On Thu, 30 Apr 2009 09:11:28 -0600, Tim Judd wrote:
> It's funny that OpenBSD's manpage says it uses FFS, not UFS -- when even I
> thought it said UFS before I looked it up.
Don't FFS and UFS refer to the same file system, the
Berkeley Fast File System, also known as 4.2bsd? In
my "studies" accor
something I wonder about
I know OpenBSD and FreeBSD both have different versions of the "UFS"
filesystems
(FreeBSD newfs(8) -O option, OpenBSD newfs(8) -O)
has someone tried to use all combinations of all options to see if they
work?
It's funny that OpenBSD's manpage says it uses FFS, not UF
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Daniel C. Dowse wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:36:31 -0400
> Chuck Robey wrote:
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> I just put a OpenBSD partition on a EIDE disk I had laying around. I'd had
>> some
>> advice (apparently ba
On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:36:31 -0400
Chuck Robey wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I just put a OpenBSD partition on a EIDE disk I had laying around. I'd had
> some
> advice (apparently bad) that the OpenBSD UFS filesystem could provide a
> filesystem that I could acce
On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:36:31 -0400, Chuck Robey wrote:
> Is there ANY filesystem that would be a good bet, so that I could transfer
> stuff
> to & from FreeBSD to OpenBSD? Besides (obviously) UFS?
Yes, there is, and it even isn't a file system.
It's tar. You can easily create a tar archive
and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I just put a OpenBSD partition on a EIDE disk I had laying around. I'd had some
advice (apparently bad) that the OpenBSD UFS filesystem could provide a
filesystem that I could access from FreeBSD ... least, just now when I tried to
mount either of the
