On Fri, Dec 10, 2004 at 02:24:02PM -0600, Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P. wrote:
: If you're upgrading gnome2, what you *really* wanna
: do is use the FreeBSD-Gnome Project's "gnome_upgrade.sh"
: script. Can't say for sure about "gnome-lite", though :-|
This never works for me. Somewhere in the bu
On Saturday 11 December 2004 20:39, Robert Marella wrote:
> On Friday 10 December 2004 14:54, Jonathon McKitrick wrote:
> > I've run into some problems using 'portupgrade -R' so I'm wondering if
> > just using 'portupgrade' is good enough in most cases. I don't want a
> > port to be upgraded witho
On Friday 10 December 2004 14:54, Jonathon McKitrick wrote:
> I've run into some problems using 'portupgrade -R' so I'm wondering if just
> using 'portupgrade' is good enough in most cases. I don't want a port to
> be upgraded without NECESSARY dependencies, but I don't want minor upgrades
> done
On Fri, 10 Dec 2004, Jonathon McKitrick wrote:
Actually, it WAS what I was trying to do. I wanted to upgrade gnome2-lite
and all the packages it required, because gnome2-lite is a meta-port.
You didn't say that in your first mail:
This is a faq (No. 24) on
http://www.freebsd.org/gnome/docs/faq2.ht
On Friday 10 December 2004 14:54, Jonathon McKitrick wrote:
> I've run into some problems using 'portupgrade -R' so I'm wondering if just
> using 'portupgrade' is good enough in most cases. I don't want a port to
> be upgraded without NECESSARY dependencies, but I don't want minor upgrades
> done
Joshua Lokken wrote:
On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 19:37:40 +, Jonathon McKitrick
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, Dec 10, 2004 at 01:32:33PM -0600, Joshua Lokken wrote:
: from 'man portupgrade(1)':
:
: -r
: --recursive Act on all those packages depending on the
: gi
On Fri, Dec 10, 2004 at 02:04:26PM -0600, Joshua Lokken wrote:
: required libraries. For example, although I usually install
: XFree86-4 via the meta-port, when I want to upgrade it, I
: generally run 'portupgrade -r XFree86-4-libraries', which first
That might be a better way to do it. I'll giv
On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 19:37:40 +, Jonathon McKitrick
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 10, 2004 at 01:32:33PM -0600, Joshua Lokken wrote:
> : from 'man portupgrade(1)':
>
>
> :
> : -r
> : --recursive Act on all those packages depending on the
> : given pa
On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 16:39:32 +, Jonathon McKitrick
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 10, 2004 at 05:08:44PM +0100, Peter Ulrich Kruppa wrote:
> : Hmm, I am afraid your question is a bit general ...
>
> I've tried the '-R' option before, and ended up with portupgrade telling me
> I had s
On Fri, Dec 10, 2004 at 01:32:33PM -0600, Joshua Lokken wrote:
: from 'man portupgrade(1)':
:
: -r
: --recursive Act on all those packages depending on the
: given packages as well.
:
: -R
: --upward-recursive Act on all those packages required
:
On Fri, 10 Dec 2004, Jonathon McKitrick wrote:
On Fri, Dec 10, 2004 at 05:08:44PM +0100, Peter Ulrich Kruppa wrote:
: Hmm, I am afraid your question is a bit general ...
I've tried the '-R' option before, and ended up with portupgrade telling me
I had stale dependencies, and I never can get those f
On Fri, Dec 10, 2004 at 05:08:44PM +0100, Peter Ulrich Kruppa wrote:
: Hmm, I am afraid your question is a bit general ...
I've tried the '-R' option before, and ended up with portupgrade telling me
I had stale dependencies, and I never can get those fixed right. Maybe I
should just stop using th
On Fri, 10 Dec 2004, Jonathon McKitrick wrote:
I've run into some problems using 'portupgrade -R' so I'm wondering if just
using 'portupgrade' is good enough in most cases. I don't want a port to be
upgraded without NECESSARY dependencies, but I don't want minor upgrades
done UNNECESSARILY that mi
I've run into some problems using 'portupgrade -R' so I'm wondering if just
using 'portupgrade' is good enough in most cases. I don't want a port to be
upgraded without NECESSARY dependencies, but I don't want minor upgrades
done UNNECESSARILY that might cause inconsistencies in the database.
jm
14 matches
Mail list logo
