On Sun, Oct 04, 2009 at 10:01:14PM +0200, Oliver Fromme wrote:
> Leandro F Silva wrote:
> > Hey guys,
> >
> > Let's vote to have a native i386 / amd64 flash player \o/ ..
>
> The latest Linuxulator works quite well on -current with
> the Linux flash binary + pluginwrapper port, doesn't it?
>
--- On Sun, 10/4/09, jhell wrote:
> From: jhell
> Subject: Re: Voting for a native i386/amd64 flash player
> To: "James Phillips"
> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Received: Sunday, October 4, 2009, 1:07 PM
>
>
>
> On Sun, 4 Oct 2009 08:33 -0700
Leandro F Silva wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> Let's vote to have a native i386 / amd64 flash player \o/ ..
The latest Linuxulator works quite well on -current with
the Linux flash binary + pluginwrapper port, doesn't it?
Works for me, at least.
> We just have to create an account and voting on the
-- Leandro F Silva wrote :
Hey guys,
Let's vote to have a native i386 / amd64 flash player \o/ ..
We just have to create an account and voting on the link below =D
http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/FP-1060
___
freebsd-questi...@free... mailing list
ht
On Sun, 4 Oct 2009 08:33 -0700, anti_spam256@ wrote:
Message: 29
Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 23:45:18 -0600
From: Chad Perrin
Subject: Re: Voting for a native i386/amd64 flash player
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <20091004054518.gd37...@guilt.hydra>
Content-Type: text
>
> Message: 29
> Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 23:45:18 -0600
> From: Chad Perrin
> Subject: Re: Voting for a native i386/amd64 flash player
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Message-ID: <20091004054518.gd37...@guilt.hydra>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="
Yep, I am in.
I signed here:
http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/FP-1060
and also there:
http://www.petitiononline.com/flash4me/petition.html
Its the last thing I need to have a full native FreeBSD environment.
Maybe you should dig out this thread after some weeks again, Leandro. I guess
we can
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 9:25 PM, Leandro F Silva wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> Let's vote to have a native i386 / amd64 flash player \o/ ..
>
> We just have to create an account and voting on the link below =D
>
> http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/FP-1060
>
>
I voted and added a coment:
* "Maybe it requir
On Sat, Oct 03, 2009 at 08:01:07AM -0700, James Phillips wrote:
>
> I have this fantasy that if I design and build a better streaming video
> format, "They" (broadcasters) will use it, if properly marketed.
It may be a fantasy, but as fantasies go, it's not a bad one.
>
> This would be despite
On Sat, Oct 03, 2009 at 09:04:00AM -0400, Robert Huff wrote:
> Rolf G Nielsen writes:
>
> > > Let's vote to have a native i386 / amd64 flash player \o/ ..
> >
> > Where do I vote to have them continue forever not creating a
> > FreeBSD version of that crap?
>
> Is your objection to Fla
On Sat, Oct 03, 2009 at 07:56:53AM +0200, Rolf G Nielsen wrote:
>
> Where do I vote to have them continue forever not creating a FreeBSD
> version of that crap?
If you s/Free/Open/ I think the question answers itself.
--
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]
On Sat, Oct 03, 2009 at 08:50:16AM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
>
> Google apparently favours HTML-5 as their future direction, rather than
> Flash. And where YouTube goes, the rest of the world will surely follow,
> at least as far as Video streaming is concerned.
Oh, thank goodness. Flash vid
> --
>
> Message: 9
> Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 06:28:29 +0100
> From: "Lucian @ lastdot.org"
> Subject: Re: Voting for a native i386/amd64 flash player
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Message-ID:
> <5a3c8f45091008k
Rolf G Nielsen writes:
> > Let's vote to have a native i386 / amd64 flash player \o/ ..
>
> Where do I vote to have them continue forever not creating a
> FreeBSD version of that crap?
Is your objection to Flash in particular, or to any product in
that specific niche?
Lucian @ lastdot.org wrote:
On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 5:56 AM, Chad Perrin wrote:
On Fri, Oct 02, 2009 at 08:15:07PM -0500, J Sisson wrote:
And if enough people petition Microsoft, we can get them to release Windows
7 source under the GPL.
Reality called...your request to ignore it was denied.
Leandro F Silva wrote:
Hey guys,
Let's vote to have a native i386 / amd64 flash player \o/ ..
We just have to create an account and voting on the link below =D
http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/FP-1060
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
h
On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 5:56 AM, Chad Perrin wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 02, 2009 at 08:15:07PM -0500, J Sisson wrote:
>>
>> And if enough people petition Microsoft, we can get them to release Windows
>> 7 source under the GPL.
>>
>> Reality called...your request to ignore it was denied.
>
> Actually, we
On Fri, Oct 02, 2009 at 08:15:07PM -0500, J Sisson wrote:
>
> And if enough people petition Microsoft, we can get them to release Windows
> 7 source under the GPL.
>
> Reality called...your request to ignore it was denied.
Actually, we *could*. The problem is the definition of "enough". I'm
su
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 8:01 PM, Aryeh M. Friedman
wrote:
> Good luck the community has tried for years to get it and adobe seems to
> not care
>
>
> Leandro F Silva wrote:
>
>> Hey guys,
>>
>> Let's vote to have a native i386 / amd64 flash player \o/ ..
>>
>> We just have to create an account and
Good luck the community has tried for years to get it and adobe seems to
not care
Leandro F Silva wrote:
Hey guys,
Let's vote to have a native i386 / amd64 flash player \o/ ..
We just have to create an account and voting on the link below =D
http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/FP-1060
Hey guys,
Let's vote to have a native i386 / amd64 flash player \o/ ..
We just have to create an account and voting on the link below =D
http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/FP-1060
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/m
21 matches
Mail list logo
