- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 2:23 PM
Subject: Using portsupgrade with make arguments
> Hi all,
>
> just to get it clear for me: If I upgrade a port that has been originally
> installed with a
I apologise that I have lost the In-Reply-To: Field, but here is my question.
On Tue 2004-04-20 (21:23), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> just to get it clear for me: If I upgrade a port that has been
> originally
> installed with additional make arguments I must include them again. Is
> th
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 09:23:58PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> just to get it clear for me: If I upgrade a port that has been
>> originally
>> installed with additional make arguments I must include them again. Is
>> the
>> following correct?
>>
>> Original installation:
>> # make arg_1=
On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 09:23:58PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> just to get it clear for me: If I upgrade a port that has been originally
> installed with additional make arguments I must include them again. Is the
> following correct?
>
> Original installation:
> # make arg_1=val_1 arg_2=ar
On Tuesday 20 April 2004 12:23 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> just to get it clear for me: If I upgrade a port that has been
> originally installed with additional make arguments I must include
> them again. Is the following correct?
>
> Original installation:
> # make arg_1=val_1 arg_2
Hi all,
just to get it clear for me: If I upgrade a port that has been originally
installed with additional make arguments I must include them again. Is the
following correct?
Original installation:
# make arg_1=val_1 arg_2=arg_2 install clean
Upgrading port using portupgrade:
# portupgrade -R -
