Re: a question regarding proper printf(3) formating and alignment

2010-11-17 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Nov 17), Karl Vogel said: > >> In the last episode (Nov 17), Alexander Best said: > > A> i've looked at a lot of utilities in the bsd src tree and most of them > A> seem to be doing something like this: > > A> Device 1M-blocks UsedAvail Capacity > A> /dev/lab

Re: a question regarding proper printf(3) formating and alignment

2010-11-17 Thread Karl Vogel
>> In the last episode (Nov 17), Alexander Best said: A> i've looked at a lot of utilities in the bsd src tree and most of them A> seem to be doing something like this: A> Device 1M-blocks UsedAvail Capacity A> /dev/label/swapfs 10239010239 0% A> /dev/label/sw

Re: a question regarding proper printf(3) formating and alignment

2010-11-17 Thread Alexander Best
On Wed Nov 17 10, Dan Nelson wrote: > In the last episode (Nov 17), Alexander Best said: > > hi there, > > > > i've looked at a lot of utilities in the bsd src tree and most of them > > seem to be doing something like this: > > > > Device 1M-blocks UsedAvail Capacity > > /dev/lab

Re: a question regarding proper printf(3) formating and alignment

2010-11-17 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Nov 17), Alexander Best said: > hi there, > > i've looked at a lot of utilities in the bsd src tree and most of them > seem to be doing something like this: > > Device 1M-blocks UsedAvail Capacity > /dev/label/swapfs 10239010239 0% > /dev/

a question regarding proper printf(3) formating and alignment

2010-11-17 Thread Alexander Best
hi there, i've looked at a lot of utilities in the bsd src tree and most of them seem to be doing something like this: Device 1M-blocks UsedAvail Capacity /dev/label/swapfs 10239010239 0% /dev/label/swap 81910 8191 0% Total 1