on any valid storage device seems to
>>> cause "media size does not match label" kernel messages (FreeBSD
Maxim Khitrov writes:
> On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 4:38 PM, Maxim Khitrov wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Executing the following commands on any valid storage device seems to
>> cause "media size does not match label" kernel messages (FreeBSD 8.2
>> amd64). I understand why they happen - glabel metadata o
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 4:38 PM, Maxim Khitrov wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Executing the following commands on any valid storage device seems to
> cause "media size does not match label" kernel messages (FreeBSD 8.2
> amd64). I understand why they happen - glabel metadata occupies the
> last sector, so b
Hi all,
Executing the following commands on any valid storage device seems to
cause "media size does not match label" kernel messages (FreeBSD 8.2
amd64). I understand why they happen - glabel metadata occupies the
last sector, so bsdlabel sees a device that is 1 sector smaller than
what the kerne
