xorg: (EE) XKB: No components provided for device Virtual core keyboard

2009-09-07 Thread Anton Shterenlikht
get back again to the xdm login prompt. In /var/log/xdm.log I get (EE) XKB: No components provided for device Virtual core keyboard I've updated to full x11/xorg port. All my ports are up to date. My xorg.conf is below. Please advise many t

Re: strange ee behaviour

2009-08-02 Thread Alexander Best
this issue still exists in BETA-2. imo it really needs to be fixed before the release of 8.0. if i were to test a new OS and discover that it comes with an editor which crashes when opening a new term i'd be very frustrated. alex ___ freebsd-questions@fr

Re: strange ee behaviour

2009-07-01 Thread Alexander Best
; >> i'm running xorg-7.4.2 and x11-wm/awesome on HEAD (r195173). > >> >> when > >> >> i run > >> >> ee > >> >> in > >> >> the debugger and open another xterm the debugger says "Program > >> >>

Re: strange ee behaviour

2009-07-01 Thread Paul B. Mahol
7/1/09, Paul B. Mahol wrote: >> > On 7/1/09, Alexander Best wrote: >> >> i'm running xorg-7.4.2 and x11-wm/awesome on HEAD (r195173). when >> >> i run >> >> ee >> >> in >> >> the debugger and open another xterm the debugger s

Re: strange ee behaviour

2009-07-01 Thread Alexander Best
oh. i see. is this hard to fix? maybe a problem report would be useful? cheers. Paul B. Mahol schrieb am 2009-07-01: > On 7/1/09, Paul B. Mahol wrote: > > On 7/1/09, Alexander Best wrote: > >> i'm running xorg-7.4.2 and x11-wm/awesome on HEAD (r195173). when > >>

Re: strange ee behaviour

2009-07-01 Thread Paul B. Mahol
On 7/1/09, Alexander Best wrote: > oh sorry. i thought this was ee related because there've been some recent > changes in the ee src. if it's awesome's fault i'll try to replace the > installed version from ports with a svn snapshot. maybe the problem's been &

Re: strange ee behaviour

2009-07-01 Thread Paul B. Mahol
On 7/1/09, Paul B. Mahol wrote: > On 7/1/09, Alexander Best wrote: >> i'm running xorg-7.4.2 and x11-wm/awesome on HEAD (r195173). when i run >> ee >> in >> the debugger and open another xterm the debugger says "Program exited >> normally.". s

Re: strange ee behaviour

2009-07-01 Thread Alexander Best
oh sorry. i thought this was ee related because there've been some recent changes in the ee src. if it's awesome's fault i'll try to replace the installed version from ports with a svn snapshot. maybe the problem's been fixed already. cheers. Paul B. Mahol schrieb a

Re: strange ee behaviour

2009-07-01 Thread Paul B. Mahol
On 7/1/09, Alexander Best wrote: > i'm running xorg-7.4.2 and x11-wm/awesome on HEAD (r195173). when i run ee > in > the debugger and open another xterm the debugger says "Program exited > normally.". so it's not a program crash i guess. > > Paul B. Maho

Re: strange ee behaviour

2009-06-30 Thread Alexander Best
i'm running xorg-7.4.2 and x11-wm/awesome on HEAD (r195173). when i run ee in the debugger and open another xterm the debugger says "Program exited normally.". so it's not a program crash i guess. Paul B. Mahol schrieb am 2009-07-01: > On 6/30/09, Alexander Best wrote:

Re: strange ee behaviour

2009-06-30 Thread Paul B. Mahol
On 6/30/09, Alexander Best wrote: > hi there, > > i'm experiencing this strange `ee` behaviour lately. when i open `ee` in an > xterm and open another xterm `ee` simply exits. if i try to enter commands > which output to sdtout/stderr like `ls` on the xterm window ee was runni

strange ee behaviour

2009-06-30 Thread Alexander Best
hi there, i'm experiencing this strange `ee` behaviour lately. when i open `ee` in an xterm and open another xterm `ee` simply exits. if i try to enter commands which output to sdtout/stderr like `ls` on the xterm window ee was running on the output is a mess. i'm running r195173 (HEAD

Re: (EE) intel(0): [DRI] Locking deadlock. (EE) intel(0): [DRI] Unlocking inconsistency:

2009-01-31 Thread Glen Barber
Antonio Rieser said: > 1) If I boot with the tablet plugged in, everything is fine. > 2) If I remove the tablet from the computer (I've only tried it during > an X session), the system panics and shuts down. Removing USB devices without cleanly disabling the device will do that, but I've personal

Re: (EE) intel(0): [DRI] Locking deadlock. (EE) intel(0): [DRI] Unlocking inconsistency:

2009-01-31 Thread Antonio Rieser
I) XINPUT: Adding extended input device "pad" (type: Wacom Pad) (II) evaluating device (cursor) (II) XINPUT: Adding extended input device "cursor" (type: Wacom Cursor) (II) evaluating device (eraser) (II) XINPUT: Adding extended input device "eraser" (type: Wacom Erase

Re: (EE) intel(0): [DRI] Locking deadlock. (EE) intel(0): [DRI] Unlocking inconsistency:

2009-01-31 Thread Glen Barber
Antonio Rieser said: > I'm running FreeBSD 7.1 on an ACER Aspire > 1680 laptop. Something is writing so many > errors to my Xorg.0.log and kdm-bin.log files > that it fills up the /var filesystem and locks my system. > (I just had my first encounter with the fixit disk - scary > but successful...

(EE) intel(0): [DRI] Locking deadlock. (EE) intel(0): [DRI] Unlocking inconsistency:

2009-01-31 Thread Antonio Rieser
) Wacom device "stylus" top X=0 top Y=0 bottom X=21648 bottom Y=13530 resol X=2540 resol Y=2540 (**) Option "BaudRate" "1200" (**) Option "StopBits" "2" (**) Option "DataBits" "8" (**) Option "Parity" "None" (*

Re: Applying short cable fix (reg=ee)

2005-12-16 Thread Fabian Keil
Thiago Esteves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, I'm from Brazil. My ethernet interface is a "sis". During boot > it sends the message: > >sis0: Applying short cable fix (reg=ee) > > > What's it ? Help me ! Exc

Applying short cable fix (reg=ee)

2005-12-16 Thread Thiago Esteves
Hi, I'm from Brazil. My ethernet interface is a "sis". During boot it sends the message: sis0: Applying short cable fix (reg=ee) What&#

Re: ee(1): why Backspace doesn't work as expected if $TERM=xterm?

2005-12-07 Thread James Bailie
Constantine A. Murenin wrote: > They map it perfectly fine as 127, it's only FreeBSD's ee(1) that has > this problem, tcsh and others work fine. ee does not do this on the console on my 5.4 machine, nor does it do this in an XTerm over an ssh connection to my 4.11 machine, t

Re: ee(1): why Backspace doesn't work as expected if $TERM=xterm?

2005-12-07 Thread Constantine A. Murenin
On 07 Dec 2005 09:27:48 -0500, Lowell Gilbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Constantine A. Murenin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Hello, > > > > When I ssh my FreeBSD 4.8 machine and try to use ee(1), I always > > notice that Backspace eras

Re: ee(1): why Backspace doesn't work as expected if $TERM=xterm?

2005-12-07 Thread Lowell Gilbert
"Constantine A. Murenin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hello, > > When I ssh my FreeBSD 4.8 machine and try to use ee(1), I always > notice that Backspace erases the following character, not the previous > one. On the contrary, I've noticed that it does no

ee(1): why Backspace doesn't work as expected if $TERM=xterm?

2005-12-06 Thread Constantine A. Murenin
Hello, When I ssh my FreeBSD 4.8 machine and try to use ee(1), I always notice that Backspace erases the following character, not the previous one. On the contrary, I've noticed that it does not do that when I login via console. So I decided to play with the value of $TERM. By default, w

Re: ee editor rules :)

2005-02-03 Thread Loren M. Lang
On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 08:23:12PM +, Xian wrote: > On Wednesday 02 February 2005 17:49, Gert Cuykens wrote: > > I like it allot but i cant seem to find out how to type a "/" character ? > > I think this would have more to do with setting up your keyboard (I might be > wrong). In the meantime

Re: ee editor rules :)

2005-02-03 Thread Jerry McAllister
> > On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 08:23:12PM +, Xian typed: > > > Does anyone have an "Idiots guide to VI"? > > There isn't. vi was never meant to be used by idiots ;-) Here is a simple guide. It definitely does not cover everything, but is enough to get by for most general editing in vi.

Re: ee editor rules :)

2005-02-03 Thread Matthias Buelow
Ruben de Groot wrote: Does anyone have an "Idiots guide to VI"? There isn't. vi was never meant to be used by idiots ;-) au contraire.. read the shocking truth about vi.. the story the CIA doesn't want you to know about.. the story of Vince Idiot: http://www.sbernard.ee/vince.html mkb. __

Re: ee editor rules :)

2005-02-03 Thread Ruben de Groot
On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 08:23:12PM +, Xian typed: > Does anyone have an "Idiots guide to VI"? There isn't. vi was never meant to be used by idiots ;-) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-

Re: ee editor rules :)

2005-02-02 Thread tanja pislar
hi, this is not exactly an "idiot's guide to vi", but for a quick look up of commands it can be useful. http://www.eng.hawaii.edu/Tutor/vi.html regards, tanja On Wed, 2 Feb 2005 20:23:12 +, Xian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wednesday 02 February 2005 17:49, Gert Cuykens wrote: > > I like

Re: ee editor rules :)

2005-02-02 Thread Xian
On Wednesday 02 February 2005 17:49, Gert Cuykens wrote: > I like it allot but i cant seem to find out how to type a "/" character ? I think this would have more to do with setting up your keyboard (I might be wrong). In the meantime, / is ASCII code 47, you can enter this with ^a or ^o dependin

ee editor rules :)

2005-02-02 Thread Gert Cuykens
I like it allot but i cant seem to find out how to type a "/" character ? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: (EE) No Drivers Not Found

2003-10-05 Thread T Kellers
On Sunday 05 October 2003 11:54 am, Mark Hummel wrote: > Hi, > > I've reconfigured XF86Config Server 3 times now and I've eliminated > every warning and error except the one I put in the subject line. > Startx still fails for the reason sited and I don't know why. I think > the problem is the vide

(EE) No Drivers Not Found

2003-10-05 Thread Mark Hummel
Hi, I've reconfigured XF86Config Server 3 times now and I've eliminated every warning and error except the one I put in the subject line. Startx still fails for the reason sited and I don't know why. I think the problem is the video drivers for some reason. I'm using the nv drivers which are rec

ee

2003-03-20 Thread j . fortin
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message

ee

2003-03-19 Thread j . fortin
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message

Re: how do i invoke the command "ee" ... problem solved.

2003-03-12 Thread NOEL BALANSAG
hey all, thanks for all the tips. problem is system won't let me run fsck -p, but i was able to mount the partition where my /usr is, so i was able to edit /ect/fstab and make the system look in the right places. thanks a lot to all of you. i really appreciate it. --- Mike Meyer <[EMAIL PROTEC

Re: how do i invoke the command "ee" or "vi" when system fails to load

2003-03-12 Thread Jim Trigg
On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 11:44:40PM -0600, Franklin Pierce wrote: > - Original Message - > From: Tom Parquette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 18:55:07 -0500 > To: NOEL BALANSAG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: how do i invoke the command "

Re: how do i invoke the command "ee" or "vi" when system fails toload

2003-03-12 Thread Mike Meyer
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Giorgos Keramidas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed: > Nah. It's not a good idea to use "mount -a" before fsck. The safest > thing you can do if you haven't tinkered with the sizes and/or order > of the partitions is to run: > > # fsck -p && mount -u / && mount -va I disag

Re: how do i invoke the command "ee" or "vi" when system fails to load

2003-03-12 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
fstab is pointing in the wrong place. If you can >> figure out where your /usr filesystem is you can issue a mount >> command to remount it. Once you have /usr mounted, "ee" should >> work for you. Hope this helps. Cheers... > > ironic...I dorked something up

Re: how do i invoke the command "ee" or "vi" when system fails to load

2003-03-11 Thread W. J. Williams
BALANSAG wrote: > > >hello. > > > >pardon my stupid question, but how do i invoke the > >command "ee" or "vi"? i recently removed partition no. > >2 on my disk, and fbsd resides on partition no. 3, so > >now i have 2 partitions, windoze on

Re: how do i invoke the command "ee" or "vi" when system fails to load

2003-03-11 Thread Franklin Pierce
- Original Message - From: Tom Parquette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 18:55:07 -0500 To: NOEL BALANSAG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: how do i invoke the command "ee" or "vi" when system fails to load NOEL BALANSAG wrote: >hello. > &g

Re: how do i invoke the command "ee" or "vi" when system fails toload

2003-03-11 Thread Tom Parquette
NOEL BALANSAG wrote: hello. pardon my stupid question, but how do i invoke the command "ee" or "vi"? i recently removed partition no. 2 on my disk, and fbsd resides on partition no. 3, so now i have 2 partitions, windoze on partition 1 and = fbsd on partition 2. but when i

Re: how do i invoke the command "ee" or "vi" when system fails to load

2003-03-11 Thread Lowell Gilbert
NOEL BALANSAG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > pardon my stupid question, but how do i invoke the > command "ee" or "vi"? i recently removed partition no. > 2 on my disk, and fbsd resides on partition no. 3, so > now i have 2 partitions, windoze on partition 1 a

how do i invoke the command "ee" or "vi" when system fails to load

2003-03-11 Thread NOEL BALANSAG
hello. pardon my stupid question, but how do i invoke the command "ee" or "vi"? i recently removed partition no. 2 on my disk, and fbsd resides on partition no. 3, so now i have 2 partitions, windoze on partition 1 and = fbsd on partition 2. but when i boot into fbsd, the s

$BL$>5Bz9-9p"(EE;R%a!<%k9-9p(J

2002-11-26 Thread cmail9999
<‘—MŽÒ> “dŽqƒ[ƒ‹LŽÐ ¡ŒãAL‚ð‚²Šó–]‚µ‚È‚¢•û‚Í‚±‚±‚Ö (•K‚¸–{•¶‚É‚ ‚È‚½‚̃[ƒ‹ƒAƒhƒŒƒX‚Ì‚Ý‚ð‚¨‘‚«‰º‚³‚¢j [EMAIL PROTECTED] ƒ[ƒ‹ƒAƒhƒŒƒX‚ð‚²‹L“ü‚µ‚Ä‚­‚¾‚³‚¢B §104-0061 “Œ‹ž“s’†‰›‹æ‹âÀ8-19-3 ‘æ2ƒEƒCƒ“ƒOƒrƒ‹@3F ƒ[ƒ‹ƒ}ƒKƒWƒ“”­s TEL@03-3544-6222 FAX@03-3544-6218

$BL$>5Bz9-9p"(EE;R%a!<%k9-9p(J

2002-11-02 Thread cmail11jp
<‘—MŽÒ> “dŽqƒ[ƒ‹LŽÐ ¡ŒãAL‚ð‚²Šó–]‚µ‚È‚¢•û‚Í‚±‚±‚Ö (•K‚¸–{•¶‚É‚ ‚È‚½‚̃[ƒ‹ƒAƒhƒŒƒX‚Ì‚Ý‚ð‚¨‘‚«‰º‚³‚¢j [EMAIL PROTECTED] ƒ[ƒ‹ƒAƒhƒŒƒX‚ð‚²‹L“ü‚µ‚Ä‚­‚¾‚³‚¢B §104-0061 “Œ‹ž“s’†‰›‹æ‹âÀ8-19-3 ‘æ2ƒEƒCƒ“ƒOƒrƒ‹@3F ƒ[ƒ‹ƒ}ƒKƒWƒ“”­s TEL@03-3544-6222 FAX@03-3544-6218