On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 09:39:51PM +0100, Chris Whitehouse wrote:
> Ceri Davies wrote:
> >On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 02:58:03PM -0400, Jerry McAllister wrote:
> >>>Hello Ceri,
> >>>
> >>>Thursday, August 17, 2006, 6:55:08 PM, you wrote:
> >>>
> I have a system on which /usr is slightly hosed, but
Ceri Davies wrote:
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 02:58:03PM -0400, Jerry McAllister wrote:
Hello Ceri,
Thursday, August 17, 2006, 6:55:08 PM, you wrote:
I have a system on which /usr is slightly hosed, but not badly enough
for it to fail a preen fsck.
I cannot easily get to single-user on this mach
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 04:23:01PM -0400, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
> Ceri Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 02:21:30PM -0500, Dan Nelson wrote:
> >>
> >> What kind of setup do you have where you can't get to single-user mode,
> >> but you apparently want fsck -p to fai
Ceri Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 02:21:30PM -0500, Dan Nelson wrote:
>>
>> What kind of setup do you have where you can't get to single-user mode,
>> but you apparently want fsck -p to fail (which will put you in
>> single-user mode)?
>
> fsck -p failing will drop
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 02:21:30PM -0500, Dan Nelson wrote:
> In the last episode (Aug 17), Ceri Davies said:
> > On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 02:58:03PM -0400, Jerry McAllister wrote:
> > > > Thursday, August 17, 2006, 6:55:08 PM, Ceri wrote:
> > > > > I have a system on which /usr is slightly hosed, b
In the last episode (Aug 17), Ceri Davies said:
> On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 02:58:03PM -0400, Jerry McAllister wrote:
> > > Thursday, August 17, 2006, 6:55:08 PM, Ceri wrote:
> > > > I have a system on which /usr is slightly hosed, but not badly enough
> > > > for it to fail a preen fsck.
> > > >
> >
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 08:11:42PM +0100, Ceri Davies wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 02:58:03PM -0400, Jerry McAllister wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello Ceri,
> > >
> > > Thursday, August 17, 2006, 6:55:08 PM, you wrote:
> > >
> > > > I have a system on which /usr is slightly hosed, but not badly enou
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 08:15:11PM +0200, Daniel Gerzo wrote:
> Hello Ceri,
>
> Thursday, August 17, 2006, 6:55:08 PM, you wrote:
>
> > I have a system on which /usr is slightly hosed, but not badly enough
> > for it to fail a preen fsck.
>
> > I cannot easily get to single-user on this machine,
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 02:58:03PM -0400, Jerry McAllister wrote:
> >
> > Hello Ceri,
> >
> > Thursday, August 17, 2006, 6:55:08 PM, you wrote:
> >
> > > I have a system on which /usr is slightly hosed, but not badly enough
> > > for it to fail a preen fsck.
> >
> > > I cannot easily get to sin
>
> Hello Ceri,
>
> Thursday, August 17, 2006, 6:55:08 PM, you wrote:
>
> > I have a system on which /usr is slightly hosed, but not badly enough
> > for it to fail a preen fsck.
>
> > I cannot easily get to single-user on this machine, so is there a good
> > way for me to dirty the filesystem
Hello Ceri,
Thursday, August 17, 2006, 6:55:08 PM, you wrote:
> I have a system on which /usr is slightly hosed, but not badly enough
> for it to fail a preen fsck.
> I cannot easily get to single-user on this machine, so is there a good
> way for me to dirty the filesystem just enough to force
On Aug 17, 2006, at 9:55 AM, Ceri Davies wrote:
I cannot easily get to single-user on this machine, so is there a good
way for me to dirty the filesystem just enough to force "fsck -p" to
fail (yanking power also difficult)? "umount -f /usr; reboot" doesn't
seem to work...
Edit a file on /usr
I have a system on which /usr is slightly hosed, but not badly enough
for it to fail a preen fsck.
I cannot easily get to single-user on this machine, so is there a good
way for me to dirty the filesystem just enough to force "fsck -p" to
fail (yanking power also difficult)? "umount -f /usr; rebo
13 matches
Mail list logo
