On 2003-02-16 16:54, Walter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >You could always move the FTP directory to a slice that has room.
>
> Yes, I actually thought of that, but then I'd leave my (in this
> case) /usr slice vulnerable to being filled-up with ... junk.
> Unless I put in quotas, I suppose. Hmmm.
Bill Moran wrote:
Walter wrote:
Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On 2003-02-16 09:30, Walter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I want to allow an anonymous FTP user to see a directory in another
slice, so I put a symbolic link to it. But then anyone could access
my entire file system by appending combinat
Walter wrote:
Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On 2003-02-16 09:30, Walter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I want to allow an anonymous FTP user to see a directory in another
slice, so I put a symbolic link to it. But then anyone could access
my entire file system by appending combinations of "../" to a p
Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On 2003-02-16 09:30, Walter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I want to allow an anonymous FTP user to see a directory in another
slice, so I put a symbolic link to it. But then anyone could access
my entire file system by appending combinations of "../" to a path
name; e.g. "
On 2003-02-16 09:30, Walter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I want to allow an anonymous FTP user to see a directory in another
> slice, so I put a symbolic link to it. But then anyone could access
> my entire file system by appending combinations of "../" to a path
> name; e.g. "ls share/../". Is t
Hi all,
I want to allow an anonymous FTP user to see
a directory in another slice, so I put a symbolic
link to it. But then anyone could access my
entire file system by appending combinations of
"../" to a path name; e.g. "ls share/../". Is
there a way to stop this by only allowing access
to