On 15/05/2013 15:55, Trond Endrestøl wrote:
Am I the only one to receive these emails twice, delayed only by a
couple of days since receiving the original emails?
Judging be the headers below this is either misconfiguration, a MITM
attack or something else.
yes I got a duplicate of the origin
I responded to Trond privately.
On May 15, 2013, at 2:25 AM, Trond Endrestøl
wrote:
> Am I the only one to receive these emails twice, delayed only by a
> couple of days since receiving the original emails?
>
> Judging be the headers below this is either misconfiguration, a MITM
> attack or
On 13-05-13 07:58, Trond Endrestøl wrote:
On Sun, 12 May 2013 23:11+0200, Roland van Laar wrote:
Hello,
I followed these[1] step up to the Finishing touches.
I'm using a 9.1 Release.
After the install I go into the shell and /mnt is empty.
The mount command shows that the zfs partitions are m
ed: from [192.168.2.66] ([96.236.21.119])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id lb10sm12958692veb.5.2013.05.13.06.38.03
for
(version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
Mon, 13 May 2013 06:38:03 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: ZFS mirror install /mnt is empty
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.3 \(1503\))
On May 14, 2013, at 12:10 AM, Shane Ambler wrote:
> When it comes to disk compression I think people overlook the fact that
> it can impact on more than one level.
Compression has effects at multiple levels:
1) CPU resources to compress (and decompress) the data
2) Disk space used
3) I/O to/fro
On Mon, 13 May 2013 08:40-0400, Paul Kraus wrote:
On May 13, 2013, at 1:58 AM, Trond Endrestøl wrote:
Due to advances in hard drive technology, for the worse I'm
afraid, i.e. 4K disk blocks, I wouldn't bother enabling
compression on any ZFS file systems. I might change my blog posts
to reflect
On May 13, 2013, at 9:25 AM, Trond Endrestøl
wrote:
>
> I guess it's due to my (mis)understanding that files shorter than 4KB
> stored on 4K drives never will be subject to compression. And as you
> state below, the degree of compression depends largely on the data at
> hand.
Not a m
On Mon, 13 May 2013 08:40-0400, Paul Kraus wrote:
> On May 13, 2013, at 1:58 AM, Trond Endrestøl
> wrote:
>
> > Due to advances in hard drive technology, for the worse I'm afraid,
> > i.e. 4K disk blocks, I wouldn't bother enabling compression on any ZFS
> > file systems. I might change my bl
On May 13, 2013, at 1:58 AM, Trond Endrestøl
wrote:
> Due to advances in hard drive technology, for the worse I'm afraid,
> i.e. 4K disk blocks, I wouldn't bother enabling compression on any ZFS
> file systems. I might change my blog posts to reflect this stop gap.
>
> If you do happen to hav
On Sun, 12 May 2013 23:11+0200, Roland van Laar wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I followed these[1] step up to the Finishing touches.
> I'm using a 9.1 Release.
>
> After the install I go into the shell and /mnt is empty.
> The mount command shows that the zfs partitions are mounted.
> When I reboot the sys
Hello,
I followed these[1] step up to the Finishing touches.
I'm using a 9.1 Release.
After the install I go into the shell and /mnt is empty.
The mount command shows that the zfs partitions are mounted.
When I reboot the system it can't find the bootloader.
What can I do to fix this?
Thanks,
11 matches
Mail list logo
