Re: changing subjects [in this manner]

2002-09-26 Thread Roman Neuhauser
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2002-09-25 19:32:12 -0400: > On 24 Sep 2002, Kirk Strauser wrote: > > > The thing is, I think I want just a client, not a daemon to move > > > or copy over my /var/mail/$USER from another box to my box at home > > > (similar to uucp or something). Is that clear? Said anothe

Re: changing subjects [in this manner]

2002-09-25 Thread Peter Leftwich
On 24 Sep 2002, Kirk Strauser wrote: > > Is mutt a lot like PINE? > Yes, but with a more loyal following. I donno - Myself, I am pretty devoted to PINE (i.e. very much in love) > > The thing is, I think I want just a client, not a daemon to move or copy > > over my /var/mail/$USER from anoth

Re: changing subjects [in this manner]

2002-09-25 Thread Roman Neuhauser
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2002-09-24 19:02:43 -0400: > On 24 Sep 2002, Kirk Strauser wrote: > > > PS - And that reminds me! Why am I still ssh'ing someplace and running > > > pine when I could be running xpine and (probably) POP3s'ing my mail to my box!!! > > Because you haven't discovered fetchmail a

Re: changing subjects [in this manner]

2002-09-25 Thread Roman Neuhauser
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2002-09-24 18:59:45 -0400: > On Tue, 24 Sep 2002, Roman Neuhauser wrote: > > > I meant the threads that are archived on the web, from the > > > newsgroup side of this mailing list. > > text below still applies (s/email client/favorite mail archive/) > > > > It's up to your em

Re: changing subjects [in this manner]

2002-09-24 Thread Kirk Strauser
At 2002-09-24T23:02:43Z, Peter Leftwich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Is mutt a lot like PINE? Yes, but with a more loyal following. > The thing is, I think I want just a client, not a daemon to move or copy > over my /var/mail/$USER from another box to my box at home (similar to > uucp or som

Re: changing subjects [in this manner]

2002-09-24 Thread Peter Leftwich
On 24 Sep 2002, Kirk Strauser wrote: > > PS - And that reminds me! Why am I still ssh'ing someplace and running > > pine when I could be running xpine and (probably) POP3s'ing my mail to my box!!! > Because you haven't discovered fetchmail and mutt yet? :) > Kirk Strauser Is mutt a lot like PINE

Re: changing subjects [in this manner]

2002-09-24 Thread Peter Leftwich
On Tue, 24 Sep 2002, Roman Neuhauser wrote: > > I meant the threads that are archived on the web, from the newsgroup side > > of this mailing list. > text below still applies (s/email client/favorite mail archive/) > > > It's up to your email client (not the mailinglist) to thread messages, I am

Re: changing subjects [in this manner]

2002-09-24 Thread Kirk Strauser
At 2002-09-24T05:22:39Z, Peter Leftwich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > PS - And that reminds me! Why am I still ssh'ing someplace and running > pine when I could be running xpine and (probably) POP3s'ing my mail to my > box!!! Because you haven't discovered fetchmail and mutt yet? :) -- Kirk S

Re: changing subjects [in this manner]

2002-09-24 Thread dfolkins
From: "Dan Nelson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Peter Leftwich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "FreeBSD LIST" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 10:50 PM Subject: Re: changing subjects [in this manner] > > Simply replying to a mess

Re: changing subjects [in this manner]

2002-09-23 Thread Roman Neuhauser
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2002-09-24 01:22:39 -0400: > On Mon, 23 Sep 2002, Dan Nelson wrote: > > Simply replying to a message but changing the subject will not break a > > thread. > > I meant the threads that are archived on the web, from the newsgroup side > of this mailing list. text below st

Re: changing subjects [in this manner]

2002-09-23 Thread Peter Leftwich
On Mon, 23 Sep 2002, Dan Nelson wrote: > It's up to your email client (not the mailinglist) to thread messages, > and the algorithm most use is to thread messages together based on > References: and In-Reply-To: headers, and optionally tack leftover > messages into those threads based on the subje

Re: changing subjects [in this manner]

2002-09-23 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Sep 23), Kirk Strauser said: > > At 2002-09-24T02:50:56Z, Dan Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > The safest way to create a new thread based on an existing thread is to > > manually copy your "parent" message into a textfile or X clipboard, start > > a fresh new messag

Re: changing subjects [in this manner]

2002-09-23 Thread Kirk Strauser
At 2002-09-24T02:50:56Z, Dan Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The safest way to create a new thread based on an existing thread is to > manually copy your "parent" message into a textfile or X clipboard, start > a fresh new message, pase the parent in, trim, and add "> " yourself (or > have

Re: changing subjects [in this manner]

2002-09-23 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Sep 23), Peter Leftwich said: > I wonder... with majordomo's and mail lists in general, when someone > replies and modifies the Subject line, is the thread broken and future > search engine results dissociated? Or do threads rely on "Message-ID" > codes in the full headers?

changing subjects [in this manner]

2002-09-23 Thread Peter Leftwich
I wonder... with majordomo's and mail lists in general, when someone replies and modifies the Subject line, is the thread broken and future search engine results dissociated? Or do threads rely on "Message-ID" codes in the full headers? Yes I realize this should be posted instead to something li