On 06.09.2013 22:52, Warren Block wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Sep 2013, David Demelier wrote:
>
>> 2013/9/6 Warren Block :
>>>
>>> asciidoc \
>>> -a data-uri \
>>> -a icons \
>>> -a iconsdir=/usr/local/etc/asciidoc/images/icons \
>>> -d article \
>>> -a stylesheet=~/docs/stylesheets/wb-html.css \
On Fri, 6 Sep 2013, David Demelier wrote:
2013/9/6 Warren Block :
asciidoc \
-a data-uri \
-a icons \
-a iconsdir=/usr/local/etc/asciidoc/images/icons \
-d article \
-a stylesheet=~/docs/stylesheets/wb-html.css \
-a toc \
-a revdate="2013-09-05" \
-a year="2013" \
-a max-widt
2013/9/6 Warren Block :
> On Thu, 5 Sep 2013, Warren Block wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 5 Sep 2013, David Demelier wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I've been using asciidoc for a while, I've updating it to
>>> asciidoc-8.6.8_1. But now I can't generate any correct documentation.
>>> It does not even add :toc: fiel
On Thu, 5 Sep 2013, David Demelier wrote:
Hi,
I've been using asciidoc for a while, I've updating it to
asciidoc-8.6.8_1. But now I can't generate any correct documentation.
It does not even add :toc: field.
For instance the following example should generate a HTML with its
popular blue theme
On Thu, 5 Sep 2013, Warren Block wrote:
On Thu, 5 Sep 2013, David Demelier wrote:
Hi,
I've been using asciidoc for a while, I've updating it to
asciidoc-8.6.8_1. But now I can't generate any correct documentation.
It does not even add :toc: field.
For instance the following example should ge
Hi,
I've been using asciidoc for a while, I've updating it to
asciidoc-8.6.8_1. But now I can't generate any correct documentation.
It does not even add :toc: field.
For instance the following example should generate a HTML with its
popular blue theme :
Test
===
:Author: David
:toc:
= Title
So
le, it's nearly worthless.
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org
[mailto:owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Kurt Buff
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 4:24 PM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: What's happening
Well, sorta true.
We kn
age-
> From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org
> [mailto:owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Wojciech
> Puchar
> Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 2:47 PM
> To: Robert Huff
> Cc: FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: What's happening
>
>>> >
>>
sday, June 23, 2009 2:47 PM
To: Robert Huff
Cc: FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: What's happening
>> >
>> > Jun 23 17:09:09 zeus kernel: fxp0: link state changed to DOWN
>> > Jun 23 17:22:25 zeus kernel: fxp0: link state changed
>
> Jun 23 17:09:09 zeus kernel: fxp0: link state changed to DOWN
> Jun 23 17:22:25 zeus kernel: fxp0: link state changed to UP
look at time. it's 13 minutes down
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo
Robert Huff wrote:
> David Kelly writes:
>
>> > Can anyone explain this:
>> >
>> > Jun 23 17:09:09 zeus kernel: fxp0: link state changed to DOWN
>> > Jun 23 17:22:25 zeus kernel: fxp0: link state changed to UP
>> >
>> > What's causing this???
>>
>> The wire was disconnected during tha
David Kelly writes:
> > Can anyone explain this:
> >
> > Jun 23 17:09:09 zeus kernel: fxp0: link state changed to DOWN
> > Jun 23 17:22:25 zeus kernel: fxp0: link state changed to UP
> >
> > What's causing this???
>
> The wire was disconnected during that time. Possibly the
> hub/swit
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 05:28:51PM +0200, Jack Raats wrote:
> Can anyone explain this:
>
> Jun 23 17:09:09 zeus kernel: fxp0: link state changed to DOWN
> Jun 23 17:22:25 zeus kernel: fxp0: link state changed to UP
>
> What's causing this???
The wire was disconnected during that time. Possibly t
Can anyone explain this:
Jun 23 17:09:09 zeus kernel: fxp0: link state changed to DOWN
Jun 23 17:22:25 zeus kernel: fxp0: link state changed to UP
What's causing this???
Thanks for yout time
Jack Raats
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
ht
On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 11:36:09AM -0700, Gary Kline wrote:
> > The default setting for gamma is 1. Try e.g. 2. See also xorg.conf(5).
>
> I'll try your xgamma -gamma 2 suggestion, below. Thanks for the
> data-point. I read [[ skimmed-thru ]] xorg.conf. This is another
> man p
On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 08:18:53PM +0200, Roland Smith wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 11:46:27PM -0700, Gary Kline wrote:
> > > You could try playing with the gamma value of the monitor. When X is
> > > running you can use xgamma to adjust the gamma setting. You can also set
> > > this with the G
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 11:46:27PM -0700, Gary Kline wrote:
> > You could try playing with the gamma value of the monitor. When X is
> > running you can use xgamma to adjust the gamma setting. You can also set
> > this with the Gamma entry in the Monitor section of xorg.conf.
>
>
> Or shoul
On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 04:22:58AM +0200, Roland Smith wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 03:47:22PM -0700, Gary Kline wrote:
> > I'm in the middle of a portupgrade -aP, and saw that the newest
> > mga driver is installed.
> > So I did another X -configure, moved the file to
> > /etc/
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 03:47:22PM -0700, Gary Kline wrote:
> I'm in the middle of a portupgrade -aP, and saw that the newest
> mga driver is installed.
> So I did another X -configure, moved the file to
> /etc/X11/xorg.conf and carefully tried out the new
> xf86-video
I'm in the middle of a portupgrade -aP, and saw that the newest
mga driver is installed.
So I did another X -configure, moved the file to
/etc/X11/xorg.conf and carefully tried out the new
xf86-video-mga-1.9.100.. The screen is much brighter at the
r
Radek Kozlowski wrote:
On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 08:45:01PM +0100, Admin wrote:
You might also have a point of direction to my other problem with seg
faulting apache2 ? All my efforts are documented here if you are
interested :
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2004-September/01600
On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 08:45:01PM +0100, Admin wrote:
> You might also have a point of direction to my other problem with seg
> faulting apache2 ? All my efforts are documented here if you are
> interested :
>
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2004-September/016006.html
>
> The
Admin wrote:
Radek Kozlowski wrote:
On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 08:06:34PM +0100, Hasse wrote:
And now ruby is seg faulting and core dumps when I run portsdb -uU
odin# portsdb -uU
Updating the ports index ... Generating INDEX.tmp - please
wait..Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: mod_jk2-apache2-2.0.2
Radek Kozlowski wrote:
On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 08:06:34PM +0100, Hasse wrote:
And now ruby is seg faulting and core dumps when I run portsdb -uU
odin# portsdb -uU
Updating the ports index ... Generating INDEX.tmp - please
wait..Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: mod_jk2-apache2-2.0.2
Warning: Dupl
On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 08:06:34PM +0100, Hasse wrote:
> And now ruby is seg faulting and core dumps when I run portsdb -uU
>
> odin# portsdb -uU
> Updating the ports index ... Generating INDEX.tmp - please
> wait..Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: mod_jk2-apache2-2.0.2
> Warning: Duplicate INDEX e
Hi everybody !
Am I the only one experiencing lots of problems with seg faults in 4.10 ?
This server have been running with regular cvsups of source and ports
for about 2 years now
without any problems until a month ago when it all started.
First I got a segfaulting Apache2 , and nobody seems abl
Hello,
My system has suddenly become very unresponsive and when I run top,
XFree86 reports that it is typically taking between 20-40% of the CPU,
even when the machine is completely idle.
'ps aux' reports even more! (see below)
Does anyone have any ideas what tools I can use to get to the bottom
Hello,
in my firewall I have a sendmail relay for a couple of
mailservers downstream inside my protected network--a
mail switch of sorts.
Now, I just had to restart the firewall and now I have
several dozens of process that look like
752 ?? S 0:00.00 sendmail: startup with 192.168.250.28
(sendm
28 matches
Mail list logo
