Hi all. This is my first post.
Recently the redmine port was updated to 2.3.1 and when i tried to install
it i've noticed that it has two rmagick dependencies -
ruby-rmagick(optional) and rubygem-rmagick(non-optional).
ruby-rmagic and rubygem-rmagick ports have the same COMMENT and VERSION
Sometimes build dependencies are just that --
You might benefit from using the poudriere tool to build these things in a
clean environment and then you can just install the package/runtime
dependencies.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing
Is there a way to compile a port without its dependencies?
I ask because recently I wanted two shlibs: wnck.so and rsvg.so (they are
provided by x11-toolkits/py-gnome-desktop). I didn't need all the
accompanying baggage (half of GNOME it seems), but it dragged in over 80
other packages
On 31/05/2013 16:26, b...@todoo.biz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to figure out how to change / update the dependencies on a
> package.
>
> I have a postfix package which comes from a server where mysql-client is in
> version 5.1
> And I would like to install the
Hi,
I am trying to figure out how to change / update the dependencies on a package.
I have a postfix package which comes from a server where mysql-client is in
version 5.1
And I would like to install the same package on a server where mysql-client is
in version 5.6
I am not sure if this
I did something dumb I think with ports on my box. In the process of
upgrading Perl, for every package that depended on Perl, via pkgdb, I
somehow managed to delete the fact that the package depends on Perl
itself. So now I have a bunch of packages that no longer reference
Perl in it's upstream dep
e
> should be deleted.
>From "man portmaster":
While recursing through the dependencies, if a port is marked IS_INTERAC-
TIVE this will be flagged. In the absence of this notification, under
normal circumstances the only user interaction required after the port
On Sat, 19 Jan 2013 20:40:26 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> I now run the command with what options ever, don't remember, but it's
> compiling and every few hours I have to answer n/y to delete a file, but
> there aren't stops regarding to the configuration.
I assume there is a -d or -D (delete
Compiling was finished, when I woke up at around 7 o'clock. Everything
seems to be ok, but I didn't reboot until now.
If everything should be ok after rebooting, I'll add all the steps to a
thread in the forums later today or tomorrow,
http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?p=205453#post2
Pff! It's still compiling :S, but I get back more and more functionality,
in the meanwhile I learned Old Greek.
If there would be packages available for 9.1, I would have learned how to
mix packages and ports instead.
Is it foreseeable, when there will be packages available? OTOH I read that
I now run the command with what options ever, don't remember, but it's
compiling and every few hours I have to answer n/y to delete a file, but
there aren't stops regarding to the configuration. I'm compiling since
yesterday 17 or 18 o'clock, perhaps -8 hours where it might stopped
regardin
On Fri, 18 Jan 2013, Polytropon wrote:
On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 16:37:43 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
Do the following directories have to be "more" empty?
...
If you have copied everything you might need from /usr/local
(e. g. config files in /usr/local/etc) you can remove the
whole directory subtr
On Fri, 18 Jan 2013, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
I wonder how to set a variable to automatically "answer" ok.
In this case it might be interesting to check all configurations.
I use this in /usr/local/etc/portmaster.rc:
# Do not create temporary backup packages before pkg_delete (-B)
NO_BACKUP=Bopt
#
On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 17:03:33 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 16:59:55 +0100, Ralf Mardorf
> wrote:
>
> > I stopped by Ctrl + C, add --no-confirm to the command and run it again.
> >
> > To read this mail I had to use the archive, Opera can't display received
> > emails at the
On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 16:59:55 +0100, Ralf Mardorf
wrote:
I stopped by Ctrl + C, add --no-confirm to the command and run it again.
To read this mail I had to use the archive, Opera can't display received
emails at the moment ;).
Thank you!
Oops, I should read more carefully, this doesn't
I stopped by Ctrl + C, add --no-confirm to the command and run it again.
To read this mail I had to use the archive, Opera can't display received
emails at the moment ;).
Thank you!
Regards,
Ralf
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http:
On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 16:37:43 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> Do the following directories have to be "more" empty?
>
> root@freebsd:/root # ls -hAl /usr/local/bin
> total 0
> root@freebsd:/root # ls -hAl /usr/local/sbin
> total 0
> root@freebsd:/root # ls -hAl /usr/local/lib
> total 12
> drwxr-xr-x
On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 05:50:51 +0100, Polytropon wrote:
"man portmaster"
root@freebsd:/root # portmaster --list-origins > ~/installed-port-list
root@freebsd:/root # portsnap fetch update
root@freebsd:/root # portmaster -ty --clean-distfiles
root@freebsd:/root # portmaster --check-port-dbdir
del
On Fri, 18 Jan 2013, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
I had to do a "portsnap fetch update" to compile icedtea-web and run into a
dependency hell. Most apps can't be launched anymore. When I deinstall,
recompile the new versions and install them, I have tons of dependencies for
each app.
On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 05:46:06 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> Is there a way to automatically recompile all broken apps and dependencies?
Yes, using a port management tool such as portmaster should be
able to resolve all those problems automatically, usually by
explicitely requesting the "
Hi :)
I had to do a "portsnap fetch update" to compile icedtea-web and run into
a dependency hell. Most apps can't be launched anymore. When I deinstall,
recompile the new versions and install them, I have tons of dependencies
for each app.
Is there a way to automaticall
older boxes and reinstalled the depending packages,
> using 'pkg install -f'. Lo and behold, the dependencies disappeared.
>
> Is this expected behaviour?
As far as I can see, libcheck is not currently a dependency of any of
the x11-toolkits/py-wx* ports. As libcheck is a unit test f
ll -f'. Lo and behold, the dependencies disappeared.
Is this expected behaviour?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-que
thon27
>> /usr/ports/devel/bison
>> /usr/ports/devel/qt4-corelib
>> [... etc -- rest of exceeding long list of dependencies trimmed ...]
>
> Unset the DOCS option in dns/ldns. Almost all of those dependencies are
> due to the doxygen support that drags in.
Actu
> > /usr/ports/lang/python27
> > /usr/ports/devel/bison
> > /usr/ports/devel/qt4-corelib
> > [... etc -- rest of exceeding long list of dependencies trimmed ...]
>
> Unset the DOCS option in dns/ldns. Almost all of those dependencies are
> due to the doxyge
nverters/libiconv
> /usr/ports/lang/perl5.12
> /usr/ports/devel/tmake
> /usr/ports/graphics/graphviz
> /usr/ports/print/dvipsk-tetex
> /usr/ports/print/teTeX
> /usr/ports/lang/python27
> /usr/ports/devel/bison
> /usr/ports/devel/qt4-corelib
> [... etc -- rest of exceedin
On Mon, 4 Jun 2012 15:47:29 +0200
Rada alive wrote:
> I was hoping to test dns/unbound as a lighter-weight DNS cache
> service to replace BIND. A few hours into "make install" i decided to
> abort and have a look at the dependencies.
> Can someone tell me why a DNS serv
Rada alive wrote:
> I was hoping to test dns/unbound as a lighter-weight DNS cache service to
> replace BIND. A few hours into "make install" i decided to abort and have
> a look at the dependencies.
> Can someone tell me why a DNS server needs packages like "graphics/
I was hoping to test dns/unbound as a lighter-weight DNS cache service to
replace BIND. A few hours into "make install" i decided to abort and have a
look at the dependencies.
Can someone tell me why a DNS server needs packages like "graphics/jpeg"
and "x11/randrproto&
On 15/03/2012 17:11, Robert Urban wrote:
> I seem to have found the "problem". I read somewhere that PKG_PATH should
> have
> the path to the top of the hierarchy, i.e., /cd/packages, and not
> /cd/packages/ or /cd/packages/All, because pkg_add was capable of
> adding the hierarchical component,
int I saw port names such as perl, tcl, neon, sqlite, etc fly
>> past.
> You can use the command
>
> # make missing
>
> to get a list of which dependencies need to be installed.
> See "man 7 ports" for other targets that might be useful.
this was helpful.
# make missing
to get a list of which dependencies need to be installed.
See "man 7 ports" for other targets that might be useful.
> Apparently the ports system satisfies dependencies from the ports tree by
> default.
Correct. Dependencies are resolved and installed (usually
/usr/ports/emulators/virtio-kmo
# make clean install
at this point I saw port names such as perl, tcl, neon, sqlite, etc fly past.
Apparently the ports system satisfies dependencies from the ports tree by
default.
Since I have not updated anything, it seems reasonable, and much less painf
> "Dick" == Dick Hoogendijk writes:
Dick> Are the quotes neccessary?
No.
--
Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095
http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/>
Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc.
See http://methodsandmessages.pos
On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 10:35:08AM +0200, Romain Garbage wrote:
> 2011/4/3 Chris Telting :
> >
> >> seriously, this is why i want that debian+freebsd that was
> >> discussed recently. the kernel is ours and number one in the
> >> world. and the ports stuff is basically packag
tory
would be Ubuntu, where installing something with Synaptic doesn't require
you to track all the (recursive) dependencies yourself, but uninstalling
Evolution can break the whole system because of the insanely inclusive
dependency policies for packages.
--
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]
pgpfSWO25iwLE.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Op 2-4-2011 19:03, Randal L. Schwartz schreef:
That's one of the first things I do with a fresh system that will be
only a server:
echo "WITHOUT_X11=yes">> /etc/make.conf
And then *never* use packages. Only ports
Are the quotes neccessary?
___
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 5:07 AM, Chris Telting
wrote:
>
>
> How does debian get around all the "make config" options that we deal with?
> Such as does such and such package pull in samba... Or does debian just
> compile with every option more or less enabled?
>
Yes, and no. One debian "source" p
2011/4/3 Chris Telting :
>
>> seriously, this is why i want that debian+freebsd that was
>> discussed recently. the kernel is ours and number one in the
>> world. and the ports stuff is basically packages that more/less
>> just-work. you can get the src =with= the pkg
On Sat, Apr 02, 2011 at 08:07:25PM -0700, Chris Telting wrote:
>
> > seriously, this is why i want that debian+freebsd that was
> > discussed recently. the kernel is ours and number one in the
> > world. and the ports stuff is basically packages that more/less
> > just-work. you
seriously, this is why i want that debian+freebsd that was
discussed recently. the kernel is ours and number one in the
world. and the ports stuff is basically packages that more/less
just-work. you can get the src =with= the pkg.
How does debian get around
On Sat, Apr 02, 2011 at 07:45:06PM -0500, Ryan Coleman wrote:
>
>
> On Apr 2, 2011, at 7:07 PM, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
>
> > Chris Rees wrote:
> >> On 2 April 2011 00:58, Chris Telting wrote:
> >>> One of my biggest gripes with the ports system is dependency hell.
> >>
> >> I think you'
On Apr 2, 2011, at 7:07 PM, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
> Chris Rees wrote:
>> On 2 April 2011 00:58, Chris Telting wrote:
>>> One of my biggest gripes with the ports system is dependency hell.
>>
>> I think you've misunderstood the term dependency hell [1]. Anyone
>> who has spent hours str
Chris Rees wrote:
> On 2 April 2011 00:58, Chris Telting wrote:
> > One of my biggest gripes with the ports system is dependency hell.
>
> I think you've misunderstood the term dependency hell [1]. Anyone
> who has spent hours struggling with rpm ... would never dare to
> even think of such terms
"full-featured"
metaport or metapackage would be good; just imagine you
could "pkg_add -r mplayer-full" and it would install ALL
the codecs, as well as the mencoder part, without any
further questions or interactions. On the other hand,
the "simple" default port
> "Matt" == Matt Emmerton writes:
Matt> Every time I see a webserver with X11 on it, it's because of these two.
Of
Matt> course, using ghostscript*-nox11 as well as setting WITHOUT_X11=yes
solves a
Matt> lot of this mess, but on a system that's already been "infested", it's
Matt> easier ju
figuration options and dependency detection, rather than just the
functionality that is going to be used. And build times would be
longer, usually much longer, because all functionality in the software
and all possible dependencies would have be built. And of course a lot
of software would have to be rewr
On 2-4-2011 2:51, Polytropon wrote:
So there is still stuff one needs to compile, and
YOU are in charge to define the options you need.
This is the "downside" when you're running a multi-
purpose OS like FreeBSD.
That is a good thing. But I remember an issue that I never understood. I
onced se
rs struggling with rpm (ugh, or worse CMMI) to get x
application installed
which depends on y from z.alpha.com and s from t.beta.com, which also
need rpm-ing with their own dependencies would never dare to even
think of such terms
when using the Ports Collection. I found it a miracle when I first m
primarily won't
need, but the program THAT they need insists on it.
Ports or packages, what I'm discussing is minimizing dependencies. I
compile my own packages and use them across all my computers.
What I'm saying I'd like to see is minimal installs. If you need a
featur
> > The number of console
> > programs that want to pull in X window or kde is
> > my boggling.
>
> Hmmm... The only one I remember being that way is
> the old cvsup, but there was nocvsup-nogui (or -nox11?).
Over the years I've found that ghostscript and gd are two common culprits.
Every time I
deal if B isn't installed at all, but requires caution
when it is (at version n-1). Of course, B may have other
dependencies that do not matter to A, but to B, so even
C(m) gets installed.
> The number of console
> programs that want to pull in X window or kde is my boggling.
Hmm
pull in X window or kde is
my boggling.
Those would not really be console programs, then, or their dependencies
are directly or indirectly dependent on X or KDE.
Knowing how to program myself when I see a "make config" menu on every
single port it makes me want to cry. I think the
Just in a thoughtful mood and thought I'd to the question to the cloud.
One of my biggest gripes with the ports system is dependency hell.
Ports link against so my optional components and pull them into the
install. Libraries and components are built based on make file
defines. But this do
Hi,
Upon upgrading my ports I ran into a problem: When portupgrade comes
to upgrading sysutils/eiciel it stops with the following message:
===> eiciel-0.9.8 is marked as broken: does not compile.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/ports/sysutils/eiciel.
#
However eiciel is needed by gnome2-power-to
Hi!
My system: FreeBSD 8.0, KDE 4.4.5
After deinstall qt33 before installed KOffice 2.2 I check dependencies:
portmaster --check-dependencies:
art-1.5.10_5.1
cdrdao-1.23_1
K3b-2.0.1_1
K9copy-2.3.4_4
kdevase-runtime-4.4.5
kdemultimedia-4.4.5_1
kmplayer-kde4-0.11.
libao-1.0.0
libxine-1.1.19
On 2/3/10, b. f. wrote:
> John W wrote:
> -o , or portupgrade -o, which will succeed in the simplest cases. You
> could also do it manually, by using sed(1) to substitute every
> occurrence of the old PKGNAME with the new PKGNAME in the @pkgdep
> lines in /var/db/pkg/*/+COMMENTS, and likewise fo
o to fix it?
>It seems I need to replace dependencies on p5-Email-Simple-Creator
>with dependencies on p5-Email-Simple.
>
>But if I manually do that, won't my changes be blown away the next
>time I update ports?
The committer who added the entry to /usr/ports/MOVED also seems to
have
On Mon, 1 Feb 2010 21:35:58 -0800
John W articulated:
> Is the most correct solution just to wait until all maintainers of
> ports which depend on p5-Email-Simple-Creator each update their
> makefiles to depend on p5-Email-Simple, instead? (Though that doesn't
> help in the short term :)
>
> I'm
its of ports.
Here's the issue:
I updated my ports tree with csup, and tried to run 'portmaster -na'.
It gave me this:
===>>> The mail/p5-Email-Simple-Creator port has been deleted:
Folded into p5-Email-Simple package
Ok, that makes sense. But what do I do to fix it?
It
2009/12/20 Lowell Gilbert :
..
>> Somehow I had naively assumed that apache20 and apache22 were
>> incompatible and could not simultaneously be installed. Did the binary
>> package load ignore all conflicts? What's the proper way to approach
>> these issues. Looking in the apache20 Makefile
Robin Becker writes:
> I would like to know how to use self compiled ports made with make
> install together with the packages which can be downloaded with
> pkg_add -r
>
> I'm in the process of upgrading an old freebsd 6.0 server to 8.0 and
> have decided to try and use apache22.
>
> For va
I would like to know how to use self compiled ports made with make install
together with the packages which can be downloaded with pkg_add -r
I'm in the process of upgrading an old freebsd 6.0 server to 8.0 and have
decided to try and use apache22.
For various reasons I built the apache2
ts there is no HAL in the
> config. How do I get rid of these dependencies so I can get the last
> of the ports rebuilt? These ports all seem to be part of gnome2.
Hi.
I'm not sure why it wasn't more clearly announced as being required
for the 8.0 upgrade specifically, however f
w do I get rid of these dependencies so I can get the last
> of the ports rebuilt? These ports all seem to be part of gnome2.
Hi.
I'm not sure why it wasn't more clearly announced as being required
for the 8.0 upgrade specifically, however following the 20090309 entry
in /usr/ports
I source upgraded a server from 7.2 release to 8.0 release. In trying to
rebuild all the ports, HAL is broken and won't compile. If I try to make
config on most of those ports there is no HAL in the config. How do I get
rid of these dependencies so I can get the last of the ports
re
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009, Al Plant wrote:
I installed: portsnap fetch extract -to get rid of this issue of
dependencies.
portsnap updates the ports tree. AFAIK, it will not help with updating
ports that have already been installed.
-Warren Block * Rapid City, South Dakota USA
tting no options or solutions to my
problem .. so im trying to think of radical ways an means of solving it
.. re-installing all dependencies of this pkg im hoping will solve my issue
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.o
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009, Warren Liddell wrote:
is there a command that when comnpiling a certain pkg will tell it to
forcefully re-do every single dependcy for that particular pkg ?
Depending on what you mean by "dependency", either
portupgrade -rf pkg
or
portupgrade -Rf pkg
-Warren Block * Ra
--
Adam Vande More
i use portupgrade .. but atm im getting no options or solutions to
my problem .. so im trying to think of radical ways an means of
solving it .. re-installing all dependencies of this pkg im hoping
will solve my issue
portupgrade -Rf should do
ng all of it's
dependencies to be rebuilt
portmanager x11/gnome2 -l -f
--
Jerry |===
ges...@yahoo.com|===
|===
|===
|
From
upgrade, you'll save yourself a lot
>> of headache.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Adam Vande More
>>
> i use portupgrade .. but atm im getting no options or solutions to my
> problem .. so im trying to think of radical ways an means of solving it ..
> re-installing all
or solutions to my
problem .. so im trying to think of radical ways an means of solving it
.. re-installing all dependencies of this pkg im hoping will solve my issue
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/f
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 10:53 PM, Warren Liddell wrote:
> is there a command that when comnpiling a certain pkg will tell it to
> forcefully re-do every single dependcy for that particular pkg ?
>
Judging from the topics of your recent posts, I assume you're not using a
port managment tools to ha
is there a command that when comnpiling a certain pkg will tell it to
forcefully re-do every single dependcy for that particular pkg ?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscr
John W wrote:
I'm just learning the guts of how ports work, and wonder:
How do ports specify that "any one of X, Y, Z " would satisfy a dependency.
For instance, when I build graphics/jalbum, it says it requires jdk16.
I would rather use diablo-jdk16, since I find it faster and it is
easier to
In the last episode (Sep 11), John W said:
> I'm just learning the guts of how ports work, and wonder:
>
> How do ports specify that "any one of X, Y, Z " would satisfy a dependency.
>
> For instance, when I build graphics/jalbum, it says it requires jdk16.
> I would rather use diablo-jdk16, sinc
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 11:06 PM, John W wrote:
> I'm just learning the guts of how ports work, and wonder:
>
> How do ports specify that "any one of X, Y, Z " would satisfy a dependency.
>
> For instance, when I build graphics/jalbum, it says it requires jdk16.
> I would rather use diablo-jdk16,
I'm just learning the guts of how ports work, and wonder:
How do ports specify that "any one of X, Y, Z " would satisfy a dependency.
For instance, when I build graphics/jalbum, it says it requires jdk16.
I would rather use diablo-jdk16, since I find it faster and it is
easier to install.
But ho
On Fri, 24 Jul 2009 10:57:42 -0800
Mel Flynn wrote:
> On Friday 24 July 2009 09:51:18 Jerry wrote:
> > On Fri, 24 Jul 2009 13:55:42 +0100
> >
> > "Daniel Bye" wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 02:03:43PM +0200, Ewald Jenisch wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Updating one of my sytems I follo
g
>
> Which, unfortunately, does not build /x11/kdelibs3 with the updated
> jpeg library. I had to make a link from the old library to the new one
> to get the update to work correctly. I know that some have suggested
> that, that is not the proper way to do it; however, the fact that
On Friday 24 July 2009 09:51:18 Jerry wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Jul 2009 13:55:42 +0100
>
> "Daniel Bye" wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 02:03:43PM +0200, Ewald Jenisch wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Updating one of my sytems I followed /usr/ports/UPDATING and did a
> > > "pkg_delete -r jpeg-6b_7" - on
On Friday 24 July 2009 20:51:18 Jerry wrote:
>
> Which, unfortunately, does not build /x11/kdelibs3 with the updated
> jpeg library. I had to make a link from the old library to the new one
> to get the update to work correctly. I know that some have suggested
> that, that is not the proper way to
On Fri, 24 Jul 2009 13:55:42 +0100
"Daniel Bye" wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 02:03:43PM +0200, Ewald Jenisch wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Updating one of my sytems I followed /usr/ports/UPDATING and did a
> > "pkg_delete -r jpeg-6b_7" - only to discover that everything that
>
> Au contraire, Blac
2009/7/24 RW
> On Fri, 24 Jul 2009 08:28:14 -0800
> Mel Flynn
> >
> wrote:
>
> > On Friday 24 July 2009 05:52:37 chris scott wrote:
> >
> > > maybe it would be a good idea for ports to have an event log like
> > > yum does on centos. Just a simple log of stuff added, removed, and
> > > upgraded.
2009/7/24 Mel Flynn
>
> On Friday 24 July 2009 05:52:37 chris scott wrote:
>
> > maybe it would be a good idea for ports to have an event log like yum
> does
> > on centos. Just a simple log of stuff added, removed, and upgraded. It
> > would be invaluable in this situation as you could see what
On Fri, 24 Jul 2009 08:28:14 -0800
Mel Flynn wrote:
> On Friday 24 July 2009 05:52:37 chris scott wrote:
>
> > maybe it would be a good idea for ports to have an event log like
> > yum does on centos. Just a simple log of stuff added, removed, and
> > upgraded. It would be invaluable in this sit
On Friday 24 July 2009 05:52:37 chris scott wrote:
> maybe it would be a good idea for ports to have an event log like yum does
> on centos. Just a simple log of stuff added, removed, and upgraded. It
> would be invaluable in this situation as you could see what was removed and
> it would be fairl
2009/7/24 Daniel Bye
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 03:16:54PM +0200, Peter Boosten wrote:
> > Daniel Bye wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 02:03:43PM +0200, Ewald Jenisch wrote:
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> Updating one of my sytems I followed /usr/ports/UPDATING and did a
> > >> "pkg_delete -r jpeg-6
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 03:16:54PM +0200, Peter Boosten wrote:
> Daniel Bye wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 02:03:43PM +0200, Ewald Jenisch wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Updating one of my sytems I followed /usr/ports/UPDATING and did a
> >> "pkg_delete -r jpeg-6b_7" - only to discover that everythi
Daniel Bye wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 02:03:43PM +0200, Ewald Jenisch wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Updating one of my sytems I followed /usr/ports/UPDATING and did a
>> "pkg_delete -r jpeg-6b_7" - only to discover that everything that
>
> Au contraire, Blackadder. UPDATING says to run either of
>
>
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 01:58:28PM +0100, Daniel Bye wrote:
> Ooops! My apologies - it seems that an earlier version of UPDATING did indeed
> say to pkg_delete.
>
> Ewald, I'm sorry for sounding so patronising - I feel like a total fool now.
>
Hi Dan,
Now I understand - in my UPDATING that come
delete -r - recursively delete and all others that
> depend on it.
>
> >
> > What's really bad however is that all information about the
> > dependencies that were there before is now gone, i.e. the system has
> > no clue that e.g. gnome2 was installed.
>
>
on it.
>
> What's really bad however is that all information about the
> dependencies that were there before is now gone, i.e. the system has
> no clue that e.g. gnome2 was installed.
Yep, because pkg_delete removed their entries from the registry.
>
> Fortunately, in my pa
ike the
> complete gnome2 environment plus e.g. firefox, gimp,
> openoffice.
>
> What's really bad however is that all information about the
> dependencies that were there before is now gone, i.e. the system has
> no clue that e.g. gnome2 was installed.
>
> Fortunat
lly bad however is that all information about the
dependencies that were there before is now gone, i.e. the system has
no clue that e.g. gnome2 was installed.
Fortunately, in my particular case, I did a "pkg_info -Rx jpeg-" prior
to that pkg_delete so at least I have clue as to the state o
b. f. wrote:
>> But I have seen portupgrade something and then a subsequent run
>>shows this port as being 'newer' than the version it's supposed to be.
>>I've
[snip]
>>also noticed a few times it seemed like it was upgrading the same
>>version(s) over again. I just chalked this up to the ports s
IT Department
ProCredit Bank (Bulgaria) AD
Eric Sheesley
Sent by: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org
08.07.2009 04:09
To
"b. f." , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org
cc
Subject
Re: Portupgrade not handling dependencies
Actually, the bsdpan package is not the issue here. I wa
> But I have seen portupgrade something and then a subsequent run
>shows this port as being 'newer' than the version it's supposed to be. I've
portsdb -Fu runs `make fetchindex`, grabbing the INDEX* file from
whatever server you've told it to go to, and then rebuilds/updates the
portsdb from that.
Prokofyev Vladislav wrote:
snip]
>> As seen above, libtheora built and installed just fine, but ffmpeg was
>> skipped for some reason. I ran portupgrade -a again and all worked
>> fine. This ways also occuring when I ran portupgrade -arR.
>>
>> Ports tree is updated with cvsup each night. I don
1 - 100 of 406 matches
Mail list logo
