Hi,
I'm just to know how to / step / the best practice recompile kernel with PAE
support in freebsd 8.0 i386
Ahmad Nazir b Haron
Pusat Teknologi Maklumat
Universiti Malaysia Terengganu___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
On 06/10/2011 16:55, Grant Peel wrote:
Hi all,
Short of upgrading the OS, what is the safest way to upgrade a FreeBSD server
to PHP 5.3.x from 5.2.11 ?
I am assuming downloading the ports tarball and rebuilding and reinstalling
will do it?
Any advice, samples would be appreciated,
-Grant
__
On 06/10/2011 16:55, Grant Peel wrote:
> Short of upgrading the OS, what is the safest way to upgrade a
> FreeBSD server to PHP 5.3.x from 5.2.11 ? I am assuming downloading
> the ports tarball and rebuilding and reinstalling will do it? Any
> advice, samples would be appreciated
8.0 is out of sup
Hi all,
Short of upgrading the OS, what is the safest way to upgrade a FreeBSD server
to PHP 5.3.x from 5.2.11 ?
I am assuming downloading the ports tarball and rebuilding and reinstalling
will do it?
Any advice, samples would be appreciated,
-Grant
___
wrote:
>
> > On 2/24/2011 4:51 PM, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
> >
> >> On 2/24/11 3:00 PM, nikitha wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi,
> >>> Could you plz share the information on the maximum number of routes
> that
> >>> can
> >>&
3:00 PM, nikitha wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>> Could you plz share the information on the maximum number of routes that
>>> can
>>> be added (by default) in FREEBSD 8.0/7.2 kernel?
>>> In Linux the sysctl rt_max_size is used. Is there a similar tunable
>
On 2/24/2011 4:51 PM, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
On 2/24/11 3:00 PM, nikitha wrote:
Hi,
Could you plz share the information on the maximum number of routes that can
be added (by default) in FREEBSD 8.0/7.2 kernel?
In Linux the sysctl rt_max_size is used. Is there a similar tunable
parameter in
er-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of nikitha
Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2011 8:01 AM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Tuning routing table size in FreeBSD 8.0 and 7.2
Hi,
Could you plz share the information on the maximum number of routes that can
be added (by default) in FREEB
On 2/24/11 3:00 PM, nikitha wrote:
> Hi,
> Could you plz share the information on the maximum number of routes that can
> be added (by default) in FREEBSD 8.0/7.2 kernel?
> In Linux the sysctl rt_max_size is used. Is there a similar tunable
> parameter in freeBSD?
>
> Your e
Hi,
Could you plz share the information on the maximum number of routes that can
be added (by default) in FREEBSD 8.0/7.2 kernel?
In Linux the sysctl rt_max_size is used. Is there a similar tunable
parameter in freeBSD?
Your earliest reply in this regard is much appreciated.
Thanks for any
El día Wednesday, September 29, 2010 a las 01:07:26PM +0200, Wojciech Puchar
escribió:
> > I have just installed FreeBSD 8.0 and after I login it stops at $ like its
> > waiting for me to put some type of information in or something. So what do I
> > put after the dollar sig
I have just installed FreeBSD 8.0 and after I login it stops at $ like its
waiting for me to put some type of information in or something. So what do I
put after the dollar sign???
it means you have to sent some dollars to FreeBSD fundation
On Sep 28, 2010, at 10:52 AM, William Lang wrote:
> I have just installed FreeBSD 8.0 and after I login it stops at $ like its
> waiting for me to put some type of information in or something. So what do I
> put after the dollar sign???
You're at a Unix shell prompt. I suspect the
On Tuesday 28 September 2010 1:52:56 pm William Lang wrote:
> I have just installed FreeBSD 8.0 and after I login it stops at $ like its
> waiting for me to put some type of information in or something. So what do
> I put after the do
I have just installed FreeBSD 8.0 and after I login it stops at $ like its
waiting for me to put some type of information in or something. So what do I
put after the dollar sign???
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org
On 8.0 with KDE 4.3.1 package installed I have problems with Firefox fonts.
Though I installed URW and freetype fonts according to handbook and
declared them on xorg.conf,
Firefox 3.5.4 cant display some pages properly,ie text is not
displayed. So that must be a problem with fonts,
because those pa
On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 16:28:29 +0100
Arthur Chance wrote:
> I suspect whoever you were talking to probably has more of a clue
> than I do. As a quick data point, I just ran "portsnap fetch update"
> while another process did a "df /var; sleep 1" loop and /var
> increased by about 30MB at its peak.
Can someone please assist me with some strangeness on FreeBSD 8.0 and 8.1-RC2
using a threaded test code code, I see the that freebsd 8.x seems to be using
more memory when using the syslog() call from a c program:
Results:
7.2
without syslog
PID USERNAMETHR PRI NICE SIZERES
On 07/02/10 15:38, Bruce Cran wrote:
On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 15:04:10 +0100
Arthur Chance wrote:
As a matter of idle curiosity with a bit of education thrown in, why
4GB for /var? The last time I installed a new machine I made / 1GB as
I'd found out from a previous install that 512MB wasn't really
On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 15:04:10 +0100
Arthur Chance wrote:
> As a matter of idle curiosity with a bit of education thrown in, why
> 4GB for /var? The last time I installed a new machine I made / 1GB as
> I'd found out from a previous install that 512MB wasn't really
> enough, and then decided to mak
Arthur Chance writes:
> As a matter of idle curiosity with a bit of education thrown in,
> why 4GB for /var? The last time I installed a new machine I made
> / 1GB as I'd found out from a previous install that 512MB wasn't
> really enough, and then decided to make /var bigger than the
> Handb
On 07/02/10 13:13, Bruce Cran wrote:
I have a task on my TODO list to increase the sizes of the partitions in
sysinstall: for example / goes to 1GB, /var to 4GB. I hope to commit
the code in the next couple of weeks.
As a matter of idle curiosity with a bit of education thrown in, why 4GB
for
On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 02:29:54PM -0700, Ed Flecko wrote:
> Henrik,
> When I FIRST installed 8.0, I did create a separate /home partition.
> When I installed the kernel and starting running out of space in / , I
> thought "O.K...I'll let FreeBSD make the partition sizes IT wants to
> and see if I
On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 08:33:45 +0100
Matthew Seaman wrote:
> Is it time for me to start advocating "one big partition" again?
>
> This may not be the consensus view, but I have found that for a quiet
> life and general lack of botheration it helps to create *only two*
> partitions on your hard dri
krad writes:
> all i can say is your a brave boy 8) A 1 TB+ / slice would take
> ages to fsck.
For "ages" being less than ten (fifteen ?) minutes on a modern
system with reasonable memory ...
... which should be necessary very rarely. Even on my test
system, time between involu
On 2 July 2010 08:33, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 01/07/2010 22:29:54, Ed Flecko wrote:
> > Henrik,
> > When I FIRST installed 8.0, I did create a separate /home partition.
> > When I installed the kernel and starting running out of space in / , I
On 02.07.2010 09:33, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 01/07/2010 22:29:54, Ed Flecko wrote:
>> Henrik,
>> When I FIRST installed 8.0, I did create a separate /home partition.
>> When I installed the kernel and starting running out of space in / , I
>> thought "O.K...I'll let FreeBSD make the partition si
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/07/2010 22:29:54, Ed Flecko wrote:
> Henrik,
> When I FIRST installed 8.0, I did create a separate /home partition.
> When I installed the kernel and starting running out of space in / , I
> thought "O.K...I'll let FreeBSD make the partition size
On Jul 01 12:29, Chip Camden wrote:
> On Jul 01 12:07, Ed Flecko wrote:
> > Thanks guys.
> >
> > :-)
> >
> > Doesn't that seem odd that the "default" partition size for root
> > (512M) isn't quite big enough?
> >
> > Should I make the partition size slightly larger (on future installs)
> > to el
Henrik Hudson writes:
> > Or just make one large partition. Not on a server, but I don't
> > see much reason for using multiple partitions on a laptop.
>
> Multiple partitions still isn't a bad idea if you ever have to
> fsck and even on a desktop / laptop I usually mount /tmp as
> noexe
Henrik,
When I FIRST installed 8.0, I did create a separate /home partition.
When I installed the kernel and starting running out of space in / , I
thought "O.K...I'll let FreeBSD make the partition sizes IT wants to
and see if I have the same problem, and I did.
Apparently, 512M is just, not, qui
On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 12:07:50PM -0700, Ed Flecko wrote:
> Thanks guys.
>
> :-)
>
> Doesn't that seem odd that the "default" partition size for root
> (512M) isn't quite big enough?
>
> Should I make the partition size slightly larger (on future installs)
> to eliminate this problem?
Many pe
On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 11:24:46AM -0700, Ed Flecko wrote:
> Hi folks,
> I'm running FreeBSD 8.0, and I'm trying to simple stay current with
> all security patches. It's a clean install of FreeBSD 8.0 on a 50G
> drive, and I let sysinstall select the default partition
On Thu, 01 Jul 2010, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
> Chip Camden writes:
>
> > On Jul 01 12:07, Ed Flecko wrote:
> >> Thanks guys.
> >>
> >> :-)
> >>
> >> Doesn't that seem odd that the "default" partition size for root
> >> (512M) isn't quite big enough?
> >>
> >> Should I make the partition size sl
On 1 July 2010 21:12, Ed Flecko wrote:
> Since it would be smart to have at least one known, good kernel, why
> not make the / partition maybe 1G?
>
> I know the smaller the / partition, the better the performance (since
> it's the first partition of the drive), but I can't imagine a slightly
> l
Since it would be smart to have at least one known, good kernel, why
not make the / partition maybe 1G?
I know the smaller the / partition, the better the performance (since
it's the first partition of the drive), but I can't imagine a slightly
larger / partition would impact performance that much
>
> A healthy fear, indeed.
>
> For one thing, I'd certainly rather have someone
> do "rm /boot/kernel.old/*.ko" than "rm -r /boot/kernel.old".
>
> Being even more selective is an obvious extension...
>
Why not move the old "useless" kernel to another drive. Sure if the system
kernel fails and you
Chip Camden writes:
> On Jul 01 12:07, Ed Flecko wrote:
>> Thanks guys.
>>
>> :-)
>>
>> Doesn't that seem odd that the "default" partition size for root
>> (512M) isn't quite big enough?
>>
>> Should I make the partition size slightly larger (on future installs)
>> to eliminate this problem?
>
Chip Camden writes:
> On Jul 01 15:10, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
>> Chip Camden writes:
>>
>> > I've experienced the same thing on amd64 -- the default partition size
>> > for root is too small. Rather than going to the trouble of correcting
>> > it, I just 'rm -r /boot/kernel.old' when it fails a
On Jul 01 12:07, Ed Flecko wrote:
> Thanks guys.
>
> :-)
>
> Doesn't that seem odd that the "default" partition size for root
> (512M) isn't quite big enough?
>
> Should I make the partition size slightly larger (on future installs)
> to eliminate this problem?
>
> Ed
>
On Jul 01 15:10, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
> Chip Camden writes:
>
> > I've experienced the same thing on amd64 -- the default partition size
> > for root is too small. Rather than going to the trouble of correcting
> > it, I just 'rm -r /boot/kernel.old' when it fails and then redo 'make
> > instal
Try rm -r /boot/kernel.old
I bet that's the problem.
--
James Bailie
http://www.mammothcheese.ca
-Original Message-
From: Ed Flecko
Sender: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2010 11:24:46
To:
Subject: /boot is full after running "make installkernel"
Chip,
That sounds like a smart thing to do; can you tell me more about how
to do that (or point me to a www resource; I'm happy to read more
about that).
:-)
Ed
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/fre
Chip Camden writes:
> I've experienced the same thing on amd64 -- the default partition size
> for root is too small. Rather than going to the trouble of correcting
> it, I just 'rm -r /boot/kernel.old' when it fails and then redo 'make
> installkernel', and all seems OK.
That's a little danger
Thanks guys.
:-)
Doesn't that seem odd that the "default" partition size for root
(512M) isn't quite big enough?
Should I make the partition size slightly larger (on future installs)
to eliminate this problem?
Ed
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mail
On Jul 01 11:24, Ed Flecko wrote:
> Hi folks,
> I'm running FreeBSD 8.0, and I'm trying to simple stay current with
> all security patches. It's a clean install of FreeBSD 8.0 on a 50G
> drive, and I let sysinstall select the default partition configuration
> whe
hello my os fails to start,this is the error and also my keyboard doesn't
work
Root mount waiting for: usbus3
Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/ad2s2a
ROOT MOUNT ERROR:
If you have invalid mount options, reboot, and first try the following
from the loader prompt:
set vfs.root.mountfrom.
Hi folks,
I'm running FreeBSD 8.0, and I'm trying to simple stay current with
all security patches. It's a clean install of FreeBSD 8.0 on a 50G
drive, and I let sysinstall select the default partition configuration
when I did the install.
I've taken the following steps:
#
- Original Message -
From: "Balázs Mátéffy"
To:
Sent: Sunday, June 27, 2010 2:42 PM
Subject: Re: FreeBSD 8.0 p#3
Hi,
Maybe "portsnap fetch extract" ?
Maybe the tag in your supfile was wrong for the ports.
MB.
_
On 28 June 2010 07:14, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 28/06/2010 04:42:21, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
> > Matthew Seaman wrote:
> >
> >> Fix your ports supfile: for ports you /always/ want HEAD ...
> >
> > s/always/almost &/
> >
> > If one wanted
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 28/06/2010 04:42:21, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
> Matthew Seaman wrote:
>
>> Fix your ports supfile: for ports you /always/ want HEAD ...
>
> s/always/almost &/
>
> If one wanted to download a copy of the ports tree as it existed
> when, say,
Matthew Seaman wrote:
> Fix your ports supfile: for ports you /always/ want HEAD ...
s/always/almost &/
If one wanted to download a copy of the ports tree as it existed
when, say, 6.1 was released, specifying the corresponding tag would
be the way to get it. Granted one seldom wants a frozen c
On 27 June 2010 22:14, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 27/06/2010 19:38:43, Grant Peel wrote:
>
> > When I ran CVSUp last time I seemed to have lost all ports accept the
> > newest ones. i.e. almost all the port dirs are empty.
> >
> > What is the bes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 27/06/2010 19:38:43, Grant Peel wrote:
> When I ran CVSUp last time I seemed to have lost all ports accept the
> newest ones. i.e. almost all the port dirs are empty.
>
> What is the best way to get them back?
Fix your ports supfile: for ports yo
Hi,
Maybe "portsnap fetch extract" ?
Maybe the tag in your supfile was wrong for the ports.
MB.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questio
Hi all,
When I ran CVSUp last time I seemed to have lost all ports accept the newest
ones. i.e. almost all the port dirs are empty.
What is the best way to get them back?
-Grant
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/m
In the last episode (Jun 11), Vikash Badal said:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
>
> > The fix is to remove your second call to malloc_usable_size(z)). Then
> > neither version will crash. Also, a useful habit to start is to
>
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
> questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Dan Nelson
> Sent: 11 June 2010 09:56 PM
> To: Vikash Badal
> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: threads and malloc/free on freeb
In the last episode (Jun 11), Vikash Badal said:
> I have a thread socket application that seems to be behaving strangely
>
> In a worker thread, I have the following.
>
> ---
>LogMessage(DEBUG_0, "allocated %ld", malloc_usable_size(inst));
>free(inst);
>LogMessage(DEBUG_0, "af
Greetings.
I have a thread socket application that seems to be behaving strangely
In a worker thread, I have the following.
---
LogMessage(DEBUG_0, "allocated %ld", malloc_usable_size(inst));
free(inst);
LogMessage(DEBUG_0, "after free allocated %ld", malloc_usable_size(
t
To: akash kumar
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Sent: Wed, 2 June, 2010 3:36:54 PM
Subject: Re: minicom freebsd 8.0
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 11:30 AM, akash kumar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was referring to minicom command similar to one on linux.
> On linux the config file is /etc/mi
On Sunday 06 June 2010 19:31:00 Bogdan Webb wrote:
> I'm having issues with the Fedora Core6 linux emulator on FreeBSD 8.0 it
> panics when i run HLDS, the same issue was addressed by Daniel Ballenger in
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2010-February/054646.html
I'm having issues with the Fedora Core6 linux emulator on FreeBSD 8.0 it
panics when i run HLDS, the same issue was addressed by Daniel Ballenger in
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2010-February/054646.htmlbut
i did not get the fix. Giovanni Trematerra gave a response that i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/06/2010 16:51:09, Olivier Nicole wrote:
>> /etc/rc.d/named: WARNING: run_rc_command: cannot run /usr/sbin/named
>
> /etc/rc.d/named ans /usr/sbin/named are not from the ports but from
> native FreeBSD distribution.
>
> Portsx will go into /usr
Hi,
> /etc/rc.d/named: WARNING: run_rc_command: cannot run /usr/sbin/named
/etc/rc.d/named ans /usr/sbin/named are not from the ports but from
native FreeBSD distribution.
Portsx will go into /usr/local/ only.
So apparently you mixed-up distribution and port, deleted part of one
and part of the
Ok i'll make it short coz it's the 2nd time i write this -.-' and don't even
ask why :D
So here it goes: Fresh FreeBSD 8.0 install, installed bind97 to witch i have
busted up the named.conf fine and tought, at the time, that deleting the
whole content of /etc/namedb and reinst
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 11:30 AM, akash kumar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was referring to minicom command similar to one on linux.
> On linux the config file is /etc/minirc. and the Serial Device
> is /dev/ttyUSB0, which was working for me.
> On freebsd the config file is /usr/local/etc/minicom/minirc.
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 10:32 AM, Fbsd1 wrote:
> akash kumar wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Can some one help me with the steps configuring minicom on freebsd 8.0. I
>> have a serial to usb converter running between my board and host machine.
>> Thanks,
>&
d.org
Sent: Wed, 2 June, 2010 2:02:30 PM
Subject: Re: minicom freebsd 8.0
akash kumar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can some one help me with the steps configuring minicom on freebsd 8.0. I
> have a serial to usb converter running between my board and host machine.
> Thanks,
> Akash.
>
akash kumar wrote:
Hi,
Can some one help me with the steps configuring minicom on freebsd 8.0.
I have a serial to usb converter running between my board and host machine.
Thanks,
Akash.
I take it a minicom is a external serial modem for internet access over
the phone lines.
First
Hi,
Can some one help me with the steps configuring minicom on freebsd 8.0.
I have a serial to usb converter running between my board and host machine.
Thanks,
Akash.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 1:56 AM, Dan Nelson wrote:
> In the last episode (May 22), Anoop Kumar Narayanan said:
>> I think glibc uses asynchronous free, as in it doesn't free the memory
>> immediately. So even though the memory is free'd its still part of the
>> process's address space but present
In the last episode (May 22), Anoop Kumar Narayanan said:
> I think glibc uses asynchronous free, as in it doesn't free the memory
> immediately. So even though the memory is free'd its still part of the
> process's address space but present in the free pool and so it doesn't
> crash.
FreeBSD doe
I think glibc uses asynchronous free, as in it doesn't free the memory
immediately. So even though the memory is free'd its still part of the
process's address space but present in the free pool and so it doesn't
crash.
-Anoop
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 12:48 AM, Dan Nelson wrote:
> In the last epi
In the last episode (May 21), Vikash Badal said:
> Excuse me if this is a stupid questions.
>
> I have a thread socket application that seems to be behaving strangely
>
> In a worker thread, I have the following.
>
> ---
>LogMessage(DEBUG_0, "allocated %ld", malloc_usable_size(inst))
Greetings.
Excuse me if this is a stupid questions.
I have a thread socket application that seems to be behaving strangely
In a worker thread, I have the following.
---
LogMessage(DEBUG_0, "allocated %ld", malloc_usable_size(inst));
free(inst);
LogMessage(DEBUG_0, "aft
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 10:26 AM, Vikash Badal wrote:
>
> Any idea where I'm going wrong ?
>
>
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/handbook/users-limiting.html
--
Adam Vande More
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/
Vikash Badal writes:
> Can someone assist me with tunning freebsd 8.0 so that I can
> allocate more memory to a process that is not owned by root or
> running as root.
man (5) login.conf ??
Ro
Can someone assist me with tunning freebsd 8.0 so that I can allocate more
memory to a process that is not owned by root or running as root.
>From top
I get this line before it coredumps.
PID USERNAMETHR PRI NICE SIZERES STATETIME WCPU COMMAND
1161 nntpd 1500 44
:40, Chohwora wrote:
> I am trying to download freeBSD version 8.0 I would like to find
> out,for a complete installation of a freeBSD 8.0. how many disks does it
> contain? I mean does it have disk1, disk2, etc?
You only need the disk1 CD .iso image to have everything you need to
instal
Chohwora wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to download freeBSD version 8.0 I would like to find out, for a
complete installation of a freeBSD 8.0. how many disks does it contain? I mean
does it have disk1, disk2, etc?
After downloading in ISO image, how do I burn it on a Cd so that it can be
Hello,
I am trying to download freeBSD version 8.0 I would like to find out, for a
complete installation of a freeBSD 8.0. how many disks does it contain? I mean
does it have disk1, disk2, etc?
After downloading in ISO image, how do I burn it on a Cd so that it can be
installed as a bootable
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 09:14:13AM -, Pamela Pomary wrote:
> Hello,
> I have installed rt3.8.6 with apache2-modperl2 on freebsd 8.0. I have
> configured RT_SiteConfig.pm and /apache22/Includes/http-local.conf files
> as directed by RT's wiki website
> http://wiki.be
Hello,
I have installed rt3.8.6 with apache2-modperl2 on freebsd 8.0. I have
configured RT_SiteConfig.pm and /apache22/Includes/http-local.conf files
as directed by RT's wiki website
http://wiki.bestpractical.com/view/UserManual. I get the following message
when i want to launch the web page
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 5:33 AM, Ivan Voras wrote:
> On 05/04/10 00:38, Bruce Cran wrote:
[...]
>
> Note that only KSE was removed; threading is of course fully supported by
> other mechanisms.
Does anyone know of a paper(s) that compare the different threading
model of say FBSD, Linux and OpenSo
On 05/04/10 00:38, Bruce Cran wrote:
On Monday 03 May 2010 15:52:48 Traiano Welcome wrote:
Is KSE support still in FreeBSD (8.0 and upward)?
No. KSE support was removed over 2 years ago:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2008-March/084248.html
Note that only KSE was
On Monday 03 May 2010 15:52:48 Traiano Welcome wrote:
> Is KSE support still in FreeBSD (8.0 and upward)?
No. KSE support was removed over 2 years ago:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2008-March/084248.html
--
Bruce C
Hi List
Is KSE support still in FreeBSD (8.0 and upward)?
Thanks in Advance,
Traiano Welcome
NOTE: This e-mail message and all attachments thereto contain confidential
information intended for a specific addressee and purpose. If you are not the
addressee (a) you may not disclose, copy
/sbin/init get "Segmentation Fault" while FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE-p2 i386 Xen DomU
is booting.
Xen Dom0 info:
OS: CentOS release 5.4 (Final)
Arch: x86_64
Kernel: 2.6.18-164.6.1.el5xen #1 SMP Tue Nov 3 16:48:13 EST 2009 x86_64 x86_64
x86_64 GNU/Linux
CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU
Em 22/04/2010 16:33, Vincent Hoffman escreveu:
On 22/04/2010 16:10, Paulo Fragoso wrote:
Hi,
Is realy necessary check fsck on boot for journaled file sistem?
Yes, but it should be a very quick check,
see these for some more details
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-geom/2008-
On 22/04/2010 16:10, Paulo Fragoso wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is realy necessary check fsck on boot for journaled file sistem?
>
Yes, but it should be a very quick check,
see these for some more details
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-geom/2008-August/003020.html
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail
Hi,
Is realy necessary check fsck on boot for journaled file sistem?
Can I put this line in fstab?
# DeviceMountpoint FStype Options Dump
Pass#
/dev/ad0s3d.journal/var/db ufs rw,async0 0
I can't boot if set Dump, Pass to 2 2 im
Hi Michael,
thanks for replying. Unfortunately changing the driver to the "nv" one does
not work since "nv" does not support GLX which is required by pyglet. I
appreciate your suggestion, though.
cheers,
giuseppe
--
Giuseppe Pagnoni
Dip. Scienze Biomediche
Sezione Fisiologia
Univ. di Mod
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 9:47 AM, Grant Peel wrote:
> Ivan,
>
> I actually just got it to work. Not sure why the default TCP no longer
> works but I added the -U flag to the fstab for the mount and it works.
>
> Anyone know what may bave changed in FreeBSD 8 to cause this?
>
> -Grant
>
> P.S on th
192.168.0.0
- Original Message -
From: "Ivan Voras"
To:
Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2010 10:19 AM
Subject: Re: NFS Mount FreeBSD 8.0
On 04/15/10 15:35, Grant Peel wrote:
Hi all,
I have been running a backups storage server for many years on FreeBSD
On 04/15/10 15:35, Grant Peel wrote:
Hi all,
I have been running a backups storage server for many years on FreeBSD
5.2.1. It has been and still is working fine. Several 6.x machines are
connected to it on the local network.
Since installing FreeBSD 8.0 on two machines (they used to run 6.x
Hi all,
I have been running a backups storage server for many years on FreeBSD
5.2.1. It has been and still is working fine. Several 6.x machines are
connected to it on the local network.
Since installing FreeBSD 8.0 on two machines (they used to run 6.x and
connected to the nfs mount
ports (latest version as of yesterday,
> py26-pyglet-1.1.2_1) on a FreeBSD 8.0 amd64 box, running the latest
> version of the ports' nvidia driver (nvidia-driver-195.36.15). I
> found that I cannot use either font.Text or text.label without causing
> segfaults. Here is so
t; I installed pyglet from the ports (latest version as of yesterday,
> py26-pyglet-1.1.2_1) on a FreeBSD 8.0 amd64 box, running the latest
> version of the ports' nvidia driver (nvidia-driver-195.36.15). I
> found that I cannot use either font.Text or text.label without causing
>
a FreeBSD 8.0 amd64 box, running the latest
version of the ports' nvidia driver (nvidia-driver-195.36.15). I
found that I cannot use either font.Text or text.label without causing
segfaults. Here is some sample code that makes python crash:
- SNIPPET 1
import pyglet
luxi = pyglet.font
1 - 100 of 337 matches
Mail list logo
