On 12/18/2007 2:17 AM Chad Perrin said the following:
On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 11:06:15AM +0530, Girish Venkatachalam wrote:
[snip]
If FFS2 and EXT3 are ruled out, then what is remaining? ;)
XFS?
Maybe?
My impression is that there isn't good UFS support in Linux, and that
stable ext3
On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 03:17:00AM -0700, Chad Perrin wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 11:06:15AM +0530, Girish Venkatachalam wrote:
> >
> > I generally shy away from any multiboot situation since I have few
> > machines with me. Even then I too have to multiboot once in a while.
>
> I prefer to
Ivan Voras wrote:
> ext2fs is "stable" in the sense that there are no known bugs, and it's
> 100% compatible with Linux. It "just works".
>
> Unless you get frequent power outages or similar "hard" errors, the lack
> of journaling shouldn't bother you much.
I suggest that ext2+noatime is going to
On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 11:06:30AM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote:
> Chad Perrin wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 10:39:31AM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote:
> >> Chad Perrin wrote:
> >>
> >>> That being the case, there is some data I would like to keep available to
> >>> both FreeBSD and Linux systems, in stab
On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 11:06:15AM +0530, Girish Venkatachalam wrote:
>
> I generally shy away from any multiboot situation since I have few
> machines with me. Even then I too have to multiboot once in a while.
I prefer to avoid multiboot as well, but for a while there it seemed
unlikely that I'
Chad Perrin wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 10:39:31AM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote:
>> Chad Perrin wrote:
>>
>>> That being the case, there is some data I would like to keep available to
>>> both FreeBSD and Linux systems, in stable read/write access with
>>> reasonably high access performance for bot
On 22:05:08 Dec 17, Chad Perrin wrote:
> Are you suggesting I put the filesystem on another machine and use NFS to
> make it available to both OSes on this machine? I'm looking to have a
> filesystem on *this* machine that is available to both OSes, running one
> at a time.
>
Chad,
I saw your q
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 10:38:54AM -0500, David Robillard wrote:
> > That being the case, there is some data I would like to keep available to
> > both FreeBSD and Linux systems, in stable read/write access with
> > reasonably high access performance for both (fast enough to achieve
> > decent fram
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 10:39:31AM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote:
> Chad Perrin wrote:
>
> > That being the case, there is some data I would like to keep available to
> > both FreeBSD and Linux systems, in stable read/write access with
> > reasonably high access performance for both (fast enough to achi
> That being the case, there is some data I would like to keep available to
> both FreeBSD and Linux systems, in stable read/write access with
> reasonably high access performance for both (fast enough to achieve
> decent frame rates, for instance). This seems to rule out both ext3 and
> UFS2. Wh
Chad Perrin wrote:
> That being the case, there is some data I would like to keep available to
> both FreeBSD and Linux systems, in stable read/write access with
> reasonably high access performance for both (fast enough to achieve
> decent frame rates, for instance). This seems to rule out both
I'm planning a reinstall on my laptop from scratch (making sure I have an
up-to-date backup first, of course) as soon as there's a 7.0-RELEASE
available, in which I will reorganize the filesystem and set up a FreeBSD
and Linux dual-boot system. While the bulk of my work will be done on
the FreeBSD
12 matches
Mail list logo
