Christian Weisgerber wrote:
Shouldn't bsdinstall attempt to align partitions on 4k boundaries
both for the benefit of 4k drives and flash storage?
I just installed 9.1R i386 for fun and practice, in fact I installed
it several times, and I played around with the partitioning options.
* The mode
Warren Block:
> > * Funnily enough, the ancient BSD "dangerously dedicated" scheme
> > is the only one that out of the box does not misalign partitions.
>
> The filesystems don't begin at the start of the slice anyway. There is
> a bsdlabel there.
Yes and no.
If you look at the bsdlabel(8) o
On Fri, 4 Jan 2013, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
Shouldn't bsdinstall attempt to align partitions on 4k boundaries
both for the benefit of 4k drives and flash storage?
I think the latest version does.
I just installed 9.1R i386 for fun and practice, in fact I installed
it several times, and I
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 9:14 AM, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> Shouldn't bsdinstall attempt to align partitions on 4k boundaries
> both for the benefit of 4k drives and flash storage?
>
>
That's rather up to you. AFAIK it attempts to create partitions that
preserve "cylinder" boundaries - which ar
Shouldn't bsdinstall attempt to align partitions on 4k boundaries
both for the benefit of 4k drives and flash storage?
I just installed 9.1R i386 for fun and practice, in fact I installed
it several times, and I played around with the partitioning options.
* The modern GPT scheme reserves 34 sect
