On Tuesday 24 October 2006 21:49, Juha Saarinen wrote:
> On 10/25/06, Jeff MacDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Is there anything inherintaly dangerous or wrong about enabling
> > PasswordAuthentication in sshd_config ?
> >
> > I understand how public keys are better and everything else. And I
On Tuesday 24 October 2006 21:54, Atom Powers wrote:
> On 10/24/06, Jeff MacDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Is there anything inherintaly dangerous or wrong about enabling
> > PasswordAuthentication in sshd_config ?
> >
> > I understand how public keys are better and everything else. And
> >
On 10/24/06, Jeff MacDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is there anything inherintaly dangerous or wrong about enabling
PasswordAuthentication in sshd_config ?
I understand how public keys are better and everything else. And I do
use them. I'm just curious.
There are many arguments for and agai
--- Juha Saarinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/25/06, Jeff MacDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Is there anything inherintaly dangerous or wrong about enabling
> > PasswordAuthentication in sshd_config ?
> >
> > I understand how public keys are better and everything else. And I
> do
> >
On 10/25/06, Jeff MacDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is there anything inherintaly dangerous or wrong about enabling
PasswordAuthentication in sshd_config ?
I understand how public keys are better and everything else. And I do
use them. I'm just curious.
Probably not, if you have strong pass
Is there anything inherintaly dangerous or wrong about enabling
PasswordAuthentication in sshd_config ?
I understand how public keys are better and everything else. And I do
use them. I'm just curious.
Jeff.
--
Unless otherwise indicated, anything I write is either garnered from
experience or p