On Tue Aug 10 10, ill...@gmail.com wrote:
> On 9 August 2010 14:00, Alexander Best wrote:
> > hi there,
> >
> > chflags(1) mentions that a few utilities including pax(1) aren't chflags
> > aware yet. is there a list of all those utilties available somewhere?
> > also: i don't quite understand why
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 01:59:50AM +0400, Anonymous wrote:
> >> AFIK, pax is a POSIX thing, and as such working
> >> correctly or sanely would violate its posix nature.
> >> (POSIX is an anagram of "Pox? Si!")
> >>
> >> Is cpio chflags-aware?
> >
> > To the best of my knowledge the _only_ way to
Roland Smith writes:
> On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 05:22:47PM -0400, ill...@gmail.com wrote:
>> On 9 August 2010 14:00, Alexander Best wrote:
>> > hi there,
>> >
>> > chflags(1) mentions that a few utilities including pax(1) aren't chflags
>> > aware yet. is there a list of all those utilties availa
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 05:22:47PM -0400, ill...@gmail.com wrote:
> On 9 August 2010 14:00, Alexander Best wrote:
> > hi there,
> >
> > chflags(1) mentions that a few utilities including pax(1) aren't chflags
> > aware yet. is there a list of all those utilties available somewhere?
> > in fact th
On 9 August 2010 14:00, Alexander Best wrote:
> hi there,
>
> chflags(1) mentions that a few utilities including pax(1) aren't chflags
> aware yet. is there a list of all those utilties available somewhere?
> also: i don't quite understand why this is in the BUGS section of chflags(1)
> and not
hi there,
chflags(1) mentions that a few utilities including pax(1) aren't chflags aware
yet. is there a list of all those utilties available somewhere?
also: i don't quite understand why this is in the BUGS section of chflags(1)
and not in the pax(1) manual itself [1]. this doesn't seem very lo
