On 09/08/2012 16:09, Matthias Gamsjager wrote:
Beside in production one should run with ECC memory to eliminate
the possibility of incorrect data from memory
ECC doesn't detect all memory errors.
--
Bruce Cran
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailin
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 9:19 AM, Wojciech Puchar <
woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> wrote:
> Needing fsck because the drive is failing and not able to store and
>> retrieve data reliably any more is a whole different thing.
>>
>
> or bad data stored because of non-disk errors.
>
>
> in this case an
Needing fsck because the drive is failing and not able to store and
retrieve data reliably any more is a whole different thing.
or bad data stored because of non-disk errors.
least will discover that this is happening due to the built-in
checksumming and avoid many instances of silent corrupti
On 07/08/2012 22:09, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> Of course "ZFS doesn't need fsck". Until it fails.
It doesn't need fsck for the normal case of filesystem corruption due to
system crashes: in that case, you stand to lose maybe the last one or
two IO transactions that hadn't made it onto the disk yet,
Of course "ZFS doesn't need fsck". Until it fails.
Did you personally try ZFS ?
of course.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions
El 07/08/12 16:09, Wojciech Puchar escribió:
English is not my native language, so i can make mistakes. ZFS is the
way to go if you need consistency + speed on a NFS server/service.
Of course "ZFS doesn't need fsck". Until it fails.
Did you personally try ZFS ?
English is not my native language, so i can make mistakes. ZFS is the way to
go if you need consistency + speed on a NFS server/service.
Of course "ZFS doesn't need fsck". Until it fails.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.
El 05/08/12 18:13, Wojciech Puchar escribió:
with ZFS because the consistence in disk and speed will gonna be
the differentiator.
true. it is consistently slow.
REALLY from what tale do you people get such a statements.
There is no tale, only a feature set:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zfs#Fe
El 05/08/12 20:05, Anonymous Remailer (austria) escribió:
I think that XFS & JFS are more mature filesystems than ZFS
This is not up for discussion.
but the feature set of ZFS i ahead in the future.
Too many iPads, iPhones, etc?
For a NFS server first I'll go with ZFS because the consistenc
El 05/08/12 18:10, Wojciech Puchar escribió:
really - stick with FreeBSD UFS. it is really best.
Yes UFS is very good, but very hight IO ZFS is fastest if you use
L2ARC/ZIL on SSD.
if...
better just move heavy used things on SSD and rest on HDD. really it's
fastest.
Yes, you can do tha
--As of August 5, 2012 10:29:16 AM -0600, Chad Perrin is alleged to have
said:
I think that XFS & JFS are more mature filesystems than ZFS, but the
feature set of ZFS i ahead in the future. For a NFS server first
I'll go with ZFS because the consistence in disk and speed will
gonna be the diffe
> >> I think that XFS & JFS are more mature filesystems than ZFS
This is not up for discussion.
> but the feature set of ZFS i ahead in the future.
Too many iPads, iPhones, etc?
> For a NFS server first I'll go with ZFS because the consistence in disk
If not spelling, or grammar...
> and sp
with ZFS because the consistence in disk and speed will gonna be the
differentiator.
true. it is consistently slow.
REALLY from what tale do you people get such a statements.
There is no tale, only a feature set:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zfs#Features
And everything everyone writes is al
really - stick with FreeBSD UFS. it is really best.
Yes UFS is very good, but very hight IO ZFS is fastest if you use L2ARC/ZIL
on SSD.
if...
better just move heavy used things on SSD and rest on HDD. really it's
fastest.
___
freebsd-questions@f
El 05/08/12 13:03, Wojciech Puchar escribió:
I think that XFS & JFS are more mature filesystems than ZFS, but the
feature set of ZFS i ahead in the future. For a NFS server first
I'll go with ZFS because the consistence in disk and speed will
gonna be the differentiator.
The idea that ZFS is fa
El 05/08/12 06:22, Wojciech Puchar escribió:
Hi Ashkan,
I think that XFS & JFS are more mature filesystems than ZFS, but the
feature set of ZFS i ahead in the future. For a NFS server first I'll
go with ZFS because the consistence in disk and speed will gonna be
the differentiator.
true. it
I think that XFS & JFS are more mature filesystems than ZFS, but the
feature set of ZFS i ahead in the future. For a NFS server first
I'll go with ZFS because the consistence in disk and speed will
gonna be the differentiator.
The idea that ZFS is faster than XFS is certainly a new one for me.
On Sat, Aug 04, 2012 at 03:46:53PM -0500, Marco Muskus wrote:
> Hi Ashkan,
>
> I think that XFS & JFS are more mature filesystems than ZFS, but the
> feature set of ZFS i ahead in the future. For a NFS server first
> I'll go with ZFS because the consistence in disk and speed will
> gonna be the di
i have 16tb storage. 8x2tb sata raided.
i want to share it on network via nfs.
which file system is better for it?
thank you
badly imprecise question. you may share any filesystem.
Not sure what you want to achieve. No explanation of "raided" - this means
nothing without precise description.
Hi Ashkan,
I think that XFS & JFS are more mature filesystems than ZFS, but the feature
set of ZFS i ahead in the future. For a NFS server first I'll go with ZFS
because the consistence in disk and speed will gonna be the differentiator.
true. it is consistently slow.
REALLY from what tale do
Hi Ashkan,
I think that XFS & JFS are more mature filesystems than ZFS, but the
feature set of ZFS i ahead in the future. For a NFS server first I'll go
with ZFS because the consistence in disk and speed will gonna be the
differentiator.
Look at L2ARC and ZIL to improve ZFS speed.
Regards,
hello
i have 16tb storage. 8x2tb sata raided.
i want to share it on network via nfs.
which file system is better for it?
thank you
———
Ashkan R
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To u
22 matches
Mail list logo
