On 22/02/2012 20:16, Chuck Bacon wrote:
> Looks like FreeBSD mirrors have been hacked; more than one has an empty
> pub/FreeBSD directory, and those which have a ports/distfiles directory
> don't have an linux directory at all. I've faithfully followed the
> FreeBSD handbook for 8.2, and it says t
Looks like FreeBSD mirrors have been hacked; more than one has an empty
pub/FreeBSD directory, and those which have a ports/distfiles directory
don't have an linux directory at all. I've faithfully followed the
FreeBSD handbook for 8.2, and it says the last port is that one. Help,
please?
> >> This is what I did for a 7.2 box. Note that there are compatibility
> >>
> >> # pkg_info -orx linux > linux-stuff
> >> # pkg_delete -rx linux
> >>
> >> # cd /compat/linux
> >> # find . -type f -ls
> >> # rm -rf *
> >>
> >> # sysctl compat.linux.osrelease=2.6.16
David Collins wrote:
I have periodically tested with getting flash working, and everytime I
try it fails and I go back to undoing everything I have done and
re-installing gnash. Gnash works but it does have a few niggles.
I tried the following:
This is what I did for a 7.2 box. Note that
I never had tried to install Linux flash. I did install Windows flash
under Firefox on Wine and it worked. I found that the freebsd port for
Wine would not work but if I downloaded the source from WineHQ and
compiled it would work fine, however, i tried a more recent version of
Wine which did n
I have periodically tested with getting flash working, and everytime I
try it fails and I go back to undoing everything I have done and
re-installing gnash. Gnash works but it does have a few niggles.
I tried the following:
> This is what I did for a 7.2 box. Note that there are compatibility
On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 03:32 +, RW wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 20:04:24 +
> Freminlins wrote:
>
>
> > I must admit I gave up ever getting Flash to work RELIABLY on FreeBSD
> > a long time ago. It's just too hard, too much work, and not worth the
> > misery of installing heaps of crud jus
On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 20:04:24 +
Freminlins wrote:
> I must admit I gave up ever getting Flash to work RELIABLY on FreeBSD
> a long time ago. It's just too hard, too much work, and not worth the
> misery of installing heaps of crud just to get a flipping browser
> plugin working unreliably.
S
Polytropon wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 17:55:20 -0400, Jerry wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 22:25:53 +0100
>> Polytropon Polytropon replied:
>>
>> [snip]
>>
>>
>>> That's not FreeBSD's fault. If "professional web designers"
>>> need to "optimize" their content in order to prevent you fr
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 4:55 PM, Jerry wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 22:25:53 +0100
>
> You don't really believe that do you. Web creators attempt to make their
> sites accessible to the largest possible audience. It is probably cost
> prohibited, if even reasonably possible to make a site 100% vi
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 17:55:20 -0400, Jerry wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 22:25:53 +0100
> Polytropon Polytropon replied:
>
> [snip]
>
> >That's not FreeBSD's fault. If "professional web designers"
> >need to "optimize" their content in order to prevent you from
> >properly accessing it, it's thei
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 22:25:53 +0100
Polytropon Polytropon replied:
[snip]
>That's not FreeBSD's fault. If "professional web designers"
>need to "optimize" their content in order to prevent you from
>properly accessing it, it's their fault. I would complain to
>them, or just ignore them. Content t
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 15:45:24 -0400, PJ wrote:
> Yeah, but stupid errors are not.
Nobody can make all the errors.
> anyway I goofed somewhere. but what is strange is that
> the only obvious problem I have is this flashplugin - no matter what I
> do, I cannot get it to work.
But o
gt;> Also, from the suggestions and solutions I have received on the list, I
>> have learned many, many little tips and tricks that I would never have
>> picked up without extensive digging.
>>
>
> This is true for mee, to. I keep copies of messages that I find
> in
really turn to the list when I have some problem about which I am not
> totally clear or have difficulty resolving. But then, I must admit, I
> don't really depend on the list as it is really very simple to fix the
> problems I have by just installing a fresh system and then setting
Tony McC wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 16:00:00 +
> Tony McC wrote:
>
>
>> Hi PJ,
>>
>> ok, I tried (I was also trying to offer you support, just a different
>> kind). There was a lot of irrelevant material in your response but the
>> part I have quoted shows such a deep misunderstanding of
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 16:00:00 +
Tony McC wrote:
> Hi PJ,
>
> ok, I tried (I was also trying to offer you support, just a different
> kind). There was a lot of irrelevant material in your response but the
> part I have quoted shows such a deep misunderstanding of what I was
> trying to suggest
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 09:13:02 -0400
PJ wrote:
> But to study the manual is beyond the capabilities of anyone ... sure,
> you can read it and study it... but you will forget anything you have
> read almost immediately if you are not applying what you are studying
> at once... there may be some resi
Tony McC wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 14:10:25 +0100
> Polytropon wrote:
>
>
>> In "Windows", things don't work without thinking. The
>> misbelief that is does is grounded in the fact that
>> other people have to deal with problems, while the
>> user praises "Windows" for its easyness of use.
>
I have some problem about which I am not
totally clear or have difficulty resolving. But then, I must admit, I
don't really depend on the list as it is really very simple to fix the
problems I have by just installing a fresh system and then setting up
the programs and don't bother with fixing
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 14:10:25 +0100
Polytropon wrote:
> In "Windows", things don't work without thinking. The
> misbelief that is does is grounded in the fact that
> other people have to deal with problems, while the
> user praises "Windows" for its easyness of use.
>
> In PJ's case, maybe PC-BSD
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 12:53:18 +, Tony McC wrote:
> You seem to want everything to just work without
> having to think about it, so perhaps Windows would be better for you?
> [...]
> But my
> guess is that you really would be happier and more productive with a
> Windows OS. That isn't meant to
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 16:43:11 -0500
PJ wrote:
> I wish someone could explain to me why I am no longer able to install
> flashplugin ... none of the methods work for me on amy version... I
> have literally tried them all..
> the latest was linux-f10 - I cleaned out all the linux stuff
Polytropon wrote:
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 20:56:11 -0400, PJ wrote:
I have tried them all... now I have linux-f10 with
flashplayer10 installed and all I get is an error that flashplugin.so
cannot be started because a shared file "freetype.so.6" cannot be
found... It's there allright and is linked t
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 20:56:11 -0400, PJ wrote:
> I have tried them all... now I have linux-f10 with
> flashplayer10 installed and all I get is an error that flashplugin.so
> cannot be started because a shared file "freetype.so.6" cannot be
> found... It's there allright and is linked to fretype.so.
Sergio de Almeida Lenzi wrote:
> Ok... supose you use FreeBSD 7.2 P3 (last version) but the RELEASE
> should work too..
>
> supose you use AMD64
>
> 1) compile a custom kernel with SEM (semaphore enable)
> (sem_enable=YES) in the loader.conf
> 2) deinstall all linux stuff, remove the /compat/
Ok... supose you use FreeBSD 7.2 P3 (last version) but the RELEASE
should work too..
supose you use AMD64
1) compile a custom kernel with SEM (semaphore enable) (sem_enable=YES)
in the loader.conf
2) deinstall all linux stuff, remove the /compat/linux from the system,
deinstall all pkg with
onger able to install
flashplugin ... none of the methods work for me on amy version... I have
literally tried them all..
the latest was linux-f10 - I cleaned out all the linux stuff, umounted
the proc sytem cleaned out everything I could find related (?) to linux
and reinstalled. No go, no wa
>
> That is precisely why I keep an XP box nearby. There is no way in hell
> that I would want to personally, or expect a colleague for that matter,
> to waste valuable time getting a simple plug-in to work; especially
> since I can do it in a matter of seconds on a Microsoft product.
>
Strang
--On Tuesday, October 27, 2009 04:13:52 -0500 Jerry wrote:
That is precisely why I keep an XP box nearby. There is no way in hell
that I would want to personally, or expect a colleague for that matter,
to waste valuable time getting a simple plug-in to work; especially
since I can do it in a ma
structions to enable all
>available plugins:
># nspluginwrapper -v -a -i
>Auto-install plugins from /usr/X11R6/lib/browser_plugins
>Looking for plugins in /usr/X11R6/lib/browser_plugins
>Auto-install plugins from /usr/local/lib/npapi/linux-flashplugin
>Looking for
Freminlins wrote:
> 2009/10/25 Matthew Seaman
>
>
>
>>% pkg_info -r linux-f10-flashplugin-10.0r32
>>Information for linux-f10-flashplugin-10.0r32:
>>
>>Depends on:
>>Dependency: linux_base-f10-10_2
>>Dependency: linux-f10-ope
Matthew Seaman wrote:
> PJ wrote:
>> Is there any definitive install guide for flashplugin.
>> I was able to install it on a 7.2 64bit machine and then on an i386 but
>> somehow it has morphed into god-knows-what and no longer works.
>
> This is what I did for a 7.
/X11R6/lib/browser_plugins
Auto-install plugins from /usr/local/lib/npapi/linux-flashplugin
Looking for plugins in /usr/local/lib/npapi/linux-flashplugin
Install plugin /usr/local/lib/npapi/linux-flashplugin/libflashplayer.so
into /usr/local/lib/browser_plugins/npwrapper.libflashplayer.so
Auto-inst
2009/10/25 Matthew Seaman
>% pkg_info -r linux-f10-flashplugin-10.0r32
>Information for linux-f10-flashplugin-10.0r32:
>
>Depends on:
>Dependency: linux_base-f10-10_2
>Dependency: linux-f10-openssl-0.9.8g
>Dependency: linux-f10-openldap-2.4.12_1
&
PJ wrote:
Is there any definitive install guide for flashplugin.
I was able to install it on a 7.2 64bit machine and then on an i386 but
somehow it has morphed into god-knows-what and no longer works.
This is what I did for a 7.2 box. Note that there are compatibility
issues between new
I have some instructions on http://freebsd.langhans.com.pl/af/index.html - not
updated for a while, but it might be some useful input.
Cheers
herb langhans
On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 07:56:58PM -0400, PJ wrote:
> Is there any definitive install guide for flashplugin.
> I was able to install
Glen Barber wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 7:56 PM, PJ wrote:
>
>> Is there any definitive install guide for flashplugin.
>> I was able to install it on a 7.2 64bit machine and then on an i386 but
>> somehow it has morphed into god-knows-what and no
Howdy,
On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 7:56 PM, PJ wrote:
> Is there any definitive install guide for flashplugin.
> I was able to install it on a 7.2 64bit machine and then on an i386 but
> somehow it has morphed into god-knows-what and no longer works.
Any errors?
> I thought I had insta
Is there any definitive install guide for flashplugin.
I was able to install it on a 7.2 64bit machine and then on an i386 but
somehow it has morphed into god-knows-what and no longer works.
I thought I had installed it with linux-f8 emulations but I found the
linux-f4 on the machine... so I don
For youtube, gnash works better than linux-flashplugin7 and worse than
wine+flash9 on i386. I understand that amd64 has difficulties with
wine, making gnash or similar the only option.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.o
"Conrad J. Sabatier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
On Sat, 7 Jun 2008 15:00:27 -0500
Derek Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hey all,
I have tried using swfdec-plugin to do flash, but it doesnt seem to
work too well at least with firefox.
One ... I prefer being able to select what flash loads
On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 8:47 PM, Conrad J. Sabatier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Jun 2008 15:00:27 -0500
> Derek Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Hey all,
>>
>> I have tried using swfdec-plugin to do flash, but it doesnt seem to
>> work too well at least with firefox.
>> One ... I pr
On Sat, 7 Jun 2008 15:00:27 -0500
Derek Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I have tried using swfdec-plugin to do flash, but it doesnt seem to
> work too well at least with firefox.
> One ... I prefer being able to select what flash loads automaticly and
> Two ... I like to be abl
On Tue, 17 Jun 2008 00:36:36 +0200
cpghost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The problem with Flash is neither ...
>
> but the fact that Flash *content* itself is being routinely blocked /
> filtered at the edge of many corporate networks for security reasons,
That's sounds more like the beginning o
On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 20:11:50 +0200
dick hoogendijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 14:05:19 -0400
> Gerard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > All this nonsense about using third party programs to download
> > content from sites such as, but not limited to YouTube, is just
> > unacc
On Monday 16 June 2008 16:49:45 prad wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 15:21:45 -0400
>
> Jerry McAllister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > But, businesses that allow
> > their web designer to supplant his|her ego by putting flash or any
> > other cute trick in the way of getting business done are failing
On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 15:21:45 -0400
Jerry McAllister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But, businesses that allow
> their web designer to supplant his|her ego by putting flash or any
> other cute trick in the way of getting business done are failing to
> manage their business and are welcome to go ahead
But I agree with you: Flash is not always shit or not needed. Quite a
yes you are right. not always, just USUALLY.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 08:11:50PM +0200, dick hoogendijk wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 14:05:19 -0400
> Gerard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > All this nonsense about using third party programs to download content
> > from sites such as, but not limited to YouTube, is just unacceptable.
> > If I
On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 14:05:19 -0400
Gerard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All this nonsense about using third party programs to download content
> from sites such as, but not limited to YouTube, is just unacceptable.
> If I navigate to a URL, I fully expect to be able to view all of that
> site's con
On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 09:53:05 +0200 (CEST)
Wojciech Puchar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> flash, so don't use it.
> >>
> > i don't use flash - don't need to see all those advertizements. and
> > quite frankly, i generally find flash sites irritating anyway.
>
> i don't use it because sites that R
flash, so don't use it.
i don't use flash - don't need to see all those advertizements. and
quite frankly, i generally find flash sites irritating anyway.
i don't use it because sites that RELY on flash rarely (almost never) have
any useful contents.
i occasionally like to see some things
On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 09:17:12 +0200 (CEST)
Wojciech Puchar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> simply don't use flash if it's author don't want you to do it - as
> that's what exactly is. they want only windoze and linux users to use
> flash, so don't use it.
>
i don't use flash - don't need to see all th
Unfortunately, I don't think Adobe is likely to give a damn about people
who would switch to FreeBSD (or FreeBSD spin-off like PC-BSD) if there
do we need whole lot FreeBSD users? no. after certain amount of users
quality starts to go down. the same was with linux
whether there's a current,
On Sun, Jun 08, 2008 at 04:34:17AM -0500, Sam Fourman Jr. wrote:
> for what it is worth, between 3 companies that I do consulting for, there
> are about 250 workstations that currently use, Windows ME, or Windows
> 2000.Flash and Microsoft Outlook remain the only 2 reasons we can not use
> PC-BSD.
I'm actually thinking of running it under
kqemu, if there isn't too much overhead, on my amd64 laptop until
this gets sorted out.
The "Flashplugin"s in the ports collection are the Linux
versions, which require both a) an interface between the plugin and
the
der
> kqemu, if there isn't too much overhead, on my amd64 laptop until
> this gets sorted out.
The "Flashplugin"s in the ports collection are the Linux
versions, which require both a) an interface between the plugin and
the browser and b) the Linux emulation laye
Quoting "herbert langhans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
There are some instructions how you can get the Flashplayer running.
Not perfect, but it will do in many cases.
http://freebsd.langhans.com.pl/af/index.html
Excellent howto Herb. My problem is that it seems that firefox-devel
doesn't work wi
Quoting "Derek Graham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hey all,
I have tried using swfdec-plugin to do flash, but it doesnt seem to work too
well at least with firefox.
One ... I prefer being able to select what flash loads automaticly and
Two ... I like to be able to see the flash video but all it does i
There are some instructions how you can get the Flashplayer running. Not
perfect, but it will do in many cases.
http://freebsd.langhans.com.pl/af/index.html
Cheers
herbs
--
*** Herbert Langhans, Warschau
*** Sprachtraining Langhans
*** http://www.langhans.com.pl
*** [EMAIL PROTE
tements
> for Adobe.]
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jona Joachim
> > Sent: Saturday, June 07, 2008 4:58 PM
> > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> > Subject: Re: Flashplugin
> >
On Sun, 8 Jun 2008, Sam Fourman Jr. wrote:
That worked like a charm, but Adobe Reader 8.12 not only crashes the
browser, but also wine and X. So now I have wine firefox which can handle
Flash 9, but crashes on pdfs and linux-firefox which handles pdfs, but
crashes on Flash.
What version of w
> That worked like a charm, but Adobe Reader 8.12 not only crashes the
> browser, but also wine and X. So now I have wine firefox which can handle
> Flash 9, but crashes on pdfs and linux-firefox which handles pdfs, but
> crashes on Flash.
>
What version of wine are you using? I believe they fixe
Em Dom, 2008-06-08 às 14:37 +0100, Chris Whitehouse escreveu:
> Jerry McAllister wrote:
The idea behind the FreebSD nobebook project is rather simple:
Here in my country a person must (or should) pay a lot of taxes to
the govern... for every notebook sold,
about US$200. and will not be able to access
the university data.
Well.. about the flashplugin... it is a problem... for sure...
they work with flashplugin 7
The wireless is a problem too, for that we choose intel or atheros
chip...
Tell the flashplugin team about... please
S
cess
> the university data.
>
> Well.. about the flashplugin... it is a problem... for sure...
> they work with flashplugin 7
>
> The wireless is a problem too, for that we choose intel or atheros
> chip...
>
> Tell the flashplugin team about... please
>
>
On Sat, 7 Jun 2008 22:16:34 -0400
Jerry McAllister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 08, 2008 at 12:03:50AM +0200, Dick Hoogendijk wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 7 Jun 2008 15:33:26 -0500
> > "Sam Fourman Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > use Firefox for Windows and use wine, then install th
On Sat, 7 Jun 2008, Sam Fourman Jr. wrote:
use Firefox for Windows and use wine, then install the windows Flash 9
plugin
That worked like a charm, but Adobe Reader 8.12 not only crashes the
browser, but also wine and X. So now I have wine firefox which can handle
Flash 9, but crashes on pdfs
for what it is worth, between 3 companies that I do consulting for, there
are about 250 workstations that currently use, Windows ME, or Windows
2000.Flash and Microsoft Outlook remain the only 2 reasons we can not use
PC-BSD. Wine is making some GREAT Progress, and very shortly if not already,
Outl
On Saturday 07 June 2008 23:16:34 Jerry McAllister wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 08, 2008 at 12:03:50AM +0200, Dick Hoogendijk wrote:
> > On Sat, 7 Jun 2008 15:33:26 -0500
> >
> > "Sam Fourman Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > use Firefox for Windows and use wine, then install the windows Flash 9
> > >
tall other non open source OS,
> the user must pay the taxes difference to the project...
> a value of about US$200. and will not be able to access
> the university data.
>
> Well.. about the flashplugin... it is a problem... for sure...
> they work with flashplugin 7
>
>
Well.. about the flashplugin... it is a problem... for sure...
they work with flashplugin 7
The wireless is a problem too, for that we choose intel or atheros
chip...
Tell the flashplugin team about... please
Sergio
___
freebsd-questions@freebs
Tobias Hoellrich wrote:
Since the last discussion I actually contacted the Flash Player team and
asked what it would take to get an official port for Flash Player on
FreeBSD. I was asked to provide numbers that would indicate how many
*desktop* FreeBSD systems are out there and how many of them
Tobias Hoellrich wrote:
Since the last discussion I actually contacted the Flash Player team and
asked what it would take to get an official port for Flash Player on
FreeBSD. I was asked to provide numbers that would indicate how many
*desktop* FreeBSD systems are out there and how many of them
Tobias Hoellrich wrote:
Since the last discussion I actually contacted the Flash Player team and
asked what it would take to get an official port for Flash Player on
FreeBSD. I was asked to provide numbers that would indicate how many
*desktop* FreeBSD systems are out there and how many of them
Well, there is a site that does BSD usage statistics (they recently did a
post on this list). I recommend people use their script to raise the stats.
http://www.bsdstats.org/
Camilo
"Bono Vince Malum"
> Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2008 17:09:08 -0700
> From: "Tobias Hoellrich"
s a long-time FreeBSD user and I'm not making any statements
> for Adobe.]
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jona Joachim
> > Sent: Saturday, June 07, 2008 4:58 PM
> > To: freebsd-questio
on Saturday 07 June 2008Saturday 07 June 2008 Jona Joachim Jona Joachim
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2008-06-07, Dick Hoogendijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sat, 7 Jun 2008 15:33:26 -0500
> >
> > "Sam Fourman Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> use Firefox for Windows and use wine, then
on Saturday 07 June 2008Saturday 07 June 2008 Alastair Hogge Alastair Hogge
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Jun 2008 06:47:56 Derek Graham wrote:
> > on Saturday 07 June 2008Saturday 07 June 2008 Sam Fourman Jr. "Sam
> > Fourman
> >
> > Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jun 7,
On Sun, Jun 08, 2008 at 12:03:50AM +0200, Dick Hoogendijk wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Jun 2008 15:33:26 -0500
> "Sam Fourman Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > use Firefox for Windows and use wine, then install the windows Flash 9
> > plugin
>
> People choosing FreeBSD shouldn't be "forced" to run win
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jona Joachim
> Sent: Saturday, June 07, 2008 4:58 PM
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: Flashplugin
>
> Flash is a big pain IMO.
> The Flash question has been asked *a lot* of times on this list.
> The answer usually bo
On Sun, 8 Jun 2008 06:47:56 Derek Graham wrote:
> on Saturday 07 June 2008Saturday 07 June 2008 Sam Fourman Jr. "Sam Fourman
>
> Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 3:40 PM, Derek Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > on Saturday 07 June 2008Saturday 07 June 2008 Sam Fourma
On Saturday 07 June 2008, Derek Graham wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I have tried using swfdec-plugin to do flash, but it doesnt seem to work
> too well at least with firefox.
> One ... I prefer being able to select what flash loads automaticly and
> Two ... I like to be able to see the flash video but all
On 2008-06-07, Dick Hoogendijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Jun 2008 15:33:26 -0500
> "Sam Fourman Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> use Firefox for Windows and use wine, then install the windows Flash 9
>> plugin
>
> People choosing FreeBSD shouldn't be "forced" to run windowish
> sol
> People choosing FreeBSD shouldn't be "forced" to run windowish
> solution. The OS is not supported. That's a major problem in these
> modern times, although lots of fbsd people tend to say it is not.
> That's not everyday's live however. FreeBSD does not make the web.
>
>
I agree, I made a commen
On Sat, 7 Jun 2008 15:33:26 -0500
"Sam Fourman Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> use Firefox for Windows and use wine, then install the windows Flash 9
> plugin
People choosing FreeBSD shouldn't be "forced" to run windowish
solution. The OS is not supported. That's a major problem in these
modern
on Saturday 07 June 2008Saturday 07 June 2008 Sam Fourman Jr. "Sam Fourman
Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 3:40 PM, Derek Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > on Saturday 07 June 2008Saturday 07 June 2008 Sam Fourman Jr. "Sam
> > Fourman
> >
> > Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 3:40 PM, Derek Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> on Saturday 07 June 2008Saturday 07 June 2008 Sam Fourman Jr. "Sam Fourman
> Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 3:00 PM, Derek Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > > Hey all,
> > >
> > > I have t
on Saturday 07 June 2008Saturday 07 June 2008 Sam Fourman Jr. "Sam Fourman
Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 3:00 PM, Derek Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hey all,
> >
> > I have tried using swfdec-plugin to do flash, but it doesnt seem to work
> > too
> > well at le
On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 3:00 PM, Derek Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I have tried using swfdec-plugin to do flash, but it doesnt seem to work
> too
> well at least with firefox.
> One ... I prefer being able to select what flash loads automaticly and
> Two ... I like to be able t
Hey all,
I have tried using swfdec-plugin to do flash, but it doesnt seem to work too
well at least with firefox.
One ... I prefer being able to select what flash loads automaticly and
Two ... I like to be able to see the flash video but all it does is freeze
I can't seem to get linux-flashplu
Robert Huff writes:
> > linuxpluginwrapper-20051113_8
>
> There's a reason the latest version of this available in ports
> is dated over two years ago: it's no longer the correct tool.
> Instead, use www/nspluginwrapper. (Pay attention to the
> post-install messages.)
>
I see,
Markus Hoenicka writes:
> I hardly dare to report this problem as it, let alone the fix, seems
> quite ridiculous to me. Before filing a bug report I'd like to ask if
> anyone can reproduce the problem (I see it on two computers running
> FreeBSD) or tell me what I'm doing wrong. Nevertheless
wever, the problem was present
before the upgrade as well). The relevant port versions are:
firefox-2.0.0.12_1.1
linux-flashplugin-7.0r73
linuxpluginwrapper-20051113_8
The browser plugins directory looks like this after upgrading:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# ls -al /usr/local/lib/browser_plugins
total 220
6/lib/browser_plugins
> Looking for plugins in /usr/X11R6/lib/browser_plugins
> Auto-install plugins from /usr/X11R6/lib/firefox/plugins
> Looking for plugins in /usr/X11R6/lib/firefox/plugins
> Auto-install plugins
> from /usr/local/lib/npapi/linux-flash
there any way to play flash files without using
> > > "nspluginwrapper"?
> >
> > Only in linux versions (linux-opera, linux-firefox...). There is no
> > way to use linux flashplugin in native browsers without a wrapper.
>
> Actually, yes, depends on what you
On Sat, 2 Jun 2007 09:11:25 -0400
"Tsu-Fan Cheng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> thank you for your instructions!! this helps a lot, now I can also
> enjoy youtube and watch mlb.tv on firefox with mplayer plugin.
Glad it was useful.
> I also have coredump when running nspluginwrapper, and while ru
nd is there any way to play flash files without using
> > "nspluginwrapper"?
>
> Only in linux versions (linux-opera, linux-firefox...). There is no
> way to use linux flashplugin in native browsers without a wrapper.
Actually, yes, depends on what you need. You can use grap
ser_plugins and
> plugins directory of firefox. Now i can surf without any core-dump
> error.
>
> when i try to reinstall flashplugin, firefox cant succedd to run them.
>
> What should i do? Any suggestions?
Here's the screen section from my xorg.conf:
Section &qu
1 - 100 of 135 matches
Mail list logo