> -Original Message-
> From: Dan MacMillan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, October 24, 2004 1:04 AM
> To: Ted Mittelstaedt; Danny MacMillan
> Cc: Nell Weems; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [OT] Sapir-Whorfian Advertising Clause (was Advertising
&
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Danny MacMillan
> Sent: Saturday, October 23, 2004 12:45 AM
>
> Be that as it may, the term "advertising clause" seems strictly
> definitive, as it pertains to a clause that refers to advertising.
> That
On Fri, Oct 22, 2004 at 08:50:13PM -0600, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
>
> Nell,
>
> Just a request, please do not use the term "advertising clause"
>
> This is a term that was created by the Linux bigots, specifically
> people like RMS who is so bigoted he can't see beyond the tip
> of his nose.
-clause" this
was forced on us from without, and there is no reason to use
it.
Ted Mittelstaedt
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Nell Weems
> Sent: Friday, October 22, 2004 1:36 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sub
On Fri, Oct 22, 2004 at 01:35:51PM -0700, Nell Weems wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> after typing:
> fgrep -r "All advertising materials" /usr/src/sys
> it seems like there are still many files which
> contain the advertising clause. has there been any
> attempts to contact the copyright authors of thes
Hello all,
after typing:
fgrep -r "All advertising materials" /usr/src/sys
it seems like there are still many files which
contain the advertising clause. has there been any
attempts to contact the copyright authors of these
files and see if it can be removed?
not too much of a deal, i was just
