Re: buildworld failure on VIA C3 Nehemiah

2007-12-30 Thread RW
On Sat, 29 Dec 2007 19:40:25 +0100 "Warren Head" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2007/12/29, Eric Osterweil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > > > Should I be using a different arch? Do I need a flag in the > > make.conf (I just have -pipe and -O2)

Re: buildworld failure on VIA C3 Nehemiah

2007-12-29 Thread Warren Head
2007/12/29, Eric Osterweil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > > Should I be using a different arch? Do I need a flag in the > make.conf (I just have -pipe and -O2)? > > I don't know, but this is what I read on a Gentoo wiki page: (related to bugs in a Gent

Re: buildworld failure on VIA C3 Nehemiah

2007-12-29 Thread RW
On Sat, 29 Dec 2007 10:02:44 -0500 Eric Osterweil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Do I need a flag in the > make.conf (I just have -pipe and -O2)? If you don't set any such variables in make.conf they get sensible defaults that depend on your CPUTYPE setting. You shouldn't really mess with them u

buildworld failure on VIA C3 Nehemiah

2007-12-29 Thread Eric Osterweil
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hey all, I posted a question here about a week ago about some compilation problems that I'm having on my new VIA M1G board. I've since tested my memory and even swapped the motherboard, and the problem remains. It really seems like it mus