Re: Voting for a native i386/amd64 flash player

2009-10-04 Thread Gary Kline
On Sun, Oct 04, 2009 at 10:01:14PM +0200, Oliver Fromme wrote: > Leandro F Silva wrote: > > Hey guys, > > > > Let's vote to have a native i386 / amd64 flash player \o/ .. > > The latest Linuxulator works quite well on -current with > the Linux flash bina

Re: Voting for a native i386/amd64 flash player

2009-10-04 Thread James Phillips
--- On Sun, 10/4/09, jhell wrote: > From: jhell > Subject: Re: Voting for a native i386/amd64 flash player > To: "James Phillips" > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Received: Sunday, October 4, 2009, 1:07 PM > > > > On Sun, 4 Oct 2009 08:33 -0700

Re: Voting for a native i386/amd64 flash player

2009-10-04 Thread Oliver Fromme
Leandro F Silva wrote: > Hey guys, > > Let's vote to have a native i386 / amd64 flash player \o/ .. The latest Linuxulator works quite well on -current with the Linux flash binary + pluginwrapper port, doesn't it? Works for me, at least. > We just have to create an

Re: Voting for a native i386/amd64 flash player

2009-10-04 Thread yblent8
-- Leandro F Silva wrote : Hey guys, Let's vote to have a native i386 / amd64 flash player \o/ .. We just have to create an account and voting on the link below =D http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/FP-1060 ___ freebsd-questi...@free... mailing

Re: Voting for a native i386/amd64 flash player

2009-10-04 Thread jhell
On Sun, 4 Oct 2009 08:33 -0700, anti_spam256@ wrote: Message: 29 Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 23:45:18 -0600 From: Chad Perrin Subject: Re: Voting for a native i386/amd64 flash player To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20091004054518.gd37...@guilt.hydra> Content-Type: text

Re: Voting for a native i386/amd64 flash player

2009-10-04 Thread James Phillips
> > Message: 29 > Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 23:45:18 -0600 > From: Chad Perrin > Subject: Re: Voting for a native i386/amd64 flash player > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Message-ID: <20091004054518.gd37...@guilt.hydra> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="

Re: Voting for a native i386/amd64 flash player

2009-10-04 Thread herbert langhans
gather some more signatures from recent subscribers. Cheers herb langhans On Fri, Oct 02, 2009 at 09:25:53PM -0300, Leandro F Silva wrote: > Hey guys, > > Let's vote to have a native i386 / amd64 flash player \o/ .. > > We just have to create an account and voting

Re: Voting for a native i386/amd64 flash player

2009-10-04 Thread Rodolfo Pellegrino
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 9:25 PM, Leandro F Silva wrote: > Hey guys, > > Let's vote to have a native i386 / amd64 flash player \o/ .. > > We just have to create an account and voting on the link below =D > > http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/FP-1060 > > I voted

Re: Voting for a native i386/amd64 flash player

2009-10-03 Thread Chad Perrin
On Sat, Oct 03, 2009 at 08:01:07AM -0700, James Phillips wrote: > > I have this fantasy that if I design and build a better streaming video > format, "They" (broadcasters) will use it, if properly marketed. It may be a fantasy, but as fantasies go, it's not a bad one. > > This would be despite

Re: Voting for a native i386/amd64 flash player

2009-10-03 Thread Chad Perrin
On Sat, Oct 03, 2009 at 09:04:00AM -0400, Robert Huff wrote: > Rolf G Nielsen writes: > > > > Let's vote to have a native i386 / amd64 flash player \o/ .. > > > > Where do I vote to have them continue forever not creating a > > FreeBSD version of that

Re: Voting for a native i386/amd64 flash player

2009-10-03 Thread Chad Perrin
On Sat, Oct 03, 2009 at 07:56:53AM +0200, Rolf G Nielsen wrote: > > Where do I vote to have them continue forever not creating a FreeBSD > version of that crap? If you s/Free/Open/ I think the question answers itself. -- Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]

Re: Voting for a native i386/amd64 flash player

2009-10-03 Thread Chad Perrin
On Sat, Oct 03, 2009 at 08:50:16AM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote: > > Google apparently favours HTML-5 as their future direction, rather than > Flash. And where YouTube goes, the rest of the world will surely follow, > at least as far as Video streaming is concerned. Oh, thank goodness. Flash vid

Re: Voting for a native i386/amd64 flash player

2009-10-03 Thread James Phillips
> -- > > Message: 9 > Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 06:28:29 +0100 > From: "Lucian @ lastdot.org" > Subject: Re: Voting for a native i386/amd64 flash player > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Message-ID: >     <5a3c8f45091008k

Re: Voting for a native i386/amd64 flash player

2009-10-03 Thread Robert Huff
Rolf G Nielsen writes: > > Let's vote to have a native i386 / amd64 flash player \o/ .. > > Where do I vote to have them continue forever not creating a > FreeBSD version of that crap? Is your objection to Flash in particular, or to any product in

Re: Voting for a native i386/amd64 flash player

2009-10-03 Thread Matthew Seaman
Lucian @ lastdot.org wrote: On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 5:56 AM, Chad Perrin wrote: On Fri, Oct 02, 2009 at 08:15:07PM -0500, J Sisson wrote: And if enough people petition Microsoft, we can get them to release Windows 7 source under the GPL. Reality called...your request to ignore it was denied.

Re: Voting for a native i386/amd64 flash player

2009-10-02 Thread Rolf G Nielsen
Leandro F Silva wrote: Hey guys, Let's vote to have a native i386 / amd64 flash player \o/ .. We just have to create an account and voting on the link below =D http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/FP-1060 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing

Re: Voting for a native i386/amd64 flash player

2009-10-02 Thread Lucian @ lastdot.org
On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 5:56 AM, Chad Perrin wrote: > On Fri, Oct 02, 2009 at 08:15:07PM -0500, J Sisson wrote: >> >> And if enough people petition Microsoft, we can get them to release Windows >> 7 source under the GPL. >> >> Reality called...your request to ignore it was denied. > > Actually, we

Re: Voting for a native i386/amd64 flash player

2009-10-02 Thread Chad Perrin
On Fri, Oct 02, 2009 at 08:15:07PM -0500, J Sisson wrote: > > And if enough people petition Microsoft, we can get them to release Windows > 7 source under the GPL. > > Reality called...your request to ignore it was denied. Actually, we *could*. The problem is the definition of "enough". I'm su

Re: Voting for a native i386/amd64 flash player

2009-10-02 Thread J Sisson
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 8:01 PM, Aryeh M. Friedman wrote: > Good luck the community has tried for years to get it and adobe seems to > not care > > > Leandro F Silva wrote: > >> Hey guys, >> >> Let's vote to have a native i386 / amd64 flash player \o/ .. &g

Re: Voting for a native i386/amd64 flash player

2009-10-02 Thread Aryeh M. Friedman
Good luck the community has tried for years to get it and adobe seems to not care Leandro F Silva wrote: Hey guys, Let's vote to have a native i386 / amd64 flash player \o/ .. We just have to create an account and voting on the link below =D http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/FP

Voting for a native i386/amd64 flash player

2009-10-02 Thread Leandro F Silva
Hey guys, Let's vote to have a native i386 / amd64 flash player \o/ .. We just have to create an account and voting on the link below =D http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/FP-1060 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebs

Re: Adobe Flash Player Petition

2008-04-10 Thread perryh
ct line something > relevant - this is not about "Adobe Flash Player Petition". and/or send a PR, including the content (not just the URL), to have it added to the Handbook or the FAQ. That way, even if the website goes away before a doc

Re: Adobe Flash Player Petition

2008-04-10 Thread Robert Huff
ly readable format; _date the page_. 2) post the URL to questions@, ports@, and possibly www@ and multimedia@ in separate posts. Make the subject line something relevant - this is not about "Adobe Flash Player Petition".

Re: Adobe Flash Player Petition

2008-04-10 Thread herbert langhans
Da Rock, of course. But I have no idea where to leave the howto. Where do such articles go for FreeBSD? I just found the official doku on the freebsd.org page, also some articles there. Though I can make a website on my server for it, but it seems to be a kind of overkill, for just such installi

Re: Adobe Flash Player Petition

2008-04-09 Thread Wojciech Puchar
Yes, but like any other crap they put out I'm sure we'll find a way around it... :) most people need crap. Microsoft gives them what they want ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To

Re: Adobe Flash Player Petition

2008-04-09 Thread Da Rock
On Wed, 2008-04-09 at 20:15 -0400, Eduardo Cerejo wrote: > > There's already a MacOS version available: > > > > http://silverlight.net/GetStarted/ > > That's what I said > > > and support for linux as well: > > > > http://www.mono-project.com/Moonlight > > It looks like gnash for silverlight,

Re: Adobe Flash Player Petition

2008-04-09 Thread Eduardo Cerejo
> There's already a MacOS version available: > > http://silverlight.net/GetStarted/ That's what I said > and support for linux as well: > > http://www.mono-project.com/Moonlight It looks like gnash for silverlight, it will always be a step behind like gnash. __

Re: Adobe Flash Player Petition

2008-04-09 Thread Abram Olson
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 4:18 PM, Da Rock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, 2008-04-09 at 18:01 -0400, E. J. Cerejo wrote: > > > > Da Rock wrote: > > > On Wed, 2008-04-09 at 10:15 +0200, herbert langhans wrote: > > >> Hi Volodymyr, > > >> I already use swfdec, but the curent port gets old to

Re: Adobe Flash Player Petition

2008-04-09 Thread Da Rock
On Thu, 2008-04-10 at 00:43 +0200, herbert langhans wrote: > Thanks to all the input I found a solution what works for me: > > FreeBSD 7.0 and Firefox 3.0a2 (the firefox-devel port) > > 1. I deinstalled swfdec. > 2. Closed Firefox and renamed .mozilla to .mozilla.backup > 3. Started firefox so

Re: Adobe Flash Player Petition

2008-04-09 Thread Da Rock
e websites you cannot even enter without a > > >running Flash Player. > > > > so don't watch them. their author definitely are not interested in > > providing real information, as it can't go without flash. > > > > while there is a lot of pages that

Re: Adobe Flash Player Petition

2008-04-09 Thread Da Rock
On Wed, 2008-04-09 at 18:01 -0400, E. J. Cerejo wrote: > Da Rock wrote: > > On Wed, 2008-04-09 at 10:15 +0200, herbert langhans wrote: > >> Hi Volodymyr, > >> I already use swfdec, but the curent port gets old too and doesnt seem to > >> play recent Flash pages. > >> I dont care about the animat

Re: Adobe Flash Player Petition

2008-04-09 Thread herbert langhans
Works here. But I didnt check it on many websites. Just audio is not ok, its mute. herbs > You were able to get version 9 working, I can't even do that on mine, it just > freezes firefox ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.fre

Re: Adobe Flash Player Petition

2008-04-09 Thread Eduardo Cerejo
On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 00:43:12 +0200 herbert langhans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks to all the input I found a solution what works for me: > > FreeBSD 7.0 and Firefox 3.0a2 (the firefox-devel port) > > 1. I deinstalled swfdec. > 2. Closed Firefox and renamed .mozilla to .mozilla.backup > 3.

Re: Adobe Flash Player Petition

2008-04-09 Thread herbert langhans
Thanks to all the input I found a solution what works for me: FreeBSD 7.0 and Firefox 3.0a2 (the firefox-devel port) 1. I deinstalled swfdec. 2. Closed Firefox and renamed .mozilla to .mozilla.backup 3. Started firefox so to generate a new and clean .mozilla 4. #make install /usr/ports/www/nsplu

Re: Adobe Flash Player Petition

2008-04-09 Thread Patrick C
Note that there isn't even a x64 version of the flash player for Linux. I think it also took quite a while before they released the Windows 64-bit version. Can't hurt to try though. -Patrick On 09/04/2008, E. J. Cerejo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Da Rock wrote: > >

Re: Adobe Flash Player Petition

2008-04-09 Thread E. J. Cerejo
Da Rock wrote: On Wed, 2008-04-09 at 10:15 +0200, herbert langhans wrote: Hi Volodymyr, I already use swfdec, but the curent port gets old too and doesnt seem to play recent Flash pages. I dont care about the animations, but it is frustrating not being able to enter some websites.. I'd say ta

Re: Adobe Flash Player Petition

2008-04-09 Thread Gaye Abdoulaye Walsimou
May be graphics/gnash can help ... ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: Adobe Flash Player Petition

2008-04-09 Thread sergio lenzi
In my computer running FreeBSD 7.0 64bits with gnome 2.22 the linksys site works ok... indeed I can see more than 90% of the flash (that is still 7) using nspluginwrapper. and for those that not work, the wine+firefox solution is used... it all works including youtube, bbc, fox, aol, uol... and a

Re: Adobe Flash Player Petition

2008-04-09 Thread Leslie Jensen
I find that assumption grossly inaccurate. I have experienced difficulties numerous times trying to access financial institutions without a working flash plug-in. I just had another bad experience with a linksys site using Opera: http://www.linksys.com/servlet/Satellite?c=L_CASupport_C1&childpag

Re: Adobe Flash Player Petition

2008-04-09 Thread Gerard
On Wed, 9 Apr 2008 13:15:50 +0200 (CEST) Wojciech Puchar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > PLEASE CONTACT ADOBE. TELL THEM TO RELEASE A FLASH PLUGIN FOR > > FREEBSD. > >There are more and more websites you cannot even enter without a > >running Flash Player. > &g

Re: Adobe Flash Player Petition

2008-04-09 Thread Wojciech Puchar
Hi Volodymyr, I already use swfdec, but the curent port gets old too and doesnt seem to play recent Flash pages. I dont care about the animations, but it is frustrating not being able to enter some websites.. so write a mail to website owners that you are unable to read it. point them to http

Re: Adobe Flash Player Petition

2008-04-09 Thread Wojciech Puchar
PLEASE CONTACT ADOBE. TELL THEM TO RELEASE A FLASH PLUGIN FOR FREEBSD. There are more and more websites you cannot even enter without a running Flash Player. so don't watch them. their author definitely are not interested in providing real information, as it can't go without flas

Re: Adobe Flash Player Petition

2008-04-09 Thread Da Rock
On Wed, 2008-04-09 at 10:15 +0200, herbert langhans wrote: > Hi Volodymyr, > I already use swfdec, but the curent port gets old too and doesnt seem to > play recent Flash pages. > I dont care about the animations, but it is frustrating not being able to > enter some websites.. I'd say talking

Re: Adobe Flash Player Petition

2008-04-09 Thread herbert langhans
Hi Volodymyr, I already use swfdec, but the curent port gets old too and doesnt seem to play recent Flash pages. I dont care about the animations, but it is frustrating not being able to enter some websites.. Cheers herbs ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd

Re: Adobe Flash Player Petition

2008-04-09 Thread Volodymyr Kostyrko
herbert langhans wrote: I just wrote an email to Justin Everett-Church. He is the product manager for the Adobe Flash Player, this is his blog: http://justin.everett-church.com/index.php/aboutjustin/ His email: blog justin.mailshell.com Another product manager is Emmy Huang, but I couldnt

Adobe Flash Player Petition

2008-04-09 Thread herbert langhans
Hi List, I just wrote an email to Justin Everett-Church. He is the product manager for the Adobe Flash Player, this is his blog: http://justin.everett-church.com/index.php/aboutjustin/ His email: blog justin.mailshell.com Another product manager is Emmy Huang, but I couldnt find her email

Flash player installation problems

2007-10-14 Thread David Scheidt
I'm trying to install linux-flashplugin7, and am having problems. I've got nspluginwrapper, and linux-flashplugin7 installed. When I run nspluginwrapper -a -v -i I get this error: /usr/local/lib/nspluginwrapper/i386/linux/npviewer.bin: error while loading shared libraries: libX11.so.6: canno

Re: flash player

2007-08-26 Thread Michael S
Thanks a lot. I will try that. --- Oliver Herold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes you can diable it with make > DISABLE_VULNERABILITIES=yes in the > linux-flashplugin directory. > > Cheers > > Oliver > > On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 09:53:33AM -0400, Michael S > wrote: > > Good day all, > > > > I

Re: flash player

2007-08-26 Thread N.J. Mann
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Michael S wrote: > > I am trying to install flash 7 from ports, I keep on > getting this message linux-flashplugin -- critical > vulnerabilities. >Reference: > > > I know that I

Re: flash player

2007-08-26 Thread Oliver Herold
Yes you can diable it with make DISABLE_VULNERABILITIES=yes in the linux-flashplugin directory. Cheers Oliver On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 09:53:33AM -0400, Michael S wrote: > Good day all, > > I am trying to install flash 7 from ports, I keep on > getting this message linux-flashplugin -- critical

flash player

2007-08-26 Thread Michael S
Good day all, I am trying to install flash 7 from ports, I keep on getting this message linux-flashplugin -- critical vulnerabilities. Reference: I know that I uninstalled portaudit. Is there a way to still inst

Re: Flash Player

2007-02-02 Thread RW
L standalone Flash (TM) plugin for > > Mozilla web browser libflash-0.4.13_1 GPL Flash (TM) Library > > linux-flashplugin-7.0r69 Adobe Flash Player NPAPI Plugin > > > > gnash-0.7.1_1 GNU Flash movie player > > > > firefox-2.0.0.1_1,1 Web browser based on the brow

Re: Flash Player (fwd)

2007-02-02 Thread youshi10
linux-flashplugin-7.0r69 Adobe Flash Player NPAPI Plugin gnash-0.7.1_1 GNU Flash movie player firefox-2.0.0.1_1,1 Web browser based on the browser portion of Mozilla I would recommend installing the linux-firefox port. It can coexist with the native freebsd firefox that you already have (in case

Re: Flash Player

2007-02-02 Thread Michael M. Press
I am running firefox from the ports and have the following ports installed to try and make this work but it will not. flashplugin-mozilla-0.4.13 A GPL standalone Flash (TM) plugin for Mozilla web browser libflash-0.4.13_1 GPL Flash (TM) Library linux-flashplugin-7.0r69 Adobe Flash Player

Re: Flash Player

2007-02-02 Thread youshi10
firefox from the ports and have the following ports installed to try and make this work but it will not. flashplugin-mozilla-0.4.13 A GPL standalone Flash (TM) plugin for Mozilla web browser libflash-0.4.13_1 GPL Flash (TM) Library linux-flashplugin-7.0r69 Adobe Flash Player NPAPI Plugin gnash

Flash Player

2007-02-02 Thread RYAN M. vAN GINNEKEN
installed to try and make this work but it will not. flashplugin-mozilla-0.4.13 A GPL standalone Flash (TM) plugin for Mozilla web browser libflash-0.4.13_1 GPL Flash (TM) Library linux-flashplugin-7.0r69 Adobe Flash Player NPAPI Plugin gnash-0.7.1_1 GNU Flash movie player firefox

Re: how to enable linux flash player in firefox

2007-01-30 Thread Tore Lund
Andreas Davour wrote: > I did try to set up my environment like you described. But, in the > listarchive the ftp site you mentioned is scrambled. Could you please > repost it? The site I used didn't have many of the packages. I suppose you are talking about PKG_SITES. I use this Norwegian mirro

Re: how to enable linux flash player in firefox

2007-01-30 Thread Marc Fonvieille
On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 06:31:33AM -0800, David Benfell wrote: > On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 07:50:30 +0100, Marc Fonvieille wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 12:43:21PM +0800, peter wrote: > > > 6.Check the libexec directory exists in /usr/src, > > > if no, #sysinstall-> custom->deistributions->src->li

Re: how to enable linux flash player in firefox

2007-01-30 Thread David Benfell
On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 07:50:30 +0100, Marc Fonvieille wrote: > On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 12:43:21PM +0800, peter wrote: > > 6.Check the libexec directory exists in /usr/src, > > if no, #sysinstall-> custom->deistributions->src->libexec, then > > # cd /usr/src/libexec > > # fetch http://people.FreeB

Re: how to enable linux flash player in firefox

2007-01-29 Thread Marc Fonvieille
On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 12:43:21PM +0800, peter wrote: > > Andreas Davour wrote: > > > Sorry for being so lost. I'm totally lost in the native/emulated mess > > and which of the ports work with which. > >It's terribly sad that nobody can make it work, as of now. I really > >hope > >FreeBSD 7 can

Re: how to enable linux flash player in firefox

2007-01-29 Thread peter
> Andreas Davour wrote: > Sorry for being so lost. I'm totally lost in the native/emulated mess > and which of the ports work with which. >It's terribly sad that nobody can make it work, as of now. I really >hope >FreeBSD 7 can make a change. I'm now using 6.2-PRERELEASE as the desktop with fir

Re: how to enable linux flash player in firefox

2007-01-29 Thread Garrett Cooper
Chris wrote: Tore Lund wrote: Andreas Davour wrote: [snip] Is what I get when I try Google Video. YouTube works for video, but not sound. I wonder if that state "kserel" is what's troubling us? It's past midnight here, so I'll think about this thing tomorrow. I also get YouTube without sound

Re: how to enable linux flash player in firefox

2007-01-29 Thread Chris
Tore Lund wrote: > Andreas Davour wrote: >> [snip] >> Is what I get when I try Google Video. YouTube works for video, but not >> sound. I wonder if that state "kserel" is what's troubling us? > > It's past midnight here, so I'll think about this thing tomorrow. > > I also get YouTube without so

Re: how to enable linux flash player in firefox

2007-01-29 Thread Tore Lund
Andreas Davour wrote: > [snip] > Is what I get when I try Google Video. YouTube works for video, but not > sound. I wonder if that state "kserel" is what's troubling us? It's past midnight here, so I'll think about this thing tomorrow. I also get YouTube without sound. But I get http://www.fla

Re: how to enable linux flash player in firefox

2007-01-29 Thread Tore Lund
Andreas Davour wrote: > I'll try to do a cvsup, rebuild and try to reinstall the browser and the > plugins. Is PKG_SITES only used with pkg_fetch or can I use the ports > system "as is"? I've never even heard of it before today. I believe you can use the ports system as is. In theory at least y

Re: how to enable linux flash player in firefox

2007-01-29 Thread Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri
On 1/29/07, Andreas Davour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sun, 28 Jan 2007, Garrett Cooper wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Andreas Davour wrote: >> On Sun, 28 Jan 2007, Tijl Coosemans wrote: >> Since I'm now using 6.2-PRERELEASE I guess it could be fixed in the >

Re: how to enable linux flash player in firefox

2007-01-29 Thread Tore Lund
Andreas Davour wrote: > It's terribly sad that nobody can make it work, as of now. I really hope > FreeBSD 7 can make a change. It DOES work right now, in 6.2-RELEASE with linux-flashplugin7, and that is with sound. The problem is, it only works for some users, and no one knows precisely which c

Re: how to enable linux flash player in firefox

2007-01-28 Thread Dhénin Jean-Jacques
mplayer which I installed with simple make install clean all have gotten just right and I can see them all in and it works each and everytime This is output of my about:plugins. I am really about to give up on this flash player or shockwave flash I tried performing all the steps discussed with b

Re: how to enable linux flash player in firefox

2007-01-28 Thread Dak Ghatikachalam
yer which I installed with simple make install clean all have gotten just right and I can see them all in and it works each and everytime This is output of my about:plugins. I am really about to give up on this flash player or shockwave flash I tried performing all the steps discussed with

Re: how to enable linux flash player in firefox

2007-01-28 Thread FreeBSD WickerBill
On 1/28/07, Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 1/28/07, Andreas Davour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 28 Jan 2007, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > > >> I followed those instructions and with firefox-2.0.0.1_1,1 it gives this > >> result: > >> /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/local

Re: how to enable linux flash player in firefox

2007-01-28 Thread Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri
On 1/28/07, Andreas Davour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sun, 28 Jan 2007, Tijl Coosemans wrote: >> I followed those instructions and with firefox-2.0.0.1_1,1 it gives this >> result: >> /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/local/lib/pluginwrapper/flash7.so: Undefined >> symbol "_dlsym" >> >> Since I'm no

Re: how to enable linux flash player in firefox

2007-01-28 Thread Andrew Gould
> From: Robert Huff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Sent: Sunday, January 28, 2007 7:44:41 AM > Subject: Re: how to enable linux flash player in firefox > > Andreas Davour writes: > > > Anyway. Can we hope that patch is finding it

Re: how to enable linux flash player in firefox

2007-01-28 Thread Robert Huff
Andreas Davour writes: > Anyway. Can we hope that patch is finding it's way into the main > branch with haste? As I understand it: 1) This patch is the "tip of the iceberg" for a much larger change, 2) That change will not debut globally until 7.0. 3) Unfortuna

Re: how to enable linux flash player in firefox

2007-01-28 Thread Garrett Cooper
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Andreas Davour wrote: > On Sun, 28 Jan 2007, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > >>> Since I'm now using 6.2-PRERELEASE I guess it could be fixed in the >>> final RELEASE, but it would be nice to know if someone can recognize >>> "_dlsym" and say it is so. >> >>

Re: how to enable linux flash player [9] in firefox

2007-01-27 Thread Garrett Cooper
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Gary Kline wrote: > On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 01:27:49PM -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote: >> It's a pain in the ass that Adobe / Macromedia had to invent a >> technology that so many "web developers" sought, just because of its >> ease of "developing"; if on

Re: how to enable linux flash player [9] in firefox

2007-01-27 Thread Gary Kline
On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 01:27:49PM -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote: > > It's a pain in the ass that Adobe / Macromedia had to invent a > technology that so many "web developers" sought, just because of its > ease of "developing"; if only the "developers" sought to learn CSS and a > bit of proper javas

Re: how to enable linux flash player in firefox

2007-01-27 Thread Oliver Iberien
On Saturday 27 January 2007 16:06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Subject: Re: how to enable linux flash player in firefox > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Cc: Andreas Davour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain;  charset=&

Re: how to enable linux flash player [9] in firefox

2007-01-27 Thread Jamie Jones
> I've tried installing this, too. The included readme addresses linux, and > there is no indication of what is supposed to be done with libmap.conf, which > leaves me in the dark. Has anyone figured this out? linux-flashplugin9 is useful for people who use the linux-firefox. The libmap.conf /

Re: how to enable linux flash player in firefox

2007-01-27 Thread Oliver Iberien
On Saturday 27 January 2007 16:06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Subject: Re: how to enable linux flash player in firefox > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Cc: Andreas Davour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain;  charset=&

Re: how to enable linux flash player in firefox

2007-01-27 Thread Tijl Coosemans
this mean that I cannot use linux-flash with native Firefox? Can > flash be launched as a standalone application? If the answer is yes, no, > then I will file a bug report to have linux-firefox added to the > run-dependency list. linuxpluginwrapper doesn't support flash9 yet, so no, y

Re: how to enable linux flash player in firefox

2007-01-27 Thread Tijl Coosemans
On Saturday 27 January 2007 21:17, Andreas Davour wrote: > On Sat, 27 Jan 2007, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > > If you want to use flash with native freebsd browsers, you need to use > > linuxpluginwrapper (only for FreeBSD 5.x and 6.x). The details are > > explained at > > > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc

Re: how to enable linux flash player [9] in firefox

2007-01-27 Thread Garrett Cooper
PROTECTED]> >>> Subject: how to enable linux flash player in firefox >>> To: FreeBSD Questions <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" >>> >>> Hi there:

Re: how to enable linux flash player [9] in firefox

2007-01-27 Thread Garrett Cooper
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Oliver Iberien wrote: > On Thursday 25 January 2007 23:33, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: >> Message: 2 >> Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 20:41:37 +0100 >> From: Erik Norgaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Subject: how to enable

Re: how to enable linux flash player in firefox

2007-01-27 Thread Tsu-Fan Cheng
my psersonal flash experience with opera by going to youtube is linux-opera works but not native opera+linuxplugin. TFC On 1/27/07, Andreas Davour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sat, 27 Jan 2007, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > On Saturday 27 January 2007 13:20, Andreas Davour wrote: >> On Sat, 27 Ja

Re: how to enable linux flash player [9] in firefox

2007-01-27 Thread Oliver Iberien
On Thursday 25 January 2007 23:33, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Message: 2 > Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 20:41:37 +0100 > From: Erik Norgaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: how to enable linux flash player in firefox > To: FreeBSD Questions <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Message-ID:

Re: how to enable linux flash player in firefox

2007-01-27 Thread Erik Norgaard
Tijl Coosemans wrote: On Thursday 25 January 2007 20:41, Erik Norgaard wrote: I see the new flash9 for linux has been included in ports, so I installed it - but how do I enable the plugin in Firefox? Does it work or does it crash? Basically, it works with linux-firefox and you can get sound if

Re: how to enable linux flash player in firefox

2007-01-27 Thread Tijl Coosemans
On Saturday 27 January 2007 13:20, Andreas Davour wrote: > On Sat, 27 Jan 2007, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > > Flash9 is very unstable though, so you'll probably want to stay > > with flash7 for now. > > Since I have had serious problems getting even Flash7 to work, > following instructions found here

Re: how to enable linux flash player in firefox

2007-01-27 Thread Tore Lund
Andreas Davour wrote: > On Sat, 27 Jan 2007, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > >> Flash9 is very unstable though, so you'll probably want to stay with >> flash7 for now. > > Since I have had serious problems getting even Flash7 to work, following > instructions found here at the list, could you please su

Re: how to enable linux flash player in firefox

2007-01-27 Thread Tsu-Fan Cheng
MM... we should write up a step-by-step How-to about this subject and have it post on somewhere (or have it associated with firefox pkg-message), more and more website pages depend on flash to function correctly, this is a serious issue... TFC On 1/27/07, Andreas Davour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote

Re: how to enable linux flash player in firefox

2007-01-27 Thread Tijl Coosemans
On Thursday 25 January 2007 20:41, Erik Norgaard wrote: > I see the new flash9 for linux has been included in ports, so I > installed it - but how do I enable the plugin in Firefox? Does it > work or does it crash? You should check out the freebsd-ports mailing list archives. This has been discuss

how to enable linux flash player in firefox

2007-01-25 Thread Erik Norgaard
Hi there: I see the new flash9 for linux has been included in ports, so I installed it - but how do I enable the plugin in Firefox? Does it work or does it crash? Thanks, Erik -- Ph: +34.666334818 web: http://www.locolomo.org smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic

Re: Flash player 9 Beta is Live

2006-10-22 Thread lveax . m
On 10/19/06, Dimiter Ivanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: http://blogs.adobe.com/penguin.swf/2006/10/beta_is_live.html I have downloaded the stand alone player and it works out of the box. Anyone having expirience with the browser plugin ? i download the plugin and put in ~/.mozilla/plugins. it

Re: Flash player 9 Beta is Live

2006-10-22 Thread Mark Kane
On Sun, Oct 22, 2006, at 09:46:45 -0400, Derrick Edwards wrote: > I am not able to get this to work. I downloaded, unpacked, changed > the permissions of the flash player and executed it. All I get is > the adobe flashplayer dialog box. I tried to input an URL in the > dialog box

Re: Flash player 9 Beta is Live

2006-10-22 Thread Derrick Edwards
aded 9 and went back to 7 for now where sound at > least works. > > Hopefully Adobe will add in alternate sound support methods so other > platforms besides Linux can have sound like in version 7, and of course > I hope they release a native FreeBSD binary sometime too so

Re: Flash player 9 Beta is Live

2006-10-19 Thread Mark Kane
On Thu, Oct 19, 2006, at 13:08:50 -0400, Jerry McAllister wrote: > On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 06:32:14PM +0300, Dimiter Ivanov wrote: > > > http://blogs.adobe.com/penguin.swf/2006/10/beta_is_live.html > > > > I have downloaded the stand alone player and it works out of the > > box. Anyone having exp

Re: Flash player 9 Beta is Live

2006-10-19 Thread Jerry McAllister
On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 06:32:14PM +0300, Dimiter Ivanov wrote: > http://blogs.adobe.com/penguin.swf/2006/10/beta_is_live.html > > I have downloaded the stand alone player and it works out of the box. > Anyone having expirience with the browser plugin ? > > I'm using 6.1 Release and KDE 3.5.4 O

Flash player 9 Beta is Live

2006-10-19 Thread Dimiter Ivanov
http://blogs.adobe.com/penguin.swf/2006/10/beta_is_live.html I have downloaded the stand alone player and it works out of the box. Anyone having expirience with the browser plugin ? I'm using 6.1 Release and KDE 3.5.4 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org

Re: Wanted: Flash player for ....

2006-04-28 Thread ballona
x27;t play it too. But instead of crashing it showed an upper bar saying that a plugin is missing and ask if it can try to fetch and install it for me. I've said yes but unfortunately it's said it couldn't find an appropriate plugin and that I had to do it manually. 7) Afte

Wanted: Flash player for ....

2006-04-25 Thread Chris Maness
Chris Maness wrote: --- Robert Huff > Svein Halvor Halvorsen writes: > > I was pointed in this direction by their customer > support: http://www.macromedia.com/cfusion/mmform/index.cfm?name=wishform&prod... >

Re: Wanted: Flash player for ....

2006-04-13 Thread Kris Anderson
l > > question it (politely), it might get a little > attention somewhere > > above the front-line customer service level. > > > > Anyway, the answer I got is not highly > enlightening. The most > > significant paragraph (I think): > > > >Pleas

  1   2   >