Re: where is linux-f10-flashplugin ?

2012-02-22 Thread Vincent Hoffman
On 22/02/2012 20:16, Chuck Bacon wrote: > Looks like FreeBSD mirrors have been hacked; more than one has an empty > pub/FreeBSD directory, and those which have a ports/distfiles directory > don't have an linux directory at all. I've faithfully followed the > FreeBSD handbook for 8.2, and it says t

where is linux-f10-flashplugin ?

2012-02-22 Thread Chuck Bacon
Looks like FreeBSD mirrors have been hacked; more than one has an empty pub/FreeBSD directory, and those which have a ports/distfiles directory don't have an linux directory at all. I've faithfully followed the FreeBSD handbook for 8.2, and it says the last port is that one. Help, please?

Re: flashplugin

2009-11-18 Thread David Collins
> >> This is what I did for a 7.2 box. Note that there are compatibility > >> > >> # pkg_info -orx linux > linux-stuff > >> # pkg_delete -rx linux > >> > >> # cd /compat/linux > >> # find . -type f -ls > >> # rm -rf * > >> > >> # sysctl compat.linux.osrelease=2.6.16

Re: flashplugin

2009-11-18 Thread Steve Polyack
David Collins wrote: I have periodically tested with getting flash working, and everytime I try it fails and I go back to undoing everything I have done and re-installing gnash. Gnash works but it does have a few niggles. I tried the following: This is what I did for a 7.2 box. Note that

Re: flashplugin

2009-11-17 Thread David Jackson
I never had tried to install Linux flash. I did install Windows flash under Firefox on Wine and it worked. I found that the freebsd port for Wine would not work but if I downloaded the source from WineHQ and compiled it would work fine, however, i tried a more recent version of Wine which did n

Re: flashplugin

2009-11-17 Thread David Collins
I have periodically tested with getting flash working, and everytime I try it fails and I go back to undoing everything I have done and re-installing gnash. Gnash works but it does have a few niggles. I tried the following: > This is what I did for a 7.2 box. Note that there are compatibility

Re: flashplugin

2009-10-29 Thread Wayne Sierke
On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 03:32 +, RW wrote: > On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 20:04:24 + > Freminlins wrote: > > > > I must admit I gave up ever getting Flash to work RELIABLY on FreeBSD > > a long time ago. It's just too hard, too much work, and not worth the > > misery of installing heaps of crud jus

Re: flashplugin

2009-10-28 Thread RW
On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 20:04:24 + Freminlins wrote: > I must admit I gave up ever getting Flash to work RELIABLY on FreeBSD > a long time ago. It's just too hard, too much work, and not worth the > misery of installing heaps of crud just to get a flipping browser > plugin working unreliably. S

Re: flashplugin

2009-10-28 Thread PJ
Polytropon wrote: > On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 17:55:20 -0400, Jerry wrote: > >> On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 22:25:53 +0100 >> Polytropon Polytropon replied: >> >> [snip] >> >> >>> That's not FreeBSD's fault. If "professional web designers" >>> need to "optimize" their content in order to prevent you fr

Re: flashplugin

2009-10-28 Thread Adam Vande More
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 4:55 PM, Jerry wrote: > On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 22:25:53 +0100 > > You don't really believe that do you. Web creators attempt to make their > sites accessible to the largest possible audience. It is probably cost > prohibited, if even reasonably possible to make a site 100% vi

Re: flashplugin

2009-10-28 Thread Polytropon
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 17:55:20 -0400, Jerry wrote: > On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 22:25:53 +0100 > Polytropon Polytropon replied: > > [snip] > > >That's not FreeBSD's fault. If "professional web designers" > >need to "optimize" their content in order to prevent you from > >properly accessing it, it's thei

Re: flashplugin

2009-10-28 Thread Jerry
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 22:25:53 +0100 Polytropon Polytropon replied: [snip] >That's not FreeBSD's fault. If "professional web designers" >need to "optimize" their content in order to prevent you from >properly accessing it, it's their fault. I would complain to >them, or just ignore them. Content t

Re: flashplugin

2009-10-28 Thread Polytropon
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 15:45:24 -0400, PJ wrote: > Yeah, but stupid errors are not. Nobody can make all the errors. > anyway I goofed somewhere. but what is strange is that > the only obvious problem I have is this flashplugin - no matter what I > do, I cannot get it to work. But o

Re: flashplugin

2009-10-28 Thread PJ
gt;> Also, from the suggestions and solutions I have received on the list, I >> have learned many, many little tips and tricks that I would never have >> picked up without extensive digging. >> > > This is true for mee, to. I keep copies of messages that I find > in

Re: flashplugin

2009-10-28 Thread Polytropon
really turn to the list when I have some problem about which I am not > totally clear or have difficulty resolving. But then, I must admit, I > don't really depend on the list as it is really very simple to fix the > problems I have by just installing a fresh system and then setting

Re: flashplugin

2009-10-28 Thread PJ
Tony McC wrote: > On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 16:00:00 + > Tony McC wrote: > > >> Hi PJ, >> >> ok, I tried (I was also trying to offer you support, just a different >> kind). There was a lot of irrelevant material in your response but the >> part I have quoted shows such a deep misunderstanding of

Re: flashplugin

2009-10-28 Thread Tony McC
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 16:00:00 + Tony McC wrote: > Hi PJ, > > ok, I tried (I was also trying to offer you support, just a different > kind). There was a lot of irrelevant material in your response but the > part I have quoted shows such a deep misunderstanding of what I was > trying to suggest

Re: flashplugin

2009-10-28 Thread Tony McC
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 09:13:02 -0400 PJ wrote: > But to study the manual is beyond the capabilities of anyone ... sure, > you can read it and study it... but you will forget anything you have > read almost immediately if you are not applying what you are studying > at once... there may be some resi

Re: flashplugin

2009-10-28 Thread PJ
Tony McC wrote: > On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 14:10:25 +0100 > Polytropon wrote: > > >> In "Windows", things don't work without thinking. The >> misbelief that is does is grounded in the fact that >> other people have to deal with problems, while the >> user praises "Windows" for its easyness of use. >

Re: flashplugin

2009-10-28 Thread PJ
I have some problem about which I am not totally clear or have difficulty resolving. But then, I must admit, I don't really depend on the list as it is really very simple to fix the problems I have by just installing a fresh system and then setting up the programs and don't bother with fixing

Re: flashplugin

2009-10-28 Thread Tony McC
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 14:10:25 +0100 Polytropon wrote: > In "Windows", things don't work without thinking. The > misbelief that is does is grounded in the fact that > other people have to deal with problems, while the > user praises "Windows" for its easyness of use. > > In PJ's case, maybe PC-BSD

Re: flashplugin

2009-10-28 Thread Polytropon
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 12:53:18 +, Tony McC wrote: > You seem to want everything to just work without > having to think about it, so perhaps Windows would be better for you? > [...] > But my > guess is that you really would be happier and more productive with a > Windows OS. That isn't meant to

Re: flashplugin

2009-10-28 Thread Tony McC
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 16:43:11 -0500 PJ wrote: > I wish someone could explain to me why I am no longer able to install > flashplugin ... none of the methods work for me on amy version... I > have literally tried them all.. > the latest was linux-f10 - I cleaned out all the linux stuff

Re: flashplugin

2009-10-28 Thread Matthew Seaman
Polytropon wrote: On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 20:56:11 -0400, PJ wrote: I have tried them all... now I have linux-f10 with flashplayer10 installed and all I get is an error that flashplugin.so cannot be started because a shared file "freetype.so.6" cannot be found... It's there allright and is linked t

Re: flashplugin

2009-10-28 Thread Polytropon
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 20:56:11 -0400, PJ wrote: > I have tried them all... now I have linux-f10 with > flashplayer10 installed and all I get is an error that flashplugin.so > cannot be started because a shared file "freetype.so.6" cannot be > found... It's there allright and is linked to fretype.so.

Re: flashplugin

2009-10-27 Thread PJ
Sergio de Almeida Lenzi wrote: > Ok... supose you use FreeBSD 7.2 P3 (last version) but the RELEASE > should work too.. > > supose you use AMD64 > > 1) compile a custom kernel with SEM (semaphore enable) > (sem_enable=YES) in the loader.conf > 2) deinstall all linux stuff, remove the /compat/

Re: flashplugin

2009-10-27 Thread Sergio de Almeida Lenzi
Ok... supose you use FreeBSD 7.2 P3 (last version) but the RELEASE should work too.. supose you use AMD64 1) compile a custom kernel with SEM (semaphore enable) (sem_enable=YES) in the loader.conf 2) deinstall all linux stuff, remove the /compat/linux from the system, deinstall all pkg with

Re: flashplugin

2009-10-27 Thread PJ
onger able to install flashplugin ... none of the methods work for me on amy version... I have literally tried them all.. the latest was linux-f10 - I cleaned out all the linux stuff, umounted the proc sytem cleaned out everything I could find related (?) to linux and reinstalled. No go, no wa

Re: flashplugin

2009-10-27 Thread Sergio de Almeida Lenzi
> > That is precisely why I keep an XP box nearby. There is no way in hell > that I would want to personally, or expect a colleague for that matter, > to waste valuable time getting a simple plug-in to work; especially > since I can do it in a matter of seconds on a Microsoft product. > Strang

Re: flashplugin

2009-10-27 Thread Paul Schmehl
--On Tuesday, October 27, 2009 04:13:52 -0500 Jerry wrote: That is precisely why I keep an XP box nearby. There is no way in hell that I would want to personally, or expect a colleague for that matter, to waste valuable time getting a simple plug-in to work; especially since I can do it in a ma

Re: flashplugin

2009-10-27 Thread Jerry
structions to enable all >available plugins: ># nspluginwrapper -v -a -i >Auto-install plugins from /usr/X11R6/lib/browser_plugins >Looking for plugins in /usr/X11R6/lib/browser_plugins >Auto-install plugins from /usr/local/lib/npapi/linux-flashplugin >Looking for

Re: flashplugin

2009-10-26 Thread PJ
Freminlins wrote: > 2009/10/25 Matthew Seaman > > > >>% pkg_info -r linux-f10-flashplugin-10.0r32 >>Information for linux-f10-flashplugin-10.0r32: >> >>Depends on: >>Dependency: linux_base-f10-10_2 >>Dependency: linux-f10-ope

Re: flashplugin

2009-10-26 Thread PJ
Matthew Seaman wrote: > PJ wrote: >> Is there any definitive install guide for flashplugin. >> I was able to install it on a 7.2 64bit machine and then on an i386 but >> somehow it has morphed into god-knows-what and no longer works. > > This is what I did for a 7.

Re: flashplugin

2009-10-26 Thread PJ
/X11R6/lib/browser_plugins Auto-install plugins from /usr/local/lib/npapi/linux-flashplugin Looking for plugins in /usr/local/lib/npapi/linux-flashplugin Install plugin /usr/local/lib/npapi/linux-flashplugin/libflashplayer.so into /usr/local/lib/browser_plugins/npwrapper.libflashplayer.so Auto-inst

Re: flashplugin

2009-10-26 Thread Freminlins
2009/10/25 Matthew Seaman >% pkg_info -r linux-f10-flashplugin-10.0r32 >Information for linux-f10-flashplugin-10.0r32: > >Depends on: >Dependency: linux_base-f10-10_2 >Dependency: linux-f10-openssl-0.9.8g >Dependency: linux-f10-openldap-2.4.12_1 &

Re: flashplugin

2009-10-25 Thread Matthew Seaman
PJ wrote: Is there any definitive install guide for flashplugin. I was able to install it on a 7.2 64bit machine and then on an i386 but somehow it has morphed into god-knows-what and no longer works. This is what I did for a 7.2 box. Note that there are compatibility issues between new

Re: flashplugin

2009-10-24 Thread herbert langhans
I have some instructions on http://freebsd.langhans.com.pl/af/index.html - not updated for a while, but it might be some useful input. Cheers herb langhans On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 07:56:58PM -0400, PJ wrote: > Is there any definitive install guide for flashplugin. > I was able to install

Re: flashplugin

2009-10-24 Thread PJ
Glen Barber wrote: > Howdy, > > On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 7:56 PM, PJ wrote: > >> Is there any definitive install guide for flashplugin. >> I was able to install it on a 7.2 64bit machine and then on an i386 but >> somehow it has morphed into god-knows-what and no

Re: flashplugin

2009-10-24 Thread Glen Barber
Howdy, On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 7:56 PM, PJ wrote: > Is there any definitive install guide for flashplugin. > I was able to install it on a 7.2 64bit machine and then on an i386 but > somehow it has morphed into god-knows-what and no longer works. Any errors? > I thought I had insta

flashplugin

2009-10-24 Thread PJ
Is there any definitive install guide for flashplugin. I was able to install it on a 7.2 64bit machine and then on an i386 but somehow it has morphed into god-knows-what and no longer works. I thought I had installed it with linux-f8 emulations but I found the linux-f4 on the machine... so I don&#

Re: Flashplugin

2008-08-04 Thread David Gurvich
For youtube, gnash works better than linux-flashplugin7 and worse than wine+flash9 on i386. I understand that amd64 has difficulties with wine, making gnash or similar the only option. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.o

Re: Flashplugin

2008-08-04 Thread Edwin L. Culp
"Conrad J. Sabatier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió: On Sat, 7 Jun 2008 15:00:27 -0500 Derek Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hey all, I have tried using swfdec-plugin to do flash, but it doesnt seem to work too well at least with firefox. One ... I prefer being able to select what flash loads

Re: Flashplugin

2008-08-03 Thread Sam Fourman Jr.
On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 8:47 PM, Conrad J. Sabatier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, 7 Jun 2008 15:00:27 -0500 > Derek Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hey all, >> >> I have tried using swfdec-plugin to do flash, but it doesnt seem to >> work too well at least with firefox. >> One ... I pr

Re: Flashplugin

2008-08-03 Thread Conrad J. Sabatier
On Sat, 7 Jun 2008 15:00:27 -0500 Derek Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hey all, > > I have tried using swfdec-plugin to do flash, but it doesnt seem to > work too well at least with firefox. > One ... I prefer being able to select what flash loads automaticly and > Two ... I like to be abl

Re: Flashplugin

2008-06-16 Thread RW
On Tue, 17 Jun 2008 00:36:36 +0200 cpghost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The problem with Flash is neither ... > > but the fact that Flash *content* itself is being routinely blocked / > filtered at the edge of many corporate networks for security reasons, That's sounds more like the beginning o

Re: Flashplugin

2008-06-16 Thread cpghost
On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 20:11:50 +0200 dick hoogendijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 14:05:19 -0400 > Gerard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > All this nonsense about using third party programs to download > > content from sites such as, but not limited to YouTube, is just > > unacc

Re: Flashplugin

2008-06-16 Thread Mario Lobo
On Monday 16 June 2008 16:49:45 prad wrote: > On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 15:21:45 -0400 > > Jerry McAllister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > But, businesses that allow > > their web designer to supplant his|her ego by putting flash or any > > other cute trick in the way of getting business done are failing

Re: Flashplugin

2008-06-16 Thread prad
On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 15:21:45 -0400 Jerry McAllister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > But, businesses that allow > their web designer to supplant his|her ego by putting flash or any > other cute trick in the way of getting business done are failing to > manage their business and are welcome to go ahead

Re: Flashplugin

2008-06-16 Thread Wojciech Puchar
But I agree with you: Flash is not always shit or not needed. Quite a yes you are right. not always, just USUALLY. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail

Re: Flashplugin

2008-06-16 Thread Jerry McAllister
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 08:11:50PM +0200, dick hoogendijk wrote: > On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 14:05:19 -0400 > Gerard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > All this nonsense about using third party programs to download content > > from sites such as, but not limited to YouTube, is just unacceptable. > > If I

Re: Flashplugin

2008-06-16 Thread dick hoogendijk
On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 14:05:19 -0400 Gerard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > All this nonsense about using third party programs to download content > from sites such as, but not limited to YouTube, is just unacceptable. > If I navigate to a URL, I fully expect to be able to view all of that > site's con

Re: Flashplugin

2008-06-16 Thread Gerard
On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 09:53:05 +0200 (CEST) Wojciech Puchar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> flash, so don't use it. > >> > > i don't use flash - don't need to see all those advertizements. and > > quite frankly, i generally find flash sites irritating anyway. > > i don't use it because sites that R

Re: Flashplugin

2008-06-16 Thread Wojciech Puchar
flash, so don't use it. i don't use flash - don't need to see all those advertizements. and quite frankly, i generally find flash sites irritating anyway. i don't use it because sites that RELY on flash rarely (almost never) have any useful contents. i occasionally like to see some things

Re: Flashplugin

2008-06-16 Thread prad
On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 09:17:12 +0200 (CEST) Wojciech Puchar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > simply don't use flash if it's author don't want you to do it - as > that's what exactly is. they want only windoze and linux users to use > flash, so don't use it. > i don't use flash - don't need to see all th

Re: Flashplugin

2008-06-16 Thread Wojciech Puchar
Unfortunately, I don't think Adobe is likely to give a damn about people who would switch to FreeBSD (or FreeBSD spin-off like PC-BSD) if there do we need whole lot FreeBSD users? no. after certain amount of users quality starts to go down. the same was with linux whether there's a current,

Re: Flashplugin

2008-06-15 Thread Chad Perrin
On Sun, Jun 08, 2008 at 04:34:17AM -0500, Sam Fourman Jr. wrote: > for what it is worth, between 3 companies that I do consulting for, there > are about 250 workstations that currently use, Windows ME, or Windows > 2000.Flash and Microsoft Outlook remain the only 2 reasons we can not use > PC-BSD.

Re: Flashplugin

2008-06-11 Thread eculp
I'm actually thinking of running it under kqemu, if there isn't too much overhead, on my amd64 laptop until this gets sorted out. The "Flashplugin"s in the ports collection are the Linux versions, which require both a) an interface between the plugin and the

Re: Flashplugin

2008-06-11 Thread Robert Huff
der > kqemu, if there isn't too much overhead, on my amd64 laptop until > this gets sorted out. The "Flashplugin"s in the ports collection are the Linux versions, which require both a) an interface between the plugin and the browser and b) the Linux emulation laye

Re: Flashplugin

2008-06-11 Thread eculp
Quoting "herbert langhans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: There are some instructions how you can get the Flashplayer running. Not perfect, but it will do in many cases. http://freebsd.langhans.com.pl/af/index.html Excellent howto Herb. My problem is that it seems that firefox-devel doesn't work wi

Re: Flashplugin

2008-06-11 Thread eculp
Quoting "Derek Graham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Hey all, I have tried using swfdec-plugin to do flash, but it doesnt seem to work too well at least with firefox. One ... I prefer being able to select what flash loads automaticly and Two ... I like to be able to see the flash video but all it does i

Re: Flashplugin

2008-06-10 Thread herbert langhans
There are some instructions how you can get the Flashplayer running. Not perfect, but it will do in many cases. http://freebsd.langhans.com.pl/af/index.html Cheers herbs -- *** Herbert Langhans, Warschau *** Sprachtraining Langhans *** http://www.langhans.com.pl *** [EMAIL PROTE

Re: Flashplugin

2008-06-09 Thread Jerry McAllister
tements > for Adobe.] > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jona Joachim > > Sent: Saturday, June 07, 2008 4:58 PM > > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > > Subject: Re: Flashplugin > >

Re: Flashplugin

2008-06-08 Thread Lars Eighner
On Sun, 8 Jun 2008, Sam Fourman Jr. wrote: That worked like a charm, but Adobe Reader 8.12 not only crashes the browser, but also wine and X. So now I have wine firefox which can handle Flash 9, but crashes on pdfs and linux-firefox which handles pdfs, but crashes on Flash. What version of w

Re: Flashplugin

2008-06-08 Thread Sam Fourman Jr.
> That worked like a charm, but Adobe Reader 8.12 not only crashes the > browser, but also wine and X. So now I have wine firefox which can handle > Flash 9, but crashes on pdfs and linux-firefox which handles pdfs, but > crashes on Flash. > What version of wine are you using? I believe they fixe

The Freebsd notebook project... was Flashplugin

2008-06-08 Thread sergio lenzi
Em Dom, 2008-06-08 às 14:37 +0100, Chris Whitehouse escreveu: > Jerry McAllister wrote: The idea behind the FreebSD nobebook project is rather simple: Here in my country a person must (or should) pay a lot of taxes to the govern... for every notebook sold,

Re: Flashplugin

2008-06-08 Thread Chris Whitehouse
about US$200. and will not be able to access the university data. Well.. about the flashplugin... it is a problem... for sure... they work with flashplugin 7 The wireless is a problem too, for that we choose intel or atheros chip... Tell the flashplugin team about... please S

Re: Flashplugin

2008-06-08 Thread Jerry McAllister
cess > the university data. > > Well.. about the flashplugin... it is a problem... for sure... > they work with flashplugin 7 > > The wireless is a problem too, for that we choose intel or atheros > chip... > > Tell the flashplugin team about... please > >

Re: Flashplugin

2008-06-08 Thread dick hoogendijk
On Sat, 7 Jun 2008 22:16:34 -0400 Jerry McAllister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Jun 08, 2008 at 12:03:50AM +0200, Dick Hoogendijk wrote: > > > On Sat, 7 Jun 2008 15:33:26 -0500 > > "Sam Fourman Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > use Firefox for Windows and use wine, then install th

Re: Flashplugin

2008-06-08 Thread Lars Eighner
On Sat, 7 Jun 2008, Sam Fourman Jr. wrote: use Firefox for Windows and use wine, then install the windows Flash 9 plugin That worked like a charm, but Adobe Reader 8.12 not only crashes the browser, but also wine and X. So now I have wine firefox which can handle Flash 9, but crashes on pdfs

Re: Flashplugin

2008-06-08 Thread Sam Fourman Jr.
for what it is worth, between 3 companies that I do consulting for, there are about 250 workstations that currently use, Windows ME, or Windows 2000.Flash and Microsoft Outlook remain the only 2 reasons we can not use PC-BSD. Wine is making some GREAT Progress, and very shortly if not already, Outl

Re: Flashplugin

2008-06-08 Thread Gonzalo Nemmi
On Saturday 07 June 2008 23:16:34 Jerry McAllister wrote: > On Sun, Jun 08, 2008 at 12:03:50AM +0200, Dick Hoogendijk wrote: > > On Sat, 7 Jun 2008 15:33:26 -0500 > > > > "Sam Fourman Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > use Firefox for Windows and use wine, then install the windows Flash 9 > > >

Re: Flashplugin

2008-06-07 Thread Derek Graham
tall other non open source OS, > the user must pay the taxes difference to the project... > a value of about US$200. and will not be able to access > the university data. > > Well.. about the flashplugin... it is a problem... for sure... > they work with flashplugin 7 > >

Re: Flashplugin

2008-06-07 Thread sergio lenzi
Well.. about the flashplugin... it is a problem... for sure... they work with flashplugin 7 The wireless is a problem too, for that we choose intel or atheros chip... Tell the flashplugin team about... please Sergio ___ freebsd-questions@freebs

Re: Flashplugin

2008-06-07 Thread Matthew Seaman
Tobias Hoellrich wrote: Since the last discussion I actually contacted the Flash Player team and asked what it would take to get an official port for Flash Player on FreeBSD. I was asked to provide numbers that would indicate how many *desktop* FreeBSD systems are out there and how many of them

Re: Flashplugin

2008-06-07 Thread Matthew Seaman
Tobias Hoellrich wrote: Since the last discussion I actually contacted the Flash Player team and asked what it would take to get an official port for Flash Player on FreeBSD. I was asked to provide numbers that would indicate how many *desktop* FreeBSD systems are out there and how many of them

Re: Flashplugin

2008-06-07 Thread Matthew Seaman
Tobias Hoellrich wrote: Since the last discussion I actually contacted the Flash Player team and asked what it would take to get an official port for Flash Player on FreeBSD. I was asked to provide numbers that would indicate how many *desktop* FreeBSD systems are out there and how many of them

Re: Flashplugin

2008-06-07 Thread Camilo Reyes
Well, there is a site that does BSD usage statistics (they recently did a post on this list). I recommend people use their script to raise the stats. http://www.bsdstats.org/  Camilo "Bono Vince Malum" > Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2008 17:09:08 -0700 > From: "Tobias Hoellrich"

Re: Flashplugin

2008-06-07 Thread Derek Graham
s a long-time FreeBSD user and I'm not making any statements > for Adobe.] > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jona Joachim > > Sent: Saturday, June 07, 2008 4:58 PM > > To: freebsd-questio

Re: Flashplugin

2008-06-07 Thread Derek Graham
on Saturday 07 June 2008Saturday 07 June 2008 Jona Joachim Jona Joachim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2008-06-07, Dick Hoogendijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sat, 7 Jun 2008 15:33:26 -0500 > > > > "Sam Fourman Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> use Firefox for Windows and use wine, then

Re: Flashplugin

2008-06-07 Thread Derek Graham
on Saturday 07 June 2008Saturday 07 June 2008 Alastair Hogge Alastair Hogge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 8 Jun 2008 06:47:56 Derek Graham wrote: > > on Saturday 07 June 2008Saturday 07 June 2008 Sam Fourman Jr. "Sam > > Fourman > > > > Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Sat, Jun 7,

Re: Flashplugin

2008-06-07 Thread Jerry McAllister
On Sun, Jun 08, 2008 at 12:03:50AM +0200, Dick Hoogendijk wrote: > On Sat, 7 Jun 2008 15:33:26 -0500 > "Sam Fourman Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > use Firefox for Windows and use wine, then install the windows Flash 9 > > plugin > > People choosing FreeBSD shouldn't be "forced" to run win

RE: Flashplugin

2008-06-07 Thread Tobias Hoellrich
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jona Joachim > Sent: Saturday, June 07, 2008 4:58 PM > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Flashplugin > > Flash is a big pain IMO. > The Flash question has been asked *a lot* of times on this list. > The answer usually bo

Re: Flashplugin

2008-06-07 Thread Alastair Hogge
On Sun, 8 Jun 2008 06:47:56 Derek Graham wrote: > on Saturday 07 June 2008Saturday 07 June 2008 Sam Fourman Jr. "Sam Fourman > > Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 3:40 PM, Derek Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > on Saturday 07 June 2008Saturday 07 June 2008 Sam Fourma

Re: Flashplugin

2008-06-07 Thread LtCdData
On Saturday 07 June 2008, Derek Graham wrote: > Hey all, > > I have tried using swfdec-plugin to do flash, but it doesnt seem to work > too well at least with firefox. > One ... I prefer being able to select what flash loads automaticly and > Two ... I like to be able to see the flash video but all

Re: Flashplugin

2008-06-07 Thread Jona Joachim
On 2008-06-07, Dick Hoogendijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, 7 Jun 2008 15:33:26 -0500 > "Sam Fourman Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> use Firefox for Windows and use wine, then install the windows Flash 9 >> plugin > > People choosing FreeBSD shouldn't be "forced" to run windowish > sol

Re: Flashplugin

2008-06-07 Thread Sam Fourman Jr.
> People choosing FreeBSD shouldn't be "forced" to run windowish > solution. The OS is not supported. That's a major problem in these > modern times, although lots of fbsd people tend to say it is not. > That's not everyday's live however. FreeBSD does not make the web. > > I agree, I made a commen

Re: Flashplugin

2008-06-07 Thread Dick Hoogendijk
On Sat, 7 Jun 2008 15:33:26 -0500 "Sam Fourman Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > use Firefox for Windows and use wine, then install the windows Flash 9 > plugin People choosing FreeBSD shouldn't be "forced" to run windowish solution. The OS is not supported. That's a major problem in these modern

Re: Flashplugin

2008-06-07 Thread Derek Graham
on Saturday 07 June 2008Saturday 07 June 2008 Sam Fourman Jr. "Sam Fourman Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 3:40 PM, Derek Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > on Saturday 07 June 2008Saturday 07 June 2008 Sam Fourman Jr. "Sam > > Fourman > > > > Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Flashplugin

2008-06-07 Thread Sam Fourman Jr.
On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 3:40 PM, Derek Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > on Saturday 07 June 2008Saturday 07 June 2008 Sam Fourman Jr. "Sam Fourman > Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 3:00 PM, Derek Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > Hey all, > > > > > > I have t

Re: Flashplugin

2008-06-07 Thread Derek Graham
on Saturday 07 June 2008Saturday 07 June 2008 Sam Fourman Jr. "Sam Fourman Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 3:00 PM, Derek Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hey all, > > > > I have tried using swfdec-plugin to do flash, but it doesnt seem to work > > too > > well at le

Re: Flashplugin

2008-06-07 Thread Sam Fourman Jr.
On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 3:00 PM, Derek Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hey all, > > I have tried using swfdec-plugin to do flash, but it doesnt seem to work > too > well at least with firefox. > One ... I prefer being able to select what flash loads automaticly and > Two ... I like to be able t

Flashplugin

2008-06-07 Thread Derek Graham
Hey all, I have tried using swfdec-plugin to do flash, but it doesnt seem to work too well at least with firefox. One ... I prefer being able to select what flash loads automaticly and Two ... I like to be able to see the flash video but all it does is freeze I can't seem to get linux-flashplu

linux-flashplugin-7.0 freezes firefox - weird fix included

2008-04-08 Thread Markus Hoenicka
Robert Huff writes: > > linuxpluginwrapper-20051113_8 > > There's a reason the latest version of this available in ports > is dated over two years ago: it's no longer the correct tool. > Instead, use www/nspluginwrapper. (Pay attention to the > post-install messages.) > I see,

linux-flashplugin-7.0 freezes firefox - weird fix included

2008-04-07 Thread Robert Huff
Markus Hoenicka writes: > I hardly dare to report this problem as it, let alone the fix, seems > quite ridiculous to me. Before filing a bug report I'd like to ask if > anyone can reproduce the problem (I see it on two computers running > FreeBSD) or tell me what I'm doing wrong. Nevertheless

linux-flashplugin-7.0 freezes firefox - weird fix included

2008-04-07 Thread Markus Hoenicka
wever, the problem was present before the upgrade as well). The relevant port versions are: firefox-2.0.0.12_1.1 linux-flashplugin-7.0r73 linuxpluginwrapper-20051113_8 The browser plugins directory looks like this after upgrading: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# ls -al /usr/local/lib/browser_plugins total 220

Re: Flashplugin problem after xorg 7.2 upgrade

2007-06-03 Thread Nikola Lecic
6/lib/browser_plugins > Looking for plugins in /usr/X11R6/lib/browser_plugins > Auto-install plugins from /usr/X11R6/lib/firefox/plugins > Looking for plugins in /usr/X11R6/lib/firefox/plugins > Auto-install plugins > from /usr/local/lib/npapi/linux-flash

Re: Flashplugin problem after xorg 7.2 upgrade

2007-06-02 Thread Ozan Enginoglu
there any way to play flash files without using > > > "nspluginwrapper"? > > > > Only in linux versions (linux-opera, linux-firefox...). There is no > > way to use linux flashplugin in native browsers without a wrapper. > > Actually, yes, depends on what you

Re: Fwd: Flashplugin problem after xorg 7.2 upgrade

2007-06-02 Thread Nikola Lecic
On Sat, 2 Jun 2007 09:11:25 -0400 "Tsu-Fan Cheng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > thank you for your instructions!! this helps a lot, now I can also > enjoy youtube and watch mlb.tv on firefox with mplayer plugin. Glad it was useful. > I also have coredump when running nspluginwrapper, and while ru

Fwd: Flashplugin problem after xorg 7.2 upgrade

2007-06-02 Thread Tsu-Fan Cheng
nd is there any way to play flash files without using > > "nspluginwrapper"? > > Only in linux versions (linux-opera, linux-firefox...). There is no > way to use linux flashplugin in native browsers without a wrapper. Actually, yes, depends on what you need. You can use grap

Re: Flashplugin problem after xorg 7.2 upgrade

2007-06-02 Thread Christopher Sean Hilton
ser_plugins and > plugins directory of firefox. Now i can surf without any core-dump > error. > > when i try to reinstall flashplugin, firefox cant succedd to run them. > > What should i do? Any suggestions? Here's the screen section from my xorg.conf: Section &qu

  1   2   >