Re: ambigious 'top' results

2008-12-16 Thread Mel
On Tuesday 16 December 2008 16:25:45 KES wrote: > > ===>>> 4405 prcfr 1999 cpu0: > time 34 dtbuf 6486 totfr Time counter. It it supposed to generate kern.clockrate interrupts per CPU. -- Mel Problem with today's modular software: they start wit

Re: ambigious 'top' results

2008-12-16 Thread Mel
On Tuesday 16 December 2008 16:31:35 Wojciech Puchar wrote: > are you using 7-branch? > > in my 7.1 system there is same problem. top shows often nonsense in CPU > usage of a process, but totals are OK. there's 4.3% system, so use top -S to show system processes. > you even gave an example - bzip

Re: ambigious 'top' results

2008-12-16 Thread Paul B. Mahol
On 12/16/08, KES wrote: > Здравствуйте, Questions. > > My system is overloaded, I run top to figure out which precess take > time. In both cases CPU/WCPU I do not see which process take all the > time. Which process take all processor time?? > > last pid: 24535; load averages: 3.86, 3.07, 3.07

Re: ambigious 'top' results

2008-12-16 Thread Wojciech Puchar
are you using 7-branch? in my 7.1 system there is same problem. top shows often nonsense in CPU usage of a process, but totals are OK. you even gave an example - bzip2 can't use 0% CPU running - more close to 100% :) as long as everything goes fine 100% CPU load is OK. if it's mostly mysql

ambigious 'top' results

2008-12-16 Thread KES
Здравствуйте, Questions. My system is overloaded, I run top to figure out which precess take time. In both cases CPU/WCPU I do not see which process take all the time. Which process take all processor time?? last pid: 24535; load averages: 3.86, 3.07, 3.07up 1+13:34:28 17:25:19 193 proce